causal contributor.
Thanks Jon
-Original Message-
From: Jon TURNEY
Sent: Sep 15, 2010 7:13 AM
Subject: Re: Latest Cygwin X hangs when mouse is used to highlight text
On 14/09/2010 20:52, Brian Kelly wrote:
Thanks Jon for the quick reply. I attached a new log file generated
-
From: Brian Kelly
Sent: Sep 15, 2010 11:12 AM
Subject: Re: Latest Cygwin X hangs when mouse is used to highlight text
See attached log run with XWin -logverbose 3
Only the X System hangs - not the whole PC. Other apps continue to work fine.
However, **while** the X system is hung, mintty loses
either - that could set me back a
week.
Brian Kelly
-Original Message-
From: Jon TURNEY
Sent: Sep 14, 2010 1:47 PM
Subject: Re: Latest Cygwin X hangs when mouse is used to highlight text
On 14/09/2010 18:51, Brian Kelly wrote:
I've been using Cygwin X trouble-free for years, and am
been rebooted numerous times as well - to no
avail.
Brian Kelly
-Original Message-
From: Brian Kelly
Sent: Sep 14, 2010 2:52 PM
Subject: Re: Latest Cygwin X hangs when mouse is used to highlight text
Thanks Jon for the quick reply. I attached a new log file generated with an
attempt
to give you
anything you need from me that might assist.
Thanks,
Brian Kelly
-Original Message-
From: Jon TURNEY
Sent: Sep 14, 2010 1:47 PM
Subject: Re: Latest Cygwin X hangs when mouse is used to highlight text
On 14/09/2010 18:51, Brian Kelly wrote:
I've been using Cygwin X trouble
-
From: Corinna Vinschen corinna-cyg...@cygwin.com
Sent: Aug 21, 2010 3:29 PM
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: 1.7.6-1: mount -p and mount --show-cygdrive-prefix broken in
latest release
On Aug 21 15:17, Brian Kelly wrote:
I have a script that relies on these mount options to discover how
by me so I
continued. Apparently something fell down in that whole train of events, and
when the reboot later occurred, the cygwin1.dll must not have been actually
replaced. I'll let you know if the re-install fixes things.
-Original Message-
From: Brian Kelly reedf...@ix.netcom.com
setup.exe. Otherwise ...
your mileage may vary ...
-Original Message-
From: Brian Kelly reedf...@ix.netcom.com
Sent: Aug 21, 2010 3:18 PM
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: 1.7.6-1: mount -p and mount --show-cygdrive-prefix broken in
latest release
Funny - setup.exe shows I have 1.7.6. I'm
This would be more helpful:
Do you want to not skip the package (No/Yes/Maybe)?
The Maybe can then consult a random number routine to decide whether or not
to do the operation.
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Faylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Jul 16, 2007 11:52 AM
To:
Borrowing a line from that deeply inspirational film ...
ANIMAL HOUSE:
THANK YOU SIR - MAY I HAVE ANOTHER!!??
The efforts of all involved are GREATLY appreciated!
Brian Kelly
Christopher Faylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]@cygwin.com
on 09/05/2004 12:51:25 AM
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Mon, Jun 07, 2004 at 02:26:49PM -0700, Lex Ein wrote:
http://www.cygwin.com/snapshots/
Cygwin Interim Snapshots
Whoo, racy.
Guess I missed the party.
Ok, ok. I added a subtitle to the snapshot page to make it's true nature
more obvious.
cgf
First of all - where's the 900 number?
I got this *System Error* message in my e-mail:
*plonk*
Ahh...
cgf
I'm concerned that creator might be dropping some critical data.
However someone more knowledgeable in these matters will have debug
this.
I also don't have a 64 sheet test roll installed in my bathroom.
Brian Kelly
give him one!
Brian Kelly
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/2004-02/msg00716.html
And if that seems a little vague and non-commital (much less helpful),
given that it's only February, you can ponder this:
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/2004-02/msg00714.html
Brian Kelly
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL
* its
running on unix - not Win32. Therefore, modules that expect direct,
non-POSIX access to the
Win32 subsystem are gonna need some help that wouldn't otherwise be
necessary with a true
Win32 build of Perl.
Brian Kelly
WellChoice, Inc. made the following
annotations on 02/19/2004 09:07:12 AM
it *now*.
Brian Kelly
WellChoice, Inc. made the following
annotations on 02/19/2004 03:41:10 PM
--
Attention! This electronic message contains information that may be legally
confidential and/or privileged
The answer to this question was of such profound and ineffable
importance that it earned the distinguished Mr. Brian Ford a GOLD STAR
for his brilliant, luminous exposition of cgf's sagacious guiding
principles.
http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2003-11/msg00601.html
The forever humbled,
Brian Kelly
- but unfortunately I
don't a suitible test environment available at the moment. )
( BURNING QUESTION - Are *THANK YOU's* from non-contributors ...
off - topic??? )
Brian Kelly
Sent by:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: (bcc: Brian Kelly/WTC1/Empire)
Subject
Brian Dessent [EMAIL PROTECTED]@cygwin.com on 02/02/2004 01:10:44 AM
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:'Cygwin List' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:Re: Plausibility of sendmail?
If your intent is to use Windows+Cygwin+sendmail as a production
I would
understand, and probably support (as long as there are advertised
alternatives of course!)
Brian Kelly
Brian Dessent [EMAIL PROTECTED]@cygwin.com on 02/02/2004 09:33:56 AM
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: (bcc
Andrew DeFaria wrote:
If they are so clueless as you suggest then one has to wonder why you
don't
tell them that you're running a Linux OS and using sendmail?!?
They know that Linux is *open source* and *dangerous* - because that's
what the VERY political Server Team (who have sold out to
their told anything else.
Brian Kelly
Steven Hartland [EMAIL PROTECTED]@cygwin.com on 01/27/2004
09:43:35 AM
Sent by:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: (bcc: Brian Kelly/WTC1/Empire)
Subject:cygwin processes and system'ed processes using 100% CPU
General question has
to fully determine if I can dispense with RAMpage, but so far things look
VERY encouraging.
Once again I'd like to thank cgf, Corrina, Igor, and all other
contributor's for their efforts in fixing this *WINDOWS* problem. ;-)
Brian Kelly
WellChoice, Inc. made the following
annotations on 01/24
).
Brian Kelly
Igor Pechtchanski [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 01/24/2004 10:13:22 AM
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: I post NOT to condemn cgf ...
On Sat, 24 Jan 2004 BriandotKellyatEmpirebluedotcom wrote:
... but to actually
another Gold Star - feel free to sarcastically answer this question for
Chris! )
Regards,
Brian Kelly
Christopher Faylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]@cygwin.com
on 01/19/2004 10:56:41 AM
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: (bcc: Brian
setup.exe to backed out to 1.5.5-1, rebooted - and Vim is back to
full functionality.
Brian Kelly
Christopher Faylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]@cygwin.com
on 01/19/2004 10:56:41 AM
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: (bcc: Brian
via USB2 and
NovaBack.
You should SERIOUSLY consider something similar - if you can swing it.
Brian Kelly
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Christopher Faylor
Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2003 12:38 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re
Before you go do-o-o-o-o-o-o-own - can you release 1.5.6?
I'm waiting. ;-)
Brian Kelly
aka: cgf's first ever *Black Hole* recipient (If he were to give out such
a thing).
Christopher Faylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]@cygwin.com
on 12/17/2003 03:08:58 PM
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED
Why do I feel like I'm watching an Ed Wood movie?
Thank God you guys write better code than you do comedy.
Suggested ad copy for attracting more non-contributing end-users:
Cygwin! - Come for the software, stay for the BERATEMENT!
:-l
bits and bytes may break my code, but your 'word's will
Christopher Faylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]@cygwin.com
on 11/15/2003 02:11:20 PM
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: (bcc: Brian Kelly/WTC1/Empire)
Subject:Re: Will next cygwin1.dll release have the select() fix?
On Sat, Nov 15
Anyway, can we *please* just drop this noise now.
Agreed - enough.
I'll gladly relinquish it if it'll make you feel better.
HECK NO!! cgf doesn't give those out every day - and besides, in my not
so humble opinion you've contributed MORE than enough to deserve one
outside of this *noise* - as
of
cygwin/gcc. If someone can see a quick fix - or work around - to this it
would obviously be a BIG help and be much appreciated.
Brian Kelly
cpan install IPC::Semaphore
R
unning install for module IPC::Semaphore
Running make for G/GB/GBARR/IPC-SysV-1.03.tar.gz
CPAN: Digest::MD5 loaded ok
Checksum
Oops!! My goof - I meant Win32::Semaphore. DOH!
-bk
[EMAIL PROTECTED]@cygwin.com on 11/15/2003 05:10:54 PM
Sent by:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: (bcc: Brian Kelly/WTC1/Empire)
Subject:cpan/gcc cannot compile perl module after cygwin 1.5*
Before the upgrade
, is
there backward compatibilty? And, if there is, how can I invoke it for
successful compilation? Also - any hope that the default installation will
ever again compile this, or is there now a need for a Win64::Semaphore
module?
Brian Kelly
- make
cp Semaphore.pm blib/lib/Win32/Semaphore.pm
/usr/bin
Will the next cygwin1.dll release have cgf's select() fix? And when is the
next version planned for release?
(I know a snap-shot is available).
Brian Kelly
WellChoice, Inc. made the following
annotations on 11/14/2003 12:52:23 PM
[EMAIL PROTECTED]@cygwin.com
on 11/14/2003 02:13:45 PM
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: (bcc: Brian Kelly/WTC1/Empire)
Subject:Re: Will next cygwin1.dll release have the select() fix?
On Fri, Nov 14, 2003 at 12:52:03PM
:13:28 PM
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: (bcc: Brian Kelly/WTC1/Empire)
Subject:Re: Will next cygwin1.dll release have the select() fix?
On Fri, Nov 14, 2003 at 02:10:53PM -0600, Brian Ford wrote:
On Fri, 14 Nov 2003 [EMAIL
31, 2003 1:33 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: cygwin deadlocks due to broken select() when writing to
pipes
On Fri, Oct 31, 2003 at 12:59:17AM -0500, Brian Kelly wrote:
Nevertheless, a few persistent reminders over a long period can have
the same effect as a very large number of complaints
and my son would have a telephone in his room.
Do you have a cordless phone? - Then your son has *already* had a phone
in his room!
If this technique was uniformly useful then we'd have peace in the
Middle East
Persistence has to be uniform, consistent, morally obvious, concretely
defined
- and
there it shall remain. I spent a couple hours a few weeks ago trying to
incorporate strace into the mix I run, but it turned out to be a really
complicated undertaking - so I gave up on it. So I apologize for
effectively offering nothing more than a BIG me too!!. That said .
ME TOO!!!
Brian Kelly
- allocating close to TWO MILLION DOLLARS
for the effort.
As for your *mean* response serving as a deterrent - your ongoing rant
about not wanting to hear from non-contributors is just that - ongoing
...
Brian Kelly
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
*Kisses and flower petals* ;-) for cgf, Corrina, Igor, Elfyn, and all the
rest who helped make this happen!!!
Brian Kelly
Brian Kelly
08/20/2003 08:56 AM
To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:Re: No output from DOS commands via telnet using xinetd
(Document link: Brian Kelly
cgf seems to think that working himself to death gives him the right to be
the *meanest* person on the list!
... hmmm ... GUESS IT DOES ;-)
Thanks!
Brian Kelly
Christopher Faylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]@cygwin.com on 08/31/2003 02:41:43
AM
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED
mkpasswd -d -u domain id
Brian Kelly
Doug Jenkinson [EMAIL PROTECTED]@cygwin.com on 08/22/2003 01:48:16 PM
Sent by:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: (bcc: Brian Kelly/WTC1/Empire)
Subject:Cygwin Domain Users
Hi All,
I recently got a new laptop, and my account
.html
Enjoy,
Brian Kelly
(Oh - and yes - the error messages *SUCK* - obviously created for the
developers use and *not* end-users. A big PET PEEVE of mine - the
developer's ultimate revenge against the dreaded demanding and *ungrateful*
user. Actually, it's a sin of omission - but a sin
*really* like to know at least, if anyone else
gets the same behavior.
That would at least establish that I'm dealing with a legitimate bug rather
than a setup
or configuration issue. Just a me too - or works for me would be MUCH
appreciated.
Brian Kelly
Brian Kelly
08/18/2003 03:05 PM
configuration thing I
have to do??
Brian Kelly
WellChoice, Inc. made the following
annotations on 08/18/2003 03:08:03 PM
--
Attention! This electronic message contains information that may be legally
confidential
]
To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: (bcc: Brian Kelly/WTC1/Empire)
Subject:Re: Win2k and cygwin memory leak
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gosh, isn't there a *win* in *cygwin*?? Not that I'm demanding
anything or goodness knows, making suggestions about how you 'Oh Great
One' should allocate your
= http://www.jfitz.com/software/RAMpage/
Brian Kelly
Christopher Faylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]@cygwin.com on 08/07/2003 11:40:57
AM
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: (bcc: Brian Kelly/WTC1/Empire)
Subject:Re: Win2k
of folks would be needed first.
Brian Kelly
Christopher Faylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]@cygwin.com on 08/08/2003 11:15:36
AM
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: (bcc: Brian Kelly/WTC1/Empire)
Subject:Re: Win2k and cygwin memory leak
SYSTEM:Administrators /var
That essentially fixed it.
Futhermore, it was *not* necessary to have to provide any further user
rights to the SYSTEM id.
It is working in inetd mode.
Brian Kelly
Jason Tishler [EMAIL PROTECTED]@cygwin.com on 08/11/2003 07:10:45 AM
Sent by:[EMAIL PROTECTED
it has fixes
for this?
Brian Kelly
Igor Pechtchanski [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 08/08/2003 06:50:16 PM
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: proftpd issues
On Fri, 8 Aug 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since having gotten xinetd
, it simply will *not* run with the SYSTEM ID, although telnetd *is*
running
with it.
Thanks
Brian Kelly
Igor Pechtchanski [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 08/08/2003 08:57:53 PM
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: proftpd issues
Fixes
:18 PM
Sent by:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: (bcc: Brian Kelly/WTC1/Empire)
Subject:Re: Win2k and cygwin memory leak
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, I can't feel too guilty about chiming me too - cause it
already brought forth a VERY useful and *productive
entry:
**MYLOGINID**:unused_by_nt/2000/xp:48479:10513:Brian
Kelly,U-**DOMAIN**\**MYLOGINID**,S-1-5-21-15
-888547495-1093625069-38479://**REMOTESERVERNAME**/users/**MYLOGINID**:/bin/bash
Connected to **SERVERNAME**.**DOMAINNAME**.com.
220 ProFTPD 1.2.9rc1 Server (ProFTPD Default Installation
on it . )
Andrew DeFaria [EMAIL PROTECTED]@cygwin.com on 08/07/2003 06:24:26 PM
Sent by:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: (bcc: Brian Kelly/WTC1/Empire)
Subject:Re: Win2k and cygwin memory leak
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It would have been nice
by:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: (bcc: Brian Kelly/WTC1/Empire)
Subject:Re: Win2k and cygwin memory leak
On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 03:44:11AM +0200, Luc Hermitte wrote:
* On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 03:24:26PM -0700, Andrew DeFaria
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It has already been
-- Forwarded by Brian Kelly/WTC1/Empire on 08/07/2003
10:07 PM ---
Brian Kelly
08/07/2003 10:06 PM
To:Luc Hermitte [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:Re: Win2k and cygwin memory leak (Document link: Brian Kelly)
*You're Welcome*
For it *I
.
Brian Kelly
[EMAIL PROTECTED]@cygwin.com on 08/07/2003 12:52:53 PM
Sent by:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: (bcc: Brian Kelly/WTC1/Empire)
Subject:Re: Win2k and cygwin memory leak
Now seems to be a good time for me to jump in.
I can DEFINITIVELY say
on 2003 Server. Could it be that 2000 server and
2003 server really
aren't all that different??
Anyway, before I saddle you guys with stuff, I thought I'd first ask if
*anyone* is using
it successfully on 2000 *Server*.
Brian Kelly
WellChoice, Inc. made the following
annotations on 08/05/2003
;-)
bk
Christopher Faylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]@cygwin.com on 08/08/2003 11:13:02
AM
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: (bcc: Brian Kelly/WTC1/Empire)
Subject:Re: Win2k and cygwin memory leak
On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 09
- but not with Domain id's. Is proftpd
set up to do domain authentication via ntsec??
If not, is there an ETA?
Brian Kelly
WellChoice, Inc. made the following
annotations on 08/08/2003 05:35:21 PM
--
Attention! This electronic message
;-) .
Brian Kelly
Christopher Faylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]@cygwin.com on 08/07/2003 01:56:16
PM
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: (bcc: Brian Kelly/WTC1/Empire)
Subject:Re: Win2k and cygwin memory leak
On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 12
the answers I frequently need.
Jim Drash [EMAIL PROTECTED]@cygwin.com on 08/07/2003 04:18:16 PM
Sent by:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: (bcc: Brian Kelly/WTC1/Empire)
Subject:Re: Win2k and cygwin memory leak
I will be happy to find and fix your specific memory leak
the assistance. I need xinetd to
maximize security
until we can
get secure shell working from the mainframe (don't hold your breath!).
Ah well, some folks just like liv'in in the past!
Brian Kelly
Vince Hoffman [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 08/06/2003
08:41:38 AM
To:'[EMAIL PROTECTED]' [EMAIL
if this was
indeed the one indispensible thing I needed to do.
Again - appreciate all the assistance. I need xinetd to maximize security
until we can
get secure shell working from the mainframe (don't hold your breath!).
Ah well, some folks just like liv'in in the past!
Brian Kelly
Vince
inetd
again, and telnet
again works flawlessly.
Anybody got a clue what I'm missing here?
Brian Kelly
WellChoice, Inc. made the following
annotations on 08/01/2003 08:12:43 AM
--
Attention! This electronic message
, and
prohibitions of duplicating the bundled executable without satisfying ALL
licensing restrictions of ALL
its contents - INCLUDING the distribution of source for any and all bundled
GPL software.
Brian Kelly
Christopher Faylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]@cygwin.com on 07/28/2003 11:19:04
PM
Please
) itself. Of course anyone who creates their own floppy
for their own use is exempted.
Brian Kelly
Jonathan Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED]@cygwin.com on 07/29/2003 12:47:59 PM
Sent by:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: (bcc: Brian Kelly/WTC1/Empire)
Subject:RE: Source code
of the Michigan Bar Association in
Good Standing).
Brian Kelly
Robert Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED]@cygwin.com on 07/28/2003 07:26:26
AM
Sent by:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: (bcc: Brian Kelly/WTC1/Empire)
Subject:GPL alert ? http://thinstall.com/unix_tools/
http
$
_
SEEMS LIKE AN OPEN AND SHUT CASE TO ME!
Brian Kelly
Christopher Faylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]@cygwin.com on 07/28/2003 09:19:44
AM
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: (bcc: Brian Kelly/WTC1/Empire)
Subject:Re: GPL
advise that you do so with the
assistance
of an experienced counselor.
Brian Kelly, J.D.
Jonathan Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED]@cygwin.com on 07/28/2003 07:01:18 PM
Sent by:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:Max Bowsher [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: (bcc: Brian Kelly/WTC1/Empire
I work in a large corporation with an obsessive security staff. Cygwin
is
now accepted (unofficially) through the grease gun method. In WWII
one Nazi gunmaker was developing the world's first assault weapon.
Hitler
was informed of the effort - deemed it a waste of resources and ordered
the
project
are, and no matter where life finds
you - your patch will be ready before mine!
Brian Kelly
Tremaine Floyd [EMAIL PROTECTED]@cygwin.com on 07/06/2003 08:00:21
PM
Sent by:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: (bcc: Brian Kelly/WTC1/Empire)
Subject:the kill command
I
- I'll smile.
Cygwin - comes with a lifetime money back guarantee if not satisfied
for any reason! ;-)
Brian Kelly
Christopher Faylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]@cygwin.com on 07/06/2003 08:37:15
PM
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: (bcc
to find.
I hate going to MS for anything - it just plain SUCKS. Plus I have no idea
how well MS su even works with cygwin. Have you used the two together??
Brian Kelly
Brian Dessent [EMAIL PROTECTED]@cygwin.com on 07/01/2003 08:09:57 AM
Sent by:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc
Why rewrite 'su' to do those types of tricks, when 'ssh' already exists?
Uhhh - how about script portability??
(Which is why I predict su will someday be made to do this. When??
Simple,
When somebody does it ) [ I ain't demand'in nothin from nobody ]
Brian Kelly
Karsten M. Self
does it ) [ I ain't demand'in nothin from nobody ]
Brian Kelly
Karsten M. Self [EMAIL PROTECTED]@cygwin.com on 06/29/2003
07:34:57 PM
Sent by:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: (bcc: Brian Kelly/WTC1/Empire)
Subject:Re: About the 'su' command
Is this, or could
,
the fact is, such rabble wouldn't even be singing if cygwin wasn't first
and foremost AN OUTRAGEOUS SUCCESS.
Ah well, there's always the bad that comes with the good ...
Brian Kelly
Gary R. Van Sickle [EMAIL PROTECTED]@cygwin.com on
06/26/2003 10:39:47 PM
Sent by:[EMAIL PROTECTED
with this directive:
Cygwin - use it and SHUT UP.
Thank you!
Christopher Faylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]@cygwin.com on 06/26/2003 12:40:34
AM
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: (bcc: Brian Kelly/WTC1/Empire)
Subject:Re: cygwin
of someone's time - as more and more
non-code-heads
(like moi) are using cygwin with each passing day.
Brian Kelly
Karsten M. Self [EMAIL PROTECTED]@cygwin.com on 06/26/2003 03:21:46
PM
Sent by:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:Cygwin-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: (bcc: Brian Kelly/WTC1/Empire)
Subject
- but the install - given
my experience - WILL eventually finish correctly.
Brian Kelly
Dan Hatton [EMAIL PROTECTED]@cygwin.com on 06/16/2003 11:14:46
AM
Sent by:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:cygwin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: (bcc: Brian Kelly/WTC1/Empire)
Subject:Memleak Apparently Attributable
uhhh - that's MR CHRIST to you sir. Yes OF COURSE I telnet to my
servers. I do so inside a secure network from desktops that are locked
down tighter than gold in Swiss Banks. Since I don't have every little
thing browser enabled on my servers, and IT has not seen fit to
distribute Putty to every
above - they are outta luck. Of
course brain surgery is simple if you know how to do it. So why isn't
it fixed yet??
BWAM
I understand, really I do ;-)
BK
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Brian Kelly
Sent: Saturday, June 14, 2003 11:13 PM
True Vim'ers DO NOT navigate with arrow keys. I remember reading that
somewhere. Certainly
the correct way to navigate in Vim is with the H J K and L keys.
Understood, acknowledged,
yaddy yadda yaaa. That said - I like to use the arrow keys. It's habitual
and something I've been
doing for
you a gold star, I'll simply pledge my support give you
my promise
to cast a ballot for you if a gold star referendum were ever held. ( hmmm, I
can't remember if I'm registered to vote! )
Brian Kelly
Randall R Schulz [EMAIL PROTECTED]@cygwin.com on 06/10/2003 09:41:59 AM
Sent by:[EMAIL
circa 2000-2001. They may still be - I don't know, haven't
looked. Anyhow,
do you know offhand if there is still any compelling reason to have tty in
the Cygwin
environment variable?
Thanks again.
Brian Kelly
( You're level of meanness gets only a 2 out of 10 - DISAPPOINTING!! I
expect more
is the determiner. I must be losing it - I thought I had closed
all open cmd windows and
opened a new one after updating the .profile - but - alas - that probably
is not what actually
happened.
Brian Kelly
Shankar Unni [EMAIL PROTECTED]@cygwin.com on 06/10/2003 01:43:16
PM
Sent by:[EMAIL
good fortune,
only hoping that you will compensate me in a way that you feel is just and
warranted.
Of course I trust you will keep this information STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL ;-)
Brian Kelly
Steve Fairbairn [EMAIL PROTECTED]@cygwin.com on 06/04/2003
10:28:58 AM
Sent by:[EMAIL PROTECTED
Does this mean that Cygwin is not ready for production??
Darn!! and I was just getting ready to roll it out to my biggest
client - Randy's Pizza and Bait. ( sorry - not realation )
Brian Kelly
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf
Of Randall R
- will such people read the FAQ BEFORE bothering the busy
folks on this list
NOT!
Brian Kelly
PS (One can also use cmd /c to run CYGWIN utilities - even something
like
cmd /c start cmd /c rm -rf * which will run as separate process
enabling you to return to the command line
-worker? OH
... OKAY!
Brian Kelly
Steve Fairbairn [EMAIL PROTECTED]@cygwin.com on 01/22/2003
03:57:00 AM
Sent by:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: (bcc: Brian Kelly/WTC1/Empire)
Subject:RE: Bug in rm -r with locked files
Just a small suggestion, but in order
1000
THANK YOU X 1000
There ... feel better?
Hmmm ... though not ...
; - )
Brian Kelly
Christopher Faylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]@cygwin.com on 01/22/2003 10:38:02 AM
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: (bcc
still there!!!
Brian Kelly
###
memory leak? (was: 1.3.9: fork: Permission denied (Windows 2000))
From: Reddie, Steven Steven dot Reddie at ca dot com
To: cygwin at cygwin dot com
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2002 15:30:26 +1100
Subject: memory
]
To:'Max Bowsher' [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: (bcc: Brian Kelly/WTC1/Empire)
Subject:RE: Bug in rm -r with locked files
Max corrected me:
No. The thing that rm -rf gets stuck on is vim .swp recovery file.
Ah. Sorry. Should have straced the thing before shooting off
. All the ftp's I did, I did from a local bash
shell - which works
just fine.
Of course none of this proves that the problem lies with new cygwin code.
If anyone running
NT 4.0 SP 6 could try to recreate the problem as described above - that
would be a big help.
Brian Kelly
RE: Mysterious FTP
4096 Dec 8 20:33 servlets
-rwxrwxrwx1 bmk1n0 None 12984320 Dec 8 20:42 static.tar
drwxrwxrwt3 bmk1n0 None0 Dec 8 20:33 web
ftp
Brian Kelly
Sent by:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: (bcc: Brian Kelly/WTC1/Empire)
Subject:RE: Mysterious FTP
s happened to break ftp or can suggest
what other things I can investigate
to get the bottom of this problem Id REALLY appreciate it.
Brian Kelly
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation
98 matches
Mail list logo
