Re: RE: Memory access error XWin -multiwindow

2003-06-18 Thread ralf . habacker
See http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-xfree/2003-06/msg00162.html Cheers Ralf --- original Nachricht Ende --- Ralf Habacker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- Sylvain Petreolle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- Biju G C [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit : I dont know whether this error is same as some

Re: Re: RE: Memory access error XWin -multiwindow

2003-06-18 Thread ralf . habacker
/ml/cygwin-xfree/2003-06/msg00162.html' target='_blank'uhttp://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-xfree/2003-06/msg00162.html/u/a Cheers Ralf --- original Nachricht Ende --- Ralf Habacker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- Sylvain Petreolle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- Biju G C [EMAIL

RE: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Server Test 91

2003-06-05 Thread Ralf Habacker
); -- Ralf, Thanks. http://www.msu.edu/~huntharo/xwin/shadow/XWin-Test91-DEBUG.exe.bz2 Harold Ralf Habacker wrote: Harold Hunt wrote: 5) winclass.c, winclass.h - Rename these files to winmultiwindowclass.c and winmultiwindowclass.h, respectively, since they are only used in MultiWindow

RE: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Server Test 91

2003-06-04 Thread Ralf Habacker
Harold Hunt wrote: 5) winclass.c, winclass.h - Rename these files to winmultiwindowclass.c and winmultiwindowclass.h, respectively, since they are only used in MultiWindow mode. Prefix the functions in these files with MultiWindow. (Harold L Hunt II) The appended patch contains some

RE: Custom icons per window class/name patch

2003-05-27 Thread Ralf Habacker
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Earle F. Philhower III Sent: Monday, May 26, 2003 7:28 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Custom icons per window class/name patch Howdy Ralf, At 09:39 AM 5/26/2003 +0200, you wrote: while

RE: Custom icons per window class/name patch

2003-05-27 Thread Ralf Habacker
Erle wrote: I just did some runs with the commercial apps I use at work, and can see that many do *not* create custom classes or window_roles for each type of window. KDE and gnome apps does. I think the best thing to do for the class naming is to just use an incrementing number and make

RE: Custom icons per window class/name patch

2003-05-27 Thread Ralf Habacker
Hi Ralf, Huh, where was the problem ? I've build it after applying all recent patches from Earle. When I applied Earle's and your patches in sequence, clean, from Harold's test86 sources I got some minor hiccups on the last .dif. I have seen, that you have got already this problems.

RE: new setup md5 check

2003-04-12 Thread Ralf Habacker
Gerrit P. Haase wrote: Hallo, why is the MD5 check performed every time? A good question. Because in the five minutes from now on, my packages may be corrupted? How can I get rid of it? There is a command line option to disable: -5 But what about starting setup directly from

RE: Mozilla 1.3 built on cygwin?

2003-03-31 Thread Ralf Habacker
If you have such great insight into this type of thing, it won't take you any time at all to duplicate. You've been complaining about this and other cygwin performance issues for months. Why don't *you* do something? I figured fork/exec/signals out from scratch. Certainly the brighter

RE: Mozilla 1.3 built on cygwin?

2003-03-29 Thread Ralf Habacker
I don't have the code anymore It's a pity, because everbody else has to start from scratch and couldn't take a deeper look and perhaps find the problem. Cheers Ralf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html

RE: Mozilla 1.3 built on cygwin?

2003-03-28 Thread Ralf Habacker
Having Mozilla itself running under Cygwin might not be useful to a lot of people but the fixes that Cygwin might have to go through to make this happen could pave the way for other X apps that come later. like we have encountered while porting KDE to cygin/xfree. I remember a very good

RE: Mozilla 1.3 built on cygwin?

2003-03-27 Thread Ralf Habacker
Hi First off, I have said it before and I'll say it again, Evolution from Ximian needs to be ported to Cygwin.. do you have heard from KMail or KOrganizer on cygwin/xfree. Additional for the people who does not know that there is already an alternative web browser: Konqueror from the

RE: Mozilla 1.3 built on cygwin?

2003-03-27 Thread Ralf Habacker
Hi, Having Mozilla itself running under Cygwin might not be useful to a lot of people but the fixes that Cygwin might have to go through to make this happen could pave the way for other X apps that come later. like we have encountered while porting KDE to cygin/xfree. Cheers Ralf --

RE: Gnome KDE

2003-03-23 Thread Ralf Habacker
am already running the ipc-deamon, no change, the problem seems to be with the qt-2-3.dll, if I tell cygwin to use that version, then, when I use the xclient, none of the kde icons appear Do you have this problems with the qt-designer too ? I haven't got this problems with the recent qt cvs

RE: Gnome KDE

2003-03-22 Thread Ralf Habacker
is there a location to install cygwin with Gnome /or kde as part of the package? I have looked around on the net, and the only info/help I can find is, have to install about 50 pieces of source for Gnome, and configuring X to work with KDE 2.0 seems to break using Xwin as a client connecting

cygwin application hangs in ntdll while loading a dll

2003-03-21 Thread Ralf Habacker
Hi all, while porting arts 1.2.0 (=Advanced Realtime synth for kde) I've encountered a dll loading problem loading (unter W2k verified with cygwin 1.3.21-1 and recent snapshot). The background: The arts daemon tries to load an additional library with lt_dlopen (see the backtrace below) and hangs

RE: idea for mixed import/static libraries and linking with DLLs

2003-03-18 Thread Ralf Habacker
I just realized that libc.so on linux is just a linker script and that it is used to link both the shared and static parts of libc. So, in a similar vein, you could conceivably do something like this on cygwin: /* GNU ld script Use the shared library, but some functions are only in

RE: [PATCH] libtool patch for direct-linking-to-dll

2003-03-10 Thread Ralf Habacker
On Mon, Mar 10, 2003 at 08:13:16AM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote: I didn't realize it was a patch to rip out all of the import-lib building stuff, and replace it with the new link-to-dll support. I've been blissfully trying to avoid libtool discussions but I have to ask my standard question of

RE: [PATCH] libtool patch for direct-linking-to-dll

2003-03-10 Thread Ralf Habacker
Okay, I've actually looked at the patch now. Apparently I misunderstood. I thought this was a patch to enable using libtool to link against an outside shared library in which the implib was actually a symlink to a DLL -- which I didn't think would require much if any hacking with libtool,

RE: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: binutils-20030307-1

2003-03-09 Thread Ralf Habacker
I can see many more source code changes. I think cgf meant that the only difference between this package, and straight-from-CVS binutils (20030307 snapshot) is the pseudo-reloc change. Certainly, the basic CVS source has had many many changes since 20021117. Including your

RE: rpm-4.1 successful compile on Cygwin

2003-03-08 Thread Ralf Habacker
Max Bowsher wrote: I'm not quite sure rpm really is desirable for the Cygwin dist, unless it was decided to transition to rpm packages exclusively once setup was suitably adapted. Well, there are grand designs eventually to generalize setup so that it can accept tar.bz2 (or .cyg?)

RE: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: binutils-20030307-1

2003-03-08 Thread Ralf Habacker
Hi I've made a new version of binutils available for installation. This version is a refresh from CVS on sources.redhat.com. This release has one minor change from Chuck Wilson to make --enable-runtime-pseudo-reloc the default for `ld'. Are there no more changes in this release ? Wenn I

RE: [PATCH] libtool patch for direct-linking-to-dll

2003-03-04 Thread Ralf Habacker
[BTW, Ralf, patches to libtool don't belong on cygwin-apps. It's not a packaging issue, a packaging-policy issue, nor a setup issue. This thread belongs on the main cygwin list.] I apologize for this mistake. Sometime it seems that I have too many things in my head. :-) Ralf --

[PATCH] libtool patch for direct-linking-to-dll

2003-02-28 Thread Ralf Habacker
? 2003-02-27 Ralf Habacker [EMAIL PROTECTED] * libtool.m4 (AC_LIBTOOL_SYS_DYNAMIC_LINKER): Removed postinstall_cmds and postuninstall_cmds, added shared library to 'library_names_spec'. (AC_LIBTOOL_LANG_CXX_CONFIG): Removed import library generation from

RE: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: libtool-devel-20030216, libltdl-20030216

2003-02-28 Thread Ralf Habacker
It's up to you -- that's why I coded the libtool changes so that your improvements could be a drop in fix. I think it'd be nice is file could tell me that a given file was an import lib or a (regular) lib, but it isn't necessary. There's certainly no rush. I will see. The problem is that

RE: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: libtool-devel-20030216, libltdl-20030216

2003-02-25 Thread Ralf Habacker
o speed problem with the internal win32_libid() routine is partially fixed -- approx 35% speedup. Ralf Habacker is working on some modifications to the official fileutils distribution (specifically, file.exe) that should allow an additional 8% speedup without additional changes to libtool

RE: [avail for test] libtool-devel-20030121-1

2003-02-21 Thread Ralf Habacker
Thanks for this additional note. from a previous mail: So, it's important, Ralf, that your 'file' changes NEVER generate a false positive (e.g. saying something is an import lib when it is not). If your code generates a false negative (saying something is static when it's actually an

RE: Thanks for donations

2003-02-19 Thread Ralf Habacker
Hasn't Harold suggested that people could contribute links for their own donations? I don't think it makes sense for someone to be attempting to dole out money. What would the criteria be? Better to let the users decide. I understand your point, but who in the user community would

RE: [ITP] rebase (resend)

2003-02-19 Thread Ralf Habacker
Ralf, On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 11:40:44PM +0100, Ralf Habacker wrote: I found another bug (most likely introduce by me in a previous patch) when rebasing up and the DLL is already based at the requested address. The attached patch is one way to correct this problem. Applied

RE: [avail for test] libtool-devel-20030121-1

2003-02-19 Thread Ralf Habacker
You may be right in this issue, but couldn't the symbol _dll_iname doesn't change in future implementation too ? The important question seems to me like this: [1] Which is the mostly stable identifier we build on ? filenames change because evil twisted pesky end-users change them, at any

RE: [ITP] rebase (resend)

2003-02-17 Thread Ralf Habacker
I found another bug (most likely introduce by me in a previous patch) when rebasing up and the DLL is already based at the requested address. The attached patch is one way to correct this problem. Applied and checked in. Ralf

RE: [avail for test] libtool-devel-20030121-1

2003-02-17 Thread Ralf Habacker
Thats very bad. Yeah. I don't know why these implibs need to declare these static structures; it's possible that w32api is just following the lead of the corresponding .lib files in the MSVC distribution. But, that's neither here nor there. IF these crossbreed implibs are detected as

Re: [avail for test] libtool-devel-20030121-1

2003-02-16 Thread Ralf Habacker
BTW: Do you know which libraries are also hybrid execpt of cygwin1.dll ? There are about a half-dozen in /usr/lib/w32api -- and worse, the static members are bad variable types; if you make the static members part of the DLL, then these vars can't be auto-imported without using pseudo-relocs.

Re: [avail for test] libtool-devel-20030121-1

2003-02-16 Thread Ralf Habacker
convenience libs do not count. You can still link a DLL with convenience libs, because it is assumed that a true convenience lib is built by your project, for your project, and only for your project -- it is not available to outside users and therefore there can never be any mismatch between the

RE: [ITP] rebase

2003-02-15 Thread Ralf Habacker
Just out of curiosity, why has this discussion suddenly moved to cygwin at cygwin dot com from cygwin-apps at cygwin dot com? It was my error, an little accident. Sorry Ralf

RE: [ITP] rebase

2003-02-14 Thread Ralf Habacker
wasn't tight enough. My version: (char *)relocp-SizeOfBlock (char *)relocs + size seems to be. What was the problem with this guard: To which guard are you referring? Mine or yours? Does it not fix the last entry of a relocation block ? I'm concerned that

RE: [ITP] rebase

2003-02-12 Thread Ralf Habacker
Your guard: (char *)relocp (char *)relocs + size wasn't tight enough. My version: (char *)relocp-SizeOfBlock (char *)relocs + size seems to be. What was the problem with this guard: Does it not fix the last entry of a relocation block ? Ralf

RE: [avail for test] libtool-devel-20030121-1

2003-02-12 Thread Ralf Habacker
But, you'd still need to check all static libs to see if they are really import libs after all. The good news it that we expect this to happen only rarely: when an import lib is a hybrid lib with static objs in front -- the modified 'file' test incorrectly identifies it as a static archive.

RE: [PATCH] missing in_addr_t type

2003-02-11 Thread Ralf Habacker
Applied, with the usual ChangeLog corrections. Probably I will it learn at some time. After looking in the sources, I have seen that you also have implementend the intx_t types (uintx_t were already there), which otherwise would be my next patch. Thanks -- Unsubscribe info:

RE: [ITP] rebase

2003-02-10 Thread Ralf Habacker
I can reproduce it now. I will debug and try to fix it myself. If I'm unsuccessful, then I will ask Ralf for help. Jason, your rebase depends on the ms imagehelp library, isn't it. A way may be to try my version with the -D flag. This give some additional hint about the internals of the dll.

RE: [avail for test] libtool-devel-20030121-1

2003-02-10 Thread Ralf Habacker
Ain't gonna happen. Find me a faster way to distinguish between x86 import libs and x86 static libs (and random-other-architecture libs of any sort), and I'll thank you. see [1] But telling me that I must support a fundamental philosophical and not merely technical fork of libtool for the

RE: [avail for test] libtool-devel-20030121-1

2003-02-10 Thread Ralf Habacker
ARGH. This defeats the whole purpose of the policy change -- and it is a policy change driven by the libtool development. I don't want to support a forked version of libtool that differs from mainline on a basic policy issue. May be, but like Max has stated, I don't like to be forced to

RE: [avail for test] libtool-devel-20030121-1

2003-02-08 Thread Ralf Habacker
Hi Charles, I've taken a deeper look into the libtool sources and found a hint relating to the way other os do this checking, for example libtool.m4.in snip # AC_DEPLIBS_CHECK_METHOD snip pass_all gnu*) irix5* | irix6* | nonstopux*) linux*) (most hosts) osf3* | osf4* | osf5*)

RE: [avail for test] libtool-devel-20030121-1

2003-02-08 Thread Ralf Habacker
Ralf -- please drop my 'final' script into one of your generated libtools and run your tests (what? rebuilding KDE?) on it, and let me know what you think. (Oh, and since (a) 'file' execution speed is invariant with target size, and (b) we match *DLL* and *executable* separately, if you are

RE: [avail for test] libtool-devel-20030121-1

2003-02-08 Thread Ralf Habacker
From 'info libtool': `pass_all' will pass everything without any checking. This may work on platforms in which code is position-independent by default and inter-library dependencies are properly supported by the dynamic linker, for example, on DEC OSF/1 3 and 4.

RE: [avail for test] libtool-devel-20030121-1

2003-02-08 Thread Ralf Habacker
1.4e isn't a specific version. It just means some cvs checkout after the 1.4d release but this could be a long period: :-) The recent devel libtool tells: $ libtool --version ltmain.sh (GNU libtool) 1.4e (1.1175 2003/01/01 01:57:46) ltmain of recent kde from anoncvs.kde.org: VERSION=1.4e

RE: [avail for test] libtool-devel-20030121-1

2003-02-07 Thread Ralf Habacker
You never followed up on that. Rebooting every time need very much time (about 10 minutes for me) and there is an easier way to emulate that. I've written an applications which's allocate any available memory. This removes all cached files' dll's and so one. I had similar problems while

RE: [avail for test] libtool-devel-20030121-1

2003-02-05 Thread Ralf Habacker
Yes, Ralf, I know. This is like the sixth iteration trying to solve this problem. The very first attempt did what you suggest (only it is much much more complicated than you imply; you're overlooking a lot). However, that fix was unacceptable to the automake and libtool people. Hence,

Re: [avail for test] libtool-devel-20030121-1

2003-02-03 Thread ralf . habacker
I've updated libtool-devel to the 20030121 CVS, plus added a major change of my own (inspired by Earnie Boyd and others on the libtool mailing list) that fixes the 'relink exe's over and over and over' problem on both mingw and cygwin. [Skip to the last two paragraphs for the real

RE: [avail for test] libtool-devel-20030121-1

2003-02-03 Thread Ralf Habacker
Hi Chuck, 3) What I did: create a binary wrapper -- an actual executable -- named 'foo.exe' in the main build directory. It is NOT the real foo.exe. It simply exec's the shell script, which in turn sets up the environment and exec's the real .lib/foo.exe. Eventually, the 'set up the

RE: Suggestion: KDE / QT and GNOME cygwin available

2003-01-31 Thread Ralf Habacker
Currently it is a resourcen problem, that kde/qt isn't be distributed with the cygwin net release. I have all hands to do with the user support on the kde-cygwin mailing lists and foren and to deal with the basic stuff (ld, imagehelper,libtool,...), that there is no time to support the users in

RE: Integrating Ralf's rebase into setup.exe

2003-01-30 Thread Ralf Habacker
The attached fixes the following: 1. merge problem when you applied (by hand?) the following patch: http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2002-12/msg00138.html 2. bug I introduced in the above patch when I attempted but did not successfully fix rebasing up #1 causes the

RE: Suggestion: KDE / QT and GNOME cygwin available

2003-01-30 Thread Ralf Habacker
GNOME-cygwin port: http://homepage.ntlworld.com/steven.obrien2/ KDE3-cygwin port: http://kde-cygwin.sourceforge.net/qt3/using.php ^^^ Currently kde2 is running, kde3 is in work. Would there be a chance to get these integrated into Cygwin distro? Can any of the Cygwin core developers talk

[patch] auto-import-dll libtool related patch

2003-01-25 Thread Ralf Habacker
recognized that using the same dll more than one time occurs often because of the automatic dependency tracking. 2003-01-25 Ralf Habacker [EMAIL PROTECTED] * deffile.h (def_get_module): new prototype. * deffilep.y (def_get_module): new function. * pe-dll.c (pe_implied_import_dll

RE: [patch] auto-import-dll libtool related patch

2003-01-25 Thread Ralf Habacker
Especially in libtool environments I have recognized that using the same dll more than one time occurs often because of the automatic dependency tracking. I should add, that this problem only occurs when using the dll like an object file not as a library. gcc -o xx.exe objectfiles dll.dll

RE: Perl with -i option removes files

2003-01-22 Thread Ralf Habacker
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Volker Quetschke Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 10:35 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Perl with -i option removes files Hi! Following szenario: $ echo abc testfile $ perl -p -i -e

RE: Perl with -i option removes files

2003-01-22 Thread Ralf Habacker
Sorry my finger were pressing the send to key before this mail was ready. Is this a bug or feature? $ cygcheck -c cygwin perl Cygwin Package Information Package Version cygwin 1.3.17-1 perl5.6.1-2 This is a known issue with this perl

RE: Integrating Ralf's rebase into setup.exe

2003-01-21 Thread Ralf Habacker
Hi Jason, The attached patch enables libimagehelper.a to be usable by C source too. Applied. Thanks for fixing this. Ralf

RE: Using XFree to replace explorer.exe as the window manager for Windows

2003-01-19 Thread Ralf Habacker
I am wondering if anyone has attempted to use Cygwin/XFree86 to replace explorer.exe as the window manager. David Fraser has reported done so with kde-cygwin. See http://lists.kde.org/?l=kde-cygwinm=103072530327420w=2 for further infos. Regards Ralf

binutils ld update with auto-import from dll's ?`

2003-01-13 Thread Ralf Habacker
Hi all, in december 2002 Charles Wilson and I had supplied an ld patch for the auto-import from dll functionality. For the kde-cygwin project we would like to use this new stuff in the near future for the next qt3 release. General there are two way to solve this: Because we don't like to

RE: binutils ld update with auto-import from dll's ?`

2003-01-13 Thread Ralf Habacker
patience. cgf is the maintainer for binutils on cygwin, but I'm sure he has his hands full getting ready for the imminent 1.3.19 cygwin kernel release. BTW, Danny reported a problem with Fabrizio Gennari's create an export section for .exe's patch and relocatable linking. Danny sent

RE: Integrating Ralf's rebase into setup.exe

2003-01-03 Thread Ralf Habacker
Hi Gary, How about libhabackersimagehelp.a etc? this would suggest, that this is my lib, but there are also others who have worked and probably will work on this library. I habe only started this lib I think imagehelper will be good. Ralf

RE: Integrating Ralf's rebase into setup.exe

2003-01-03 Thread Ralf Habacker
1) some that go to stdout probably should be stderr, and vice versa. still open. I think debug message should go to cerr and normal printing should go to cout. This seems mostly to be fixed in the recent cvs release. Ralf

RE: Integrating Ralf's rebase into setup.exe

2003-01-02 Thread Ralf Habacker
Still missing a lot of the errors that were fixed in my patch. Here's the remainder: 1) 'hex' and 'endl' are also in the std:: namespace 2) unbind_main.cc needs 'using namespace std;' 3) (new) rebind_main will rebind the first commandline argument over and over; it needs to use argv[i]

RE: Integrating Ralf's rebase into setup.exe

2003-01-02 Thread Ralf Habacker
Rob suggested libcygimagehlp.a for the library. Should we leave the names as is, but use -L and -I to find the right files instead? If I remember right, this lib will be used for a cygwin based rebase and later in the cygwin's setup application which is mingw based. So this lib must be

RE: Integrating Ralf's rebase into setup.exe

2003-01-02 Thread Ralf Habacker
Thats orthogonal (but IIRC is possible now/soon). The build within setup.exe will be a .a library, not a .dll. You could always use a compile flag to choose between cout error reporting and exceptions. What about the following: Step 1: library for standalone rebase Every exported library

RE: Integrating Ralf's rebase into setup.exe

2003-01-02 Thread Ralf Habacker
If I remember right, this lib will be used for a cygwin based rebase and later in the cygwin's setup application which is mingw based. So this lib must be buildable for cygwin and mingw, isn't it ? Yes. And the library should use the appropriate naming convention for the target platform.

RE: Integrating Ralf's rebase into setup.exe

2003-01-02 Thread Ralf Habacker
But, they are part of Cygwin gcc in Mingw mode (i.e., gcc -mno-cygwin). You're right. My gcc installation was corrupted. Now I can compile it. What about getopt, I can find the symbol in a library, but not the related header. ? I have installed mingw-runtime 2.2.1. Ralf

RE: Integrating Ralf's rebase into setup.exe

2003-01-02 Thread Ralf Habacker
IIRC, it is not part of Mingw. I just used a copy of getopt.[ch] from the Cygwin sources for my stand alone rebase. That curious: getopt is compiled into /usr/lib/mingw/libliberty.a; only the header is missing. I've copied the header from /usr/include/getopt.h to /usr/include/mingw and it

RE: Integrating Ralf's rebase into setup.exe

2003-01-02 Thread Ralf Habacker
Not really -- it doesn't compile anymore. Among other things: You have gotten me just between finishing the things. I was interrupted a little after written the last mail, so 10 minutes later is was mostly fixed. 0) Update the changelog when you do stuff. (You renamed the library itself,

RE: Integrating Ralf's rebase into setup.exe

2003-01-01 Thread Ralf Habacker
In checkimage.cc: - ctFile dll(filename); + LinkedObjectFile dll(filename); fixed. README needs a brief note about this 0.6 version. More than I have written in my last email ? No, it's just that the README file itself contains some brief descriptions of version 0.1 -- 0.5, but

RE: Integrating Ralf's rebase into setup.exe

2003-01-01 Thread Ralf Habacker
And heres a show stopper. The library should not use cout at all. It should throw an exception, and let the user interface handle it. Does this work also, if this library is compiled as a dll ? Do you have an example, how to do for this ? Ralf

Re: Integrating Ralf's rebase into setup.exe

2002-12-31 Thread Ralf Habacker
Hi all, relating to the this thread, which starts at http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2002-12/msg00021.html I have updated the rebase source with : - creates a static lib containing all needed objectfiles for RebaseImage() and friends. The library is named libimagehlp.a and the relating

RE: Integrating Ralf's rebase into setup.exe

2002-12-31 Thread Ralf Habacker
However, should we use the names libimagehlp.a and imagehlp.h? They clash with the mingw versions. Do you have a better name ? Ralf

RE: Integrating Ralf's rebase into setup.exe

2002-12-31 Thread Ralf Habacker
I needed to make the following changes before this would compile. Mostly namespace errors, the std:: below or something else ? but also a typo where ? and main() void vs. int. fixed I figured the library files should explicitly call std::cout friends, fixed but the executables

RE: [PATCH] exclude runtime-pseudo-reloc symbols from auto-export

2002-12-22 Thread Ralf Habacker
Hi Chris, 1. I don't see how you could do that since the symbol is associated with an existing place in memory. We could put the whole function in a different segment but that's not the kind of solution I was thinking of. 2. I was thinking that there might be an unused attribute that could be

RE: [PATCH] exclude runtime-pseudo-reloc symbols from auto-export

2002-12-21 Thread Ralf Habacker
Maybe the horse has left the barn already but it would have been nice (tm) if these type of symbols were marked in some generic way so that we wouldn't have to keep remembering to extend this table. I recall commenting on this aspect in a recent binutils thread in the cygwin lists, and

RE: Info - cygwin articel in german linux magazine

2002-12-14 Thread Ralf Habacker
Interesting. The history is a little garbled (Steve Chamberlain didn't name the project Cygwin and there was no magical decision made in 1999 to do anything) but it's always nice to get exposure. Perhaps you should send a correction to this magazine :-) Ralf -- Unsubscribe info:

RE: Info - cygwin articel in german linux magazine

2002-12-14 Thread Ralf Habacker
I *believe* (not reading German ;) that the same article is also in the English edition. You're right. See http://www.linux-magazine.com/issue/26, but it seems that you can find only the german story in the internet. Ralf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug

RE: Info - cygwin articel in german linux magazine

2002-12-14 Thread Ralf Habacker
Interesting. The history is a little garbled (Steve Chamberlain didn't name the project Cygwin and there was no magical decision made in 1999 to do anything) but it's always nice to get exposure. Perhaps you should send a correction to this magazine :-) I think I have not the

Info - cygwin articel in german linux magazine

2002-12-13 Thread Ralf Habacker
Hi all, today I've found an interesting article about cygwin, cygwin/xfree and relating topics in a german magazine. See http://www.linux-magazin.de/Artikel/ausgabe/2002/12/cygwin/cygwin.html for further informations. Regards Ralf -- Unsubscribe info:

RE: memory checker tools under cygwin

2002-12-13 Thread Ralf Habacker
hi folks, I am looking for a memory checker such as mpatrol running under cygwin Any one ever tried to run mpatrol under cygwin (or others)? No, but perhaps memwatch library could help you. See http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=27249 Ralf Habacker KDE on cygwin

RE: pipe improvements in snapshot

2002-12-11 Thread Ralf Habacker
Please check out the latest snapshot and report here if there are problems. I haven't yet tried this on Windows 9x class systems so it's entirely possible that there is a problem there. I've used this snapshot for running kde (Kmail,konqueror and other) a while on windows 2000 and haven't got

RE: rebase-0.4 patch

2002-12-05 Thread Ralf Habacker
-Original Message- From: Jason Tishler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2002 9:42 PM To: Ralf Habacker Cc: Cygwin Subject: Re: rebase-0.4 patch Ralf, On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 07:45:52AM +0100, Ralf Habacker wrote: Are you willing to accept

RE: rebase-0.4 patch

2002-12-05 Thread Ralf Habacker
3. reformat via indent Which indent command line you will use. I can do it before, do simplifiy applying backward to the kde-cygwin archive. Just 'indent'. However for C++, astyle --gnu does a better job of meeting the GNU standards, FWICT. There are two possibilites. Which tool

RE: rebase-0.4 patch

2002-12-05 Thread Ralf Habacker
However for C++, astyle --gnu does a better job of meeting the GNU standards, FWICT. $ astyle --gnu Unknown command line option: gnu For help on options, type 'astyle -h' astyle --gnu does not work. It must be astyle --style=gnu. What about spaces and tabs. Tabs would make big files smaller

RE: rebase-0.4 patch

2002-12-05 Thread Ralf Habacker
On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 08:44:37PM +1100, Robert Collins wrote: On Thu, 2002-12-05 at 19:50, Ralf Habacker wrote: astyle --gnu does not work. It must be astyle --style=gnu. What about spaces and tabs. Tabs would make big files smaller as using tabs, but the problem

[patch] fixes segfault while mutexattr initialisation

2002-12-01 Thread Ralf Habacker
(); if (!pthread_mutexattr::isGoodObject (attr)) - 2002-11-30 Ralf Habacker [EMAIL PROTECTED] * thread.cc (__pthread_mutexattr_init ): fixed seg fault if parameter content is undefined. Hops that help Ralf

RE: problem with mutexattr initialisation

2002-12-01 Thread Ralf Habacker
-Original Message- From: Robert Collins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, December 01, 2002 10:19 PM To: Ralf Habacker Cc: cygwin Subject: Re: problem with mutexattr initialisation On Sat, 2002-11-30 at 12:28, Ralf Habacker wrote: Hi, while porting the threaded

RE: [Patch] skipping import libraries for performance reasons - direct auto-import of dll's

2002-11-30 Thread Ralf Habacker
The only thing I like to say is, that instead of using a symbolic link to the dll, the unix way may be possible. What I mean is to put the dll into the lib dir (like the .so libraries in unix, the bin dir contains only executables) and to implement a LD_LIBRARY_PATH environmen support

problem with mutexattr initialisation

2002-11-29 Thread Ralf Habacker
)) +return EINVAL; *attr = new pthread_mutexattr (); if (!pthread_mutexattr::isGoodObject (attr)) - 2002-11-30 Ralf Habacker [EMAIL PROTECTED] * thread.cc (__pthread_mutexattr_init ): fixed seg fault

RE: [Patch] skipping import libraries for performance reasons - direct auto-import of dll's

2002-11-27 Thread Ralf Habacker
All well and good, Ralf, but Chris' comment grew out of your policy recommendations about *removing* the existing import lib support that libtool currently provides. I know, you probably don't think you did that -- but you said your new change would simplify libtool. Chuck, thank you for

RE: [Patch] skipping import libraries for performance reasons - direct auto-import of dll's

2002-11-26 Thread Ralf Habacker
On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 11:50:13PM +0100, Ralf Habacker wrote: Chuck Wilson wrote: Minor nit about patch format: watch out for your tab/indentation. It doesn't match the surrounding text in many cases. Okay. How are the tab width ? It's the standard 8 characters per tab. You

RE: [Patch] skipping import libraries for performance reasons - direct auto-import of dll's

2002-11-26 Thread Ralf Habacker
This and perhaps other libraries may be an exception, but couldn't this splitted like linux does ? If I remember right, they uses a standard lib like glibc, which may be a shared lib and some kind of startupcode in an objectfile (static), which may be different for executable or dll's or

RE: Cygwin GNOME 1.4 binary packages

2002-11-25 Thread Ralf Habacker
I am definitely interested in a cygwin GNOME binary, like the KDE binary which is available on sourceforge using the standard cygwin setup.exe (but I have not yet managed to get running properly on Win98) Where are the problems with win98 ? Ralf

[Patch] skipping import libraries for performance reasons - direct auto-import of dll's

2002-11-25 Thread Ralf Habacker
with recent qt-2/3 and kde2 sources without any problems. A sample test case is appended too. Please give this patch a try and report problems to me o0r to this list. Thank you Ralf Habacker KDE on cygwin http://cygwin.kde.org ld-auto-import-dll.patch Description: Binary data ld

RE: [Patch] skipping import libraries for performance reasons - direct auto-import of dll's

2002-11-25 Thread Ralf Habacker
On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 01:46:50PM +0100, Ralf Habacker wrote: 3. ld works more like the linux version. There are only static archives and shared libraries which could be linked directly without the indirection of using import libraries. This simplifies for example libtool handling. I don't

RE: [Patch] skipping import libraries for performance reasons - direct auto-import of dll's

2002-11-25 Thread Ralf Habacker
On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 11:50:13PM +0100, Ralf Habacker wrote: Chuck Wilson wrote: Minor nit about patch format: watch out for your tab/indentation. It doesn't match the surrounding text in many cases. Okay. How are the tab width ? It's the standard 8 characters per tab. You also aren't

RE: 3rd time lucky? Apache startup woes

2002-11-24 Thread Ralf Habacker
what does ssp do?! Haven't seen about that beast before. Could someone enlight me please?! from man ssp SSP - The Single Step Profiler Original Author: DJ Delorie The SSP is a program that uses the Win32 debug API to run a program one ASM instruction at a

FW: qt with other compiler on windows

2002-11-20 Thread Ralf Habacker
Hi all, this thread I have found on [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I've experimented with using cygwin as my development environment... My initial goal was to compile using gcc, as we are using gcc in the MacOSX world. I ended up grabbing the qmake and moc from the KDE distribution to accomplish

<    1   2   3   4   >