Re: FAO: cfg: defaults

2003-01-05 Thread John Morrison
On Sat, 4 Jan 2003, Randall R Schulz wrote: John, At 08:50 2003-01-04, John Morrison wrote: ... Please find for you perusal and review... (long links, will wrap!) Why don't you enclose all URLs in email within angle brackets instead of forcing people to reintegrate the wrapped links?

Re: FAO: cfg: defaults

2003-01-05 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Sat, Jan 04, 2003 at 07:32:50PM -0800, Randall R Schulz wrote: I hope this isn't too far off-topic or excessive in its protractedness. If you'd like, I'll tease the cat a little and get some scratches on my arms. Mrrow! I do appreciate the education. Thanks. cgf -- Unsubscribe info:

Re: FAO: cfg: defaults

2003-01-04 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Sat, Jan 04, 2003 at 03:36:12PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: You don't need my permission. Just post to cygwin-apps and see what others think. Or, since you're the package maintainer and, I'm sure that you've tested this, feel free to just refresh your packages. Actually, I do have one

FAO: cfg: defaults

2003-01-04 Thread John Morrison
From: Christopher Faylor On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 12:56:03PM -, Morrison, John wrote: You'd probably want something like: snip/ setup.hint: sdesc: Conditionally move default files to proper location category: _PostInstallLast requires: ash findutils fileutils sed sh-utils autodep:

Re: FAO: cfg: defaults

2003-01-04 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Sat, Jan 04, 2003 at 04:50:41PM -, John Morrison wrote: From: Christopher Faylor On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 12:56:03PM -, Morrison, John wrote: You'd probably want something like: snip/ setup.hint: sdesc: Conditionally move default files to proper location category: _PostInstallLast

Re: FAO: cfg: defaults

2003-01-04 Thread Christopher Faylor
[Redirecting to cygwin-apps] On Sat, Jan 04, 2003 at 03:17:40PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: On Sat, Jan 04, 2003 at 04:50:41PM -, John Morrison wrote: From: Christopher Faylor On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 12:56:03PM -, Morrison, John wrote: You'd probably want something like: snip/

Re: FAO: cfg: defaults

2003-01-04 Thread Randall R Schulz
John, At 08:50 2003-01-04, John Morrison wrote: ... Please find for you perusal and review... (long links, will wrap!) Why don't you enclose all URLs in email within angle brackets instead of forcing people to reintegrate the wrapped links? Even a short URL can fall on a line wrap boundary

Re: FAO: cfg: defaults

2003-01-04 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Sat, Jan 04, 2003 at 04:24:53PM -0800, Randall R Schulz wrote: At 08:50 2003-01-04, John Morrison wrote: Please find for you perusal and review... (long links, will wrap!) Why don't you enclose all URLs in email within angle brackets instead of forcing people to reintegrate the wrapped links?

Re: FAO: cfg: defaults

2003-01-04 Thread Robert Collins
On Sun, 2003-01-05 at 12:33, Christopher Faylor wrote: On Sat, Jan 04, 2003 at 04:24:53PM -0800, Randall R Schulz wrote: At 08:50 2003-01-04, John Morrison wrote: Please find for you perusal and review... (long links, will wrap!) Why don't you enclose all URLs in email within angle brackets

Re: FAO: cfg: defaults

2003-01-04 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Sat, Jan 04, 2003 at 05:58:10PM -0800, Randall R Schulz wrote: Chris, I think it's in one of the email RFCs. I remember tracking it down once during an (ill-considered) debate on one of the Bay Area Usenet groups. I should have made note of where I found it, but I didn't. I can find a

Re: FAO: cfg: defaults

2003-01-04 Thread Randall R Schulz
Chris, I hope this isn't too far off-topic or excessive in its protractedness. If you'd like, I'll tease the cat a little and get some scratches on my arms. Anyway, I found this in RFC 1738, Uniform Resource Locators (URL) (http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1738.txt, lines 1183 through 1225):