home, which is different from my setup, but I think that's fine.
This suggests something in the environment. Possibly your colleague have
%HOME% defined. Cygwin will pick it up.
> What seems odd is that he didn't get the default dot files created, being
> .profile, .bash_profi
ink that's fine.
What seems odd is that he didn't get the default dot files created, being
.profile, .bash_profile, and .bashrc. I don't even remember whether this
happened the first time I set it up. In any case, I handed him my dot
files to template from, but I was curious about
On Nov 22 15:20, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Nov 17 18:46, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > On Nov 17 17:32, koerner.sebastian wrote:
> > > Hello Corinna,
> > >
> > > Oh, btw. In your OP you claimed that you have netapps for which Cygwin
> > > returns "cifs" and other netapps for which Cygwin retu
On Nov 17 18:46, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Nov 17 17:32, koerner.sebastian wrote:
> > Hello Corinna,
> >
> > Oh, btw. In your OP you claimed that you have netapps for which Cygwin
> > returns "cifs" and other netapps for which Cygwin returns "vfat" as
> > filesystem. The above one is clea
On Nov 18 08:56, Gary wrote:
> Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > Oh, btw. In your OP you claimed that you have netapps for which Cygwin
> > returns "cifs" and other netapps for which Cygwin returns "vfat" as
> > filesystem. The above one is clearly one of the "cifs" type.
> >
> > Here's the question: D
On Nov 17 17:32, koerner.sebastian wrote:
> Hello Corinna,
>
> Oh, btw. In your OP you claimed that you have netapps for which Cygwin
> returns "cifs" and other netapps for which Cygwin returns "vfat" as
> filesystem. The above one is clearly one of the "cifs" type.
>
> Here's the questio
Hello Corinna,
Oh, btw. In your OP you claimed that you have netapps for which Cygwin
returns "cifs" and other netapps for which Cygwin returns "vfat" as
filesystem. The above one is clearly one of the "cifs" type.
Here's the question: Do you *really* have some for which the latest
Cygwi
On Nov 17 16:01, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Nov 17 15:16, koerner.sebast...@t-online.de wrote:
> > Hi Corinna,
> >
> > > Try the latest developer snapshot from http://cygwin.com/snapshots/
> > I used the one from Nov 2th. No change. Dotfiles are created and the
> > mount does not say "netapp"
On Nov 17 15:16, koerner.sebast...@t-online.de wrote:
> Hi Corinna,
>
> > Try the latest developer snapshot from http://cygwin.com/snapshots/
> I used the one from Nov 2th. No change. Dotfiles are created and the
> mount does not say "netapp"
>
> Anyway, if the latest snapshot does not solve
TE_ONCE : FALSE
FILE_SUPPORTS_TRANSACTIONS : FALSE
bash-3.2$ pwd
/cygdrive/s
bash-3.2$
Maybe there is an unhappy coincidence with the netapps and this is a race
condition between find -exec and rmdir that did not occur before 1.7?
Because from your earlier postings i expect rmdir to leave
On Nov 17 10:20, koerner.sebast...@t-online.de wrote:
> Hello everyone,
> I am referring to
> http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/2010-07/msg00164.html
> where Slide reports about weird files appearing on netapp and Corinna
> Vinschen says that this is fixed in CVS - and this recycle bin method shoul
Hello everyone,
I am referring to
http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/2010-07/msg00164.html
where Slide reports about weird files appearing on netapp and Corinna Vinschen
says that this is fixed in CVS - and this recycle bin method should not be used
for netapp devices.
We currently have the same i
Another way is to open a cygwin prompt and type
touch .filename
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Morgan Gangwere on 10/10/2007 6:50 AM:
> Obviously, Windows Explorer is stupid, and has a mundane limitation. The
> workaround is to use cygwin to create . files.
>
>> there is another option, use another file manager such as
>> totalCom
ancky Leyn\My Documents\.foo
> > with the Windows explorer file manager this doesn't work.
> > Explorere says: "You must type a file name".
> >
> > What is wrong here? Must I rename the .dot files/dirs, so that they
> > have a basename?
>
> Obvious
pe a file name".
>
> What is wrong here? Must I rename the .dot files/dirs, so that they
> have a basename?
Obviously, Windows Explorer is stupid, and has a mundane limitation. The
workaround is to use cygwin to create . files.
- --
Don't work too hard, make some time for fun
16 matches
Mail list logo
