default keep, allow downgrade...

2003-03-09 Thread linda w \(cyg\)
* Don't downgrade if the curr version is = installed? I vote yes. --- Can it just default to 'keep', and if the user overrides it, then they get what they choose? I mean if a user installs a beta and something breaks for them, they might want to go back. -linda

Re: Pending setup patches (issue 4)

2003-03-09 Thread Max Bowsher
Elfyn McBratney wrote: * Preliminary colour-coding patch (from me) http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-01/msg00361.html Code design feedback received from Robert. GUI feedback appreciated from *anyone*. I *really* liked this addition. Having to go through that entire list of

Re: default keep, allow downgrade...

2003-03-09 Thread Max Bowsher
linda w (cyg) wrote: * Don't downgrade if the curr version is = installed? I vote yes. --- Can it just default to 'keep', and if the user overrides it, then they get what they choose? I mean if a user installs a beta and something breaks for them, they might want to go back. Yes, all we

Re: when is next release of setup.exe

2003-03-09 Thread Max Bowsher
linda w (cyg) wrote: I tried it with eliminating the argument...seems to run... Now I'm worried...why'd it work?cause I happen to have all the right libraries in place and a generic new-user wouldn't have them? No, because that option, in this specific case, is a no-op.

Re: when is next release of setup.exe

2003-03-09 Thread Robert Collins
On Sun, 2003-03-09 at 22:12, Max Bowsher wrote: linda w (cyg) wrote: I tried it with eliminating the argument...seems to run... Now I'm worried...why'd it work?cause I happen to have all the right libraries in place and a generic new-user wouldn't have them? No, because that

postgres

2003-03-09 Thread Xaver
Hi, I'm tryind to run postgres, but when I start the initdb -d -D /var/postgres/base I receive the following error message: Running with debug mode on. initdb variables: PGDATA=eror datadir=/usr/share/postgresql PGPATH=/usr/bin ENCODING= ENCODINGID=0

Python Tkinter module problem: pydog -g doesn't work

2003-03-09 Thread Volker Zell
Hi I tried pydoc and got the following errors. According to the docu the tkinter module should work. Is anybody using this ? 11:02 PM [515] pydoc -g Traceback (most recent call last): File /bin/pydoc, line 4, in ? pydoc.cli() File /usr/lib/python2.2/pydoc.py, line 2049, in cli gui()

Problem compiling Numeric-23.0 with latest python-2.2.2-6

2003-03-09 Thread Volker Zell
Hi I just tried compiling Numeric-23.0 with latest python-2.2.2-6 and got the following error: /bin/python setup.py build running build running build_py creating build creating build/lib.cygwin-1.3.20-i686-2.2 copying Lib/ArrayPrinter.py - build/lib.cygwin-1.3.20-i686-2.2 copying

Re: postgres

2003-03-09 Thread Max Bowsher
Xaver wrote: I'm tryind to run postgres, but when I start the initdb -d -D /var/postgres/base I receive the following error message: IpcSemaphoreCreate: semget(key=1, num=17, 03600) failed: Function not implemented Wrong mailing list. Read the included documentation:

setup zlib

2003-03-09 Thread Max Bowsher
I just realized we are still using zlib 1.1.3 in setup. Requesting approval to upgrade to zlib 1.1.4.

Re: when is next release of setup.exe

2003-03-09 Thread Pavel Tsekov
On Sat, 8 Mar 2003, Max Bowsher wrote: Neither will work. 2.249.2.5 won't compile with gcc3, or with gcc2 from a gcc2 package. It only works with the ancient gcc2 packaged as gcc. Yes. Right. Obviously if linda have followed the recent threads she could avoid build problems. There is

RE: [PATCH] Sometimes, You Just Need A Bigger Chooser

2003-03-09 Thread Gary R. Van Sickle
Gary R. Van Sickle wrote: I've just been testing this, and I've found setup hangs when 'Finish' is clicked. It then unhangs and continues when the window focus is moved to another application. Gary, do you see this too? Well... I hadn't until I just rebuilt. Son of a

Re: when is next release of setup.exe

2003-03-09 Thread Max Bowsher
Pavel Tsekov wrote: Yes. Right. Obviously if linda have followed the recent threads she could avoid build problems. There is no need to rehash the long discussion each time someone decides to compile setup. Max Bowsher wrote: Rehash? Recent? Maybe I'm just forgetful, but I don't remember a

Re: Cygwin setup crashes

2003-03-09 Thread Max Bowsher
Max Bowsher wrote: Manu wrote: I've patched and rebuilt. I have now: Can't open (null) for reading: No such file This occurs in install.cc, line 173: --- /* install one source at a given prefix. */ static int install_one_source (packagemeta pkgm, packagesource source, String

Re: Pending packages status

2003-03-09 Thread Volker Quetschke
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi! | 1. grace | | date : 25 Nov 2002 | version: 5.1.10-1 | status : not reviewed | notes : http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2002-11/msg00322.html | votes : 2 (Lapo and Robert) | url: http://www.scytek.de/cygwin/grace-5.1.10-1.tar.bz2 |

Pending setup patches (issue 6)

2003-03-09 Thread Max Bowsher
Patches held to allow feedback: ~~~ * Remove autotool-generated files from CVS Will happen on Thurs 13th March if no objections received by then. Patches queued for review: ~~ * Add foreign to AUTOMAKE_OPTIONS (both setup and libgetopt++) *

[setup TODO] Proposed prioritization of TODO items

2003-03-09 Thread Max Bowsher
Here is a proposal for relative priorities of setup TODO items. Opinions welcome. Max. TODO (ideally for next release): * Don't downgrade if the curr version is = installed? * Mark versions as prev/curr/test in the GUI when clicking through them. * Remove *empty* directories on uninstalls.

Re: LPRng was Re: Pending packages status

2003-03-09 Thread Pavel Tsekov
On Sat, 8 Mar 2003, Max Bowsher wrote: Max: IMO, a simple bootstrap.sh containing the appropriate autotool commands would be better. Earnie: A source release for a binary package isn't supposed to require autotools. IIRC, this is GNU standards mandated; if not it certainly is

Re: Pending setup patches (issue 4)

2003-03-09 Thread Igor Pechtchanski
On Sun, 9 Mar 2003, Max Bowsher wrote: Elfyn McBratney wrote: * Preliminary colour-coding patch (from me) http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-01/msg00361.html Code design feedback received from Robert. GUI feedback appreciated from *anyone*. I *really* liked this addition.

Re: Pending setup patches (issue 6)

2003-03-09 Thread Igor Pechtchanski
Max, Only relevant parts quoted. Replies inline below... On Sun, 9 Mar 2003, Max Bowsher wrote: Patches queued for review: ~~ * Igor's postinstall logging Thread start: http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2002-10/msg00129.html Take2 Patch:

Re: Pending setup patches (issue 4)

2003-03-09 Thread Max Bowsher
Igor Pechtchanski wrote: On Sun, 9 Mar 2003, Max Bowsher wrote: Elfyn McBratney wrote: * Preliminary colour-coding patch (from me) http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-01/msg00361.html Code design feedback received from Robert. GUI feedback appreciated from *anyone*. I *really*

Wrong list (Was Re: Pending setup patches)

2003-03-09 Thread Igor Pechtchanski
On Sun, 9 Mar 2003, Max Bowsher wrote: Cygwin (Robert Collins) wrote: === - Original Message - From: Igor Pechtchanski [EMAIL PROTECTED] I still suspect we need a = rather than == - but we'll see :}. Rob Only if files is traversed in order of decreasing minlevel.

Re: grace Review (Re: Pending packages status)

2003-03-09 Thread Max Bowsher
Volker Quetschke wrote: Hi Max, I updated to grace 5.1.12, the new urls are: ~ http://www.scytek.de/cygwin/grace-5.1.12-1.tar.bz2 ~ http://www.scytek.de/cygwin/grace-5.1.12-1-src.tar.bz2 ~ http://www.scytek.de/cygwin/setup.hint I've never used grace, but it's a pity for a package to

Re: postgres

2003-03-09 Thread Michael Pierce
since postgresql is an *application*, what is the purpose of cygwin-apps?? is it for applications or for development of applications?? If for development, then the list name should change it's name to be more specific. BTW what list *is* suited for application issues?? since there are *no

Re: postgres

2003-03-09 Thread Max Bowsher
Michael Pierce wrote: since postgresql is an *application*, what is the purpose of cygwin-apps?? is it for applications or for development of applications?? If for development, then the list name should change it's name to be more specific. BTW what list *is* suited for application issues??

RE: when is next release of setup.exe

2003-03-09 Thread linda w \(cyg\)
Thus skipping it would be a bad habit to get into. Rob --- On the other hand, using it and having it hang isn't exceptionally useful. Maybe that behavior will get sorted out down the line as well ((hope), since don't know why it hangs...unresponsive to ctl-c). Linda

Re: when is next release of setup.exe

2003-03-09 Thread Max Bowsher
linda w (cyg) wrote: Thus skipping it would be a bad habit to get into. Rob --- On the other hand, using it and having it hang isn't exceptionally useful. Maybe that behavior will get sorted out down the line as well ((hope), since don't know why it hangs...unresponsive to ctl-c). Huh???

Re: grace Review (Re: Pending packages status)

2003-03-09 Thread Volker Quetschke
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi! |I updated to grace 5.1.12, the new urls are: |~ http://www.scytek.de/cygwin/grace-5.1.12-1.tar.bz2 |~ http://www.scytek.de/cygwin/grace-5.1.12-1-src.tar.bz2 |~ http://www.scytek.de/cygwin/setup.hint The urls above now points to the new

RE: /etc/setup/setup.cfg ?

2003-03-09 Thread linda w \(cyg\)
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Max Bowsher Sent: Sun, Mar 09, 2003 8:43a To: John Morrison; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: /etc/setup/setup.cfg ? John Morrison wrote: BTW, apart from colours, what would you store? Whether the

Re: /etc/setup/setup.cfg ?

2003-03-09 Thread Max Bowsher
linda w (cyg) wrote: -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Max Bowsher Sent: Sun, Mar 09, 2003 8:43a To: John Morrison; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: /etc/setup/setup.cfg ? John Morrison wrote: BTW, apart from colours, what would you

--disabled-shared = hang?

2003-03-09 Thread linda w \(cyg\)
Dangitthought I sent this out again -Orginal Message- From: Robert McNulty Junior [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sat, Mar 08, 2003 9:28p To: linda w (cyg); [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: when is next release of setup.exe Linda, reconfigure your program and include

Re: when is next release of setup.exe

2003-03-09 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Sun, Mar 09, 2003 at 05:42:09PM -, Max Bowsher wrote: linda w (cyg) wrote: Thus skipping it would be a bad habit to get into. On the other hand, using it and having it hang isn't exceptionally useful. Maybe that behavior will get sorted out down the line as well ((hope), since don't

Re: --disabled-shared = hang?

2003-03-09 Thread Max Bowsher
linda w (cyg) wrote: Dangitthought I sent this out again -Orginal Message- From: Robert McNulty Junior [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sat, Mar 08, 2003 9:28p To: linda w (cyg); [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: when is next release of setup.exe Linda, reconfigure your

Re: Pending setup patches (issue 4)

2003-03-09 Thread Elfyn McBratney
Elfyn McBratney wrote: * Preliminary colour-coding patch (from me) http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-01/msg00361.html Code design feedback received from Robert. GUI feedback appreciated from *anyone*. I *really* liked this addition. Having to go through that entire list

Re: Pending setup patches (issue 4)

2003-03-09 Thread Elfyn McBratney
Elfyn McBratney wrote: * Preliminary colour-coding patch (from me) http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-01/msg00361.html Code design feedback received from Robert. GUI feedback appreciated from *anyone*. I *really* liked this addition. Having to go through that

Re: Cygwin setup crashes

2003-03-09 Thread Max Bowsher
Manu wrote: Max Bowsher wrote: Would you be able to try setup-2.322 (current HEAD)? We think we've fixed this. It's available at http://www.cygwin.com/setup-snapshots/ if it isn't convenient to build it yourself. I tried Download from Internet, Install from local directory, then misc

Re: /etc/setup/setup.cfg ?

2003-03-09 Thread Michael A Chase
On Sun, 9 Mar 2003 16:38:57 - Max Bowsher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Igor Pechtchanski wrote: There have been bits of persistent state that people wanted to store for setup. I'm proposing an Xdefaults-style setup.cfg in /etc/setup. If we compile a list of things to go in there, I could

Re: /etc/setup/setup.cfg ?

2003-03-09 Thread Robert Collins
On Mon, 2003-03-10 at 07:08, Michael A Chase wrote: On Sun, 9 Mar 2003 16:38:57 - Max Bowsher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Igor Pechtchanski wrote: There have been bits of persistent state that people wanted to store for setup. I'm proposing an Xdefaults-style setup.cfg in /etc/setup.

Re: /etc/setup/setup.cfg ?

2003-03-09 Thread Robert Collins
On Mon, 2003-03-10 at 07:58, Christopher Faylor wrote: On Mon, Mar 10, 2003 at 07:49:27AM +1100, Robert Collins wrote: Also, I'd prefer /etc/setup.rc rather that /etc/setup/setup.cfg. Wouldn't /etc/setuprc be somewhat more consistent with existing unix practices? Sure. I'm happy with that

Re: Pending setup patches (issue 4)

2003-03-09 Thread Robert Collins
On Mon, 2003-03-10 at 05:59, Elfyn McBratney wrote: Do you think that a fixed set of colours is OK, or do I need to make them customizable? Erm.. I think fixed is fine for now and perhaps fixed could be a TODO? No. Colour is one of those areas where bad choices make it all-but-impossible

Re: Pending setup patches (issue 4)

2003-03-09 Thread Robert Collins
On Mon, 2003-03-10 at 02:57, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: On Sun, 9 Mar 2003, Max Bowsher wrote: I like this feature too. However, the colors definitely have to be configurable. I could fix it, but then how do I submit the changes? A patch to a patch? :-| Or do I regenerate your patch from

Re: --disabled-shared = hang?

2003-03-09 Thread Robert Collins
On Mon, 2003-03-10 at 05:23, Max Bowsher wrote: linda w (cyg) wrote: Dangitthought I sent this out again checking whether stripping libraries is possible... yes checking dynamic linker characteristics... Win32 ld.exe Without the arg it went though, did make

Fixed patch for install.cc

2003-03-09 Thread Pavel Tsekov
On Sun, 9 Mar 2003, Cygwin (Robert Collins) wrote: * Pavel's Do not uninstall if upgrade package fails md5 patch http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-02/msg00178.html Pavel, This patch was missing IDS_CRC_ERROR definitions, even though it used it. Tsk! I've applied it

Re: Pending setup patches (issue 6)

2003-03-09 Thread Igor Pechtchanski
On Sun, 9 Mar 2003, Max Bowsher wrote: Igor Pechtchanski wrote: On Sun, 9 Mar 2003, Max Bowsher wrote: But what about: +// TODO: free unused map entries Not a show-stopper. Setup keeps all kinds of memory chunks around. They'll be freed when it exits anyway, it's just cleaner to

Re: Pending setup patches (issue 6)

2003-03-09 Thread Igor Pechtchanski
On Sun, 9 Mar 2003, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: On Sun, 9 Mar 2003, Max Bowsher wrote: Igor Pechtchanski wrote: On Sun, 9 Mar 2003, Max Bowsher wrote: But what about: +// TODO: free unused map entries Not a show-stopper. Setup keeps all kinds of memory chunks around.

Re: /etc/setup/setup.cfg ?

2003-03-09 Thread Igor Pechtchanski
On Sun, 9 Mar 2003, Max Bowsher wrote: Igor Pechtchanski wrote: There have been bits of persistent state that people wanted to store for setup. I'm proposing an Xdefaults-style setup.cfg in /etc/setup. If we compile a list of things to go in there, I could write a parser for it (I don't

ITP: libgeotiff-1.2.0-1

2003-03-09 Thread Charles Wilson
[Hello? What's with the new subscriber-only rule?] GeoTIFF represents an effort by over 160 different remote sensing, GIS, cartographic, and surveying related companies and organizations to establish a TIFF based interchange format for georeferenced raster imagery. All code within libgeotiff

Re: Pending setup patches (issue 6)

2003-03-09 Thread Max Bowsher
Igor Pechtchanski wrote: Also, dependences/dependencies: Both are valid words, but the 2nd seems (to me) more commonly used? Must be my compiler background... I'll change it if it bothers people. That would be consistent with elsewhere in setup: choose.cc:Dependency *dp =

RE: --disabled-shared = hang?

2003-03-09 Thread linda w \(cyg\)
It hung from this process: had bad --disabled-shared, so dropped it from config and ran config built binary -- that worked...binary came up and seemed all fine. Then someone pointed out my misspelling, so I tried running config again from the .obj dir (libopt++ bootstrap part had already been

RE: /etc/setup/setup.cfg ?

2003-03-09 Thread Gary R. Van Sickle
On Mon, 2003-03-10 at 07:58, Christopher Faylor wrote: On Mon, Mar 10, 2003 at 07:49:27AM +1100, Robert Collins wrote: Also, I'd prefer /etc/setup.rc rather that /etc/setup/setup.cfg. Wouldn't /etc/setuprc be somewhat more consistent with existing unix practices? Sure. I'm happy

RE: /etc/setup/setup.cfg ?

2003-03-09 Thread Igor Pechtchanski
On Sun, 9 Mar 2003, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote: On Mon, [EMAIL PROTECTED]:58, Christopher Faylor wrote: On Mon, Mar 10, [EMAIL PROTECTED]:49:27AM +1100, Robert Collins wrote: Also, I'd prefer /etc/setup.rc rather that /etc/setup/setup.cfg. Wouldn't /etc/setuprc be somewhat more

Re: /etc/setup/setup.cfg ?

2003-03-09 Thread Elfyn McBratney
On Sun, 9 Mar 2003, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote: On Mon, [EMAIL PROTECTED]:58, Christopher Faylor wrote: On Mon, Mar 10, [EMAIL PROTECTED]:49:27AM +1100, Robert Collins wrote: Also, I'd prefer /etc/setup.rc rather that /etc/setup/setup.cfg. Wouldn't /etc/setuprc be somewhat more

Re: /etc/setup/setup.cfg ?

2003-03-09 Thread Igor Pechtchanski
On Mon, 10 Mar 2003, Elfyn McBratney wrote: On Sun, 9 Mar 2003, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote: On Mon, 2003-03-10 at 07:58, Christopher Faylor wrote: On Mon, Mar 10, 2003 at 07:49:27AM +1100, Robert Collins wrote: Also, I'd prefer /etc/setup.rc rather that /etc/setup/setup.cfg.

Re: --disabled-shared = hang?

2003-03-09 Thread Robert Collins
On Mon, 2003-03-10 at 11:05, Christopher Faylor wrote: On Mon, Mar 10, 2003 at 08:53:06AM +1100, Robert Collins wrote: Does it hang in the setup configure, the libgetopt++ configure, or some other configure? (There's not enough context given so far to tell). It's not hanging for me at all.

RE: --disabled-shared = hang?

2003-03-09 Thread Robert Collins
On Mon, 2003-03-10 at 12:42, linda w (cyg) wrote: Problem magically went away. Perhaps, technically, something should have cleaned up something somewhere, but I wouldn't worry about it. Just an oddity Ah well. *shrug*. Rob signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed

Re: /etc/setup/setup.cfg ?

2003-03-09 Thread Robert Collins
On Mon, 2003-03-10 at 13:11, Elfyn McBratney wrote: How about [/etc/]setup.conf ? it follows the (other) unix convention of configuration file naming. Thank you. That works for everyone I think. Rob -- GPG key available at: http://users.bigpond.net.au/robertc/keys.txt. signature.asc

Re: Setup cvs HEAD build problems

2003-03-09 Thread Robert Collins
Igor, have we address points 1 2 below? I don't recall... Rob On Fri, 2002-10-18 at 14:08, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: Hi, Just checked setup out from cvs (:pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvs/cygwin-apps) and tried to build. I created a new directory, from there ran $(SETUP_SOURCE)/configure with

Re: [PATCH] Postinstall script ordering in setup - take 2

2003-03-09 Thread Robert Collins
On Wed, 2003-03-05 at 11:41, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: On 5 Mar 2003, Robert Collins wrote: On Wed, [EMAIL PROTECTED]:19, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: On 5 Mar 2003, Robert Collins wrote: Using the packages as dependencies we can build the same topological tree based on the packages

Re: Pending setup patches (issue 2)

2003-03-09 Thread Robert Collins
On Wed, 2003-03-05 at 11:52, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: On 5 Mar 2003, Robert Collins wrote: Other than that, please expand to address all scripts. Rob Rob, There is a design issue here that I'd like to address before I work more on this. I recall your comment that this should be tied

Re: /etc/setup/setup.cfg ?

2003-03-09 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Mon, Mar 10, 2003 at 02:23:06PM +1100, Robert Collins wrote: On Mon, 2003-03-10 at 13:11, Elfyn McBratney wrote: How about [/etc/]setup.conf ? it follows the (other) unix convention of configuration file naming. Thank you. That works for everyone I think. Yup. cgf

Re: Pending setup patches (issue 6)

2003-03-09 Thread Robert Collins
On Mon, 2003-03-10 at 02:16, Max Bowsher wrote: Patches held to allow feedback: ~~~ * Remove autotool-generated files from CVS Will happen on Thurs 13th March if no objections received by then. I'll do this one (assuming no objections)... gives me some

Re: Setup cvs HEAD build problems

2003-03-09 Thread Igor Pechtchanski
Rob, There was a follow-up message: http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2002-10/msg00152.html That eliminates #1. I don't know how to fix #2 -- could have something to do with cvs checkout timestamps. I don't believe it was addressed, though. Igor On 10 Mar 2003, Robert Collins wrote:

Re: Pending setup patches (Re: [PATCH] Re: Removing concat.cc/h)

2003-03-09 Thread Max Bowsher
Cygwin (Robert Collins) wrote: === - Original Message - From: Igor Pechtchanski [EMAIL PROTECTED] I still suspect we need a = rather than == - but we'll see :}. Rob Only if files is traversed in order of decreasing minlevel. Otherwise we'd have to traverse the whole set before

Re: Where did X11R6

2003-03-09 Thread Andrew Markebo
/ chuck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | I did the [- Install Cygwin now. Ran setup and Ta-Da working | like a charm ..except | /usr/X11R6 - not there. To include xhost - very imprortant to me :-( | | What'da I miss? You did a standard install, did not select X11co. Probably? /Andy --

Remote Session mouse problems

2003-03-09 Thread Nikolai Lusan
Hi, I am trying to use cygwin/xfree86 to run XDMCP sessions from my linux box. I am using the command XWin -fullscreen -emulate3buttons -from 192.168.1.11 -query 192.168.1.1 -fp tcp/192.168.1.1:7100 -nowinkill -unixkill The problem I have is that my mouse buttons do not work within xfree. I

X -query hostname does not work

2003-03-09 Thread Gernot Zander
Hi, I have a host where kdm is running (and allowing sessions from my local network, where other PCs running linux get their X-Sessions from this server). I tried cygwin's X (and start applications from the server with for instance xv -display winbox:0, this works fine. Then I try X -query

Re: X -query hostname does not work

2003-03-09 Thread Nikolai Lusan
On Sun, 9 Mar 2003, Gernot Zander wrote: I have a host where kdm is running (and allowing sessions from my local network, where other PCs running linux get their X-Sessions from this server). I tried cygwin's X (and start applications from the server with for instance xv -display winbox:0,

winsup/cygwin ChangeLog fhandler.h fhandler_pr ...

2003-03-09 Thread cgf
CVSROOT:/cvs/uberbaum Module name:winsup Branch: cgf-dev-branch Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-09 16:22:59 Modified files: cygwin : ChangeLog fhandler.h fhandler_proc.cc fhandler_process.cc path.cc path.h pinfo.cc

winsup/cygwin ChangeLog Makefile.in include/cy ...

2003-03-09 Thread cgf
CVSROOT:/cvs/uberbaum Module name:winsup Branch: cgf-dev-branch Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-09 16:45:20 Modified files: cygwin : ChangeLog Makefile.in cygwin/include/cygwin: socket.h Log message: merge from trunk Patches:

winsup/testsuite ChangeLog Makefile.in README ...

2003-03-09 Thread cgf
CVSROOT:/cvs/uberbaum Module name:winsup Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-09 17:03:05 Modified files: testsuite : ChangeLog Makefile.in README testsuite/config: default.exp testsuite/winsup.api: winsup.exp Log message: *

src/winsup/cygwin ChangeLog rmsym

2003-03-09 Thread corinna
CVSROOT:/cvs/src Module name:src Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-09 17:13:46 Modified files: winsup/cygwin : ChangeLog rmsym Log message: * rmsym: Fix regular expression. Patches:

src/winsup/testsuite ChangeLog winsup.api/ltp/ ...

2003-03-09 Thread corinna
CVSROOT:/cvs/src Module name:src Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-09 17:53:06 Modified files: winsup/testsuite: ChangeLog winsup/testsuite/winsup.api/ltp: fork10.c Log message: * winsup.api/ltp/fork10.c (main): Remove non-portable declaration

src/winsup/cygwin ChangeLog syscalls.cc

2003-03-09 Thread cgf
CVSROOT:/cvs/src Module name:src Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-09 18:10:42 Modified files: winsup/cygwin : ChangeLog syscalls.cc Log message: * syscalls.cc (unlink): Attempt to be more clever about setting attributes of file. Only open

winsup/cygwin ChangeLog ChangeLog.branch cygwi ...

2003-03-09 Thread cgf
CVSROOT:/cvs/uberbaum Module name:winsup Branch: cgf-dev-branch Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-09 18:15:58 Modified files: cygwin : ChangeLog ChangeLog.branch cygwin-gperf devices.h path.cc rmsym syscalls.cc Log

src/winsup/utils ChangeLog getfacl.c

2003-03-09 Thread corinna
CVSROOT:/cvs/src Module name:src Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-09 19:04:24 Modified files: winsup/utils : ChangeLog getfacl.c Log message: * getfacl.c (username): Fix ambiguous printf calls. (groupname): Ditto. (main): Ditto.

winsup/utils Makefile.in

2003-03-09 Thread cgf
CVSROOT:/cvs/uberbaum Module name:winsup Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-09 19:29:22 Modified files: utils : Makefile.in Log message: . Patches:

winsup/testsuite ChangeLog Makefile.in

2003-03-09 Thread cgf
CVSROOT:/cvs/uberbaum Module name:winsup Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-09 19:46:29 Modified files: testsuite : ChangeLog Makefile.in Log message: * winsup.api/winsup.exp: Use -nostdinc when compiling. * Makefile.in: Specifically search

src/winsup/cygwin ChangeLog autoload.cc fcntl. ...

2003-03-09 Thread cgf
CVSROOT:/cvs/src Module name:src Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-09 20:10:25 Modified files: winsup/cygwin : ChangeLog autoload.cc fcntl.cc fhandler_proc.cc mmap.cc ntea.cc poll.cc sec_acl.cc select.cc

src/winsup/cygwin fhandler_disk_file.cc fhandl ...

2003-03-09 Thread cgf
CVSROOT:/cvs/src Module name:src Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-09 20:31:08 Modified files: winsup/cygwin : fhandler_disk_file.cc fhandler_serial.cc fhandler_socket.cc fhandler_virtual.cc mmap.cc net.cc

src/winsup/cygwin ChangeLog include/cygwin/ver ...

2003-03-09 Thread cgf
CVSROOT:/cvs/src Module name:src Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-09 20:50:11 Modified files: winsup/cygwin : ChangeLog winsup/cygwin/include/cygwin: version.h Log message: * include/cygwin/version.h: Bump DLL minor number to 21. Patches:

winsup/cygwin ChangeLog autoload.cc fcntl.cc f ...

2003-03-09 Thread cgf
CVSROOT:/cvs/uberbaum Module name:winsup Branch: cgf-dev-branch Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-09 20:53:46 Modified files: cygwin : ChangeLog autoload.cc fcntl.cc fhandler_disk_file.cc fhandler_proc.cc

src/winsup/cygwin ChangeLog

2003-03-09 Thread cgf
CVSROOT:/cvs/src Module name:src Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-09 20:54:12 Modified files: winsup/cygwin : ChangeLog Log message: fix typo Patches:

winsup/cygwin ChangeLog

2003-03-09 Thread cgf
CVSROOT:/cvs/uberbaum Module name:winsup Branch: cgf-dev-branch Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-09 20:54:33 Modified files: cygwin : ChangeLog Log message: merge from trunk Patches:

src/winsup/cygwin ChangeLog Makefile.in cygser ...

2003-03-09 Thread corinna
CVSROOT:/cvs/src Module name:src Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-09 21:51:00 Modified files: winsup/cygwin : ChangeLog Makefile.in cygserver_shm.h cygwin.din glob.c shm.cc syscalls.cc winsup.h winsup/cygwin/include/cygwin:

src/winsup/cygwin ChangeLog winver.rc

2003-03-09 Thread corinna
CVSROOT:/cvs/src Module name:src Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-09 22:13:06 Modified files: winsup/cygwin : ChangeLog winver.rc Log message: * winver.rc: Change Copyright hint to inlcude 2003. Patches:

src/winsup/cygwin ChangeLog

2003-03-09 Thread corinna
CVSROOT:/cvs/src Module name:src Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-09 22:13:27 Modified files: winsup/cygwin : ChangeLog Log message: Fix typo. Patches:

winsup/cygwin ChangeLog Makefile.in cygserver_ ...

2003-03-09 Thread cgf
CVSROOT:/cvs/uberbaum Module name:winsup Branch: cgf-dev-branch Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-10 00:07:01 Modified files: cygwin : ChangeLog Makefile.in cygserver_shm.h cygwin.din glob.c shm.cc syscalls.cc winsup.h

Re: PATCH: Implements /proc/cpuinfo and /proc/partitions

2003-03-09 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Thu, Mar 06, 2003 at 10:58:31PM -, Chris January wrote: 2003-03-06 Christopher January [EMAIL PROTECTED] * autoload.cc (GetSystemTimes): Define new autoload function. * fhandler_proc.cc (proc_listing): Add cpuinfo and partitions entries.

cygwin archive? (previous versions for fallback)

2003-03-09 Thread günter strubinsky
I had a previous release of cygwin running. It contained postgresql 7.2.3. When I updated now, Postgresql version 7.3.2 was installed which sadly requires a dump and restore of the 'old' database to recognize the data. That I found out too late. My data can not be accessed anymore. When I tried to

Re: cygwin archive? (previous versions for fallback)

2003-03-09 Thread Max Bowsher
günter strubinsky wrote: I had a previous release of cygwin running. It contained postgresql 7.2.3. When I updated now, Postgresql version 7.3.2 was installed which sadly requires a dump and restore of the 'old' database to recognize the data. That I found out too late. My data can not be

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: mc-4.6.0-1

2003-03-09 Thread Thorsten Kampe
* Pavel Tsekov (03-03-08 18:16 +0100) The Midnight Commander visual shell has been updated to version 4.6.0-1. This is major upgrade and the result of more then one and a half year of bugfixing and code cleanup. Thanks. Midnight Commander has become better and the old bugs are gone.

Re: Python Tkinter module problem: pydog -g doesn't work

2003-03-09 Thread Jason Tishler
Volker, IMO, this post is more appropriate for cygwin@ than [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Sun, Mar 09, 2003 at 12:51:36PM +0100, Volker Zell wrote: ImportError: No module named _tkinter Sorry, the above was caused by a Python 2.2.x versus 2.3 build difference. I was set up for Python 2.3 (i.e., CVS)

Re: Problem compiling Numeric-23.0 with latest python-2.2.2-6

2003-03-09 Thread Jason Tishler
IMO, this post is more appropriate for cygwin@ than [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Sun, Mar 09, 2003 at 12:52:58PM +0100, Volker Zell wrote: I just tried compiling Numeric-23.0 with latest python-2.2.2-6 and got the following error: SF is down right now. Is there really a Numeric-23.0? I could only

Re: Problem compiling Numeric-23.0 with latest python-2.2.2-6

2003-03-09 Thread Dr. Volker Zell
Jason == Jason Tishler [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Jason IMO, this post is more appropriate for cygwin@ than [EMAIL PROTECTED] OK Jason On Sun, Mar 09, 2003 at 12:52:58PM +0100, Volker Zell wrote: I just tried compiling Numeric-23.0 with latest python-2.2.2-6 and got the

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: mc-4.6.0-1

2003-03-09 Thread Pavel Tsekov
On Sun, 9 Mar 2003, Thorsten Kampe wrote: Unfortunately there are now some new ones: 1. It takes more than 5 seconds to start mc in a rxvt window - in a normal console window mc starts immediately. Removing my rxvt customizations in .Xdefaults has no effect. 2. If you start mc under

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: mc-4.6.0-1

2003-03-09 Thread Thorsten Kampe
* Pavel Tsekov (03-03-09 15:34 +0100) On Sun, 9 Mar 2003, Thorsten Kampe wrote: Unfortunately there are now some new ones: 1. It takes more than 5 seconds to start mc in a rxvt window - in a normal console window mc starts immediately. Removing my rxvt customizations in .Xdefaults has no

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: bison-20030307-1

2003-03-09 Thread fergus
Thanks for recent update to bison which addresses all issues raised in http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2003-02/msg02011.html and (as far as I can determine things) now works flawlessly. Fergus -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting:

nano editor : v.1.2.0 released

2003-03-09 Thread fergus
For users of the editor nano and the Cygwin-supplied version 1.1.10-1: there is an update to nano version 1.2.0 available at their site http://www.nano-editor.org/dist/v1.2/nano-1.2.0.tar.gz that seems to install oob (configure / make / make install) and works well. To the maintainer: is there any

Re: nano editor : v.1.2.0 released

2003-03-09 Thread Gareth Pearce
My holidays end today, I'll look into stoping being slack and try to release asap. 1.1.11/12/pre1/pre2 all had issues - but i havent noticed anything much reported back against 1.2.0 on the nano-devel list - so it should be fine. Gareth Pearce - nano 'maintainer' (for lack of a betterword) -

RE: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: binutils-20030307-1

2003-03-09 Thread Ralf Habacker
I can see many more source code changes. I think cgf meant that the only difference between this package, and straight-from-CVS binutils (20030307 snapshot) is the pseudo-reloc change. Certainly, the basic CVS source has had many many changes since 20021117. Including your

  1   2   >