Christopher Faylor wrote:
For the next setup release, can we change Download from Internet to
Download from Internet Without Installing?
Agreed - how about Download Only - Do Not Install, though? I think that is
a bit more attention grabbing, and from Internet is just a bit redundant!
Also,
Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
Hi,
The setup version currently on the Cygwin web site exhibits the following
behavior: in Keep mode, it was impossible to select the new version of
the Cygwin package for the upgrade.
I'm somehow not surprised. Those horribly twiddly-cycle controls in setup
are
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Fri, Nov 19, 2004 at 12:27:47PM -, Max Bowsher wrote:
Anyway, this means many users are likely to have old 'invalid' versions
of
these packages. Which means, that before I can release a new setup, I
need
to make setup recover gracefully, rather than exiting at
On Sat, Nov 20, 2004 at 03:05:35PM -, Max Bowsher wrote:
Christopher Faylor wrote:
For the next setup release, can we change Download from Internet to
Download from Internet Without Installing?
Agreed - how about Download Only - Do Not Install, though? I think
that is a bit more attention
On Sat, Nov 20, 2004 at 03:07:17PM -, Max Bowsher wrote:
Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
The setup version currently on the Cygwin web site exhibits the following
behavior: in Keep mode, it was impossible to select the new version of
the Cygwin package for the upgrade.
I'm somehow not surprised.
On Wed, Nov 17, 2004 at 12:07:20AM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Thu, Nov 11, 2004 at 12:00:43PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
I notice that there hasn't been a new release of ghostscript in some
time. We need a new release to eliminate some of the lurking
dependencies on the deprecated
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Sat, Nov 20, 2004 at 03:14:52PM -, Max Bowsher wrote:
And one important consequence of this is that packagers must *never*
change
files without changing the release number, once they have gone to the
mirrors - because setup.exe will be telling users that something
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Sat, Nov 20, 2004 at 03:05:35PM -, Max Bowsher wrote:
Christopher Faylor wrote:
For the next setup release, can we change Download from Internet to
Download from Internet Without Installing?
Agreed - how about Download Only - Do Not Install, though? I think
that
On Sat, Nov 20, 2004 at 05:10:53PM -, Max Bowsher wrote:
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Sat, Nov 20, 2004 at 03:14:52PM -, Max Bowsher wrote:
And one important consequence of this is that packagers must *never*
change
files without changing the release number, once they have gone to the
On Sat, Nov 20, 2004 at 05:17:33PM -, Max Bowsher wrote:
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Sat, Nov 20, 2004 at 03:05:35PM -, Max Bowsher wrote:
Christopher Faylor wrote:
For the next setup release, can we change Download from Internet to
Download from Internet Without Installing?
Agreed - how
Christopher Faylor wrote:
setup.ini is always correct. If the package changed in setup.ini, that
should not trigger a download unless the user specifically asks for it.
I don't see any reason to check md5sums for packages that aren't being
installed. When a package is specifically requested for
On Sat, Nov 20, 2004 at 05:39:26PM -, Max Bowsher wrote:
Christopher Faylor wrote:
setup.ini is always correct. If the package changed in setup.ini, that
should not trigger a download unless the user specifically asks for it.
I don't see any reason to check md5sums for packages that aren't
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Sat, Nov 20, 2004 at 05:39:26PM -, Max Bowsher wrote:
Christopher Faylor wrote:
setup.ini is always correct. If the package changed in setup.ini, that
should not trigger a download unless the user specifically asks for it.
I don't see any reason to check md5sums
The Copyright year, year, ... have been somewhat neglected so far as
adding additional years in concerned.
Additionally, some are Red Hat, Inc., and others are individual
contributors.
I could use some advice on whether it is acceptable to just have a single
identical copyright header for
On Sat, Nov 20, 2004 at 06:23:51PM -, Max Bowsher wrote:
The Copyright year, year, ... have been somewhat neglected so far as
adding additional years in concerned.
Additionally, some are Red Hat, Inc., and others are individual
contributors.
I could use some advice on whether it is
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Sat, Nov 20, 2004 at 06:23:51PM -, Max Bowsher wrote:
The Copyright year, year, ... have been somewhat neglected so far as
adding additional years in concerned.
Additionally, some are Red Hat, Inc., and others are individual
contributors.
I could use some advice on
On Sat, Nov 20, 2004 at 07:31:29PM -, Max Bowsher wrote:
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Sat, Nov 20, 2004 at 06:23:51PM -, Max Bowsher wrote:
The Copyright year, year, ... have been somewhat neglected so far as
adding additional years in concerned.
Additionally, some are Red Hat, Inc., and
Dave wrote:
Definitely go for a dialog box.
Revised patch attached.
Sorry, but I have to reject this patch.
The MessageBox output takes no account of the fact that it is being
displayed in a proportional-width font, and as a result comes out
impressively mangled.
As the reality is that the
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Sat, Nov 20, 2004 at 05:17:33PM -, Max Bowsher wrote:
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Sat, Nov 20, 2004 at 03:05:35PM -, Max Bowsher wrote:
Christopher Faylor wrote:
For the next setup release, can we change Download from Internet to
Robert McNulty Junior wrote:
Change the behavior so Setup does not install immieadly after you
download the Distribution.
I see this in every scenario since it first came out.
That dang Install from Internet is there every time.
Its installing right after downloading. I hate that.
Look what
Hello,
I've uploaded binary and source packages of the recently
announced version 3.6 of gnugo. See
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/gnugo-announce/2004-11/msg1.html
for the announcement.
This version is an update of the current 3.4. 3.6 depends on
the libncurses8 package (instead of
a.rburgers wrote:
Hello,
I've uploaded binary and source packages of the recently
announced version 3.6 of gnugo. See
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/gnugo-announce/2004-11/msg1.html
for the announcement.
This version is an update of the current 3.4. 3.6 depends on
the libncurses8 package
On Sat, Nov 20, 2004 at 09:20:32PM -, Max Bowsher wrote:
Robert McNulty Junior wrote:
Change the behavior so Setup does not install immieadly after you
download the Distribution. I see this in every scenario since it first
came out. That dang Install from Internet is there every time. Its
I really like the cygwin-cvs and newlib-cvs lists for keeping track of
what changes are being made to the DLL and newlib. Setup is in a
different repository, however, correct? Is there a list to which I can
subscribe to see commits?
Brian
I was reading through the daily report from Zone Alarm. It talked about
Gentoo Linux's fcron.
Do we have fcron? Because if we do, I think I know what is going on here.
On Halloween, November 6, and November 9 of this month, I found that
only I had no internet connection. I had xorg and the
I'm cross posting since the X11 developers blame
everything on the cywin setup.exe
When I try to install it is at 94%(installing
everything) and the file that I get a hangup at is
etc/postinstall/xorg-x11-fnts.sh
When I click cancel on the installation I am then
given another error
Cannot open
CVSROOT:/cvs/src
Module name:src
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-20 19:09:19
Modified files:
winsup/cygwin : ChangeLog cygheap.h registry.h registry.cc
uinfo.cc shared.cc syscalls.cc
Log message:
2004-11-20 Pierre Humblet
CVSROOT:/cvs/src
Module name:src
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-20 23:42:36
Modified files:
winsup/cygwin : ChangeLog fhandler.cc pipe.cc
Log message:
2004-11-20 Pierre Humblet [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* fhandler.cc (fhandler::write):
CVSROOT:/cvs/src
Module name:src
Branch: noreparent
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-21 04:39:13
Modified files:
winsup/cygwin : ChangeLog cygheap.h pinfo.cc pinfo.h spawn.cc
Log message:
* cygheap.h (init_cygheap::pid_handle): New element.
At 01:23 AM 11/20/2004 -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
Here's the good news/bad news.
On Tue, Nov 16, 2004 at 10:56:40AM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
The simplification of the code from removing all of the reparenting
considerations is not something that I'm going to give up on easily.
Here are minor changes that facilitate grepping traces.
Pierre
2004-11-20 Pierre Humblet [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* fhandler.cc (fhandler::write): Remove debug_printf.
* pipe.cc (fhandler_pipe::create): Edit syscall_printf format.
Index: fhandler.cc
At 02:20 PM 11/20/2004 -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Sat, Nov 20, 2004 at 01:51:16PM -0500, Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
Here are minor changes that facilitate grepping traces.
Pierre
2004-11-20 Pierre Humblet [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* fhandler.cc (fhandler::write): Remove debug_printf.
On Sat, Nov 20, 2004 at 02:27:37PM -0500, Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
At 02:20 PM 11/20/2004 -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Sat, Nov 20, 2004 at 01:51:16PM -0500, Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
Here are minor changes that facilitate grepping traces.
Pierre
2004-11-20 Pierre Humblet [EMAIL
Peter Rehley schrieb:
Peter Rehley wrote:
Larry Hall wrote:
We have a customer that is using flex under a custom version of
cygwin that we provided them (with source). The customer is having
problems when their *.l files are in dos format. Flex is taking
the lines from the file and adding
Chuck schrieb:
I'm actually referring to pax format archives (ustar).
I want to be able to unarchive files - many files - but changing one string
in the name to another. I typically use it to clone databases on Solaris. I
may have 15 mount points all with a subdirectory named DB1. When I extract
Dave Korn schrieb:
-Original Message-
From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Michael Hipp
Sent: 19 November 2004 19:06
I thought I was the only one with that opinion of McNorton.
We are not alone!
http://www.google.com/search?hl=enq=norton+%2Bsucks
Results 1 - 10 of about 87,900 for norton
Gerrit P. Haase schrieb:
Sam Steingold wrote:
when will 3.4 become the default version?
I'm currently preparing an gcc update to gcc-3.4.2, if this is
usable I will make this the default. So you may expect it to be
released before Christmas 2004.
with dwarf2?
--
Crime does not pay ... as well as
Hi!
Thanks a lot for your reply!
Quoting Mark Paulus [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Sounds like you might need a -L option
gcc -o testclapack testclapack.c -Ldir to library lapack.a -cblaswr
-lblas.a tmglib.a -latlas -lg2c
If I understand well, this tells gcc to access a certain directory (with the -L
On Sat, Nov 20, 2004 at 09:07:21AM +0100, Reini Urban wrote:
Peter Rehley schrieb:
Peter Rehley wrote:
Larry Hall wrote:
We have a customer that is using flex under a custom version of cygwin
that we provided them (with source). The customer is having problems
when their *.l files are in dos
At 1:28 AM +0100 11/20/04, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
Stephen Studley wrote:
At 4:30 PM -0500 11/18/04, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
perl -we 'my $str=`ssh -n [EMAIL PROTECTED] ls`;print [$str]\n'
good idea, however same results, at least from my Windows machine.
The command-line perl works fine from my
On Sat, Nov 20, 2004 at 06:31:19AM +, PJ wrote:
I have X/cygwin running and know about ssh tunneling, but that's not quite
what
I'm looking for. What I want to do is basically ssh to the remote machine and
actually have a full X desktop from that machine running in cygwin, not just
apps
Peter Rehley schrieb:
On Nov 20, 2004, at 12:07 AM, Reini Urban wrote:
Peter Rehley schrieb:
Peter Rehley wrote:
Larry Hall wrote:
We have a customer that is using flex under a custom version of
cygwin that we provided them (with source). The customer is
having problems when their *.l files are
Gerrit P. Haase schrieb:
Reini Urban wrote:
Gerrit P. Haase schrieb:
Sam Steingold wrote:
when will 3.4 become the default version?
I'm currently preparing an gcc update to gcc-3.4.2, if this is
usable I will make this the default. So you may expect it to be
released before Christmas 2004.
with
On Nov 20, 2004, at 10:19 AM, Reini Urban wrote:
Peter Rehley schrieb:
On Nov 20, 2004, at 12:07 AM, Reini Urban wrote:
Peter Rehley schrieb:
Peter Rehley wrote:
Larry Hall wrote:
We have a customer that is using flex under a custom version of
cygwin that we provided them (with source). The
The autotools wrappers (automake 1.7.9-1, autoconf 2.59-1, and libtool
1.5b-1) all have argument parsing bugs. They are trying to parse every
option known to either autotool-stable or autotool-devel, but fail in
several respects.
First, the wrappers are not robust to new options being added. For
On Nov 20, 2004, at 11:20 AM, kent morris wrote:
I installed cygwin and found it does not meet my needs. How do I
un-install it? WIN XP Control Panel does not show it in the add/remove
window. I have not found any documentation on how to remove the
program.
Did you see this?
kent morris wrote:
I installed cygwin and found it does not meet my needs. How do I
un-install it? WIN XP Control Panel does not show it in the add/remove
window. I have not found any documentation on how to remove the program.
http://cygwin.com/faq/faq.html#SEC19
Brian
--
Unsubscribe info:
On Sat, Nov 20, 2004 at 07:19:17PM +0100, Reini Urban wrote:
so cgf should repackage it. it's obviously a bug.
From the description of the behavior of the released flex binary, it sounds
like it is working just fine.
If you are saying that I should repackage the source files because you
Eric Blake wrote:
The autotools wrappers (automake 1.7.9-1, autoconf 2.59-1, and libtool
1.5b-1) all have argument parsing bugs. They are trying to parse every
option known to either autotool-stable or autotool-devel, but fail in
several respects.
True.
First, the wrappers are not robust to new
On 20 Nov 2004 at 16:53, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
s there any way to get a hardcopy printout of the modules installed
by setup.exe (the Cygwin installer)?
Thanks!
kj
cygcheck -c prn
Sending this to you direct and to list. List keeps bouncing me
stating I am sending html. NOT!
Wes
Reini Urban wrote:
Gerrit P. Haase schrieb:
I'm currently preparing an gcc update to gcc-3.4.2, if this is
usable I will make this the default. So you may expect it to be
released before Christmas 2004.
with dwarf2?
I don't know yet. Probably many packages need to be rebuild with this
change?
I've packaged the recently released gnugo-3.6 for cygwin.
The announcement of gnugo-3.6 can be found here:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/gnugo-announce/2004-11/msg1.html
Gnu Go is a state of the art go playing program.
Go is an ancient boardgame originating from Asia, that
becomes
Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
No, it will be enabled, or better sjlj will not be enabled and the build
defaults to dwarf2.
I was wrong with this statement.
To clarify this:
gcc-3.4 has DWARF2 debug informations enabled, but exception handling
will stay to be SjLj exceptions and not be DWARF2, because:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
dwycoff wrote:
| I tried using a perl-tk script in cygwin that I wrote more than
| a year ago. Whenever I run it it dies at:
|
| Can't locate Tk.pm in @INC (@INC contains: /usr/lib/perl5/5...
|
| I did a search and couldn't find Tk.pm. So I looked
54 matches
Mail list logo
