Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Wed, Jan 07, 2009 at 12:37:37AM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote:
Charles Wilson wrote:
This should make it easier for Dave, and those who want to help him, to
develop gcc and binutils -- avoiding things like this:
http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2008-12/msg00201.html
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Christopher Faylor on 1/6/2009 11:00 PM:
On Wed, Jan 07, 2009 at 12:37:37AM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote:
Charles Wilson wrote:
This should make it easier for Dave, and those who want to help him, to
develop gcc and binutils --
On Wed, Jan 07, 2009 at 09:44:39AM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote:
But I didn't. So if you (cgf) would like, I'll pull the gcc-tools-*
packages and wait for 3 (2 more now, counting Eric's) more votes. No big
deal.
I'm not going to pull the package but I couldn't let a confusing email
sit in the
Dear Cygwin,
I submitted an ITP for Macaulay 2 on Nov 11 and there have been no positive
votes since then. I would have thought that by now, if there were any interest
in having it in cygwin, there would have been a positive vote. I understand
that 5 are required.
As I said before, Macaulay 2
On Wed, Jan 07, 2009 at 01:04:39PM -0600, Daniel R. Grayson wrote:
I submitted an ITP for Macaulay 2 on Nov 11 and there have been no
positive votes since then. I would have thought that by now, if there
were any interest in having it in cygwin, there would have been a
positive vote. I
On Wed, Jan 07, 2009 at 02:14:26PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
I don't see it in Fedora 10 but it looks like it was included in the
extras package for older Fedoras.
...But this does not automatically qualify Macaulay2 for inclusion in
the Cygwin distribution.
cgf
Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 14:14:26 -0500
From: Christopher Faylor cgf-use-the-mailinglist-ple...@cygwin.com
To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: [ITP] Macaulay2 1.1
Reply-To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com
On Wed, Jan 07, 2009 at 01:04:39PM -0600, Daniel R. Grayson wrote:
I submitted an ITP for
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Daniel R. Grayson wrote:
I submitted an ITP for Macaulay 2 on Nov 11 and there have been no positive
votes since then. I would have thought that by now, if there were any
interest
in having it in cygwin, there would have been a positive vote.
You must be reading her message differently from the way I did.
In any case, if it were to turn out that Macaulay 2 were interesting to cygwin,
but one of the libraries Macaulay 2 depends on was not interesting to cygwin,
then I wouldn't have to package that library, would I? I could just
Yaakov,
Attached is a patch against the xinit package in cygports svn:
* In an attempt to avoid some instances of the ever popular I upgraded X and
now my keyboard doesn't work problem, update the X server starting sample
scripts to actively unset XKEYSYMDB etc., environment variables, rather
CVSROOT:/cvs/src
Module name:src
Changes by: cori...@sourceware.org 2009-01-07 14:11:57
Modified files:
winsup/w32api : ChangeLog
winsup/w32api/include: winbase.h
Log message:
* include/winbase.h (SCS_64BIT_BINARY): Define.
Patches:
CVSROOT:/cvs/src
Module name:src
Changes by: cori...@sourceware.org 2009-01-07 14:12:40
Modified files:
winsup/cygwin : ChangeLog fhandler_disk_file.cc path.cc
Log message:
* fhandler_disk_file.cc (fhandler_disk_file::link): Only add .exe if
original
CVSROOT:/cvs/src
Module name:src
Changes by: cori...@sourceware.org 2009-01-07 18:18:24
Modified files:
winsup/cygwin : ChangeLog ntdll.h syscalls.cc
Log message:
* ntdll.h: Reorder NT status flags. Fix a case difference. Add
STATUS_CANNOT_DELETE flag.
On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 11:41 AM, Larry Hall (Cygwin)
reply-to-list-only...@cygwin.com wrote:
Jeenu V wrote:
With cgf's help and a good look at your cygcheck output, I believe I was
able to reproduce something like your problem. If I'm right, then you
want to remove 'tty' from your CYGWIN
For a similar problem I eventually went to the cygwin installer, unchecked
hide obsolete packages, went into the _obsolete area, selected everything
beginning with xorg-x11-f (I would assume the XFree86-f* packages would work
too) and restarted the X Windows server; actually by rebooting the
Hello, Corinna,
cygwin-ow...@cygwin.com schrieb am 16.12.2008 11:08:05:
Hello? Did you read all of my previous mail?
Please, don't http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#TOFU
==
Yes, I read and understand it now!
On Dec 16 09:39, Carsten.Porzler
According to Buchbinder, Barry (NIH/NIAID) [E] on 12/31/2008 2:29 PM:
[sorry for my delay in replying]
`sort -n' and `sort -g' work inconsistently with 0 and -0 if there are
leading spaces. Sometimes -0 is before 0, as I would expect, and sometimes
it is afterwards. Adding `-b' does not
On Dec 23 20:09, Lawrence Mayer wrote:
Cygwin 1.7-37 and -36 misname certain hardlinks by adding an extra .exe
extention: e.g.
ln vgaoem.fon ..
creates vgaoem.fon.exe in the parent directory, not vgaoem.fon as expected.
The same bug occurs with
cp -l vgaoem.fon ..
This bug
On Dec 31 22:38, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Thu, Jan 01, 2009 at 12:06:40AM +, Eric Blake wrote:
David Rothenberger daveroth at acm.org writes:
It seems that read-only files in Cygwin 1.7 are not truly read-only.
The sequence of steps below shows that chmod 444 file1 does not make
the
On Jan 4 19:46, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
It would be a helpful enhancement to have a /proc/mounts interface to
the mountpoint data, with /etc/mtab perhaps being a symlink thereto. Is
this something that could be easily added, or is this a
On Jan 5 11:50, Freddy Jensen wrote:
I just finished setting up my new 64-bit Windows Server 2008 machine.
One of the final things was to install cygwin on the machine so I
could get all the Unix functionality. However, I ran into a problem
when launching the tcsh shell. I got this error:
On Wed, 7 Jan 2009, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
The same happens with all hardlinks to files used by the system. The NT
status code returned when trying to set the delete disposition flag is
C121, STATUS_CANNOT_DELETE. None of the Windows native methods to
delete these hardlinks works. I'm
On Wed, Jan 07, 2009 at 01:49:46PM +0530, Jeenu V wrote:
On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 11:41 AM, Larry Hall (Cygwin)
reply-to-list-only...@cygwin.com wrote:
Jeenu V wrote:
With cgf's help and a good look at your cygcheck output, I believe I was
able to reproduce something like your problem. If I'm
On Jan 7 09:38, Brian Ford wrote:
On Wed, 7 Jan 2009, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
The same happens with all hardlinks to files used by the system. The NT
status code returned when trying to set the delete disposition flag is
C121, STATUS_CANNOT_DELETE. None of the Windows native
Hi
I have a problem that may be cygwin or not. I'll just ask here if anybody knows
something (or to show me some better place to go to).
We use a quite old cross-gcc (2.95.2), built with cygwin and running on various
windows (since NT on to vista). The currently used cygwin is version
On Wed, Jan 07, 2009 at 03:31:32PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
This is a problem of the lapack package. Unfortunately the lapack
package is orphaned and nobody volunteered to be the new package
maintainer so far.
I've created a new lapack.csh file which should not have this
problem and
Fabian Cenedese wrote:
Hi
I have a problem that may be cygwin or not. I'll just ask here if anybody knows
something (or to show me some better place to go to).
We use a quite old cross-gcc (2.95.2), built with cygwin and running on various
windows (since NT on to vista). The currently used
Freddy Jensen wrote:
== Begin included message ==
From: Larry Hall (Cygwin) XXX
Date: Tue Jan 6 2009 2:55pm
To: cygwin XXX
Subj: Re: Missing telnet, rlogin, and rsh on cygwin
[ Attachment (text/plain): 1301 bytes
Character set: utf-8
plain text
Encoded with
I need to put a Cygwin snapshot on CD[*].
To that end I've been searching the mailing list archive. So
far the scripts wirtten by Vin Shelton look like they're
awfully close to what I want.
http://www.Cygwin.com/ml/Cygwin/2007-03/msg00606.html
The only thing that (AFAICT) is missing is the
Grant Edwards wrote:
I need to put a Cygwin snapshot on CD[*].
To that end I've been searching the mailing list archive. So
far the scripts wirtten by Vin Shelton look like they're
awfully close to what I want.
http://www.Cygwin.com/ml/Cygwin/2007-03/msg00606.html
This link goes nowhere
but ISOs are available here:
http://cygwinsolutions.com/
I generate two ISOs - one for source, one for binary.
For instance here is a binary ISO:
http://updates.cygwinsolutions.com/20090107-11/cygwin-20090107-11-bin.iso
and here is a source ISO:
http://updates.cygwinsolutions.com/20090107-11/cygwin
On Wed, 7 Jan 2009, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
The same happens with all hardlinks to files used by the system. The NT
status code returned when trying to set the delete disposition flag is
C121, STATUS_CANNOT_DELETE. None of the Windows native methods to
delete these hardlinks works. I'm
On 2009-01-07, Larry Hall (Cygwin) reply-to-list-only...@cygwin.com wrote:
Grant Edwards wrote:
I need to put a Cygwin snapshot on CD[*].
To that end I've been searching the mailing list archive. So
far the scripts wirtten by Vin Shelton look like they're
awfully close to what I want.
/20090107-11/cygwin-20090107-11-bin.iso
and here is a source ISO:
http://updates.cygwinsolutions.com/20090107-11/cygwin-20090107-11-src.iso
You don't have to provide the source code along with the binary. You
just have to be willing to provide the source code to anyone who asks
for it.
One
Grant Edwards wrote:
On 2009-01-07, Larry Hall (Cygwin) reply-to-list-only-lh AT cygwin DOT
com wrote:
^
http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#PCYMTNQREAIYR Thanks.
Grant Edwards wrote:
I need to put a Cygwin snapshot on CD[*].
On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 9:22 PM, Christopher Faylor
cgf-use-the-mailinglist-ple...@cygwin.com wrote:
screen uses ptys. ptys are equivalent to CYGWIN=tty.
We really don't guarantee that pure Windows applications will work with
ptys.
Hm... looks like I've to live without cmd.exe from screen.
On Thu, Jan 08, 2009 at 12:23:16AM +, Grant Edwards wrote:
On 2009-01-07, Larry Hall (Cygwin) reply-to-list-only...@cygwin.com wrote:
And, as you noted, you need to distribute the source of your
application
I don't see what my application has to do with anything. Just
because I compile an
On Thu, Jan 08, 2009 at 12:25:59AM +, Grant Edwards wrote:
One of the things I liked about Vin Shelton's script was that it
allowed me to customize what was installed by default. I need to add
5-6 packages to the default install. I'd really like to keep it to 1
CD if at all possible. I was
On Wed, Jan 07, 2009 at 09:18:11PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Thu, Jan 08, 2009 at 12:25:59AM +, Grant Edwards wrote:
One of the things I liked about Vin Shelton's script was that it
allowed me to customize what was installed by default. I need to add
5-6 packages to the default
On 2009-01-08, Christopher Faylor cgf-use-the-mailinglist-ple...@cygwin.com
wrote:
On Thu, Jan 08, 2009 at 12:23:16AM +, Grant Edwards wrote:
On 2009-01-07, Larry Hall (Cygwin) reply-to-list-only...@cygwin.com wrote:
And, as you noted, you need to distribute the source of your
application
On 2009-01-08, Christopher Faylor cgf-use-the-mailinglist-ple...@cygwin.com
wrote:
On Thu, Jan 08, 2009 at 12:25:59AM +, Grant Edwards wrote:
One of the things I liked about Vin Shelton's script was that
it allowed me to customize what was installed by default. I
need to add 5-6 packages
On 2009-01-08, Grant Edwards gra...@visi.com wrote:
I didn't think it was relevent to the question at hand, but to
try to short-circuit yet another endless, pointless discussion
of the GPL, I'll explain exactly what the CD is for.
What I'm putting together is a CD with a very basic Cygwin
Grant Edwards wrote:
I mean the packages that are installed by default when you run
setup.exe for the first time and don't select any additional
packages. Maybe that set of packages is called something else?
We usually call that the Base installation, as those packages are in
the Base
43 matches
Mail list logo
