: cygdrive prefix
Cygdrive default prefix:
Build date: Wed Nov 27 18:54:29 EST 2002
Shared id: cygwin1S3
--
Dr. Thomas Baker[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Institutszentrum Schloss Birlinghoven mobile +49-171-408-5784
Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft
to make
sure that this is in fact the problem.
Thanks,
Tom Baker
On Sun, Jan 12, 2003 at 08:17:32PM +0100, Thomas Baker wrote:
I use Cygwin 1.3.17, NTFS file systems, and Win2000 (see
excerpt from cygcheck -s below). Both with cp and mv, I am
getting error messages when copying or moving
On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 09:55:01AM -0500, Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc) wrote:
At 04:55 AM 1/16/2003, Thomas Baker wrote:
In the absence of responses to my earlier note (below), and
having made a second fruitless search of FAQs and archives,
I'd like to make a second and final attempt
' [file ...]
exit 2
;;
1) subst=$1
while read fname; do rename_1 $fname; done
;;
*) subst=$1; shift
for fname; do rename_1 $fname; done
;;
esac
--
Dr. Thomas Baker[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Institutszentrum Schloss
not a programmer and do not have time to test this
systematically but thought others on this list might want
to hear about this.
Tom Baker
--
Dr. Thomas Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
SUB - Goettingen State+49-551-39-3883
and University Library
On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 10:26:26AM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
On Mon, 6 Jun 2005, Thomas Baker wrote:
Just wanted to report that I was seeing error messages such as the
following in Korn shell scripts:
/home/tbaker/u/bin/urlists[50]: internal error: alloc: freeing
memory
procmail: Opening TEST
procmail: Acquiring kernel-lock
procmail: Unlocking TEST.lock
From tbaker Wed Oct 23 10:44:40 2002
Subject: TEST
Folder: TEST 958
--
Dr. Thomas Baker[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Institutszentrum
that success in the file procmail.log.
Tom
On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 08:25:23AM -0400, Jason Tishler wrote:
On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 01:43:19PM +0200, Thomas Baker wrote:
On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 07:16:14AM -0400, Jason Tishler wrote:
What *exactly* does procmail.log indicate happened
On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 09:02:39AM -0400, Jason Tishler wrote:
On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 02:39:51PM +0200, Thomas Baker wrote:
| mda /usr/bin/procmail -d %T # pass message to the local MDA
The above .fetchmailrc line invokes procmail differently than procmail
-m. Since fetchmail
.
Tom
--
Dr. Thomas Baker[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Institutszentrum Schloss Birlinghoven mobile +49-171-408-5784
Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft work +49-30-8109-9027
53754 Sankt Augustin, Germanyfax +49-2241-144-2352
|Your system mailbox: /var/spool/mail/tbaker
--
Dr. Thomas Baker[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Institutszentrum Schloss Birlinghoven mobile +49-171-408-5784
Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft work +49-30-8109-9027
53754 Sankt Augustin, Germany
Two previous posts actually answer this question, but I
didn't see them because Procmail quietly started doing its
job again (because the solution worked) and didn't arrive in
my mailbox...
Apologies, and many thanks,
Tom
On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 10:51:43AM +0200, Thomas Baker wrote:
On Wed, Oct
Dear all,
I recently upgraded to cygwin 1.7.1-1 on two computers:
-- an ASUS netbook running Windows XP (German edition)
-- a Fujitsu-Siemens desktop running Windows XP (English)
The software on the C: partitions of the two computers
has been installed separately (including c:/cygwin and
Dear all,
I recently upgraded to Cygwin 1.7 on my two machines:
-- an ASUS netbook with Windows XP (German version)
-- a Fujitsu-Siemens desktop with Windows XP (English version)
Each machine has its own installed base of software on C: (including Cygwin),
but all data files -- including
Apologies for repeating my message - the Cygwin list would only let me sign
up using my googlemail account - then googlemail caught your response in a
delete filter :-(
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 11:41 PM, Gary cyg...@garydjones.name wrote:
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 09:12:00AM -0500, Thomas Baker
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 5:02 PM, Jason Tishler ja...@tishler.net wrote:
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 09:12:00AM -0500, Thomas Baker wrote:
The problem is that since the upgrade to Cygwin 1.7, the fetchmail
on my _desktop_ computer no longer passes the incoming messages to the
MDA procmail. Each
Jason,
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 9:17 PM, Jason Tishler ja...@tishler.net wrote:
Please note the following:
http://cygwin.com/acronyms#PPIOSPE
My apologies if I overlooked that - I'm temporarily working in googlemail
because of this procmail situation and feel out of my usual element (mutt).
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 8:13 AM, Jason wrote:
http://cygwin.com/acronyms#PPIOSPE
My apologies if I overlooked that - I'm temporarily working in
googlemail because of this procmail situation and feel out of my usual
element (mutt).
Unfortunately, you are still overlooking the above. :,(
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 10:33 AM, Thomas Baker wrote:
This also does not work:
procmail -d tbaker msg.mbox
However, on the netbook
procmail -d tbaker msg.mbox
works fine, delivering the message where it is supposed to go.
On the netbook the permissions for /usr/bin
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 11:25 AM, Eric wrote:
According to Thomas Baker on 2/23/2010 9:06 AM:
On the netbook the permissions for /usr/bin/procmail start with:
-rwxr-x---+
The trailing + tells you that there are ACLs attached to the file that may
further impact who can access the file
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 11:49 AM, Gary wrote:
If I pipe one message into procmail with:
procmail -v -d tbaker msg.mbox
procmail reports:
Locking strategies: dotlocking, fcntl()
Default rcfile: $HOME/.procmailrc
Your system mailbox:
And you're sure you are running the correct procmail, i.e. there is no
other procmail in your path before the one you are expecting to run?
$ type -a procmail
procmail is /usr/bin/procmail
procmail is /bin/procmail
Yes, though the result repeats itself as follows:
$ type -a procmail
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 1:28 PM, Jason wrote:
Can you be a bit more specific? Is anything added to the procmail log?
You could also add VERBOSE=on on the command line for more info.
What does the following indicate?
$ procmail VERBOSE=on msg.mbox
procmail: [4092] Tue Feb 23 14:11:50 2010
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 2:35 PM, Jason Tishler wrote:
What does the following indicate?
?? ??$ procmail VERBOSE=on msg.mbox
procmail: [4092] Tue Feb 23 14:11:50 2010
procmail: Locking /var/spool/mail/TBaker.lock
[snip]
You should have seen a line like the following:
procmail:
Evidently if it does not find /home/TBaker/.procmailrc, it does
not go looking for /home/tbaker/.procmailrc. Since my entire
file system is based on tbaker, I'd love to find a way to eradicate
the TBaker from my system entirely. The guy who set up my XP
installation many years ago set my
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 4:44 PM, Larry Hall (Cygwin)
reply-to-list-only...@cygwin.com wrote:
Evidently if it does not find /home/TBaker/.procmailrc, it does
not go looking for /home/tbaker/.procmailrc. Since my entire
file system is based on tbaker, I'd love to find a way to eradicate
the
$ cd /home
$ ls
Administrator TBaker tbaker
How did you manage to create two subdirectories (i.e., TBaker and
tbaker) in the same parent directory that only differ by case?
Are you configured for case sensitive filenames? What does the
following indicate?
$ regtool
Are you configured for case sensitive filenames? What does the
following indicate?
$ regtool get '\HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Session
Manager\kernel\obcaseinsensitive'
I am on the road today with the netbook, and on the netbook the command
above yields a response of 1.
On
Dear all,
I have been using a Korn shell script twenty times per day
for more than ten years -- I published an earlier version
in UnixWorld in 1994 and the latest version last year in
lifehacker.com [1].
When I now run the script on brand-new Cygwin installations,
it loses data. I have tested
Dear all,
I have been using a Korn shell script twenty times per day
for more than ten years -- I published an earlier version
in UnixWorld in 1994 and the latest version last year in
lifehacker.com [1].
When I now run the script on brand-new Cygwin installations,
it loses data. I have tested
René Berber wrote:
[snip]
I have searched FAQs and mailing lists for problems with
timeout and the like but find nothing obviously relevant.
[snip]
I have seen that problem and it has nothing to do with Cygwin. The
problem is with SATA drives and Window's asynchronous unbuffered disk
On Mon, Nov 12, 2007 at 04:03:14AM -0600, René Berber wrote:
[snip]
However, the other problem (see below) has occurred --
sporadically -- on three different machines, all running
German or English-language versions of XP, two with SATA
disks and one with an ATA disk, all with freshly
On Mon, Nov 12, 2007 at 09:38:03PM -0500, Morgan Gangwere wrote:
if the copy of xp is new enough, its got a funky little tool called
the Windows Malware Detection And removal Tool (a freind of mine who
is an MS MVP has had the same problem as you just under a different
circumstance.)
I'll
On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 09:58:31AM -0500, Robert Pendell wrote:
One other thing I wanted to add to this was make sure the drives are not
overheating. Some drives will actually shut down or begin to act
erratically if they get too hot. I discovered this when doing work with
my external
On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 06:06:21PM +0100, Thomas Baker wrote:
if the copy of xp is new enough, its got a funky little tool called
the Windows Malware Detection And removal Tool (a freind of mine who
is an MS MVP has had the same problem as you just under a different
circumstance.)
I
On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 05:59:01PM +0100, Thomas Baker wrote:
The speed is not the problem, it could be the usual suspect: an
anti-virus, unlikely because the data written is not executable but it
could be adding an extraneous delay between data written and data read.
I'll ask the guy who
On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 10:07:09AM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
I would be grateful if someone could suggest a way to test
this. Would it make sense (and is it possible) to replace
the Cygwin kernel or the coreutils package (because of
mv) with earlier versions and see if the script
On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 06:03:42PM -0500, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
Lewis Hyatt wrote:
These machines have an anti-virus program, but the same one I have
been using for the past two or three years. The filenames either have
no extension, or .txt.
That's most likely the problem anyway,
On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 06:03:42PM -0500, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
These machines have an anti-virus program, but the same one I have
been using for the past two or three years. The filenames either have
no extension, or .txt.
That's most likely the problem anyway, what happens if you
On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 10:40:27AM -, Dave Korn wrote:
On 16 November 2007 09:45, Thomas Baker wrote:
I uninstalled Anti-Vir [1], and the script has run hundreds
of times on several different data sources with no errors yet,
so this may indeed be the problem!
There's another one
On Thu, Nov 22, 2007 at 12:56:33PM -0500, Igor Peshansky wrote:
The /bin/pdksh script sequence that is causing problems is:
[snip]
The obvious question is: do you still get the error if you replace pdksh
with bash, or is the problem pdksh-specific?
When you reduce this to a minimal
41 matches
Mail list logo
