I noticed that story on Slashdot -
http://ask.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/08/12/1932246 . May
be of interest for some people (or not).
--
How to contact me - http://www.pervalidus.net/contact.html
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cy
On Wed, 28 Jul 2004, Charles Wilson wrote:
Unfortunately, the ijg group does not distribute the autoconf
source for libjpeg's configure script. It's on my todo list
to really truly autoconfiscate libjpeg (and libtiff) -- which
will make things like this easier. But it's not a very high
priori
On Sun, 27 Jun 2004, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Sun, Jun 27, 2004 at 05:29:50PM -0400, Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
Your change makes getc work almost as fast a getc_unlocked.
This is on Win98. Yesterday's results were on WinME, where the
differences were larger. That hard drive died this morning :(
On Sun, 9 May 2004, Andrew DeFaria wrote:
> jerzy szczudÅowski wrote:
>
> > Since mailx package is not ported to Cygwin, and from time to time
> > someone miss it, I wrote short shell script that enables straight
> > compatibility with some programs which by default depend on "mail"
> > command (i
On Sun, 2 May 2004, Frédéric L. W. Meunier wrote:
> On Sun, 2 May 2004, Frédéric L. W. Meunier wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 2 May 2004, Errol Smith wrote:
> >
> > > I'm having a problem with mc's editor (4.6.0-4, also tried
> > > mc-4.6.0a-20030721 with same
On Sun, 2 May 2004, Frédéric L. W. Meunier wrote:
> On Sun, 2 May 2004, Errol Smith wrote:
>
> > I'm having a problem with mc's editor (4.6.0-4, also tried
> > mc-4.6.0a-20030721 with same issue). (cygwin 1.5.9-1 on 98se)
> > If you are editing a file wider
On Sun, 2 May 2004, Errol Smith wrote:
> I'm having a problem with mc's editor (4.6.0-4, also tried
> mc-4.6.0a-20030721 with same issue). (cygwin 1.5.9-1 on 98se)
> If you are editing a file wider than the screen, sometimes
> the display becomes corrupted, with odd parts of lines
> appearing at t
On Thu, 29 Apr 2004, Keith Thompson wrote:
> Cygwin still includes the GNU fileutils (4.1), sh-utils (2.0.11), and
> textutils (2.0) packages. These were merged some time ago into the new
> coreutils package; the lastest release is 5.2.1.
>
> Note that upgrading would result in some changes in be
On Thu, 29 Apr 2004, [GB2312] 张丽 wrote:
> I use a function I know is in the libiberty.a,but still get a
> link error.how can i link the libiberty.a.Thank you!
What about posting your error ? Maybe it's due to
http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2003-09/msg01496.html (no
longer the case for gcc).
--
On Sat, 17 Apr 2004, Daniel Houle wrote:
> I'm new to the Cygwin world, in fact, I'm prety new to linux.
>
> I'm trying to nstall nmap on CTGWIN and I always get the following ewrror.
>
> error: Failed dependencies:
> ld-linux.so.2 is needed by nmap-3.50-1
> libc.so.6 is needed by
On Fri, 16 Apr 2004, Chris Herborth wrote:
> I've got a consistently repeatable problem with lftp when
> sending data, either with "put" or "mirror -R"; the transfer
> goes extremely slowly, and then lftp dumps core (see
> attached). This is over a fish protocol connection.
This is a known issue
On Wed, 14 Apr 2004, Dave Korn wrote:
> > From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Frédéric L. W. Meunier
> > Sent: 14 April 2004 07:35
>
> > Anyway, does anybody know if GCC in Cygwin is compiled with
> > --disable-checking ? gcc -v didn't return it, so it doesn't
&g
On Tue, 13 Apr 2004, Hans Horn wrote:
> Are there other benchmarks around that compare gcc3.x, gcc3.x
> (cygwin), etc against the gcc2.9x vintage?
2.95.x has always been much faster for both C and C++ when
compared to 3.x.
At least on Linux, 3.4.0 prerelease was around 10% faster to
compile the
On Fri, 2 Apr 2004, Hans Horn wrote:
> this was something I did try out as well. However, the dll produced with
> "-no-cygwin" was just as "bad" as before.
> Then I recalled faintly reading some discussion a while back, that
> "mingw-gcc != gcc -no-cygwin" (don't remember details, though).
-no-cy
On Sun, 28 Mar 2004, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 27, 2004 at 10:18:58PM -0800, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote:
> >WADR to CGF's hard work, I can tell you even before it is released that
> >1.5.10 has bugs. So do 1.5.11, 1.5.12, etc. With a software project of
> >sufficient size, it's
On Mon, 22 Mar 2004, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
> OK, I know we've been through this before, but there's now a new version
> of SDL (1.2.7), with a new development: it builds OOTB on Cygwin, all I
> had to do was reautotool.
>
> There are problems however:
>
> 1) when building on Cygwin, the default
This is probably off topic here. gtk-list at gnome dot org is a
better place. Anyway, 2.0.7 is very old and you didn't show the
errors (probably a bunch of undefined references everyone get
also with 2.4.0).
See
http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gtk-list/2004-March/msg00152.html
for recent patches.
On Sun, 21 Mar 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have the lastest stable version of cygwin installed and when I try to compile som
> programs (e.g. gnugo 3.0 (http://www.gnu.org/software/gnugo/gnugo.html)) i get the
> following error:
> gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I../engine-I../utils
On Sat, 20 Mar 2004, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 20, 2004 at 06:05:23PM -0300, Fr?d?ric L. W. Meunier wrote:
> >On Fri, 19 Mar 2004, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> >
> >$ cygcheck.exe -f /usr/lib/libiberty.a
> >binutils-20040312-1
> >cygwin-1.5.9-1
> >
> >Since you maintain both, what's t
On Fri, 19 Mar 2004, Christopher Faylor wrote:
$ cygcheck.exe -f /usr/lib/libiberty.a
binutils-20040312-1
cygwin-1.5.9-1
Since you maintain both, what's the consensus ?
--
How to contact me - http://www.pervalidus.net/contact.html
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-sim
I can't see for myself now, but what changed that made the
binary size jump from 90624 to 934424 ?
On Thu, 18 Mar 2004, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> I've updated the version of sed to 4.0.9-1.
>
> This is the latest stable sed release 4.0.9.
>
> Changes from 4.0.8:
>
> 0 address behaves correctly
On Thu, 11 Mar 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> All responses to man present properly to screen as far as I
> can tell with the exception of man rxvt which contains a lot
> of explicit code of the style .YODLTAGSTART roffcmd ...
> .YODLTAGEND.
True. The man page is messed up. If the maintainer use
On Wed, 10 Mar 2004, Brian Mohr wrote:
> I have recently installed Cygwin and am attempting to
> rollback from gcc 3.3.1 to 3.2.x. A friend of mine was able
> to do this a few days before I tried it. However, I only see
> gcc 3.3.1 when running setup.exe by either using the "Prev"
> button or by
Why are you asking it on a Cygwin mailing-list ? You should ask
the author / maintainers of such application.
On Wed, 10 Mar 2004, John Cox wrote:
> What should I download to be able to use the geometry plotting capability of this
> program?
> Your software is recommended in the MCNP5 documentat
Yes, the mailing-list software could be changed to obfuscate
them. Is it so hard ?
On Mon, 1 Mar 2004, Randall R Schulz wrote:
> I think it's pretty unreasonable to rely on every individual posting to
> this list to obfuscate email addresses in their submissions. It's
> inherently error prone, wi
On Fri, 27 Feb 2004, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 27, 2004 at 02:55:16PM -0800, Brian Dessent wrote:
> >As far as setup.exe is concerned, it should have installed this package
> >for you. The setup.hint for the 'less' package includes the line:
> >
> >requires: cygwin termcap libpcre0
On Fri, 27 Feb 2004, MEA-MikeFriedrichs wrote:
> When I searched for 'cygpcre-0.dll' at http://cygwin.com/packages : the
> following is my results.
>
> Found 2 matches for cygpcre-0.dll.
> 1364d60.jpg
> libpcre0/libpcre0-4.4-2
> Perl-Compatible Regular Expressions library
> 1364d70.jpg
> libpcre0
smartmontools now has support for Cygwin in CVS. There's a full
package I made for 1.5.7 (just missed a postinstall script for
/etc/smartd.conf - will be in 5.30) that can be installed
through setup.exe.
And a smartctl binary compiled with -mno-cygwin.
More information is available at
http://smar
On Thu, 26 Feb 2004, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 26, 2004 at 08:09:54PM -0300, Fr?d?ric L. W. Meunier wrote:
> >smartmontools now has support for Cygwin in CVS. There's a full
> >package I made for 1.5.7 (just missed a postinstall script for
> >/etc/smartd.conf - will be in 5.30) that
On Thu, 26 Feb 2004, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 26, 2004 at 09:44:20PM -0300, Fr?d?ric L. W. Meunier wrote:
> >On Thu, 26 Feb 2004, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> >>On Thu, Feb 26, 2004 at 08:09:54PM -0300, Fr?d?ric L. W. Meunier wrote:
> >>>smartmontools now has support for Cygwin in CV
I'm Cc'ing the Cygwin mailing-list since others may be
interested in a S.M.A.R.T. tool that works with it. And someone
may even be able to help you.
I got it to compile under Cygwin (without -mno-cygwin).
What I did:
mv os_generic.c os_generic.c.old
ln -sf os_win32/os_win32.c os_generic.c
Then
On Thu, 5 Feb 2004, Edward S. Peschko wrote:
> well, I was there - I'm referring to the link *inside* the message.
> It points to some site which no longer exists.
I uploaded the 2 ldd (I got from Google some time ago) to
http://www.pervalidus.net/cygwin/ldd/
--
http://www.pervalidus.net/contac
On Wed, 4 Feb 2004, Charles Wilson wrote:
> This is thanks to the new iconv support in newlib. Even tho it is
> "turned off" in cygwin-1.5.7, the new cygwin package still installs its
> own version of /usr/include/iconv.h -- and the "new" version is not, of
> course, recognized as GNU iconv.
>
>
On Tue, 3 Feb 2004, Reid Thompson wrote:
> my 2 cents, and what i believe is an easier and more appropriate
> solution ( think like you're on unix/linux) - for your cygwin
> bash/rxvt/etc terminals explicitely set the path in your .bashrc such
> that the cygwin binaries are found first -- and eith
On Tue, 3 Feb 2004, Shankar Unni wrote:
> Daniel Atallah wrote:
>
> > If the tcl dll included with cygwin conflicts with the
> > native win32 tcl (still a problem if you don't have
> > native tcl installed)
>
> Yes - I don't think this is a conflict per se, rather than simply
> finding and trying
On Sat, 31 Jan 2004, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> There was a few hour period during which an older version of cygwin 1.5.7
> was released. I hope this doesn't cause any problems. The correct version
> is dated '2004-01-30 19:32'.
http://mirrors.rcn.net/pub/sourceware/cygwin/release/cygwin/
stil
On Mon, 26 Jan 2004, Randall R Schulz wrote:
> Howdy, Folks,
>
> I installed the new Mozila (1.6) yesterday and was exploring the
> "about:*" pages via the new "about:about" master about page. Check out
> "about:buildconfig":
>
>
> -==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==-
>
On Wed, 21 Jan 2004, Dave Korn wrote:
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Frédéric L. W. Meunier
>
> [...snip!...]
> > I think it happened when I pressed
> > some keys, but it wasn't ^Z.
> [...snip!...]
>
>
>
On Wed, 21 Jan 2004, Mark Blackburn wrote:
> Frédéric L. W. Meunier wrote:
>
> >I don't see anything in the announcement about the lack of
> >support -
> >http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-12/msg00225.html
> >. 2.6.8-3 has it.
> >
> >
On Wed, 21 Jan 2004, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On reflection, the code above (which I happened to have written) didn't
> look right to me, so I did a little digging. I think I was either
> confused when I wrote it or I'm confused now. Assuming, as always, that
> I'm less confused now than I wa
On Tue, 20 Jan 2004, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 10:04:29PM -0200, Fr?d?ric L. W. Meunier wrote:
> >I thought ^Z would suspend LFTP, but it's 's'. Anyway, let me
> >report it.
> >
> >In 1.5.5, nothing happens when you start it and press ^Z.
> >
> >In 1.5.6 and 1.5.7 snapsho
I don't see anything in the announcement about the lack of
support -
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-12/msg00225.html
. 2.6.8-3 has it.
But I see /usr/share/doc/Cygwin/lftp-2.6.10.README doesn't
mention --enable-ssl and lftp-2.6.8.README does.
Also, I think the crypt dependency can
I thought ^Z would suspend LFTP, but it's 's'. Anyway, let me
report it.
In 1.5.5, nothing happens when you start it and press ^Z.
In 1.5.6 and 1.5.7 snapshot:
in handle_threadlist_exception!
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
--
How to contact me - http://www.pervalidus.net/contact.html
--
Uns
On Tue, 20 Jan 2004, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 06:04:14PM -0200, Fr?d?ric L. W. Meunier wrote:
> >A cvs update from src/ also downloads many other modules (I
> >guess all from
> >http://sources.redhat.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/?cvsroot=src),
> >not just the changes from
http://cygwin.com/cvs.html
cvs checkout winsup
"This will create a subdirectory called src and fill it with
the core sources."
Yes, it creates a src directory with a bunch of files and the
config, contrib, etc, include, libiberty, newlib, and winsup
directories.
"Once you have the latest source
On Tue, 20 Jan 2004, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 03:47:39AM -0200, Fr?d?ric L. W. Meunier wrote:
> >On Mon, 19 Jan 2004, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> >>And, no, screen becoming screwed up in an rxvt session is not a show
> >>stopper.
> >
> >Yes, but it's something that will
On Mon, 19 Jan 2004, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> And, no, screen becoming screwed up in an rxvt session is not
> a show stopper.
Yes, but it's something that will make all screen users not
upgrade to 1.5.6 or downgrade to 1.5.5 when they see how broken
it's. Broken dettach / reattach is nothing c
I compiled Lynx under 1.5.6 and tried to run it under 1.5.5:
"The procedure entry point _fcntl64 could not be located in the
dynamic link library cygwin1.dll"
How many Cygwin applications are supposed to be affected by the
following changes ?
- Make tmpfile 64-bit aware. (Corinna Vinschen)
- Ma
On Sun, 28 Dec 2003, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Dec 2003, Frédéric L. W. Meunier wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 27 Dec 2003, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> >
> > > On Sat, Dec 27, 2003 at 07:42:18PM -0200, Frédéric L. W. Meunier wrote:
> > > >I did
On Sat, 27 Dec 2003, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 27, 2003 at 07:42:18PM -0200, Fr?d?ric L. W. Meunier wrote:
> >I did the following:
> >
> >Start the application in a terminal.
> >Use ps in another terminal.
> >Use gdb -p from that terminal.
> >
> >Then:
> >
> >(gdb) c
> >Continuing.
>
I did the following:
Start the application in a terminal.
Use ps in another terminal.
Use gdb -p from that terminal.
Then:
(gdb) c
Continuing.
Do something with the application.
Then I tried ^C in gdb and it didn't work, but it works on
Linux.
Sorry, I'm not used to debug things, but I'd like
On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 03:22:10PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> >On Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 02:31:40PM -0200, Fr?d?ric L. W. Meunier wrote:
> >>At least here rxvt dies after started. cmd.exe works. Latest
> >>Cygwin packages on XP Professional SP
At least here rxvt dies after started. cmd.exe works. Latest
Cygwin packages on XP Professional SP1 + all updates.
--
How to contact me - http://www.pervalidus.net/contact.html
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.ht
On Tue, 16 Dec 2003, dezai G wrote:
> I have downloaded and intalled the new cygwin with
> gcc 3.3.1-3
> My freehdl (http://www.freehdl.seul.org/) no longer
> compile with the new cygwin.
> How can i download the previous setup of cygwin to be
> able to compile my freeHdl program
What about repo
I noticed the latest cygwin1.dll snapshot messes up screen
under rxvt. I haven't tried spapshots for quite a while, so it
may be an old problem. I know screen isn't part of Cygwin, but
it's very useful, even without the reattaching stuff. I'm using
my package from http://www.pervalidus.net/cygwin/s
On Fri, 12 Dec 2003, Doug Jenkinson wrote:
> Hey everyone,
> I saw this in a comment about the latest build of Mozilla, 1.6 beta that
> is, and tried on Firebird. If you open up a window/tab/whatever and
> goto "about:buildconfig", cygwin is mentioned! I'm just sharing the
> info, as I really no
On Sat, 29 Nov 2003, David A. Cobb wrote:
> > OK, Now I've reconciled my configure options with those in the
> > document, and defined the libraries as shown.
>
>
> Same result, basically. This time I got to a recursion about 180 proc's
> deep when something failed ( happily ) and unwound the sta
On Fri, 28 Nov 2003, Tomasz Rojek wrote:
> > There are 2 binaries I know of, one I built and doesn't have.
> > Perl support - http://www.pervalidus.net/cygwin/irssi/
> I will try that one. Irssi is much more attractive and user friendly than
> ircII or naim, that's why I prefer it.
I took the tim
I guess he's talking about irssi, which isn't part of Cygwin.
ircII doesn't include Perl support. But I'm not sure since he
used 'irc'.
There are 2 binaries I know of, one I built and doesn't have
Perl support - http://www.pervalidus.net/cygwin/irssi/
The other, which is older, has and is at
http
On Thu, 27 Nov 2003, Thorsten Kampe wrote:
> * David A. Cobb (2003-11-27 17:54 +0100)
> > My configure/make score is just barely above zero. I'd be sure it was
> > all me if it was indeed zero - but not quite.
>
> > Latest attempt: rxvt-2.7.10
>
> Install rxvt via Setup.exe.
That won't fix the s
On Tue, 25 Nov 2003, Frank P. Hart wrote:
> I am interested in using the Cscope package with ViM on
> my Cygwin/WinXP installation. Unfortunately, the
> configure script (and subsequent make attempts) for
> Cscope 15.5 fails because the file 'ncurses.h' is
> absent. The ncurses package on my ins
On Sun, 23 Nov 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> The only thing I found missing really are the libraries' header files.
>
> One such library is libjpeg, which has no development package, and i
> believe there was some compression lib also.
The headers are in jpeg-6b-11.tar.bz2. As I don't see libjp
On Sun, 23 Nov 2003, Larry Hall wrote:
> At 04:40 PM 11/23/2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
>> I could also try to compile a Cygwin binary version of the
>> library, but that would be at least slightly harder.
> This would be a true Cygwin package so I don't see a reason
> it couldn't be include
On Fri, 21 Nov 2003, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Nov 2003, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 02:50:18PM -0600, Parker, Ron wrote:
> > >I created a patch for GNU screen 3.9.15 that will allow it to be compiled
> > >and installed on Cygwin. The patch is attached belo
On Thu, 20 Nov 2003, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
> P.P.S. Speaking of Linux, did you know that Cygwin runs under
> WINE? :-D
Really ? Everything, including compiling ?
--
How to contact me - http://www.pervalidus.net/contact.html
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
On Wed, 12 Nov 2003, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 04:15:46PM -0200, Fr?d?ric L. W. Meunier wrote:
> > On Wed, 12 Nov 2003, Brian Ford wrote:
> >
> > > Corinna,
> > >
> > > Did you get a chance to look at the strace output he posted here:
> > >
> > > http://pervalidus.port5.com
On Wed, 12 Nov 2003, Brian Ford wrote:
> Corinna,
>
> Did you get a chance to look at the strace output he posted here:
>
> http://pervalidus.port5.com/tmp/imap.txt.gz
>
> A glance there by trained eyes might save him some time. I don't have the
> time or the training for mine :). It appears to
On Wed, 12 Nov 2003, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 12:20:57AM -0200, Fr?d?ric L. W. Meunier wrote:
> > Now I'm trying with gdb, but don't know if the following is
> > right.
> >
> > $ openssl s_client -connect mail.postaccesslite.com:993
> > $ gdb
> > (gdb) attach PPID of opens
On Tue, 11 Nov 2003, Frédéric L. W. Meunier wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Nov 2003, Brian Ford wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 11 Nov 2003, Frédéric L. W. Meunier wrote:
> > > On Tue, 11 Nov 2003, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > > > Me neither. Seems to be a local problem.
> >
On Tue, 11 Nov 2003, Brian Ford wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Nov 2003, Frédéric L. W. Meunier wrote:
> > On Tue, 11 Nov 2003, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > > Me neither. Seems to be a local problem.
> >
> > I don't see what could be wrong with my installation.
> >
&
On Tue, 11 Nov 2003, Brian Ford wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Nov 2003, Frédéric L. W. Meunier wrote:
> > On Tue, 11 Nov 2003, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > > Me neither. Seems to be a local problem.
> >
> > I don't see what could be wrong with my installation.
&g
nOn Tue, 11 Nov 2003, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 01:52:36AM -0200, Fr?d?ric L. W. Meunier wrote:
> > OK, so here's what turns out to be an OpenSSL issue. All thanks
> > to Eduardo.
> >
> > On Mon, 10 Nov 2003, Eduardo Chappa wrote:
> >
> > > *** Fr?d?ric L. W. Meunier wrote
OK, so here's what turns out to be an OpenSSL issue. All thanks
to Eduardo.
On Mon, 10 Nov 2003, Eduardo Chappa wrote:
> *** Frédéric L. W. Meunier wrote on Nov 11, 2003:
>
> :) > Is there any delay?
> :)
> :) Yes.
>
> Ok, this means that the problem is not Pine.
I don't know what's wrong, but can't reproduce with the
same versions of PC-Pine and Pine for Linux.
I have 5 IMAP accounts. The main INBOX is fastmail.fm.
The others are
incoming-folders=PostaccessLite {mail.postaccesslite.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED],
PostaccessLite-fredlwm {mail.postaccessli
On Fri, 31 Oct 2003, David Andersen wrote:
> I'm trying to get irc to work, but I keep getting the following:
>
> *** Connecting to port 6667 of server irc.freenode.net
> *** Looking up your hostname...
> *** Checking ident
> *** Found your hostname
> *** No identd (auth) response
> *** Closing Li
On Thu, 23 Oct 2003, Larry Hall wrote:
> At 09:03 AM 10/23/2003, Heiko Nardmann you wrote:
> >
> >Where do I find a gcc 2.95.3 package for Cygwin?
> >
> With any luck, nowhere. gcc 2.95.3 is broken and as a result, has been
> removed from the distribution. You might be able to find it on some ou
I read it makes significant differences for compile times when
GCC is configured with --disable-checking, but 3.3.1-2 doesn't
return it with gcc -v. Does it make any difference on Cygwin ?
It certainly does on Linux.
--
How to contact me - http://www.pervalidus.net/contact.html
--
Unsubscribe in
On Mon, 13 Oct 2003, Monique Y. Herman wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Oct 2003 at 01:37 GMT, Edward Peschko penned:
> > On Sun, Oct 12, 2003 at 07:24:29PM -0600, bob wrote:
> >> Is there any way to have more than one console session available in
> >> one rxvt (or dos) window? I am thinking of the konsole th
On Sat, 11 Oct 2003, Edward Peschko wrote:
> (pps - 'screen' - as per 4.0.1, just gained cygwin support.
> You might want to add that to your list of cygwin packages.)
I don't see any Cygwin support in 4.0.1. Where did you read it
? There's nothing in patchlevel.h (which details the changes),
rea
g my (this) thread.
On Wed, 8 Oct 2003, Frédéric L. W. Meunier wrote:
> mainly because one of my pages is the 10° result of a search
> for download+cygwin1.dll on Google.
--
How to contact me - http://www.pervalidus.net/contact.html
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscrib
I distribute some binaries since 1 1/2 year, and was also
always redistributing the latest cygwin1.dll (and making the
sources available from the same sites due to the license) to
make people's life easier, but it turns out a lot of people
were only downloading it, mainly because one of my pages is
Thanks, I'll do that. I remember when I tried as a symlink and
something hung setup (I guess setup doesn't handle them ?). It
wasn't the XFree86-bin-icons issue, which also hung when I
reverted the symlink.
I'll go through the archives to see what I should do for
XFree86-bin-icons since I had to u
On Mon, 6 Oct 2003, Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
> Perhaps the setup postinstall scripts should change to using
> bash. Its behavior is correct and will avoid frustrations.
It'd be nice it I could get rid of it. I have to use
#!/bin/bash in my scripts, change rxvt (the X11 version)
because it default
On Sat, 4 Oct 2003, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 04, 2003 at 06:09:15PM -0300, Fr?d?ric L. W. Meunier wrote:
> >On Sat, 4 Oct 2003, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
> >>>I've repeatedly asked for someone to take over maintainership of gcc.
> >>>If you are producing packages on your web site can I
On Sat, 4 Oct 2003, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
> Hallo Christopher,
>
>
> > I've repeatedly asked for someone to take over maintainership of gcc.
> > If you are producing packages on your web site can I ask you go to all
> > of the way and maintain gcc for cygwin?
>
> I'm thinking about it for a while
On Thu, 2 Oct 2003, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 01:22:03PM -0300, Fr?d?ric L. W. Meunier wrote:
> > On Thu, 2 Oct 2003, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > > On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 02:50:14PM -0300, Fr?d?ric L. W. Meunier wrote:
> > > > I don't think Links has a maintainer, or one w
On Thu, 2 Oct 2003, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 02:50:14PM -0300, Frédéric L. W. Meunier wrote:
> > I don't think Links has a maintainer, or one we can contact.
>
> What do you mean? Links has a Cygwin maintainer at least.
If you mean one who contribute
On Wed, 1 Oct 2003, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 11:28:10AM +0200, Patrick Eisenacher wrote:
> > Corinna,
> >
> > is there an easy way to find out whether I still have a package
> > installed that needs the openssl 0.9.6x compatibility package? I would
> > love to get rid of t
Anybody know how (better if recursively) ? I extracted a
tarball under Cygwin and later copied it to a Linux partition.
Obviously all Cygwin shortcuts created at extract time are
copied, breaking it.
--
How to contact me - http://www.pervalidus.net/contact.html
--
Unsubscribe info: http://c
binutils
cygwin
gcc (not gcc2)
What's the right version ? It seems the last package installed
overwrites it, so I have the one from cygwin.
--
How to contact me - http://www.pervalidus.net/contact.html
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: htt
Maybe this should be directed to cygwin-xfree. I don't know,
really.
I read there are plans to make fontconfig a package. It
probably will go to /usr/lib along with FreeType (the
standalone sources also include a .pc file for it), but this
doesn't fix xcursor and xft.
XFree86-prog installs
/usr/X
Replying to a message from 26 February...
Victor Stepanov wrote:
>> Does anybody using latest "home build" browser from links
>> family? I've tried to compile each, but with same problem -
>> links.exe does not recognize letter commands, only Ctrl
>> ones.
>> After finishing links.exe all letter
While running configure for IceWM (I don't think it's a
question for cygwin-xfree) I noticed the following:
checking for shmat... no
checking for shmat in -lipc... no
The second test returned yes when I created libipc.a and
libipc.dll.a symlinks.
What's the right procedure for this test, which s
On Sun, 21 Sep 2003, Alex Vinokur wrote:
> I would like to use both gcc 3.2-3 and gcc 3.3-1.
> Is it possible?
> What and how do I download and install?
I have both (only C and C++), but manually installed them. I
renamed the old binaries to *-3.exe and moved the old
libstdc++.a and libsupc++.a t
I wonder it anyone has any plans to port it. Even the
commercial S.M.A.R.T. suites for Windows aren't that good. I
tried all. It'd be a nice addition, really.
Unfortunately I'm not (yet) a programmer, still know very
little about Cygwin, but got it to compile removing some code
that may be needed
Nevermind. I redownload setup.ini from sources.redhat.com. BTW,
no md5sum problem.
On Sat, 20 Sep 2003, Frédéric L. W. Meunier wrote:
> Here setup is crashing / exiting. I downloaded setup.ini from
> sources.redhat.com and the packages from mirrors.rcn.net. I'm
> installin
Here setup is crashing / exiting. I downloaded setup.ini from
sources.redhat.com and the packages from mirrors.rcn.net. I'm
installing from a local directory. It exits while scanning the
packages.
On Sun, 21 Sep 2003, Cliff Hones wrote:
> On the two mirrors which I could find which have the new 1
On Fri, 5 Sep 2003, Frédéric L. W. Meunier wrote:
> I just switched to 3.2-3 and was impressed with the following:
>
> Cygwin -O2 -O2 + -Wl,-s -Os -Os + -Wl,-s
> --
> 2.95.3-10 15178 665615178 6656
> 3.2-3 26710 14336
I suggest you use rxvt since the Cygwin "terminal" appers to be
broken for that. I don't know if it ever worked, but it never
did since I started with 1.3.10. I now use 1.5.3. I reported
it. See
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/2003-01/msg00048.html
and follow
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygw
Answering 2 in 1.
On Fri, 5 Sep 2003, Wayne wrote:
> There have been discussions on various forums about increased
> executable size and in particular, compile time, pretty much
> since gcc-3.1 was in beta. Exe will be bigger than 2-95, even
> after stripping.
I agree that even on Linux this is
1 - 100 of 150 matches
Mail list logo
