At 08:47 PM 7/11/2004, you wrote:
On Sat, Jul 10, 2004 at 09:54:05AM -0500, Eduardo Chappa wrote:
That was CGF himself, he volunteered to not to volunteer.
He brought
this topic onto himself.
This statement is disingenuous. For shame.
Perhaps, perhaps not. I'm still waiting
Mit freundlichen GrĂ¼ssen,
?
With friendly GrĂ¼ssen.
I knew that high school German would come in handy some day... ;-)
--
Gary R. Van Sickle
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:
On Sat, Jul 10, 2004 at 09:54:05AM -0500, Eduardo Chappa wrote:
That was CGF himself, he volunteered to not to volunteer. He brought
this topic onto himself.
This statement is disingenuous. For shame.
Perhaps, perhaps not. I'm still waiting for somebody, other than you
Chris[1], to
On Sun, July 11, 2004 10:22 pm, LDR said:
--- Igor Pechtchanski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
*PCYMTNQREAIYR* -- Please Configure Your Mailer To Not Quote Raw
E-mail Addresses In Your Replies.
http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#PCYMTNQREAIYR.
- What mailers (mail clients?) do
cygwin-ownerXXXYOU_KNOW_THE_REST wrote on Sunday, July 11, 2004 7:54 PM:
On Sun, July 11, 2004 10:22 pm, LDR said:
--- Igor Pechtchanski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
*PCYMTNQREAIYR* -- Please Configure Your Mailer To Not Quote Raw
E-mail Addresses In Your
GARY VANSICKLE wrote:
There's three reasons people knee-jerk against HTML email:
1. It isn't ASCII (i.e. the Back in my day a child would open up a
gift and within seconds he'd either burst into flames or lose a limb!
That's the way it was and we liked it![1] Defense).
2a. There isn't
Responding before I read the whole thread, as I'm sure this gets a whole lot
uglier:
On Jul 9 11:03, William Blunn wrote:
I think not. I think the counter argument would be Yes we know it
makes the occasional command-line appear line-wrapped, but
that is a
nano-issue compared to
As a person who regularly uses HTML style email and posting
(much to many peoples chargrin and complaints) I rarely
fester them with all
sorts of colors and fonts. Other HTML emails and posts I
receive are also rarely festered with all sorts of colors
and fonts. Why? Because doing so
Nobody's trying to force you to read. You shouldn't try to
force them to write in a particular style. In the end
communication, at least civil communication and I'd say any
communication that is, in the long term, successsful, always
requires *compromise* on both parties. Your stated
I never used the word fix, please do not misunderstand me.
I refer to
this as enhance. Yes, it is broken, by the way.
So, it's broken and you want me to enhance it so that it
won't be broken anymore but you were not suggesting a
fix. Got it.
Can somebody show me where anybody made
Possibly I should add that I am comparing the behavior of
version 1.5.10 to a much older version that I was using
before.
It wasn't by chance... oh... say... B20? ;-)
So whatever is causing this odd behavior on my system
may not be a feature that was new to version 1.5.10. I am
Am I the only one that thinks reading a 12 page document, and possibly
editing 5 different config files is a hell of a lot of work just to get
the delete key to work?!?!?!
You want to make the delete key delete in bash?
No, he just wants the delete key to work as God intended it to work.
So, to answer that question, why not something like this:
# --- BEGIN_DEFS ---
if [ -f ${FULLPKG}.defs ]; then
. ${FULLPKG}.defs
fi
# --- END_DEFS ---
So, if my source package name is foo.tar.Z, then I can put the
[snip]
following in my defs file:
# Maintainer defs
Hello from Gregg C Levine
Actually Gary, its called SP2 RC1, for XP. Its going through that
phase, with SP1 RC2 due out towards the end of the month, and the
actual SP2 going to the RTM phase so that its in time to be released
by the 21 July, date. (If you can believe that.)
I of course
I did some test and found out that ``every file whose path includes
Korean characters weren't openable.'' Still, I could move arround those
[snip]
I just installed the XP SP2 preview or whatever they call it. One of the
things in the very long list of things it claims to fix is some problem
I hesitate to enforce a standard template for all announcements but I
really would like to see people start including unsubscribe instructions
in their announcement email.
Please do me a favor and include unsubscribe instructions in your
announcement email. Please just copy the few lines
When you send messages to a mailing list, you invite discussion. That
is why we have mailing lists.
Well, that's why other organizations have mailing lists anyway.
(Please send all we're just means to the list or not at all. I have a
very thin skin and get offended if somebody sends me
Not sure what an hdf5 is, but in general it is not possible to do
sync-to-backing-storage from an arbitrary account in Windows. Not
even on
removable media, which of course is where you often need it most.
Microsoft's rationale behind this escapes me, but there it is.
Furthermore,
even
I'm trying to port some code that uses flushall() to cygwin.
The non-windows version of the code uses 'system(sync)'
but this fails the builtin tests.
The code is hdf5-1.6.2, in case that helps.
Not sure what an hdf5 is, but in general it is not possible to do
sync-to-backing-storage from
I got this *System Error* message in my e-mail:
*plonk*
Ahh...
cgf
I'm concerned that creator might be dropping some critical data.
However someone more knowledgeable in these matters will have debug
this.
I also don't have a 64 sheet test roll installed in my bathroom.
I got this *System Error* message in my e-mail:
*plonk*
Ahh...
cgf
I'm concerned that creator might be dropping some critical data.
However someone more knowledgeable in these matters will have debug
this.
I also don't have a 64 sheet test roll installed in my bathroom.
Brian
On Thu, Apr 22, 2004 at 08:26:00AM -0700, Eduardo Chappa wrote:
:) that Cygwin is different (e.g. we could do this in the cygwin
:) applications mailing list).
:)
:) Why do you want to change so many programs when all you need is a
:) cygwin managed mount?
IMO, the correct
Hello,
I have been trying to fix a patch for maildir for Pine, and while
thinking about this I recalled that support for Maildir in Cygwin (e.g
Mutt) has been discussed a couple of times. It seems to be that the only
thing stopping people from being able to use it is a agreement on the
[snip]
New copying methods have been added and checked:
Test file modes : text, binary
--
Testsuites
--
C-01 : Functions getc() and putc()
C-02 : Functions fgetc() and fputc()
C-03 : Functions fread() and
Hi all,
I found a way to issue an actual sync() on win32, and as browsing
through winsup directory gave me only this
winsup/sygwin/syscalls.cc #1128
extern C int
sync ()
{
return 0;
}
I think cygwin DLL might benefit from a code I found by looking in
sync.exe by
[snip]
SUSv3 has this to say about sync():
quote
The sync() function shall cause all information in memory that updates
file
systems to be scheduled for writing out to all file systems.
The writing, although scheduled, is not necessarily complete upon return
from
sync().
/quote
Noo... Please, remove all of these safety checks.
There must be some kind of user sanity presupposition. Or else the tools
soon will be crippled to a state where they are unusable for normal work.
FWIW I'm with Hannu. Should rm ask you, Do you *really* want to delete
this file?, or make a
Subject: Re: cygwin... from Turkey
...NER NERRR!
Keep on rockin' in the Free world!...
;-)
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:
On Sat, Mar 27, 2004 at 03:05:11PM -0500, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
Is the ITP moratorium declared in
http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2004-03/msg00036.html still in effect?
Nope. Daniel's back. Sorry that I never made that clear.
I'd like to explore new methods for getting packages into
29 matches
Mail list logo