On Dec 27 18:06, Brian Ford wrote:
On Fri, 23 Dec 2011, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Dec 22 12:51, Brian Ford wrote:
On Wed, 21 Dec 2011, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On second thought I'm a bit puzzled that the pthread stack isn't
correctly aligned as well. Ignoring the
On Mon, 9 Jan 2012, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Dec 27 18:06, Brian Ford wrote:
On Fri, 23 Dec 2011, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Sorry, but what I don't get from your reply is if the andl worked or
not.
No; by itself, it does not. Adding a subl $12, %%esp following it so
that the
On Jan 9 09:41, Brian Ford wrote:
On Mon, 9 Jan 2012, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Dec 27 18:06, Brian Ford wrote:
On Fri, 23 Dec 2011, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Sorry, but what I don't get from your reply is if the andl worked or
not.
No; by itself, it does not. Adding a
On Fri, 23 Dec 2011, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Dec 22 12:51, Brian Ford wrote:
On Wed, 21 Dec 2011, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On second thought I'm a bit puzzled that the pthread stack isn't
correctly aligned as well. Ignoring the pthread_attr_setstack case
which wasn't supported so
On Dec 22 12:51, Brian Ford wrote:
On Wed, 21 Dec 2011, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On second thought I'm a bit puzzled that the pthread stack isn't
correctly aligned as well. Ignoring the pthread_attr_setstack case
which wasn't supported so far anyway, the OS stack set up by
CreateThread
On Dec 21 15:25, Brian Ford wrote:
On Wed, 21 Dec 2011, Brian Ford wrote:
Still trying, but getting the following warning turned into an error by
-Werror which looks like it might be valid?
cc1plus: warnings being treated as errors
src/winsup/cygwin/fhandler.cc:
In member function
On Thu, 22 Dec 2011, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Dec 21 15:25, Brian Ford wrote:
On Wed, 21 Dec 2011, Brian Ford wrote:
Thanks for the fix Christopher, but I must be using the wrong compiler or
something. Here's my next issue:
src/winsup/cygwin/child_info.h:
In static member
On Dec 22 09:20, Brian Ford wrote:
On Thu, 22 Dec 2011, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Dec 21 15:25, Brian Ford wrote:
On Wed, 21 Dec 2011, Brian Ford wrote:
Thanks for the fix Christopher, but I must be using the wrong compiler or
something. Here's my next issue:
On Dec 22 16:31, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Dec 22 09:20, Brian Ford wrote:
On Thu, 22 Dec 2011, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Dec 21 15:25, Brian Ford wrote:
On Wed, 21 Dec 2011, Brian Ford wrote:
Thanks for the fix Christopher, but I must be using the wrong compiler
or
On Thu, 22 Dec 2011, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
The error message is kind of nonsense anyway. The expression in question
is
sizeof (cygheap_exec_info) + (nprocs * sizeof (children[0]))
so it's just a `sizeof', not an actual usage of the member. Try this
for now:
Index: sigproc.cc
On Thu, 22 Dec 2011, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Btw., you are apparently not running the latest gcc-4. I just tried to
compile this file (without my patch) on Cygwin and it works fine without
any warning or error:
$ gcc --version
gcc (GCC) 4.5.3
You are correct, although I just ran setup
On Wed, 21 Dec 2011, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On second thought I'm a bit puzzled that the pthread stack isn't
correctly aligned as well. Ignoring the pthread_attr_setstack case
which wasn't supported so far anyway, the OS stack set up by
CreateThread is 64K aligned. From that 64K aligned
On Dec 20 17:45, Brian Ford wrote:
I'm just headed home from work right now, but I thought I would let you
know of a regression from 1.7.9. It appears the effect of this patch:
http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-cvs/2004-q2/msg00124.html
is no longer working in the current snapshot. I'll
On Dec 21 10:42, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Dec 20 17:45, Brian Ford wrote:
I'm just headed home from work right now, but I thought I would let you
know of a regression from 1.7.9. It appears the effect of this patch:
http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-cvs/2004-q2/msg00124.html
is no
On 21/12/2011 09:42, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
But OTOH I have to admit that I don't see how this alignment business
worked at all. Aligning the stack to 16 byte in mainCRTStartup doesn't
guarantee that the stack is still 16 byte aligned in main(). If that
worked so far, it seems like a
On Dec 21 15:20, Dave Korn wrote:
On 21/12/2011 09:42, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
But OTOH I have to admit that I don't see how this alignment business
worked at all. Aligning the stack to 16 byte in mainCRTStartup doesn't
guarantee that the stack is still 16 byte aligned in main(). If
I'm sorry. I should have learned by now not to post at the last minute
before leaving for the day. I always make mistakes and leave out
important information. Thanks for considering my problem in spite of
these oversights. More below...
On Wed, 21 Dec 2011, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Dec 20
On Wed, 21 Dec 2011, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Dec 21 15:20, Dave Korn wrote:
GCC assumes that the stack starts off 16-aligned when the OS hands over to
the exe's entrypoint, and then makes sure it stays that way by always
rounding
stack frame sizes up to the nearest multiple of 16.
On Dec 21 10:22, Brian Ford wrote:
On Wed, 21 Dec 2011, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Dec 21 15:20, Dave Korn wrote:
GCC assumes that the stack starts off 16-aligned when the OS hands over
to
the exe's entrypoint, and then makes sure it stays that way by always
rounding
stack
On Wed, 21 Dec 2011, Brian Ford wrote:
I'm trying to test now, but I haven't built cygwin in years so I'm still
working to get things set up.
Still trying, but getting the following warning turned into an error by
-Werror which looks like it might be valid?
cc1plus: warnings being treated as
On Wed, 21 Dec 2011, Brian Ford wrote:
Still trying, but getting the following warning turned into an error by
-Werror which looks like it might be valid?
cc1plus: warnings being treated as errors
src/winsup/cygwin/fhandler.cc:
In member function fhandler_base_overlapped::wait_return
I'm just headed home from work right now, but I thought I would let you
know of a regression from 1.7.9. It appears the effect of this patch:
http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-cvs/2004-q2/msg00124.html
is no longer working in the current snapshot. I'll try to narrow it down
to which change
22 matches
Mail list logo
