Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
On Thu, 30 Sep 2004, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:
Well, yes. The flash drive is a Sandisk Cruzer Mini which is USB
2.0 with fallback to 1.1. The computer is a Dell Dimension 4600
which claims eight USB 2.0 connectiors.
Running Windows XP.
[snip]
]
Subject: [OT] RE: cp to flash drive very slow
On Thu, 30 Sep 2004, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:
Well, yes. The flash drive is a Sandisk Cruzer Mini which is USB
2.0 with fallback to 1.1. The computer is a Dell Dimension 4600
which claims eight USB 2.0 connectiors.
Running Windows XP
you wrote:
SNIP
What happens if you cp between two hard drives, or across the
network? Same
crazy slowness?
--
Gary R. Van Sickle
How about 'tar --diff' and '--update' - tried them?
/Hannu E K Nevalainen, B.Sc. EE Microcomputer systems--72--
** mailing list preference;
On Thu, 30 Sep 2004, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:
Well, yes. The flash drive is a Sandisk Cruzer Mini which is
USB 2.0 with fallback to 1.1. The computer is a Dell
Dimension 4600 which claims eight USB 2.0 connectiors.
Running Windows XP.
[snip]
(EIGHT USB 2.0 connectors? Wowzers!
Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
On Thu, 30 Sep 2004, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:
Well, yes. The flash drive is a Sandisk Cruzer Mini which is
USB 2.0 with fallback to 1.1. The computer is a Dell
Dimension 4600 which claims eight USB 2.0 connectiors.
Running Windows XP.
[snip]
(EIGHT USB 2.0
you wrote:
Thanks for responding, Gary.
Regardless, 3.7Mb/second seems like something's wrong somewhere.
Are you running USB2.0 hub-to-device?
I dunno. I'm not very knowledgable about hardware esp. USB. How
would I tell?
dar
Sorry for butting in...
I'd say it should've read USB 2.0
Well, yes. The flash drive is a Sandisk Cruzer Mini which is USB 2.0 with
fallback to 1.1. The computer is a Dell Dimension 4600 which claims eight
USB 2.0 connectiors. Running Windows XP.
I don't think caching is the difference. I was able to unzip the .zip
file right after xcopy had copied
you ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote on :
Well, yes. The flash drive is a Sandisk Cruzer Mini which is USB 2.0
with fallback to 1.1. The computer is a Dell Dimension 4600 which
claims eight USB 2.0 connectiors. Running Windows XP.
Right, then we know. ;-)
I don't think caching is the
Well, yes. The flash drive is a Sandisk Cruzer Mini which is
USB 2.0 with fallback to 1.1. The computer is a Dell
Dimension 4600 which claims eight USB 2.0 connectiors.
Running Windows XP.
Ok, like Hannu said, it's a USB 2.0 connection then, as long as you don't
have any USB 1.1 hubs
I tried using cp to copy a zip file 106MB from my hard drive
to my flash drive (sandisk mini cruzer). After 20 minutes it
still had not completed.
xcopy copied the file in 22 seconds.
Why would cp be so much slower? Any ideas as to work-arounds?
Last I checked, cp was slower on
10 matches
Mail list logo