Re: Ready for test coreutils-5.2.0-1

2004-03-12 Thread Charles Wilson
Joshua Daniel Franklin wrote: There are also some patches I'm considering adding from fileutils-4.1-2 (proposed-fileutils-patches.txt). I got these by diffing fileutils-4.1 with the src package for fileutils-4.1-2. I was hoping that the previous maintainer could comment on these patches so I

Re: Ready for test coreutils-5.2.0-1

2004-03-12 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Fri, Mar 12, 2004 at 03:45:44AM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote: Joshua Daniel Franklin wrote: There are also some patches I'm considering adding from fileutils-4.1-2 (proposed-fileutils-patches.txt). I got these by diffing fileutils-4.1 with the src package for fileutils-4.1-2. I was hoping that

.rdata section in Cygwin executables?

2004-03-12 Thread Joe Buehler
The emacs recompile fails because there is a section in the initially built emacs.exe named .rdata that the unexec() code for Cygwin is not expecting. The section appears to have something to do with exception handling and is only 1k in size. I'm reading up on this at the moment, but a couple

Pending PPL

2004-03-12 Thread Igor Pechtchanski
Hi, all, FYI, I'm still working on the PPL, but doing it properly is taking more time than I anticipated. I now appreciate Dan's efforts even more... :-) The PPL *is* coming, just not as soon as I expected. Igor -- http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/ |\

Re: .rdata section in Cygwin executables?

2004-03-12 Thread Egor Duda
Joe Buehler wrote: The emacs recompile fails because there is a section in the initially built emacs.exe named .rdata that the unexec() code for Cygwin is not expecting. The section appears to have something to do with exception handling and is only 1k in size. .rdata is a section where read-only

Re: .rdata section in Cygwin executables?

2004-03-12 Thread Joe Buehler
Egor Duda wrote: You may write your own linker script so that all rdata section will be put to .data when emacs.exe is linked, but again, it doesn't look as the proper way to deal with the problem. According to objdump, there is no readonly flag set for .rdata. Does Windows know about the name

Re: Ready for test coreutils-5.2.0-1

2004-03-12 Thread Mark Blackburn
So I will delete the following: usr/bin/uptime.exe usr/bin/kill.exe usr/share/man/man1/uptime.1.gz usr/share/man/man1/kill.1.gz I will include the fileutils patches except the ones to src/copy.c and lib/regex.c since they have no apparent effect. One final question: for now do I rename

Re: .rdata section in cygwin executables?

2004-03-12 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Fri, Mar 12, 2004 at 10:28:02AM -0500, Joe Buehler wrote: Egor Duda wrote: You may write your own linker script so that all rdata section will be put to .data when emacs.exe is linked, but again, it doesn't look as the proper way to deal with the problem. According to objdump, there is no

Re: Pending PPL

2004-03-12 Thread Igor Pechtchanski
On Fri, 12 Mar 2004, Christopher Faylor wrote: On Fri, Mar 12, 2004 at 09:38:40AM -0500, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: Hi, all, FYI, I'm still working on the PPL, but doing it properly is taking more time than I anticipated. I now appreciate Dan's efforts even more... :-) The PPL *is* coming,

Re: Ready for test coreutils-5.2.0-1

2004-03-12 Thread Joshua Daniel Franklin
--- Mark Blackburn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So I will delete the following: usr/bin/uptime.exe usr/bin/kill.exe usr/share/man/man1/uptime.1.gz usr/share/man/man1/kill.1.gz I will include the fileutils patches except the ones to src/copy.c and lib/regex.c since they have no

Re: Ready for test coreutils-5.2.0-1

2004-03-12 Thread Igor Pechtchanski
On Fri, 12 Mar 2004, Joshua Daniel Franklin wrote: --- Mark Blackburn marklistatfangorndotca wrote: So I will delete the following: usr/bin/uptime.exe usr/bin/kill.exe usr/share/man/man1/uptime.1.gz usr/share/man/man1/kill.1.gz I will include the fileutils patches except

Re: Ready for test coreutils-5.2.0-1

2004-03-12 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Fri, Mar 12, 2004 at 01:54:00PM -0500, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: textutils. Those three have been combined into a single set of utilities called the coreutils. category: Base requires: cygwin libiconv2 libint ^^^ This is fine for testing, but don't

Re: .rdata section in Cygwin executables?

2004-03-12 Thread Ralf Habacker
On Friday 12 March 2004 15:51, Egor Duda wrote: Joe Buehler wrote: The emacs recompile fails because there is a section in the initially built emacs.exe named .rdata that the unexec() code for Cygwin is not expecting. The section appears to have something to do with exception handling

Ready for test coreutils-5.2.0-1 [again]

2004-03-12 Thread Mark Blackburn
Here's what's changed since my last packaging attempt: 1) The following files are deleted from the distribution: usr/bin/uptime.exe usr/bin/kill.exe usr/share/man/man1/uptime.1.gz usr/share/man/man1/kill.1.gz 2) Fileutils patches have been included. Package is available at the same location:

Ready for test: patchutils 0.2.28

2004-03-12 Thread Max Bowsher
A long time ago, I packaged patchutils 0.2.26, uploaded them to personal webspace for testing, and... forgot to tell anyone about it. Oops! I've just updated to the latest upstream version (0.2.28). Packages are available here: Setup URL: http://centaur.robinson.cam.ac.uk/~mob22/cygwin

Re: Ready for test coreutils-5.2.0-1

2004-03-12 Thread Charles Wilson
Frédéric L. W. Meunier wrote: + /usr/lib/charset.alias I don't think this should be installed (neither by the current fileutils). Maybe Charles Wilson can comment. That's correct. /usr/lib/charset.alias SHOULD only be installed by the gettext package (since all the other projects which

[GTG] Re: Ready for test: patchutils 0.2.28

2004-03-12 Thread Igor Pechtchanski
On Fri, 12 Mar 2004, Max Bowsher wrote: A long time ago, I packaged patchutils 0.2.26, uploaded them to personal webspace for testing, and... forgot to tell anyone about it. Oops! I've just updated to the latest upstream version (0.2.28). Packages are available here: Setup URL:

Re: Ready for test coreutils-5.2.0-1

2004-03-12 Thread Frédéric L. W. Meunier
On Thu, 11 Mar 2004, Mark Blackburn wrote: + /usr/lib/charset.alias I don't think this should be installed (neither by the current fileutils). Maybe Charles Wilson can comment. BTW, did you run make check ? Last time I tried it didn't run at all. -- http://www.pervalidus.net/contact.html

Re: Ready for test coreutils-5.2.0-1 [again]

2004-03-12 Thread Frédéric L. W. Meunier
Just now that 5.2.1 has been released ! On Fri, 12 Mar 2004, Mark Blackburn wrote: Here's what's changed since my last packaging attempt: 1) The following files are deleted from the distribution: usr/bin/uptime.exe usr/bin/kill.exe usr/share/man/man1/uptime.1.gz

Re: Ready for test coreutils-5.2.0-1

2004-03-12 Thread Mark Blackburn
Igor Pechtchanski wrote: On Fri, 12 Mar 2004, Joshua Daniel Franklin wrote: --- Mark Blackburn marklistatfangorndotca wrote: So I will delete the following: usr/bin/uptime.exe usr/bin/kill.exe usr/share/man/man1/uptime.1.gz usr/share/man/man1/kill.1.gz I will include the fileutils