Alexander Gottwald wrote on Wednesday, October 26, 2005 7:00 PM:
On Wed, 2005-10-26 at 18:49 +0200, Alexander Gottwald wrote:
run.exe is often used from Windows shortcuts to start programs like
XWin. Even the X-start-menu-icons uses it this way, A shortcut will
not work.
To clarify this:
Does anyone have website or ftp space available to upload the xorg
packages too temporarily until they are moved to sourceware ?
They are around 70Mb of files.
Alan.
I'm attempting to create my first Cygwin package, and decided to use the
generic-build-script method.
The package is ctags (http://ctags.sourceforge.net/), which builds just
fine out of the box. With a bit of scripting [*] I have the build
process automated. Problem is, the generated binary
On Oct 27 10:51, Alan Hourihane wrote:
Does anyone have website or ftp space available to upload the xorg
packages too temporarily until they are moved to sourceware ?
They are around 70Mb of files.
You have an account on sourceware and upload rights. Just scp your stuff
to your home dir or
Warren Young wrote:
the corresponding autoconf variable. As g-b-s runs configure, ${bindir)
ends up being /usr/bin, so when the g-b-s inst step runs, the binaries
go to /usr/bin, not to $UNPACKED_TARBALL/.inst/usr/bin.
Most standard autoconf/automake-generated configure scripts support the
A new release of the xorg-* binaries are available for upload.
This coincides with X.Org 6.9/7.0 RC1 (release candidate 1)
I'm not sure how or whether packages are identified as test packages
anymore through setup, but they should be marked so if possible.
Files are at :-
On Oct 27 12:56, Alan Hourihane wrote:
A new release of the xorg-* binaries are available for upload.
This coincides with X.Org 6.9/7.0 RC1 (release candidate 1)
I'm not sure how or whether packages are identified as test packages
anymore through setup, but they should be marked so if
On Thu, 2005-10-27 at 13:49 +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Oct 27 10:51, Alan Hourihane wrote:
Does anyone have website or ftp space available to upload the xorg
packages too temporarily until they are moved to sourceware ?
They are around 70Mb of files.
You have an account on
On Thu, 2005-10-27 at 14:01 +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Oct 27 12:56, Alan Hourihane wrote:
A new release of the xorg-* binaries are available for upload.
This coincides with X.Org 6.9/7.0 RC1 (release candidate 1)
I'm not sure how or whether packages are identified as test
Brian Dessent wrote:
Most standard autoconf/automake-generated configure scripts support the
use of DESTDIR for the make install step.
Ah. Then I think I can fix this by making ctags' Makefile.in honor
DESTDIR. Tiny patch with low impact, so likely to be accepted upstream.
Hi
I would like to contribute and maintain the gnubg package:
* http://www.gnu.org/software/gnubg/gnubg.html (Homepage)
* ftp://alpha.gnu.org/gnu/gnubg/ (Download location)
Ciao
Volker
--
Here is the setup.hint file:
sdesc: A backgammon player and analysis tool
ldesc: GNU Backgammon
I'm getting email about this:
upset: *** warning package xorg-x11-fcyr refers to non-existent
external-source: xorg-x11-fnts
xorg-x11-fcyr contains an external-source line but, unfortunately, upset
will only recognize source packages that are actually included in the
distribution. That means
On Thu, 27 Oct 2005, Christopher Faylor wrote:
However, shouldn't the curr release xorg-x11-fcyr be at 6.8.1.0-3, like
xorg-x11-fnts?
Actually the xorg-x11 packages are not built from the -src files but from a
CVS checkout becuase of the monolitic structure. The correct solution would
be one
On Thu, 2005-10-27 at 10:25 -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
I'm getting email about this:
upset: *** warning package xorg-x11-fcyr refers to non-existent
external-source: xorg-x11-fnts
xorg-x11-fcyr contains an external-source line but, unfortunately, upset
will only recognize source
14 matches
Mail list logo
