LICENSE: base-files and use of CC0

2012-10-25 Thread Jari Aalto
According to: git clone git://github.com/dsastrem/base-files.git base-files.git May files are put out using CC0 license[1]. I'm wondering this as it is to my understanding recommended only for data (images, pure data files, databases etc.), or for code snippets that accompany documentation

Re: LICENSE: base-files and use of CC0

2012-10-25 Thread Warren Young
On 10/25/2012 12:43 AM, Jari Aalto wrote: According to: git clone git://github.com/dsastrem/base-files.git base-files.git May files are put out using CC0 license[1]. I'm wondering this as it is to my understanding recommended only for data (images, pure data files, databases etc.), or

Re: [RFU] unison*

2012-10-25 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Oct 24 12:08, Andrew Schulman wrote: Please upload new versions of unison2.27, unison2.32, and unison2.40, and a new package unison2.45. While unison2.45 is technically a new package, it shouldn't need GTG as it's just a new version of Unison, like the other unison* packages.

Please hold off on new package updates for a while

2012-10-25 Thread Christopher Faylor
Something funny seems to be going on with the mirrors. A number have been out of date for a day or more. Please don't upload any packages for 24 hours so that I can assess the problem. Thanks. cgf

Re: LICENSE: base-files and use of CC0 - public domain

2012-10-25 Thread Jari Aalto
2012-10-25 17:17 Warren Young 2012-10-25 17:17 Warren Young | On 10/25/2012 12:43 AM, Jari Aalto wrote: | | According to: | | git clone git://github.com/dsastrem/base-files.git base-files.git | | | May files are put out using CC0 license[1]. I'm wondering this as it is | to my

Re: LICENSE: base-files and use of CC0 - public domain

2012-10-25 Thread David Sastre Medina
https://github.com/dsastrem/base-files.git Most probably, a wrong assumption on my side. I am not a lawyer, and most of this parlance goes far beyond my understanding. I wouldn't mean any harm whatsoever to this project, or would I purposedly introduced a legal flaw by using the Public Domain

Re: LICENSE: base-files and use of CC0 - public domain

2012-10-25 Thread Jari Aalto
2012-10-26 00:20 David Sastre Medina On 2012-10-25 23:20, David Sastre Medina wrote: | https://github.com/dsastrem/base-files.git | | Most probably, a wrong assumption on my side. No worries, it caught my attention as it was an unusual choice, considering the existing licencing policy in Open

Re: [RFU] w3m-0.5.3-2

2012-10-25 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 08:14:53PM -0400, Bob Heckel wrote: Please upload w3m-0.5.3-2 as current, delete w3m-0.5.3-1 and leave w3m-0.5.2-2 as previous. wget -x -nH --cut-dirs=2 \ http://bheckel.sdf.org/cygwin/w3m/w3m-0.5.3-2-src.tar.bz2 \ http://bheckel.sdf.org/cygwin/w3m/w3m-0.5.3-2.tar.bz2 \

Re: LICENSE: base-files and use of CC0 - public domain

2012-10-25 Thread Achim Gratz
David Sastre Medina writes: The only outstanding issue I can think of right now, would be to revert this change: -PATH=/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:${PATH} +ORIGINAL_PATH=${PATH} +PATH=/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin The details about this issue can be found here: