On Apr 27 12:47, Peter A. Castro wrote:
On Fri, 24 Apr 2015, Peter A. Castro wrote:
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 07:40:46 -0700 (PDT)
From: Peter A. Castro
Subject: Re: [HEADSUP] Dropping libopenssl098 from distro
Ugh...resending since I forgot to remove the email addresses from the quoted
On Fri, 24 Apr 2015, Peter A. Castro wrote:
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 07:40:46 -0700 (PDT)
From: Peter A. Castro doc...@fruitbat.org
To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: [HEADSUP] Dropping libopenssl098 from distro
On Mon, 20 Apr 2015, Peter A. Castro wrote:
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2015 14:40:40
On Apr 24 07:40, Peter A. Castro wrote:
On Mon, 20 Apr 2015, Peter A. Castro wrote:
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2015 14:40:40 -0700 (PDT)
From: Peter A. Castro Subject: Re: [HEADSUP] Dropping libopenssl098 from
distro
On Thu, 2 Apr 2015, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2015 13:35:23
On Mon, 20 Apr 2015, Peter A. Castro wrote:
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2015 14:40:40 -0700 (PDT)
From: Peter A. Castro
Subject: Re: [HEADSUP] Dropping libopenssl098 from distro
On Thu, 2 Apr 2015, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2015 13:35:23 +0200
From: Corinna Vinschen
Subject: Re
On Apr 20, 2015, at 3:40 PM, Peter A. Castro doc...@fruitbat.org wrote:
the machine I had access to disappeared a month ago and I've been scrambling
to get another one.
VirtualBox and the Windows 10 Technical Preview are free, and they run Cygwin
just fine. :)
On Thu, 2 Apr 2015, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2015 13:35:23 +0200
From: Corinna Vinschen
Subject: Re: [HEADSUP] Dropping libopenssl098 from distro
Peter?
It's another two weeks :}
Sorry. it's been a very busy 6 months.
Also, the machine I had access to disappeared a month
: [HEADSUP] Dropping libopenssl098 from distro
Peter?
Ping?
Oh Carp! I forgot about this! Sorry!! It's been a very busy two months
for me. I'll see if I can complete my port soon. Again, Sorry!
No worries. I just don't want to remove the libopenssl098 package,
finally
Peter?
Ping?
On Feb 2 10:16, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Jan 31 13:32, Peter A. Castro wrote:
On Mon, 26 Jan 2015, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 21:43:44 +0100
From: Corinna Vinschen
Subject: Re: [HEADSUP] Dropping libopenssl098 from distro
Just a quick
On Thu, 19 Mar 2015, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2015 18:12:21 +0100
From: Corinna Vinschen
Subject: Re: [HEADSUP] Dropping libopenssl098 from distro
Peter?
Ping?
Oh Carp! I forgot about this! Sorry!! It's been a very busy two months
for me. I'll see if I can complete my
On Mar 19 22:09, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Mar 19 13:19, Peter A. Castro wrote:
On Thu, 19 Mar 2015, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2015 18:12:21 +0100
From: Corinna Vinschen
Subject: Re: [HEADSUP] Dropping libopenssl098 from distro
Peter?
Ping?
Oh Carp! I
On Mar 19 13:19, Peter A. Castro wrote:
On Thu, 19 Mar 2015, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2015 18:12:21 +0100
From: Corinna Vinschen
Subject: Re: [HEADSUP] Dropping libopenssl098 from distro
Peter?
Ping?
Oh Carp! I forgot about this! Sorry!! It's been a very busy two
On 2/3/2015 4:17 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Feb 2 10:46, Ken Brown wrote:
I've now begun working on the 64-bit build. I found a few minor things I
had to change, and the build was pretty far along, when I apparently hit a
gcc bug:
[...]
Oh, that's too bad. I hope somebody from the gcc
On Feb 2 10:46, Ken Brown wrote:
On 1/30/2015 11:40 AM, Ken Brown wrote:
On 1/30/2015 8:25 AM, Ken Brown wrote:
On 1/30/2015 4:41 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Jan 29 15:25, Ken Brown wrote:
I'm attaching the patches that I applied (on top of Reini's patches) in
order to make the build
On 1/30/2015 11:40 AM, Ken Brown wrote:
On 1/30/2015 8:25 AM, Ken Brown wrote:
On 1/30/2015 4:41 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Jan 29 15:25, Ken Brown wrote:
I'm attaching the patches that I applied (on top of Reini's patches) in
order to make the build succeed. I also had to use libdb4.5
On Jan 31 13:32, Peter A. Castro wrote:
On Mon, 26 Jan 2015, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 21:43:44 +0100
From: Corinna Vinschen
Subject: Re: [HEADSUP] Dropping libopenssl098 from distro
Just a quick update on the libopenssl098 frontier:
On Jan 14 15:13, Corinna
On Mon, 26 Jan 2015, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 21:43:44 +0100
From: Corinna Vinschen
Subject: Re: [HEADSUP] Dropping libopenssl098 from distro
Just a quick update on the libopenssl098 frontier:
On Jan 14 15:13, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
it's really *really* overdue
On 1/30/2015 8:25 AM, Ken Brown wrote:
On 1/30/2015 4:41 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Jan 29 15:25, Ken Brown wrote:
I'm attaching the patches that I applied (on top of Reini's patches) in
order to make the build succeed. I also had to use libdb4.5 instead of
libdb4.8.
Is that ok? I
On 1/30/2015 2:02 PM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
On Fri, 2015-01-30 at 11:40 -0500, Ken Brown wrote:
On 1/30/2015 8:25 AM, Ken Brown wrote:
On 1/30/2015 4:41 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Jan 29 15:25, Ken Brown wrote:
I'm attaching the patches that I applied (on top of Reini's patches) in
On Fri, 2015-01-30 at 11:40 -0500, Ken Brown wrote:
On 1/30/2015 8:25 AM, Ken Brown wrote:
On 1/30/2015 4:41 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Jan 29 15:25, Ken Brown wrote:
I'm attaching the patches that I applied (on top of Reini's patches) in
order to make the build succeed. I also had
Hi Ken,
On Jan 29 15:25, Ken Brown wrote:
On 1/23/2015 8:48 AM, Ken Brown wrote:
My guess is correct. lisp.exe uses bit 31 (counting from the LSB) as a
marker
during garbage collection, and this is incompatible with Cygwin's use of high
memory for the heap. I think I know how to fix this
Corinna Vinschen writes:
I just had a look and it turned out that the 64 bit release only has
a single db version, 5.3, while the 32 bit version comes with 4.5 and
4.8 only. Volker???
5.3 for 64 bit was compiled by Yaakov I think, when I was absent.
xemacs and db are the
On 1/30/2015 4:41 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Hi Ken,
On Jan 29 15:25, Ken Brown wrote:
On 1/23/2015 8:48 AM, Ken Brown wrote:
My guess is correct. lisp.exe uses bit 31 (counting from the LSB) as a marker
during garbage collection, and this is incompatible with Cygwin's use of high
memory
On 1/23/2015 8:48 AM, Ken Brown wrote:
My guess is correct. lisp.exe uses bit 31 (counting from the LSB) as a marker
during garbage collection, and this is incompatible with Cygwin's use of high
memory for the heap. I think I know how to fix this (by defining
LINUX_NOEXEC_HEAPCODES in the
Just a quick update on the libopenssl098 frontier:
On Jan 14 15:13, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
it's really *really* overdue to remove the OpenSSL 0.98 DLLs from
the 32 bit distro. Fortunately they were never in the 64 bit distro.
The problem is that we still have packages requiring
On 01/14/2015 03:19 PM, Ken Brown wrote:
On 1/14/2015 12:46 PM, Achim Gratz wrote:
Corinna Vinschen writes:
Clisp is not yet ported to 64bit and it has problems under 32bit as
well
(temporary file generation) that also affect Maxima from ports.
If it's a problem with the Cygwin DLL, it
On Jan 23 15:45, Andrew Schulman wrote:
I, for one, welcome our new clisp overlord!
ALL HAIL THE CLISP OVERLORD
YMMD,
Corinna
--
Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Maintainer cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat
pgp9Zl8MXnfxf.pgp
On Jan 23 17:43, Ken Brown wrote:
On 1/23/2015 3:09 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Hi Ken,
On Jan 23 08:48, Ken Brown wrote:
[...]
My guess is correct. lisp.exe uses bit 31 (counting from the LSB) as a
marker during garbage collection, and this is incompatible with Cygwin's use
of high
Dear Volker, Ken and Corinna,
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 10:43 AM, Dr. Volker Zell wrote:
Ken Brown writes:
On 1/23/2015 5:57 AM, Dr. Volker Zell wrote:
gcc -c -ggdb -O2 -pipe -Wimplicit-function-declaration
Hi Ken,
On Jan 23 08:48, Ken Brown wrote:
On 1/14/2015 4:19 PM, Ken Brown wrote:
It is. There's a configure option --ignore-absence-of-libsigsegv. But
there
are more serious problems, affecting both the 32-bit and 64-bit versions.
(So
even just rebuilding clisp for 32-bit Cygwin will
I, for one, welcome our new clisp overlord!
ALL HAIL THE CLISP OVERLORD
On 1/23/2015 3:09 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Hi Ken,
On Jan 23 08:48, Ken Brown wrote:
On 1/14/2015 4:19 PM, Ken Brown wrote:
It is. There's a configure option --ignore-absence-of-libsigsegv. But there
are more serious problems, affecting both the 32-bit and 64-bit versions. (So
even just
On 1/23/2015 5:57 AM, Dr. Volker Zell wrote:
gcc -c -ggdb -O2 -pipe -Wimplicit-function-declaration
-fdebug-prefix-map=/cygdrive/d/misc/src/release/xemacs-21.4.22-2.i686/build=/usr/src/debug/xemacs-21.4.22-2
On 1/14/2015 4:19 PM, Ken Brown wrote:
On 1/14/2015 12:46 PM, Achim Gratz wrote:
Corinna Vinschen writes:
Clisp is not yet ported to 64bit and it has problems under 32bit as well
(temporary file generation) that also affect Maxima from ports.
If it's a problem with the Cygwin DLL, it would
Volker Zell writes:
Hi
I'm on business, no access to the logs...I will come back to this on
friday.
Here we are
Ciao
Volker
Vin Shelton writes:
Volker -
I can build XEmacs on 32-bit Cygwin. What doesn't work for you?
gcc -c -ggdb -O2 -pipe
Hi, Volker -
Vin wrote:
I can build XEmacs on 32-bit Cygwin. What doesn't work for you?
Volker wrote:
Here we are
A few thoughts:
1. You need to use the most recent XEmacs sources from mercurial.
2. You must have an old version of libpng installed, because 21.4.22
won't compile with the
Vin Shelton writes:
Hi, Volker -
Vin wrote:
I can build XEmacs on 32-bit Cygwin. What doesn't work for you?
Volker wrote:
Here we are
A few thoughts:
1. You need to use the most recent XEmacs sources from mercurial.
OK
2. You must have an old
On Jan 23 16:43, Dr. Volker Zell wrote:
Ken Brown writes:
On 1/23/2015 5:57 AM, Dr. Volker Zell wrote:
gcc -c -ggdb -O2 -pipe -Wimplicit-function-declaration
-fdebug-prefix-map=/cygdrive/d/misc/src/release/xemacs-21.4.22-2.i686/build=/usr/src/debug/xemacs-21.4.22-2
Hi
I'm on business, no access to the logs...I will come back to this on friday.
Ciao
Volker
Vin Shelton writes:
Volker -
I can build XEmacs on 32-bit Cygwin. What doesn't work for you?
Thanks,
Vin Shelton
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 6:27 AM, Dr. Volker Zell
On Jan 16 09:08, Marco Atzeri wrote:
On 1/15/2015 2:03 PM, Marco Atzeri wrote:
On 1/14/2015 3:13 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Hi folks,
it's really *really* overdue to remove the OpenSSL 0.98 DLLs from
the 32 bit distro. Fortunately they were never in the 64 bit distro.
On 1/15/2015 2:03 PM, Marco Atzeri wrote:
On 1/14/2015 3:13 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Hi folks,
it's really *really* overdue to remove the OpenSSL 0.98 DLLs from
the 32 bit distro. Fortunately they were never in the 64 bit distro.
pure-ftpdKostya Altukhov
I will look on it
On Jan 16 09:08, Marco Atzeri wrote:
On 1/15/2015 2:03 PM, Marco Atzeri wrote:
On 1/14/2015 3:13 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Hi folks,
it's really *really* overdue to remove the OpenSSL 0.98 DLLs from
the 32 bit distro. Fortunately they were never in the 64 bit distro.
pure-ftpd
doc...@fruitbat.org,
Yaakov Selkowitz yselkow...@cygwin.com,
Marco Atzeri marco.atz...@gmail.com,
Dr. Volker Zell dr.volker.z...@oracle.com,
David Rothenberger daver...@acm.org, Reini Urban rur...@x-ray.at
Subject: [HEADSUP] Dropping libopenssl098 from distro
Hi folks,
it's really
On Wed, 14 Jan 2015, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Hi folks,
it's really *really* overdue to remove the OpenSSL 0.98 DLLs from
the 32 bit distro. Fortunately they were never in the 64 bit distro.
The problem is that we still have packages requiring libopenssl098.
These need rebuilding or
David Stacey writes:
On 14/01/15 14:13, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
The following packages have dependecies of their own, so they can't
go away until the dependent packages have been rebuilt:
libpqMarco Atzeri
required by:
xemacs
Volker -
I can build XEmacs on 32-bit Cygwin. What doesn't work for you?
Thanks,
Vin Shelton
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 6:27 AM, Dr. Volker Zell
dr.volker.z...@oracle.com wrote:
David Stacey writes:
On 14/01/15 14:13, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
The following packages have
On 1/15/2015 1:31 PM, Vin Shelton wrote:
It used to compile but was not usable because of broken subprocess
support. Now it doesn't even compile :-(
Ciao
Volker
Volker -
I can build XEmacs on 32-bit Cygwin. What doesn't work for you?
Thanks,
Vin Shelton
Question:
0) does it
On Jan 15 13:50, Marco Atzeri wrote:
On 1/15/2015 1:31 PM, Vin Shelton wrote:
It used to compile but was not usable because of broken subprocess
support. Now it doesn't even compile :-(
Ciao
Volker
Volker -
I can build XEmacs on 32-bit Cygwin. What doesn't work for you?
On 1/14/2015 3:13 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Hi folks,
it's really *really* overdue to remove the OpenSSL 0.98 DLLs from
the 32 bit distro. Fortunately they were never in the 64 bit distro.
pure-ftpdKostya Altukhov
I will look on it
Regards
Marco
On 1/15/2015 1:57 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Jan 15 13:50, Marco Atzeri wrote:
On 1/15/2015 1:31 PM, Vin Shelton wrote:
It used to compile but was not usable because of broken subprocess
support. Now it doesn't even compile :-(
Ciao
Volker
Volker -
I can build XEmacs on 32-bit
On Jan 15 14:03, Marco Atzeri wrote:
On 1/14/2015 3:13 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Hi folks,
it's really *really* overdue to remove the OpenSSL 0.98 DLLs from
the 32 bit distro. Fortunately they were never in the 64 bit distro.
pure-ftpd Kostya Altukhov
I will look on it
Thanks
Marco/Volker et al -
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 7:50 AM, Marco Atzeri marco.atz...@gmail.com wrote:
On 1/15/2015 1:31 PM, Vin Shelton wrote:
It used to compile but was not usable because of broken subprocess
support. Now it doesn't even compile :-(
Ciao
Volker
Volker -
I can build
Hi Vin,
Hi Volker,
On Jan 15 09:12, Vin Shelton wrote:
Marco/Volker et al -
[...]
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 7:50 AM, Marco Atzeri ... wrote:
Question:
0) does it work ?
[...]
2) have you tried a 64 build also ?
No, but based on feedback from the xemacs-beta mailing list, I do not
2015-01-14 16:13 Corinna Vinschen
corinna-cygwin-rDBXBDvO6BXQT0dZR+AlfA(at)public.gmane.org:
|
|
| it's really *really* overdue to remove the OpenSSL 0.98 DLLs from
| the 32 bit distro.
|
| ctorrentJari Aalto
| suckJari Aalto
Done. Rebuilt and uploaded.
Jari
pgpNWtFsFUQDW.pgp
On 1/14/2015 12:46 PM, Achim Gratz wrote:
Corinna Vinschen writes:
Clisp is not yet ported to 64bit and it has problems under 32bit as well
(temporary file generation) that also affect Maxima from ports.
If it's a problem with the Cygwin DLL, it would be nice to get a
bug report and,
On 14/01/15 14:13, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
The following packages have dependecies of their own, so they can't
go away until the dependent packages have been rebuilt:
libpqMarco Atzeri
required by:
xemacs Dr. Volker Zell
Some time ago, there was a
Hi folks,
it's really *really* overdue to remove the OpenSSL 0.98 DLLs from
the 32 bit distro. Fortunately they were never in the 64 bit distro.
The problem is that we still have packages requiring libopenssl098.
These need rebuilding or removing.
The following packages need simple
On Jan 14 18:15, Achim Gratz wrote:
Corinna Vinschen writes:
clisp and xemacs need rebuilding against libpq5. libsasl2-sql
is old and unused and can go away.
Clisp is not yet ported to 64bit and it has problems under 32bit as well
(temporary file generation) that also affect
Corinna Vinschen writes:
Clisp is not yet ported to 64bit and it has problems under 32bit as well
(temporary file generation) that also affect Maxima from ports.
If it's a problem with the Cygwin DLL, it would be nice to get a
bug report and, preferredly, an STC, so we have a chance to fix
Corinna Vinschen writes:
clisp and xemacs need rebuilding against libpq5. libsasl2-sql
is old and unused and can go away.
Clisp is not yet ported to 64bit and it has problems under 32bit as well
(temporary file generation) that also affect Maxima from ports. ONe of
the things
On Wed, 2015-01-14 at 15:13 +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
it's really *really* overdue to remove the OpenSSL 0.98 DLLs from
the 32 bit distro. Fortunately they were never in the 64 bit distro.
The problem is that we still have packages requiring libopenssl098.
These need rebuilding or
60 matches
Mail list logo
