-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Volker Quetschke wrote:
| http://www.scytek.de/cygwin/release/gnupg/setup.hint
| http://www.scytek.de/cygwin/release/gnupg/gnupg-1.2.4-1.tar.bz2
| http://www.scytek.de/cygwin/release/gnupg/gnupg-1.2.4-1-src.tar.bz2
version: 1.2.4-1
install:
Hmm, I had the 1.2.4 version ready for a while, but forgot to mention
it.
I was asked for the links, here they are:
Changes since version 1.2.2-3:
* New upstream version
NOTES
-
You find build instructions for a windows native executable (MinGW)
after unpacking the source (see gnupg.README
Volker Quetschke wrote:
Hmm, I had the 1.2.4 version ready for a while, but forgot to mention
it.
Now it's too late. Anyone here with a bit web/ftp space to host the
cygwin package? (Preferably in europe?)
Volker
(Former cygwin gnupg mainainer)
Feel free to post the links or to email me the
Volker Quetschke wrote:
Now it's too late. Anyone here with a bit web/ftp space to host the
cygwin package? (Preferably in europe?)
I guess the nice guts at gnupg.org would be happy to host a /cygwin/
directory in their FTP and put in the web page: cygwin users out there
can just add this
Christopher Faylor wrote on Monday, February 23, 2004 12:38 AM:
Hmm. I guess I haven't been as diligent as I should have been. I've
pulled gnupg from the distribution.
Wouldn't this be a candidate for a source only distrubution with a postbuild script
that complies and installs the
Andreas Seidl schrieb:
Volker Quetschke wrote:
Now it's too late. Anyone here with a bit web/ftp space to host the
cygwin package? (Preferably in europe?)
Feel free to post the links or to email me the packages and the
setup.hint file. For some time, I can put them on a server in Germany.
And
On Mon, 23 Feb 2004, Jörg Schaible wrote:
Christopher Faylor wrote on Monday, February 23, 2004 12:38 AM:
Hmm. I guess I haven't been as diligent as I should have been. I've
pulled gnupg from the distribution.
Wouldn't this be a candidate for a source only distrubution with a
Igor Pechtchanski wrote on Monday, February 23, 2004 2:29 PM:
On Mon, 23 Feb 2004, Jörg Schaible wrote:
Wouldn't this be a candidate for a source only distrubution with a
postbuild script that complies and installs the package ?
Regards,
Jörg
FWIW, that's basically what I was thinking
Lapo wrote:
Daniel Reed wrote:
| Package: ccrypt 1.6-2 [2004-01-20]
| Description: A utility for encrypting and decrypting files and streams
|Proposer: Andreas Seidl
|Proposal: http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2004-01/msg00112.html
|Release directory (for use with setup.exe):
On Sun, Feb 22, 2004 at 07:39:49PM +0100, Andreas Seidl wrote:
However, a new problem might have popped up. Reading this thread
http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2004-02/msg01103.html
I wonder if there are legal problems for RedHat to distribute the ccrypt
package?
You're right. There are.
cgf wrote:
On Sun, Feb 22, 2004 at 07:39:49PM +0100, Andreas Seidl wrote:
However, a new problem might have popped up. Reading this thread
http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2004-02/msg01103.html
I wonder if there are legal problems for RedHat to distribute the ccrypt
package?
Andreas,
Next
On Sun, Feb 22, 2004 at 04:27:06PM -0500, Nicholas Wourms wrote:
cgf wrote:
On Sun, Feb 22, 2004 at 07:39:49PM +0100, Andreas Seidl wrote:
However, a new problem might have popped up. Reading this thread
http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2004-02/msg01103.html
I wonder if there are legal problems
cgf wrote:
On Sun, Feb 22, 2004 at 04:27:06PM -0500, Nicholas Wourms wrote:
cgf wrote:
On Sun, Feb 22, 2004 at 07:39:49PM +0100, Andreas Seidl wrote:
However, a new problem might have popped up. Reading this thread
http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2004-02/msg01103.html
I wonder if there are
On Sun, Feb 22, 2004 at 05:53:47PM -0500, Nicholas Wourms wrote:
cgf wrote:
On Sun, Feb 22, 2004 at 04:27:06PM -0500, Nicholas Wourms wrote:
cgf wrote:
On Sun, Feb 22, 2004 at 07:39:49PM +0100, Andreas Seidl wrote:
However, a new problem might have popped up. Reading this thread
No, I wouldn't, but I didn't intend on that being the only statement.
Consider this: The gpg which we distribute contains the *exact* same
cipher, AES{128,192,256}, as ccrypt plus gpg also has twofish
blowfish.
The last time I checked, those two were also considered
strong encryption
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Daniel Reed wrote:
| Package: ccrypt 1.6-2 [2004-01-20]
| Description: A utility for encrypting and decrypting files and streams
|Proposer: Andreas Seidl
|Proposal: http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2004-01/msg00112.html
|Release
* 2004-02-13 Daniel Reed nmlorg AT cygwin.com list.cygwin-apps
* Message-Id: 20040213170003.12333.qmail AT sources.redhat.com
| Package: ploticus 2.11-1 [2003-09-15]
| Description: Command line driven tool to generates various plots and graphs
|Proposer: Jari Aalto
|Proposal:
On Mon, 16 Feb 2004, Jari Aalto+mail.linux wrote:
* 2004-02-13 Daniel Reed nmlorg AT cygwin.com list.cygwin-apps
| Package: joe 2.9.8-1 [2003-11-11]
| Description: Fast and simple editor which emulates 5 other editors
| [snip]
| Good to go: Gerrit P. Haase
| Status: Attained
This is the list of pending packages as of Friday, February 13, 2004.
** PACKAGE PROPOSERS ** Please verify these fields **
Package: The name and version of the package as it will appear in setup.
Proposal: Files that will be uploaded to sources.redhat.com unmodified.
HOLD-UPS: What you need to
On Fri, 13 Feb 2004, Daniel Reed wrote:
This is the list of pending packages as of Friday, February 13, 2004.
Oh, yeah, Friday the 13th... Is that, perhaps, why my comments from
http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2004-02/msg00084.html didn't make it
in? ;-)
Let's try this again:
[snip]
Package: sgrep 1.92.1-1 [2003-09-15]
Package: joe 2.9.8-1 [2003-11-11]
Package: aspell-de 0.50.2-1 [2004-01-30]
Package: aspell-pl 0.50.2-1 [2004-01-30]
BTW, the last two above are dictionaries for an existing package -- should
they need votes? Is there a way to mark them as
--- Igor Pechtchanski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- sgml-base: http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2004-02/msg00047.html
- and it may have been pulled by the original proposer
Yes, let's pull this off the propsed package list.
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Finance: Get
22 matches
Mail list logo
