Jon Turney writes:
>>> Which I can easily believe happens, due to the rather weird way that
>>> the data from a parser reduction is transferred into the package
>>> database.
>
> Can you test the attached patch, please?
Thanks, this works for the last package problem, although I can't
account for
On 02/02/2018 19:38, Achim Gratz wrote:
Jon Turney writes:
Do you have an idea yet why the last package gets orphaned (or did, if
'Yet'? This is the first time I've heard of this!
Right you are. I thought I had mentioned it already, but forgot since I
can't post from work.
Is this
Jon Turney writes:
>> Do you have an idea yet why the last package gets orphaned (or did, if
>
> 'Yet'? This is the first time I've heard of this!
Right you are. I thought I had mentioned it already, but forgot since I
can't post from work.
> Is this regression?
Yes.
>> it's already fixed)?
On 01/02/2018 20:21, Achim Gratz wrote:
Jon Turney writes:
A new setup release candidate is available at:
https://cygwin.com/setup/setup-2.886.x86.exe(32 bit version)
https://cygwin.com/setup/setup-2.886.x86_64.exe (64 bit version)
Locally compiled, but not well tested yet.
Jon Turney writes:
> A new setup release candidate is available at:
>
> https://cygwin.com/setup/setup-2.886.x86.exe(32 bit version)
> https://cygwin.com/setup/setup-2.886.x86_64.exe (64 bit version)
Locally compiled, but not well tested yet.
> Changes compared to 2.885:
> - Apply
A new setup release candidate is available at:
https://cygwin.com/setup/setup-2.886.x86.exe(32 bit version)
https://cygwin.com/setup/setup-2.886.x86_64.exe (64 bit version)
Since this contains many internal changes, I think this could use some
wider testing before being deployed.
