On Sat, September 17, 2005 2:35 pm, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Sep 17 07:19, Eric Blake wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Max Bowsher on 9/16/2005 4:27 PM:
The current /etc/profile does not permit the use of symlinks in
/etc/profile.d/ - it ignores them.
On Sat, September 17, 2005 5:33 pm, Max Bowsher wrote:
John Morrison replied to me privately (accidentally, I presume).
Yes, it was - sorry Max.
I'm forwarding the message to cygwin-apps@ to maintain threading:
Thanks - I wondered by it didn't appear on the list before I logged off!
J.
Please upload into perl:
http://xarch.tu-graz.ac.at/publ/cygwin/release/perl-libwin32/perl-libwin32-0.26-1.tar.bz2
790765 d9e9278eb21dae1c2da0983e93acc900
http://xarch.tu-graz.ac.at/publ/cygwin/release/perl-libwin32/perl-libwin32-0.26-1-src.tar.bz2
718845 2ec0772ce228c2ad07d356768d34a2b0
On Sun, September 18, 2005 1:14 am, Max Bowsher wrote:
Eric Blake wrote:
Sorry, didn't realise. If I change the line
/bin/find /etc/profile.d -type f -iname '*.sh' -or -iname '*.zsh'
to be
/bin/find -L /etc/profile.d -type f -iname '*.sh' -or -iname '*.zsh'
would that fix things? (The
Gerrit P. Haase schrieb:
James R. Phillips wrote:
Hm, another program in util-linux that would be nice to have is
'script'. All
linux systems have it. Is anyone interested in taking that on ?
script does not build out of the box. I ported another similar tool,
I believe Reini has done
Reini Urban wrote:
Please upload into perl:
http://xarch.tu-graz.ac.at/publ/cygwin/release/perl-libwin32/perl-libwin32-0.26-1.tar.bz2
790765 d9e9278eb21dae1c2da0983e93acc900
http://xarch.tu-graz.ac.at/publ/cygwin/release/perl-libwin32/perl-libwin32-0.26-1-src.tar.bz2
718845
Hello,
Is it possible to use only 'curr:' without 'prev:'?
Gerrit
--
=^..^=
Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
Hello,
Is it possible to use only 'curr:' without 'prev:'?
And will 'curr: 0.1' overrule an installed 0.2 package?
Gerrit
--
=^..^=
Yaakov S wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
I'm back, will try to catch up on everything what I missed.
Here's a few things from GNOME:
1) As I'm convinced that everything is working now, please upload the
libIDL(2)/ORBit(2) packages per the
Gerrit P. Haase schrieb:
Reini Urban wrote:
...
properly rebased via gbs, though the general gbs solution to do a
automatic rebase is quite hard.
interested parties can see steps rebase1 and rebase2 in
http://xarch.tu-graz.ac.at/publ/cygwin/release/perl-libwin32/perl-libwin32-0.26-1.sh
upset: *** warning package GConf2 requires non-existent package
sysvinitatk-runtime
I've made the obvious fix.
cgf
Christopher Faylor wrote:
upset: *** warning package GConf2 requires non-existent package
sysvinitatk-runtime
Oops, sorry for the mess.
I've made the obvious fix.
Thank you.
Gerrit
--
=^..^=
Reini Urban wrote:
Gerrit P. Haase schrieb:
Reini Urban wrote:
properly rebased via gbs, though the general gbs solution to do a
automatic rebase is quite hard.
interested parties can see steps rebase1 and rebase2 in
On Sun, Sep 18, 2005 at 01:49:22PM +0200, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
Is it possible to use only 'curr:' without 'prev:'?
Assuming that you you want the curr: package and only the curr:
package to show up in setup.ini, then yes.
cgf
I personally have no need for PHP, but I know it's a very widely used piece
of software.
After John Morrison's recent mention of PHP in passing, I decided to do a
quick estimate of how difficult getting PHP working on Cygwin would be. To
cut a long story short, I got a bit carried away, and
I'll guess this message was meant to go to the list :)
Dave.
--- Joe Linoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2005 10:50:52 -0700
From: Joe Linoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Dave [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [HEADSUP] ALL Maintainers, please reply.
Dave wrote:
So, ALL
On Sep 18 11:12, John Morrison wrote:
On Sat, September 17, 2005 2:35 pm, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
I'm wondering if base-files can't check if /etc/profile has been changed,
for instance, using md5sum. Then it could overwrite the file if it's
still
the original version, or, if it has been
On Sep 18 17:30, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
Reini Urban wrote:
Gerrit P. Haase schrieb:
Reini Urban wrote:
properly rebased via gbs, though the general gbs solution to do a
automatic rebase is quite hard.
interested parties can see steps rebase1 and rebase2 in
Max Bowsher wrote:
2) Shared library headaches.
PHP definitely needs its postgresql support available to be useful most
non-trivial application. If I want to avoid creating a hard dependency
on the postgresql package, the PHP pgsql extension needs to be built as
a shared library. But to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
Yes, it is a new package, however there is currently another package
with the same name and a higher version, libIDL. This will be renamed
to libIDL2. The new libIDL package needs the tag therefore and there is
no previous
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Gerrit, since you obviously care, I'm wondering if you are also going
to install the package when you're happy. I don't understand the
discussion here enough to see if it's ok to upload or not.
It is definitively good to go. I just was wondering why Reini doesn't
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
It is needed to add a 'curr: 0.6.8-2' to the libIDL setup.hint because
currently libIDL(2) is at 0.8.3-2, right? Maybe we should name the
package different, eg. ORBit-libIDL to avoid conflicts?
No, when you remove the old
On Sun, Sep 18, 2005 at 04:23:17PM +0200, Reini Urban wrote:
Gerrit P. Haase schrieb:
Reini Urban wrote:
...
properly rebased via gbs, though the general gbs solution to do a
automatic rebase is quite hard.
interested parties can see steps rebase1 and rebase2 in
Yaakov S wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
Yes, it is a new package, however there is currently another package
with the same name and a higher version, libIDL. This will be renamed
to libIDL2. The new libIDL package needs the tag therefore and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
It will never be installed for a user who has already 0.8.x?
Yes, it will be; but it's small, and I intend to mention this upon
announcement. After the switch, those who don't want 0.6.x can just
uninstall it on the next run
25 matches
Mail list logo
