Cool. Thank you very much for running with the libtool stuff.
ltdl the new one should safely sub for the old one - right choice.
Rob
I've put three new packages here:
http://www.neuro.gatech.edu/users/cwilson/cygutils/testing/
I am not yet ready to even ask for official inclusion. This is just a
kind of "here, heads up, what do you think?" message.
There's
libtool-20010531-rc6.tar.bz2
libtool-20010531-rc6-src.tar.b
Christopher Faylor wrote:
> Actually, I'm going to remove update-setup. It's old and doesn't
> support all of the newly advertised setup.hint features. That's why I
> wrote 'upset'.
fair enough.
> update-setup is a lot simpler than 'upset', though, for obvious reasons.
> I assume tha
On Sun, Dec 09, 2001 at 09:58:37PM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote:
>Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
>As it happens, it is available thru public cvs (who knew?)
>
>cvs -d:pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvs/cygwin login
> password anoncvs
>cvs -d:pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvs/cygwin co htdocs/upset
>cvs -d:p
More to the point,
setup.hint's structure WILL be changing to accomodate setup.exe's needs.
So anything that wants to work on setup.hint will need to change along
with it - and I'm not interested in supporting multiple programs.
There's enough work to do on setup.exe itself that adding work just
Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> Charles Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>>should have asked Chris for
>>permission to post his code
>>[]
>>Because it is completely and totally unsupported [..]
>>not enough (global) benefit. Therefore: unsupported and not
>>widely available.
>>
>
> I c
Charles Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> should have asked Chris for
> permission to post his code
> []
> Because it is completely and totally unsupported [..]
> not enough (global) benefit. Therefore: unsupported and not
> widely available.
I can understand the `unsupported' part ver
