Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Thu, Aug 19, 2004 at 12:42:28AM +0100, Max Bowsher wrote:
At some point in the medium-to-long-term future, I'd quite like to move
the
setup code from CVS to Subversion.
Partly, that's because of all the little improvements subversion brings
over cvs, but a notable
Max Bowsher schrieb:
Please rename your libopenldap2-2-15 package to libopenldap2_2_15
The dashes followed by digits in the name are making setup.exe confused
about which part is the package name and which part is the version number.
Shouldn't it be libopenldap-2.2.15?
Official versions are
On Aug 18 17:04, John Morrison wrote:
Please upload :)
http://homepage.ntlworld.com/j-n-s.morrison/john/cygwin/base-files/base-files-3.0-2.tar.bz2
http://homepage.ntlworld.com/j-n-s.morrison/john/cygwin/base-files/md5sum
Reini Urban wrote:
Max Bowsher schrieb:
Please rename your libopenldap2-2-15 package to libopenldap2_2_15
The dashes followed by digits in the name are making setup.exe confused
about which part is the package name and which part is the version
number.
Shouldn't it be libopenldap-2.2.15?
Official
Max Bowsher writes:
Please rename your libopenldap2-2-15 package to libopenldap2_2_15
The dashes followed by digits in the name are making setup.exe
confused about which part is the package name and which part is the
version number.
Thanks for the catch.
I would like to
Dr. Volker Zell wrote:
Max Bowsher writes:
Please rename your libopenldap2-2-15 package to libopenldap2_2_15
The dashes followed by digits in the name are making setup.exe
confused about which part is the package name and which part is the
version number.
Thanks for the catch.
I
Robert Collins wrote:
On Thu, 2004-08-19 at 00:42 +0100, Max Bowsher wrote:
[about the possibility of converting setup to subversion]
I'm also not keen on this for several reasons:
* subversion doesn't address the issues with merging distribution that
made it difficult for folk with long-running
On Thu, 2004-08-19 at 00:42 +0100, Max Bowsher wrote:
At some point in the medium-to-long-term future, I'd quite like to move the
setup code from CVS to Subversion.
Partly, that's because of all the little improvements subversion brings over
cvs, but a notable concrete benefit subversion
On Aug 19 23:00, Robert Collins wrote:
I'm also not keen on this for several reasons:
* subversion doesn't address the issues with merging distribution that
made it difficult for folk with long-running patches to stay in sync
* subversion appears to be a very fragile system (I'm working with
Rafael,
what about a perl-libwin32 update for cygwin perl-5.8.5?
it works almost out of the box, just the site_perl/5.8.5/ path has to
used instead.
or maybe a clever postinstall script should be used, which checks for
the current perl version and moves the paths then.
maybe you want to
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Aug 19 23:00, Robert Collins wrote:
I'm also not keen on this for several reasons:
* subversion doesn't address the issues with merging distribution that
made it difficult for folk with long-running patches to stay in sync
* subversion appears to be a very fragile
On Thu, Aug 19, 2004 at 07:12:37AM +0100, Max Bowsher wrote:
I would not support such a move.
I'd be interested to hear your reasons, so we might discuss this.
Again, I do not see any reason to fragment cygwin/cygwin-apps development
like this. Telling people that you need to use svn if you
Max Bowsher writes:
libopenldap2_2_7 , IMO.
Base the package name on the DLL name, since if the dll name changes,
linked applications will break (so a new package will be needed) and
if the dll name doesn't change, then you won't be able to make a
concurrently
All:
Just ran across a bug in ssmtp-config that brings up an issue in
build-a-config-file interview scripts in general:
If the user makes an error typing in a config setting, and (naturally
enough) hits the backspace key to fix it, ssmtp-config (and probably
many other similar scripts as well)
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Thu, Aug 19, 2004 at 07:12:37AM +0100, Max Bowsher wrote:
I would not support such a move.
I'd be interested to hear your reasons, so we might discuss this.
Again, I do not see any reason to fragment cygwin/cygwin-apps development
like this. Telling people that you
15 matches
Mail list logo
