Re: symlink dll

2004-09-01 Thread Reini Urban
Max Bowsher schrieb: IT WILL NOT WORK! Try it yourself if you like. Ah sure, static PE imports. So we just have to use delay loading for ld, similar to the MSVC linker. Then via some kind of libcygdelay.a with a symlink resolver before LoadLibrary(). Wine winegcc has it.

Re: [setup] Why does PackageSpecificationhaveaprivatecopy-constructor? (Robert?)

2004-09-01 Thread Max Bowsher
Robert Collins wrote: On Tue, 2004-08-31 at 23:42 +0100, Max Bowsher wrote: Unless we add explicit copy-constructors to every single class, I'd rather just leave it out and let the compiler handle things implicitly? It seems cleaner to me. I think you'll find every class that has a destructor

Re: [setup] Why does PackageSpecificationhaveaprivatecopy-constructor? (Robert?)

2004-09-01 Thread Robert Collins
On Wed, 2004-09-01 at 08:12 +0100, Max Bowsher wrote: Robert Collins wrote: Have you heard of the 'rule of 3' ? No. Apparently I need to do some reading. http://www.parashift.com/c++-faq-lite/coding-standards.html#faq-27.9 A class with any of {destructor, assignment operator, copy

Re: [ITP] ocaml-3.08.1-1

2004-09-01 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Aug 31 12:18, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: On Tue, 31 Aug 2004, Corinna Vinschen wrote: Urgh, even worse, both archives were broken as well. For some reason I can't download them using curl. Wget worked, though. I fixed them. Could be a problem with the logging script used on the site.

Re: [ITP] ocaml-3.08.1-1

2004-09-01 Thread Igor Pechtchanski
On Wed, 1 Sep 2004, Corinna Vinschen wrote: On Aug 31 12:18, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: On Tue, 31 Aug 2004, Corinna Vinschen wrote: Urgh, even worse, both archives were broken as well. For some reason I can't download them using curl. Wget worked, though. I fixed them. Could be a

Re: [setup] Why doesPackageSpecificationhaveaprivatecopy-constructor? (Robert?)

2004-09-01 Thread Max Bowsher
Robert Collins wrote: On Wed, 2004-09-01 at 08:12 +0100, Max Bowsher wrote: Robert Collins wrote: Have you heard of the 'rule of 3' ? No. Apparently I need to do some reading. http://www.parashift.com/c++-faq-lite/coding-standards.html#faq-27.9 A class with any of {destructor, assignment

ocaml packaging dependency bug: curses vs. termcap

2004-09-01 Thread Robert R Schneck-McConnell
The recently produced ocaml package assumes that it will be able to find -lcurses when it links programs. I had to download the libncurses-devel package to get the linker working. I expect this should be included among the dependencies. (Perhaps gcc should as well, since the ocaml linker

Re: ocaml packaging dependency bug: curses vs. termcap

2004-09-01 Thread Igor Pechtchanski
On Wed, 1 Sep 2004, Robert R Schneck-McConnell wrote: The recently produced ocaml package assumes that it will be able to find -lcurses when it links programs. I had to download the libncurses-devel package to get the linker working. I expect this should be included among the dependencies.

Re: ocaml packaging dependency bug: curses vs. termcap

2004-09-01 Thread Robert R Schneck-McConnell
On Wed, 1 Sep 2004, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: On Wed, 1 Sep 2004, Robert R Schneck-McConnell wrote: [ocaml linker requires gcc and libncurses-devel] Umm, right. Thanks for the heads-up. I'm a bit uncomfortable, though, with making the ocaml package depend on both libncurses-devel and gcc,