On 2017-10-31 12:15, Achim Gratz wrote:
> Am 31.10.2017 um 12:21 schrieb Corinna Vinschen:
>> Not sure what distros you're referring to. Of the 58467 packages
>> in Fedora 26, 7822 are using epochs.
>
> I'm expecting as much since it was rpm that introduced the epoch IIRC (I think
> an earlier
On 10/31/2017 12:56 PM, Ken Brown wrote:
On 10/30/2017 5:55 PM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
It would
also be nice if the updated URW fonts[2] would also be installed under
e.g. /usr/share/fonts/urw-base35.
Is the attached what you had in mind? Following Fedora, I only packaged
*.t1 and *.afm
Am 31.10.2017 um 12:21 schrieb Corinna Vinschen:
Not sure what distros you're referring to. Of the 58467 packages
in Fedora 26, 7822 are using epochs.
I'm expecting as much since it was rpm that introduced the epoch IIRC (I
think an earlier approach was using a "serial number"). Debian is
On 10/30/2017 5:55 PM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
It would
also be nice if the updated URW fonts[2] would also be installed under
e.g. /usr/share/fonts/urw-base35.
Is the attached what you had in mind? Following Fedora, I only packaged
*.t1 and *.afm files, even though the source package also
On 2017-10-31 05:21, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Oct 31 11:06, Achim Gratz wrote:
>> Am 30.10.2017 um 16:58 schrieb Jon Turney:
>>> "everyone" != "everyone, ignoring people who disagree with me"
>>
>> I think this is an unfair summary of my position.
>>
>>> If you think epochs are a bad idea, you
> On 30/10/2017 19:43, Ken Brown wrote:
> > My cygport files and patch are attached. The two fonts packages
> > don't need updating, but their cygport files had to be updated, so I'm
> > attaching them for future reference.
> >
> > In the case of ghostscript, the current version is 9.22, but it
On Oct 31 11:06, Achim Gratz wrote:
> Am 30.10.2017 um 16:58 schrieb Jon Turney:
> > "everyone" != "everyone, ignoring people who disagree with me"
>
> I think this is an unfair summary of my position.
>
> > If you think epochs are a bad idea, you need to give reasons, not just
> > pretend there
Am 30.10.2017 um 16:58 schrieb Jon Turney:
"everyone" != "everyone, ignoring people who disagree with me"
I think this is an unfair summary of my position.
If you think epochs are a bad idea, you need to give reasons, not just
pretend there is no debate.
I was strictly talking about those
