Stanislav Sinyagin wrote:
Did someone think of developing a simple framework for making the packages,
especially for that software which supports Cygwin and configure does everything
for you?
Concurrent Version Systems has an autobuild package. I haven't looked
at it yet, just found it
Robert Collins wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Earnie Boyd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 12:19 AM
I suppose you could do this but the purists would say you should do
export PAGER /bin/less
Good point. Hey, Robert, why not add
Christopher Faylor wrote:
Well, my interest begins and ends with the file creation being moved
somewhere sensible. Simply running setup should not create
/etc/profile any more than installing sed.
Yep. Agreed.
I'm not sure I agree. It doesn't matter what creates it, it needs
Robert Collins wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Lapo Luchini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 11:48 PM
But if a cygwin
native version is needed nonetheless I could volunteer to package it.
IMO we should have a fully self-hosted distribution. At the
Yay
Earnie
Charles Wilson wrote:
Anybody else want to weigh in, here? So far I've got one 'yay' vote
from Robert (but putting pkgconfig into contrib instead of latest)
Fine by me Any other votes?
--Chuck
Charles Wilson wrote:
I've got pkgconfig ready for contribution to the
FYI.
Earnie.
---BeginMessage---
Hi,
I recently got the w32api from the CVS and now the compilation of this
small code broke.
FARPROC fpDirectDrawCreate = GetProcAddress(hmodDDraw, DirectDrawCreate);
if (fpDirectDrawCreate != NULL)
{
retval = (*fpDirectDrawCreate) (NULL, lpdd, NULL);
}
Wrong list!!
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just compiled gnuplot-3.7 from source files for
cygwin under Xfree86. Every thing was running fine
for a postscript terminal, but it fails for a
X11 terminal, for instance plotted lines fall outside
the graph
Wrong list!!
Tamer Samy abdelazim wrote:
Hi All ;
i am using cygwin for windows. I tried to call matlab
engine from C under cygwin under win2K ... I am always get errors
from gcc compiler (the error is under)
I do not know which libmat.a or which liberary i can use.Can you
Charles Wilson wrote:
file:/Polgara/private/software/windows/cygwin-new/setup.ini
file:Polgara/private/software/windows/cygwin-new/setup.ini
This makes sense. You need two // after file: and two // before
Polgara. The extra fifth / was just ignored.
Earnie.
Robert Collins wrote:
On Thu, 2002-01-24 at 22:35, Gareth Pearce wrote:
Hi ... I am going out on a limb here and assume that this feature hasnt been
suggested before. (ummm yeah I know I should of checked the message lists -
I am prepared to shoot myself if I am wrong :P)
I'm not sure
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Tue, Jan 22, 2002 at 02:45:17PM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
Or maybe Danny Smith can provide details on what it takes to build said
library, and one of the folk that keep building gcc for-the-hell-of-it
and talking on cygwin@ can become the maintainer?
It's
Hmm... OOTB? Did you take care to test it? In the past there've been
issues with the way files are left opened while the temp files are being
copied over them. That doesn't work with Win32 and therefore Cygwin.
With CVS already working do we need RCS?
Earnie.
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On
Jason Tishler wrote:
Any ideas why stripping prevents some DLLs from being rebased and
not others? Any solutions besides not stripping?
Text mode mounts?
Earnie
_
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at
Your reference doesn't say that _ALL_ packages need a README. What's
difficult with Robots? Your reference also doesn't say anything about
adding how the package was configured to a README. Your reference was
only dealing with where to put the READMEs that need to be created. I
don't see a
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Thu, Dec 20, 2001 at 08:53:30PM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
Ok, I bit. Step 5:
5. Create setup.hint file following the documentation on this web page.
For new packages the first upload MUST be tagged as experimental. Once
the package has no major bug
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 01:58:55PM -, Ebrey, Carl wrote:
Gah! I meant to send this to the list but I replied and so it went to
Earnie instead. Sorry about that...
Okay, I could be really wrong here but from what I can see,
http://cygwin.com/setup.html
Wrong list. This post belongs on [EMAIL PROTECTED] Before posting to
this or other lists please review the list functions at
http://cygwin.com/lists.html .
Earnie.
Michael Rumpf wrote:
Hi,
I'm new to the list and I don't know if this problem is already solved, but
I couldn't find a
Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
Hallo,
I am sure that this was discussed, I didn't searched the archives, but
I want to make this request (again if it is so):
Change the default mount behaviour to create binmode user mounts
if called without options.
Example:
$ mount C:/some/drive /mydrive
Pavel Tsekov wrote:
Any opinions on this topic ?
Btw one thing - I've found many #include strings.h in
the latest sources - shouldn't this be changed to #include
string.h ? mingw doesnt have strings.h. Btw It seems that
if you have string.h you dont need strings.h (I'm under
egor duda wrote:
Hi!
Wednesday, 05 December, 2001 Earnie Boyd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
EB egor duda wrote:
Wednesday, 05 December, 2001 Pavel Tsekov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SUSv2 mandates both strings.h and string.h
EB Wrong documentation base. You must use MSDN for MinGW
Robert Collins wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Earnie Boyd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Keeping backward compatible/useable behaviour for
a) Local installs from directories without setup.ini files, and
That user must deal with those themselves.
Nice in theory. If that was truely
Robert Collins wrote:
Chuck,
Misc as a category acts like base: things in it always install.
Uhm, why? I missed this conversation evidently. IMNSHO, Base should be
the only required install. Misc are niceties that make the job easier
but aren't required.
I guess this isn't
101 - 122 of 122 matches
Mail list logo
