On Wed, 2002-09-25 at 19:09, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
*Updated* packages are trusted by default. They can be uploaded w/o
review.
I'll upload updates if notified here. Oh, once a day, so allow 24 hr
turnaround :}
Rob
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Wed, 2002-09-25 at 20:36, Chris January wrote:
*Updated* packages are trusted by default. They can be uploaded w/o
review.
Not being funny, but this probably shouldn't be the case. I could easily
spoof some mail headers and get a compromised binary uploaded. I think there
should
On Wed, 2002-09-25 at 21:11, Chris January wrote:
*Updated* packages are trusted by default. They can be uploaded w/o
review.
Not being funny, but this probably shouldn't be the case. I could easily
spoof some mail headers and get a compromised binary uploaded.
Then I suggest
On Mon, 2002-09-23 at 21:54, Lapo Luchini wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I was thinking abut it (again)... but a little search avoided me a
duplicate proposal... So I will answer to latest messages I can find
about it, as I'm very interested in the thing.
- From
On Wed, 2002-09-25 at 21:34, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
It's still Corinna.
Doh. I'm thumb fingered at the moment, I think my keyboard (which is new
when I got a devel pc) doesn't agree with me. Sorry!
the list as a ready-to-upload package is indeed from the maintainer.
Thats about it.
On Wed, 2002-09-25 at 23:18, Lapo Luchini wrote:
2) cygwin has a implicitly trusted key, whose private key is used by
CGF, Corinna, or any central cygwin trusted member
I don't think we want an implicitly trusted key. We do need a central
key of sorts, but that is different because the user
On Wed, 2002-09-25 at 23:36, Morrison, John wrote:
I think, if this key thing goes ahead, somebody is going to
have to come up with a *very* detailed method of getting a
key and signing things with regards to cygwin stuff. Making
a package for cygwin _is_ not easy for people who grew up
in
On Sun, 2002-09-22 at 22:13, Max Bowsher wrote:
Robert Collins wrote:
Much better. Please supply as a attachment, along with a changelog.
Will do.
Cool, Thanks.
OK. It was a (not so good) attempt at a performance optimization.
Done too early :].
+ setString, String::caseless
On Sun, 2002-09-01 at 03:44, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Sat, Aug 31, 2002 at 05:58:27PM +0100, John Morrison wrote:
Hi All,
Rob would *really* like to get this functionality out of setup...
It's easy enough for Rob to coordinate. He just has to upload your
tools and update setup.exe.
On Sat, 2002-07-20 at 14:25, Harry Johnston wrote:
At 03:01 PM 02/07/19, Robert Collins wrote:
It is conventional for setup wizards to have a different caption on each
Here 'tis. I'm not familiar with CVS, but I think I did it right - if not,
let me know!
Harry.
It was just fine
On Sat, 2002-09-21 at 19:12, Max Bowsher wrote:
CVSROOT: /cvs/cygwin-apps
Module name: setup
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-09-21 01:59:30
Modified files:
. : Makefile.in aclocal.m4 configure
cfgaux : depcomp ltmain.sh
Log message:
current generated
On Tue, 2002-07-23 at 15:49, Harry Johnston wrote:
Hi,
Attached are diffs to provide a basic unattended mode in setup.exe. Let me
know if they need to be in a different format, or if I should be using CVS
(I might need a hint or two though).
Applied. For the record, please supply a
On Sun, 2002-09-22 at 00:01, Max Bowsher wrote:
Yes, I remember, but what is the difference between having to bootstrap _some_
of setup, and having to bootstrap _all_ of setup ?
Good, then you'll understand I don't want to go through that again right
now.
You are welcome to go through it
On Fri, 2002-09-20 at 00:57, Max Bowsher wrote:
Take 2. I'm confident about everything but my const qualifiers on
packagemeta::getReadableCategoryList ().
Please pay close attention to them. Thanks.
Much better. Please supply as a attachment, along with a changelog.
Also, I've made some
On Thu, 2002-09-19 at 21:29, Max Bowsher wrote:
Here is a patch for setup.
IniDBBuilderPackage.cc: Fix DEBUG mode
Hunk 1: Remove a DEBUG message box which otherwise pops up once per package
during ini parsing, thus rendering DEBUG unusable.
This stays for now. It's there because it was
On Thu, 2002-09-19 at 22:20, Max Bowsher wrote:
Robert Collins wrote:
On Thu, 2002-09-19 at 21:29, Max Bowsher wrote:
Here is a patch for setup.
IniDBBuilderPackage.cc: Fix DEBUG mode
Hunk 1: Remove a DEBUG message box which otherwise pops up once per package
during ini parsing
On Fri, 2002-09-20 at 01:34, Max Bowsher wrote:
In the snapshot, sort order is alphabetically by package name.
In CVS HEAD, sort order is by installed/not installed, followed by
alphabetically by package name.
Is this intentional? I could not find a ChangeLog entry saying so.
It's a work
On Tue, 2002-09-10 at 19:23, Paul Johnston wrote:
Hi,
/etc/hosts - ${SYSTEMROOT}/system32/drivers/etc/hosts
So, like all great ideas, all that it needs is an actual patch to make
it happen.
Ok, I will have a go at this. As it involves mods to the setup program, I'm
going to move
On Mon, 2002-09-02 at 18:42, Morrison, John wrote:
From: Robert Collins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
On Sun, 2002-09-01 at 03:44, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Sat, Aug 31, 2002 at 05:58:27PM +0100, John Morrison wrote:
Hi All,
Rob would *really* like to get this functionality out
On Sun, 2002-09-01 at 03:44, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Sat, Aug 31, 2002 at 05:58:27PM +0100, John Morrison wrote:
Hi All,
Rob would *really* like to get this functionality out of setup...
It's easy enough for Rob to coordinate. He just has to upload your
tools and update setup.exe.
On Thu, 2002-08-29 at 01:44, Jason Tishler wrote:
make clobber -- for the bandwidth challenged, next time?
oopsee. :}.
There were a few logic flaws that made it not work for me.
Huh? Do you mean the RebaseConfigParser::parseFoo diffs? I couldn't
find any other likely candidates.
On Thu, 2002-08-29 at 02:36, Jason Tishler wrote:
Rob,
On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 01:51:55AM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
On Thu, 2002-08-29 at 01:44, Jason Tishler wrote:
Huh? Do you mean the RebaseConfigParser::parseFoo diffs?
The missing return true from the parser submethods
On Tue, 2002-08-13 at 22:26, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Hmm, perhaps it *is* better to bump the version?!?
Yes.
Rob
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Wed, 2002-08-14 at 00:11, Nicholas Wourms wrote:
Robert Collins wrote:
On Wed, 2002-08-14 at 00:02, Nicholas Wourms wrote:
Well that may be the way it should be, but the reality of the situation
is this:
Check the source luke.
Source != Reality
Ha!. Source
On Wed, 2002-08-14 at 00:34, Nicholas Wourms wrote:
Robert Collins wrote:
What I mean to say is that, despite one's best efforts, compiled source
doesn't always behave as one had intended. Of course it will act as it
is written, it just may not seem apparent that the way it acts
On Wed, 2002-08-14 at 12:41, Gareth Pearce wrote:
alphabetical order can still obviously screw this up anyway, no way to work
this perfectly until the full versioned dependency set comes in -
pre-removal-depends post-install-depends ... etc.
That level of depends tracking is not needed.
On Mon, 2002-08-12 at 09:02, Len Giambrone wrote:
I would dearly love to see setup able to be run fully from the command line.
In the process of determining how to use the tools in libgetopt++ to do this,
I came across this in the archives:
On Mon, 2002-08-12 at 11:26, Len Giambrone wrote:
Great. It seems he also forgot to mention another option he added:
-r --no-replaceonreboot
Prevent the replacement of an in-use file on reboot.
Is there an easy way to write a help/usage command other than searching
through the
On Fri, 2002-08-09 at 00:48, Jason Tishler wrote:
On Wed, Aug 07, 2002 at 05:46:32PM -0400, Nicholas Wourms wrote:
I know its supposed to be part of setup.exe, but with Rob being
indefinately tied up, I think this is the most prudent step at this
point.
Actually, I'm suppose to be
On Sat, 2002-08-10 at 01:09, Jason Tishler wrote:
Rob,
On Sat, Aug 10, 2002 at 12:39:39AM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
On Fri, 2002-08-09 at 00:48, Jason Tishler wrote:
Do others share Nicholas's views on this issue?
I'm completely impartial. Well nearly: I think that a separate
On Thu, 2002-08-01 at 23:39, Jason Tishler wrote:
But seriously, thank you *very* much for taking the time to explain how
the Builder pattern really does fit this application. Some of what you
said was bouncing around inside of my head, but you brought order to the
chaos. I will run (well,
On Wed, 2002-07-31 at 00:52, John Morrison wrote:
There's now a 1.0-2. Added a little more functionality and
lots more comments.
I've not recieved much feedback wrt this. Come on folks -
what do you think?
I think we should get the bare minimal functionality *released*, and
then debate
On Thu, 2002-08-01 at 11:50, Danny Smith wrote:
--- Danny Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have modified the
Adriano dos Santos Fernandes patchset somewhat so that
it
can be used with both cygwin and mingw
In absence of feedback on this patch from cygwin developers I will modify so
On Thu, 2002-08-01 at 13:17, Danny Smith wrote:
Lastly, wouldn't SEH be a feasible alternative (if the ReactOS work is
usable).
my concern with ReactOS SEH is that is has Borland license uncertainties.
Please follow up privately - I think we are off topic now :}. I really
need to
On Wed, 2002-07-31 at 11:02, Hack Kampbjørn wrote:
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Tue, Jul 30, 2002 at 11:27:06PM +0200, Hack Kampbj?rn wrote:
What about depending on all the programs called in the scripts like:
# cp, mkdir - fileutils
# hostname, id - sh-utils
# sh - ash
# tr -
On Wed, 2002-07-31 at 12:14, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Wed, Jul 31, 2002 at 12:02:49PM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
so it should depend on it - even though the package is there to help
bash.
ash also accesses /etc/profile. So we'd be introducing a circular
dependency. Does every
On Mon, 2002-07-29 at 22:55, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
Earnie,
The reply-to address for the mailing list is now [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In light of this, maybe you should reevaluate whether your default
action should be to hit ``reply'' or ``reply-to-all''.
It doesn't appear to be. I thought
On Mon, 2002-07-29 at 23:03, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
Oops, clicked the wrong message. The ones I have been testing over the
last few days all had the reply-to set :)
I had been testing messages from [EMAIL PROTECTED] and I thought that
one had the reply-to set as well... was I again just
On Sun, 2002-07-28 at 21:18, John Morrison wrote:
After (much ;) discussion with Rob here's the first 'release' of the
profile package.
I'm for inclusion of these packages - they allow setup to become
somewhat simpler.
Thanks John!
Rob
msg03505/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
'nuff said.
msg03492/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Thu, 2002-07-25 at 20:14, David Starks-Browning wrote:
On 25 Jul 02, in cygwin-xfree, Robert Collins writes:
I've been trying for *ages* to get /etc/profile to be an external file.
All' it needs is *someone* willing to be a package maintainer for it.
Hardly an onerous role, yet no one
On Thu, 2002-07-25 at 20:40, Morrison, John wrote:
From: Robert Collins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
On Thu, 2002-07-25 at 20:14, David Starks-Browning wrote:
On 25 Jul 02, in cygwin-xfree, Robert Collins writes:
I've been trying for *ages* to get /etc/profile to be an
external
On Thu, 2002-07-25 at 01:47, Christopher Faylor wrote:
Robert, please remove md5sum from your dpkg package.
Thanks,
cgf
Done. OH, and OOOPS!
Rob
On Thu, 2002-07-25 at 02:28, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Thu, Jul 25, 2002 at 01:52:20AM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
On Thu, 2002-07-25 at 01:47, Christopher Faylor wrote:
Robert, please remove md5sum from your dpkg package.
Thanks,
Done. OH, and OOOPS!
Wow. Quick response
On Thu, 2002-07-25 at 05:29, 佐藤 龍之介 wrote:
Hi,
I'm interested in becoming new package maintainer for doxygen,
so, I read Contributors Guide,and made
setup.hint,src-package,bin-package.
Please tell me what I should do next.
Who do I send these files to?
Do what Nicholas suggested with
On Thu, 2002-07-25 at 05:43, Nicholas Wourms wrote:
...Also, have you
considiered using qt2-cygwin for doxywizard? [ see
http://kde-cygwin.sourceforge.net ]
I don't think anything packaged in the Net Distribution should depend on
an outside site. That will cause waaay to many support requests
===
- Original Message -
From: Harry Johnston [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 3:49 PM
Subject: Diffs for setup.exe unattended mode
Hi,
Attached are diffs to provide a basic unattended mode in setup.exe.
Let me
know if they need to be in a
Thanks Norman, these where useful.
However, I'm still having trouble getting the 2.4.23 libxml2 to link
against python.
I'd like to offer it with python - perhaps you and gerrit can confirm my
trouble?
I'll send over the patch and build script in private email if you are
interested.
Cheers,
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Sent: Thursday, 18 July 2002 7:50 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Guile-1.5.6-4 available for review/upload
Dr. Volker Zell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
janneke
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Sent: Thursday, 18 July 2002 8:09 PM
As noticed, this has been discused on cygwin-apps. As an addendum,
I'm working to provide cross-compile setup as mknetrel scripts, but
Now this is probably going to start a huge email wave. So I'll start by
making some key points:
1) Setup does not support dpkg or rpm yet, so this package is -not-
meant to interoperate with setup.exe.
(*)
2) I'm not trying to 'race' Nicholas's rpm efforts. I don't think we
should -ever- place
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Sent: Thursday, 18 July 2002 9:13 PM
Btw, are these serious enough to warrant another upload, or do we wait
a few days to gather more bugs? If so, I've made a -5 bugfix release
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Sent: Thursday, 18 July 2002 9:37 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Concise Instructions for Doing a gcc
Cross-Compile in CYGWIN for FreeBSD
Robert Collins [EMAIL
-Original Message-
From: Nicholas Wourms [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, 18 July 2002 9:49 PM
To: Robert Collins
2) I'm not trying to 'race' Nicholas's rpm efforts. I don't think we
should -ever- place cygwin maintainers in a position where they must
have either dpkg
I think it would be nice to add configuration dialogs for packages to
setup.exe.
i.e. when installing ssh, ask the user whether to configure sshd or not.
The requirements are:
* It must be capable of being driven textually - for future command line
setup.exe installs.
* It must be capable of
===
- Original Message -
From: Harry Johnston [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 19, 2002 12:04 PM
Subject: setup.exe window captions
Hi,
It is conventional for setup wizards to have a different caption on
each
page of the property sheet, but the cygwin
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Nicholas Wourms
Sent: Wednesday, 17 July 2002 10:09 PM
To: Jason Tishler
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: rebase problem for cygcurl-2.dll still existing?!
Jason Tishler wrote:
Is that a
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Nicholas Wourms
Sent: Tuesday, 16 July 2002 3:04 AM
To: cygx
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Installation Classes for setup.exe [was RE:
LibICE.DLL is a BIG problem]
Hi,
Instead of
Title: Message
Some
stripped .dll's corrupt on rebase, others don't.
What
I'm wondering is if the recent thread about COFF file format and section sizes
has anything to do with the rebase corruption that occurs?
Rob
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Lapo Luchini
Sent: Sunday, 14 July 2002 7:44 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]:CygWin-Apps
OK, I prepared the package using aclocal libtoolize
--force at the
beginning of the conf
What about
ldesc: programs to convert GIF images
These are some programs that use libungif to convert images.
The libungif library is a specially modified version of giflib which
is free of the Unisys LZW patent. It can read all GIFs, but only
write uncompressed GIFs.
(Courtesy of
If you run setup under DebugView, or a similar tool, is any output
created?
Can you get me a stackdump?
Rob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Nicholas Wourms
Sent: Sunday, 14 July 2002 8:46 AM
To: Cygwin-Apps
Subject:
- Original Message -
From: David A. Cobb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Robert Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hmmm...so *setup* would have to know who maintains what, as far as
official packages go. Now, this can't be compiled-into the executable;
it has to be distributed from the mirrors
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Pavel Tsekov
Sent: Thursday, 11 July 2002 8:10 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: setup pre-release updated - please test with it
Hello Robert,
Monday, July 08, 2002, 2:58:39 PM, you
- Original Message -
From: Charles Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 9:29 AM
So, this proposal is actually two parts:
1) policy: how to handle unofficial (e.g. non-ITP'ed) but setup
compatible ports. My proposal: don't. They don't need to be
distributed
- Original Message -
From: Volker Quetschke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 4:57 AM
Subject: Re: GnuPG 1.1.90 test version (new test package)
Hello???
Any comments?
Apparently not :}. Does this need uploading?
Rob
- Original Message -
From: Charles Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Robert Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 8:40 AM
Subject: Re: Maintainers doing it for themselves
If the signature doesn't checkout on your 'net release' keyring, then
it's not a maintainer
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Gary R. Van Sickle
Sent: Tuesday, 9 July 2002 8:13 PM
Whew! Now back to my cave for another hundred years ;-).
Heh, well now we have you emailing again... And mutt off your plate
Howabout
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Nicholas Wourms
Sent: Tuesday, 9 July 2002 8:45 PM
To: Robert Collins
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: custom container code now obsolete for setup sources
Robert Collins wrote:
I've
- Original Message -
From: Nicholas Wourms [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jan Nieuwenhuizen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 5:01 AM
Jan et al.,
Let keep the conversation about building a cross-compiler automatically
going. I think CGF is being rather
- Original Message -
From: Jan Nieuwenhuizen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Nicholas Wourms [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 5:43 AM
But what I would like is
apt-get task-cygwin-devel
Have I mentioned already that setup.exe HEAD has full support for
mmm, time for arch/subversion/another one of the recent pack of opensource /
free software revision control systems?
Rob
- Original Message -
From: Charles Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jan Nieuwenhuizen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Earnie Boyd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002
- Original Message -
From: Lapo Luchini [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED];
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 5:34 PM
Subject: setup.ini format [Was: setup.exe and replacing of in-use files]
[vV]ersion: return PACKAGEVERSION;
Do you accidentally know where is the nearest
- Original Message -
From: Gary R. Van Sickle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Cygwin-Apps [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 11:59 AM
Subject: RE: [FINALLY]: Mutt-1.4-1 package ready
Also, libintl2 requires libiconv2, so he should only need to depend on
libintl2. Similarly,
- Original Message -
From: Charles Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 1:49 PM
This is counter to the RPM (and mebbe deb?) concept of shipping
pristine sources. Is there some way to do this?
deb ships pristine sources.
unpack -src, giving:
- Original Message -
From: Charles Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Charles Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 1:54 PM
unpack -src, giving:
foo-1.2-3.mknetrel
foo-1.2-3.patch
foo-1.2.tar.gz
Yes, this looks an awful lot like 'method 2' -- and we've got
Thanks Max!
I've checked this in but I do think we should check the return value.
What if the handle is invalid? Does sendmessage return a value then?
Rob
- Original Message -
From: Max Bowsher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 10:04 PM
Subject:
Ok, I've updated the snapshots page to have the
current pre-release version sitting there. I've no further patches queued for
this, so pending feedback from here I'll push this to [EMAIL PROTECTED] for testing this coming
weekend.
Rob
- Original Message -
From: David A. Cobb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 8:11 AM
Subject: [Bug] SETUP.EXE regression -- proposing going backward again
I see in SETUP.EXE vsn 2.249.2.5 that setup is back to proposing to
over-write test versions
- Original Message -
From: Lapo Luchini [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]:CygWin-Apps
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 4:10 AM
...
investigating setup.exe's sources, to try to patch a better behaviour,
even if setup.ini file has a wrong format.
- Original Message -
From: Lapo Luchini [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]:CygWin-Apps
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 4:10 AM
...
investigating setup.exe's sources, to try to patch a better behaviour,
even if setup.ini file has a wrong format.
Currently setup.exe creates a few files by hand.
They include
/cygwin.bat
/etc/profile
/etc/postinstall/passwd-grp.bat
I really really want to remove these from
setup.exe.
I posted a sample package to deal with /etc/profile
back last year.
This needs a package maintainer for these
- Original Message -
From: Lapo Luchini [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]:CygWin-Apps
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 3:00 AM
I don't know yacc format enough to extract that information myself from
iniparse.y.
But... steange inilex.l doesn't
- Original Message -
From: David A. Cobb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Charles Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Nicholas Wourms [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Jan
Nieuwenhuizen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 8:27 AM
Subject: Re: ITP: Guile 1.5.6
Charles Wilson wrote:
Now,
- Original Message -
From: Lapo Luchini [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 2:16 AM
Subject: Re: setup.exe and replacing of in-use files
Oh, and BTW: the patch was about 2 minutes work :}. Doing transactional
installs will be somewhat more :}.
I
Chris,
Can you please modify upset (or tell me where to find the current CVS so I
can offer a patch) to generate per-version requirements lists in setup.ini?
I'm not sure how best to specify such things in setup.hint :[.
This is compatible with the current released setup.exe, and enables
Thanks Chris.
The following patch should move the requires: line out to be per-version,
but it doesn't address the upset internal representation to allow true
per-version requires. I'll have a longer study of this issue next weekend.
Cheers,
Rob
===
Index: upset
- Original Message -
From: Pavel Tsekov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Robert Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 04, 2002 5:11 PM
Subject: Re[2]: [PATCH] Re: Setup.exe 2.249.2.4 crashing under Windows NT
4.0 SP6
RC I've applied this to HEAD and 2002-07
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Earnie Boyd
Sent: Friday, 5 July 2002 12:54 AM
To: Jan Nieuwenhuizen; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ITP: Guile 1.5.6
--- Jan Nieuwenhuizen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi List,
Last night,
- Original Message -
From: Pavel Tsekov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Robert Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It seems to be gone :)
Yes, ermm, cough, cough. I had a bug in my new code, which I was still
tracking down here. It's fixed now, in CVS, and a new snapshot is on the
way.
Since the code
- Original Message -
From: Bradey Honsinger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 04, 2002 5:55 AM
Subject: RE: Setup: capturing postinstall output
Does this seem like a good (or bad) way to go to anyone else (particularly
Robert)? I didn't expect my hacked-up
http://sources.redhat.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/setup/?cvsroot=cygwin-apps
I'll add it to the cygwin-apps setup.html page when I get some time.
Rob
- Original Message -
From: Pavel Tsekov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 7:33 PM
Subject: CVSWeb
- Original Message -
From: Robert Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: John Marshall [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 8:25 PM
One way to fix that would be to change #3 (as defined in my previous
posting) so that adding an URL that happens to have
I've taggest setup-200207 for the setup sources.
This is mainly focused onpushing the user feedback enhancements out to
release. (To prevent concerns about setup 'crashing' (checking MD5's takes a
little time) on local installs with large package cache dirs). It also includes
the new
It's all part of the same problem - conflicts,dependencies, removing
critical parts of the system by hand! - they all need a way to provide user
feedback that the user is asking for something problematic. They then need a
way to be shown just the relevant packages to resolve that conflict.
I've
Folks, please be sure to regenerate your Makefile next time you build
setup HEAD. I've removed the -Winline to allow the cygwin stock gcc STL
red-black tree code to compile w/o warnings. (I'm slowly stripping out
all the custom templates created when the STL wasn't available. It's
nice to see the
AFAICT http://prdownloads.sf.net/kde-cygwin/setup.ini is not a valid
setup.ini.
It's a redirect page of some sort.
It shouldn't crash setup, and setup-HEAD doesn't crash. You could try the
setup available from http://www.cygwin.com/setup-snapshots.
Rob
- Original Message -
From:
- Original Message -
From: Pavel Tsekov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 7:57 PM
Subject: Re: New setup snapshot and changes
Hello Robert,
Wednesday, June 26, 2002, 11:54:05 PM, you wrote:
RC Key changes:
RC * Feedback on MD5 processing.
RC
- Original Message -
From: John Marshall [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Robert Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It sounds very good to me! So add syntax (or just more parsing because
it's already there?) to mirrors.lst so setup.exe could display stuff
like
http://foonet.no (Norway)
Cool
- Original Message -
From: Ralf Habacker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Cygwin-Apps [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 9:20 PM
Subject: RE: new setup.exe crashes with kde's setup.ini
AFAICT http://prdownloads.sf.net/kde-cygwin/setup.ini is not a valid
setup.ini.
Rob, where
501 - 600 of 1001 matches
Mail list logo
