Re: Ping? + RFC [was RE: Setup.exe vs corrupt lst.gz files.]

2008-02-26 Thread Robert Collins
On Tue, 2008-02-26 at 07:24 -0800, Brian Dessent wrote: To really do this right (e.g. how MSI can rollback to the starting state midway through a aborted install) is a tremendous amount of work that I don't think anyone here is prepared to take on. FWIW this is why I started porting dpkg to

Re: [ITA] squid: Web Proxy Cache

2007-12-10 Thread Robert Collins
On Mon, 2007-12-10 at 11:13 +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote: On Dec 9 23:45, Dr. Volker Zell wrote: Hi I would like to adopt and maintain the squid package from Robert Collins. Cool, thanks! ... The file etc/defaults/etc/squid/squid.conf has CRLF line endings. Is that ok? Or do you

Re: 6th summary (was Re: [HEADSUP] ALL Maintainers, please reply.)

2005-10-26 Thread Robert Collins
On Wed, 2005-10-26 at 11:43 +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote: NOTE: This is one mail before the last on this matter. LIST 1: PACKAGES WITH UNCLEAR OWNERSHIP === dpkg Robert Collins or up for grabs? squid

Re: [HEADSUP] ALL Maintainers, please reply.

2005-09-16 Thread Robert Collins
On Thu, 2005-09-15 at 20:36 +0200, Gerrit P. Haase wrote: Christopher Faylor wrote: On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 07:41:24PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote: On Sep 16 03:36, Robert Collins wrote: I'm still here, but not actively maintaining packages, offhand that means dpkg, squid probably

Re: [HEADSUP] ALL Maintainers, please reply.

2005-09-15 Thread Robert Collins
On Thu, 2005-09-15 at 18:45 +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote: other maintainer without getting any notice from them. Since we have a couple of packages which haven't been updated for a good amount of time, there's apparently a need to find out, which packages are still maintained and which

Re: Welcoming Brian Dessent as setup maintainer

2005-05-03 Thread Robert Collins
On Tue, 2005-05-03 at 21:00 -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 12:15:37AM +0100, Max Bowsher wrote: Brian Dessent wrote: that currently the local cache is keyed to the url. Another thing to discuss is whether that, itself, is a bug. It's not a bug, per se, since it

Re: setup.exe sucks

2004-12-08 Thread Robert Collins
On Tue, 2004-12-07 at 15:16 -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: I believe that it was always Robert's intention to work towards the use of a true package manager someday. That time is now. I can't take it anymore. Ack. Rob -- GPG key available at: http://www.robertcollins.net/keys.txt.

Re: setup RFC: Ditch homegrown http/ftp code and use a library?

2004-11-13 Thread Robert Collins
On Sat, 2004-11-13 at 11:57 +0100, Lapo Luchini wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Max Bowsher wrote: * Package file scarcely ever change whilst keeping the same name. Also, they are compressed, so a small change is likely to cause the entire contents to change

Re: setup RFC: Ditch homegrown http/ftp code and use a library?

2004-11-13 Thread Robert Collins
On Sat, 2004-11-13 at 12:11 +0100, Lapo Luchini wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Robert Collins wrote: Calculating which file to use as a basis for rsync is easy without symlinks: Its just the 'closest to the version being downloaded'. Define closest as you would

Re: setup RFC: Ditch homegrown http/ftp code and use a library?

2004-11-13 Thread Robert Collins
On Sun, 2004-11-14 at 03:08 +0100, Lapo Luchini wrote: Robert Collins wrote: Thats my point : rsync doesn't require the same file name to use the content for optimisation. You tell rsync what file to use as the basis, and what file to write to. This, if you rsync one file at a time

Re: setup.exe sizes openldap-2-2-15

2004-10-27 Thread Robert Collins
On Wed, 2004-10-27 at 04:03 +0200, Reini Urban wrote: Brian Dessent schrieb: Reini Urban wrote: Esp. Replaces: sh-utils fileutils textutils would be needed for coreutils. And it doesn't require additional user-input. It's not strictly necessary. There's already the _ZZZRemovedPackages

Re: [setup] Why does PackageSpecificationhaveaprivatecopy-constructor? (Robert?)

2004-09-01 Thread Robert Collins
On Wed, 2004-09-01 at 08:12 +0100, Max Bowsher wrote: Robert Collins wrote: Have you heard of the 'rule of 3' ? No. Apparently I need to do some reading. http://www.parashift.com/c++-faq-lite/coding-standards.html#faq-27.9 A class with any of {destructor, assignment operator, copy

Re: [setup] Why does PackageSpecification have a privatecopy-constructor? (Robert?)

2004-08-31 Thread Robert Collins
On Tue, 2004-08-31 at 08:54 +0100, Max Bowsher wrote: So we have code like that at the moment? Certainly. 4 occurrences in IniDBBuilderPackage.cc and 1 in package_db.cc. Eh? I can't find any. We have things like setSourcePackage(PackageSpecification(name)); which at the end of the call

Re: [setup] Why does PackageSpecification have a private copy-constructor? (Robert?)

2004-08-31 Thread Robert Collins
On Tue, 2004-08-31 at 06:17 -0400, Doctor Bill wrote: Actually, this makes perfect sense. When you do SomeClass(), without using the new operator, you are telling the compiler to create this instance on the stack, and then when you do foo(SomeClass()) you are telling the compiler to pass

Re: [setup] Why does PackageSpecification have aprivatecopy-constructor? (Robert?)

2004-08-31 Thread Robert Collins
On Tue, 2004-08-31 at 14:27 +0100, Max Bowsher wrote: Robert Collins wrote: which is public, and should be usable. See: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html#cxx_rvalbind I agree with you, but the C++ Standard and GCC 3.4 disagree with both of us. Eek. gcc 3.x have all honoured

Re: [setup] Why does PackageSpecification haveaprivatecopy-constructor? (Robert?)

2004-08-31 Thread Robert Collins
On Tue, 2004-08-31 at 23:42 +0100, Max Bowsher wrote: Unless we add explicit copy-constructors to every single class, I'd rather just leave it out and let the compiler handle things implicitly? It seems cleaner to me. I think you'll find every class that has a destructor also has an

Re: [setup] Why does PackageSpecification have a private copy-constructor? (Robert?)

2004-08-30 Thread Robert Collins
On Mon, 2004-08-30 at 18:33 +0100, Max Bowsher wrote: I can't see why setup's PackageSpecification class has a private copy-constructor. Am I missing something? erm. to only allow the class itself to create copies. The reason why I am suddenly interested is that the C++ standard says that

Re: More setup 2.427 problems.

2004-08-29 Thread Robert Collins
On Sun, 2004-08-29 at 23:08 +0100, Max Bowsher wrote: Plus, although I'd put setup.exe into a folder entitled C:\cygcache and run it from there (and used it as the directory to download into), another folder, C:\cygwin, was created as well. It contains only 5 very small files in

Re: Seeking initial reactions: Moving setup from CVS to

2004-08-22 Thread Robert Collins
On Fri, 2004-08-20 at 22:21 +0100, Max Bowsher wrote: Subversion is not a pre-condition for my work on setup - just something that would be extremely useful. I'm sure you can understand why contemplating moving lots of source files into subdirectories, whilst using cvs, does *not* fill me

Re: Seeking initial reactions: Moving setup from CVS to Subversion?

2004-08-19 Thread Robert Collins
On Thu, 2004-08-19 at 00:42 +0100, Max Bowsher wrote: At some point in the medium-to-long-term future, I'd quite like to move the setup code from CVS to Subversion. Partly, that's because of all the little improvements subversion brings over cvs, but a notable concrete benefit subversion

maintainers wanted for:

2004-08-14 Thread Robert Collins
setup.exe. squid. I recently went from a 20/80 split between two employers to full time with the one that was 80% and now find my self not using windows for 95% of the time. I'll carry on with bug support for setup until someone else steps up. Cheers, Rob -- GPG key available at:

Re: setup preremove postremove

2004-06-05 Thread Robert Collins
Preremove is to do things like removing cached rebased .dll's etc - things you can only do while the rest of your package is installed. postremove is to do cleanup that you cannot do while the rest of your package is installed. Rob -- GPG key available at: http://www.robertcollins.net/keys.txt.

Re: [ITP] neon (A WebDAV library required by Subversion)

2004-05-03 Thread Robert Collins
On Mon, 2004-05-03 at 21:56, Max Bowsher wrote: Reini Urban wrote: Max Bowsher schrieb: sdesc: An HTTP and WebDAV client library = neon === sdesc: A HTTP and WebDAV client library = libneon24 === sdesc: Runtime library component of Neon - an HTTP and WebDAV

Re: Two new categories created. Comment needed

2004-04-07 Thread Robert Collins
On Thu, 2004-04-08 at 06:38, Harold L Hunt II wrote: [cue offended remark from Rob Collins after his last offended remark almost three weeks ago with still no action as far as I can tell, sorry Rob, but I wish you could be more honest with yourself about how much time you have]. I didn't

Re: Two new categories created. Comment needed

2004-04-07 Thread Robert Collins
On Thu, 2004-04-08 at 06:38, Harold L Hunt II wrote: A longer term solution would be a tag in setup.hint files that mark a package as removed, but this is insanely more complex. Erm, what precisely do you want here. Simply removing the package should be enough. Or are you looking for a

Re: setup.exe development stalled?

2004-03-29 Thread Robert Collins
On Thu, 2004-03-25 at 23:29, Reini Urban wrote: Robert Collins schrieb: On Sat, 2004-03-13 at 08:07, Christopher Faylor wrote: At the very least, it would be nice to get out a new release which resized correctly. I know that the current implementation isn't perfect but I wonder

Re: setup.exe development stalled?

2004-03-18 Thread Robert Collins
On Fri, 2004-03-19 at 05:33, Harold L Hunt II wrote: Christopher Faylor wrote: It seems like development for setup.exe is sort of stalled. I agree completely. At the very least, it would be nice to get out a new release which resized correctly. I know that the current implementation

Re: Heads-up: postinstall scripts and PATH (Attn all package maintainers)

2004-02-24 Thread Robert Collins
On Wed, 2004-02-25 at 07:04, Christopher Faylor wrote: Wow. I can't believe I fell into this trap. I have been writing shell scripts for a long long time and should know better. Thanks for the heads up. I suspect that this accounts for some strange installation problems. Would it be

Re: Heads-up: postinstall scripts and PATH (Attn all package maintainers)

2004-02-24 Thread Robert Collins
On Wed, 2004-02-25 at 07:12, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: This might work, except that a) postinstall scripts on the whole are updated more often and more easily than setup.exe (i.e., this solution won't help people using the version of setup.exe they already have on their computer, so the

Re: Heads-up: postinstall scripts and PATH (Attn all package maintainers)

2004-02-24 Thread Robert Collins
On Wed, 2004-02-25 at 07:21, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: Rob, However, the postinstall scripts did fail to run correctly (for some reason or another), and I just assumed that this was the reason. Even if it isn't, the scripts still needs to be fixed, IMO. Ok, so the question is why didn't

Re: Heads-up: postinstall scripts and PATH (Attn all package maintainers)

2004-02-24 Thread Robert Collins
On Wed, 2004-02-25 at 07:39, Harold L Hunt II wrote: I'm updating the xfig setup.hint files right now. I am also fixing the longstanding issue of depending upon ghostscript instead of 'ghostscript-x11 ghostscript-base'. This has caused numerous compliants about being unable to export

Re: Heads-up: postinstall scripts and PATH (Attn all package maintainers)

2004-02-24 Thread Robert Collins
On Wed, 2004-02-25 at 07:49, Harold L Hunt II wrote: I suggest that it does make sense to put in an explicit dependency on some such packages, though perhaps not all such packages, because if a user already has ghostscript-x11 and ghostscript-base installed, then manually uninstalls

Re: a script to remove empty directories

2004-02-19 Thread Robert Collins
On Fri, 2004-02-20 at 01:56, Andreas Seidl wrote: Igor Pechtchanski wrote: Feel free to send a patch for this. ;-) Igor I have written the following script, which is as good as I can do at the moment. Oh . I'm sorry, I replied to the wrong thread with my previous email about

Re: a script to remove empty directories

2004-02-19 Thread Robert Collins
On Fri, 2004-02-20 at 01:56, Andreas Seidl wrote: Igor Pechtchanski wrote: Andreas, Feel free to send a patch for this. ;-) Igor I have written the following script, which is as good as I can do at the moment. And is utterly useless. Cygwin setup is written in C/C++. Rob --

Re: [Cron cd /sourceware/ftp/anonftp/pub/cygwin; /sourceware/infra/bin/cygwin/upset -C -u setup.ini; /usr/local/bin/upx -q -q -q setup.exe || exit 0]

2004-02-03 Thread Robert Collins
On Wed, 2004-02-04 at 05:26, Christopher Faylor wrote: - Forwarded message from Cron Daemon - From: root (Cron Daemon) Subject: Cron cgf cd /sourceware/ftp/anonftp/pub/cygwin; /sourceware/infra/bin/cygwin/upset -C -u setup.ini; /usr/local/bin/upx -q -q -q setup.exe || exit 0

Re: upset and the setup.exe package server

2003-12-10 Thread Robert Collins
On Thu, 2003-12-11 at 16:30, Joshua Daniel Franklin wrote: Actually, after looking things over, I think that cygwin-apps would be the best place to put this. Am I cleared for messing with the cygwin-apps htdocs as well as the Cygwin ones, or are they separate projects? I got the htdocs from

Re: upset and the setup.exe package server

2003-12-09 Thread Robert Collins
On Tue, 2003-12-09 at 17:48, Joshua Daniel Franklin wrote: I do link to http://cygwin.com/setup.html which truly documents the setup.ini and setup.hint files. Maybe that page would be a good place to add some comments about upset? Don't forget

RE: non-setup information in setup.hint (was Re: Maintainers/Pack ages List, 2003-11-22)

2003-11-25 Thread Robert Collins
I'm not sure why this is non-setup information. Both binary only (no source: entry for a package), and Maintainer are setup.ini fields. Rob -- GPG key available at: http://www.robertcollins.net/keys.txt. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

RE: non-setup information in setup.hint (was Re: Maintainers/Pack ages List, 2003-11-22)

2003-11-25 Thread Robert Collins
On Wed, 2003-11-26 at 10:32, Daniel Reed wrote: On 2003-11-25T20:53+1100, Robert Collins wrote: ) I'm not sure why this is non-setup information. Both binary only (no ) source: entry for a package), and Maintainer are setup.ini fields. Were you suggesting using Maintainer: and relying

Re: non-setup information in setup.hint (was Re: Maintainers/Pack ages List, 2003-11-22)

2003-11-25 Thread Robert Collins
On Wed, 2003-11-26 at 11:25, Christopher Faylor wrote: I'm not sure why Maintainer: makes sense as a for-setup.ini field given our stated policies. It doesn't have to go into setup.ini - I was simply stating my confusion about inventing a new syntax, when one already exists. Rob -- GPG key

Re: Maintainers/Packages List, 2003-11-22

2003-11-24 Thread Robert Collins
On Tue, 2003-11-25 at 07:48, Christopher Faylor wrote: cgf (who's madly trying to think up some scheme to make the gold stars actually worth something) Whats the exchange rate :}. Rob -- GPG key available at: http://www.robertcollins.net/keys.txt. signature.asc Description: This is a

Re: still broken squid

2003-11-16 Thread Robert Collins
On Mon, 2003-11-17 at 18:39, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, it appears that the broken squid problem still persists (running the latest snapshot 11/11/2003 dll) Yep. It's on my TODO. Don't ask how long that is :}. Rob -- GPG key available at: http://www.robertcollins.net/keys.txt.

Re: [PATCH] Setup: more intuitive resizing controls + some dialogs

2003-11-02 Thread Robert Collins
On Sun, 2003-11-02 at 13:01, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: On Sun, 2 Nov 2003, Robert Collins wrote: Ah, I see. We must have different definitions of centered. I view CP_MIDDLE as same size but centered around the new position, which will require the left and right edges to be adjusted evenly

Re: AW: [Patch] Resizing fixes

2003-11-02 Thread Robert Collins
On Sun, 2003-11-02 at 03:25, Ralf Habacker wrote: The first one is to split the list into two parts: a category window on the left side and a package list on the right (like yast on suse linux) and second a search field to search for a specific package. re: splitting - that sounds possible.

Re: [PATCH] Setup: more intuitive resizing controls + some dialogs

2003-11-01 Thread Robert Collins
On Sat, 2003-11-01 at 14:35, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: As promised. Igor == ChangeLog: 2003-10-31 Igor Pechtchanski [EMAIL PROTECTED] Applied. I think there's a bug in the MIDDLE enum handling though. I've

Re: AW: AW: [PATCH] setup - help and local dir command line optionswasRe: Setup Command Line Options

2003-11-01 Thread Robert Collins
On Sat, 2003-11-01 at 12:16, Ralf Habacker wrote: Rob I need more time to think about what you have written and how to start with which class, I have take some time to inspect how it could be go and have build a testcase to see what kind of api is needed. Please note that I am

Re: [Patch] Resizing fixes

2003-11-01 Thread Robert Collins
On Fri, 2003-10-31 at 23:33, Frank Richter wrote: This patch now properly deals with minimizing the window - before, some sizes/positions were slightly off when the window was minimized and restored. It also constraints the size of the property sheet, it now can't get smaller than it's

Re: [Patch] Improved error message when selecting directory fails

2003-11-01 Thread Robert Collins
On Fri, 2003-10-31 at 23:36, Frank Richter wrote: Now, the last error code is evaluated and an appropriate message is displayed. There's also a choice to 'Retry', 'Ignore' the error or 'Abort' the directory change. The idea is that under circumstances the user may be able to fix the cause

Re: [PATCH] Setup: more intuitive resizing controls + some dialogs

2003-11-01 Thread Robert Collins
On Sun, 2003-11-02 at 07:20, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: On Sat, 1 Nov 2003, Robert Collins wrote: On Sat, 2003-11-01 at 14:35, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: As promised. Igor == ChangeLog: 2003-10-31

Re: let me be the first...

2003-11-01 Thread Robert Collins
On Sun, 2003-11-02 at 04:16, Christopher Faylor wrote: I'm having a hard time with setup.exe. Every time I run it, I have to resize the Packages to Install screen (or whatever it is called). Couldn't you just make the screen bigger or, at the very least, remember the size I chose for the

Re: archive.progeny.com gone

2003-10-28 Thread Robert Collins
On Wed, 2003-10-29 at 06:26, Christopher Faylor wrote: I guess archive.progeny.com was sick of being the first alphabetically in our mirror list. They are no longer mirroring cygwin and I've removed them from the mirrors.txt file. They should be gone when the next mirror list refresh runs

RE: [PATCH] setup - help and local dir command lineoptionswasRe: Setup Command Line Options

2003-10-27 Thread Robert Collins
On Tue, 2003-10-28 at 04:12, Ralf Habacker wrote: Not quite: I'm not in the business of splitting up patches and adjusting changelogs - could you please provide: The patch for main.cc and localdir.cc The updated changelog Here is it. Applied. Rob -- GPG key available at:

Re: [Patch] Resizeable main window

2003-10-26 Thread Robert Collins
On Fri, 2003-10-17 at 06:59, Frank Richter wrote: On 16.10.2003 22:29, Robert Collins wrote: Before further review, I'd like you to correct such abuses of C++. Done. Please include new files in the diff. (You can use diff -Nup /dev/null newfile.cc maindiff) Saves me time guessing whether

Re: [Fwd: Re: [Patch] Resizeable main window]

2003-10-26 Thread Robert Collins
On Fri, 2003-10-17 at 07:19, Frank Richter wrote: Original Message Subject: Re: [Patch] Resizeable main window Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2003 23:19:05 +0200 From: Frank Richter [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Robb, Sam [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] On 16.10.2003 23:10,

Re: AW: [PATCH] setup - help and local dir command line options wasRe: Setup Command Line Options

2003-10-26 Thread Robert Collins
Oh, and please resubmit the patch with the correction I requested.. Rob -- GPG key available at: http://members.aardvark.net.au/lifeless/keys.txt. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: PATCH: Save/load proxy settings in setup.exe

2003-10-26 Thread Robert Collins
On Thu, 2003-10-23 at 23:27, Jerry D. Hedden wrote: On Thu, 2003-10-23 at 22:55, Jerry D. Hedden wrote: One of the items on the TODO list for setup.exe is to save and load proxy settings so the user doesn't have to keep entering them. Below is a small patch to ConnectionSetting.cc to do

Re: AW: [PATCH] setup - help and local dir command line options wasRe: Setup Command Line Options

2003-10-26 Thread Robert Collins
On Sat, 2003-10-25 at 22:23, Ralf Habacker wrote: This is in the wrong place: LocalDirSetting::load is the right method to query the option from. While thinking about this a while more, I recognized that there is some more basic work necessary how to design the command line interface. Are

Re: [Patch] Resizeable main window

2003-10-26 Thread Robert Collins
I've committed Franks code - thanks Frank. I decided not to wait for the win98 tests, as it's been 2 weeks, which is IMO enough time for bugs to surface, from folk interested in this. Gary, I know we spent mucho time heading towards integration of your patch, I'm sorry that some of that effort

Re: [Patch] Resizeable main window

2003-10-26 Thread Robert Collins
On Mon, 2003-10-27 at 07:10, Robert Collins wrote: I've uploaded a new setup. For now, I'm not going to announce this on ... snapshot. Rob -- GPG key available at: http://members.aardvark.net.au/lifeless/keys.txt. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally

Re: AW: AW: [PATCH] setup - help and local dir command line optionswasRe: Setup Command Line Options

2003-10-26 Thread Robert Collins
On Mon, 2003-10-27 at 04:33, Ralf Habacker wrote: Rob, I've roughed stuff out here before, I think. Anywhere, here goes a quick brain dump. I need more time to think about what you have written and how to start with which class, but let me ask one question now, perhaps you can fix this:

Re: [PATCH] setup - help and local dir command line options was Re: Setup Command Line Options

2003-10-24 Thread Robert Collins
On Sat, 2003-10-25 at 10:43, Ralf Habacker wrote: Below there are two patches: 1. A patch implementing a help option, it prints it output to the setup.log (main.cc) Approved. 2. Additional a patch to allow setting the local dir from the commandline. (localdir.cc) This is in the wrong

[Fwd: Re: PATCH: Save/load proxy settings in setup.exe]

2003-10-23 Thread Robert Collins
Max, could you please commit this. -- GPG key available at: http://members.aardvark.net.au/lifeless/keys.txt. ---BeginMessage--- On Thu, 2003-10-23 at 22:55, Jerry D. Hedden wrote: One of the items on the TODO list for setup.exe is to save and load proxy settings so the user doesn't have to

Re: setup.exe don't stops memory leak?

2003-10-08 Thread Robert Collins
On Thu, 2003-10-09 at 06:53, Gerrit P. Haase wrote: Hallo, That was with the setup.exe version I checked out today from mirrors.rcn.net. Which could be any version. What was the version number? Also, your best bet to fix this is to build a debug version and break into in when this happens.

RE: [forwarded email: cygwin mirrors and installation]

2003-10-07 Thread Robert Collins
On Tue, 2003-10-07 at 13:02, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote: You'll have to forgive my ignorance here, but is there some way to query ftp/http servers for how much load they're under? Not as a standard. Thinking out loud, what we roughly want is: -users can choose any mirror explicitly. -on the

Re: Setup disabling of nonexistent virus scanners

2003-10-07 Thread Robert Collins
On Tue, 2003-10-07 at 11:32, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote: Hmmm, yeah, I'll look at this. I wonder why I don't get this and (I assume) others don't Incorrect const clause on wantsActivation in the base class lead to inconsistent method signatures. I fixed this this morning, but have been

RE: Setup disabling of nonexistent virus scanners

2003-10-07 Thread Robert Collins
On Tue, 2003-10-07 at 21:33, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote: I don't understand. In proppage.{h,cc} (the base class) and in any overrides (i.e. root and AntiVirus) both I and CVS have: virtual bool wantsActivation() const [etc...] CVS was missing the const. See the most recent commit to

Re: [setup PATCH] Rework do_download [next_dialog removal (2b)]

2003-10-06 Thread Robert Collins
On Tue, 2003-09-30 at 21:49, Max Bowsher wrote: Robert Collins wrote: On Thu, 2003-07-31 at 08:16, Max Bowsher wrote: And another... This seems more complex than the previous code. You're moving window specific code from the specific class into the generic threebar class. This doesn't

Re: [setup PATCH] Rework do_download [next_dialog removal (2b)]

2003-09-30 Thread Robert Collins
On Thu, 2003-07-31 at 08:16, Max Bowsher wrote: And another... This seems more complex than the previous code. You're moving window specific code from the specific class into the generic threebar class. This doesn't seem right to me. Rob -- GPG key available at:

Re: package download stats?

2003-09-18 Thread Robert Collins
On Fri, 2003-09-19 at 01:11, Christopher Faylor wrote: That's kind of what I was thinking. I could generate a cgi script to run, if necessary but obviously it would need some kind of authentication to avoid abuse. Is there something like this out there somewhere? popularity-contest does

Re: package download stats?

2003-09-18 Thread Robert Collins
On Fri, 2003-09-19 at 03:18, Christopher Faylor wrote: I'm all for adding this to setup but we'll have to wait for Robert to come online to see his take on this. I'm not all that interested, though I will review patches for impact on setup. Clean design etc etc needed. It doesn't feel like

Re: broken squid

2003-09-17 Thread Robert Collins
On Fri, 2003-09-19 at 06:10, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just ran and update of my cygwin tree, it appears that squid has stopped working. note that i have already upped my file descriptor limit. thanks. jake This is possibly a cygwin1.5 thing, I'm planning a new build of squid this weekend, as

Re: Preremove section in http://cygwin.com/setup.html

2003-09-16 Thread Robert Collins
On Wed, 2003-09-17 at 04:16, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: Ping! Pong. You had actions listed in your email, that you haven't come back to me with their results.. Rob On Thu, 10 Jul 2003, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: Rob, Replies inline. On 10 Jul 2003, Robert Collins wrote: Well

Re: new package proposal : CLISP

2003-09-13 Thread Robert Collins
On Sun, 2003-09-14 at 05:10, Charles Wilson wrote: I think the setup.hint format allows build-requires, but I'm not sure if setup.exe supports them -- or if it should. What if I want to simply download a source package to look at it, but not build it? Yep. The parser handles

Re: [setup PATCH] Work with gcc-3.3.1

2003-08-18 Thread Robert Collins
On Tue, 2003-08-19 at 07:17, Max Bowsher wrote: +2003-08-18 Max Bowsher [EMAIL PROTECTED] + + * win32.h: Undefine NOMINMAX before defining it, as libstdc++-v3 3.3.1 + defines NOMINMAX itself. Does it define it the same way? I'd rather we did #ifndef NOMINMAX #define NOMINMAX #endif Rob --

Re: [PATCH] Setup: clarify confusing antivirus log message

2003-08-18 Thread Robert Collins
On Sun, 2003-08-17 at 12:16, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: I didn't think we needed this either, but there were a few people who did read the logs (without much more knowledge of setup). Frankly, some of the setup-related questions on the list result in a request to post the log, and apparently

Re: [PATCH] Setup: clarify confusing antivirus log message

2003-08-16 Thread Robert Collins
On Fri, 2003-08-15 at 02:41, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: 'Nuff said. I don't think we need this. The log file is -not- readable without knowledge of setup. Any assumption folk draw from it need 'expert' review anyway. In short, this change is for folk that shouldn't be reading the log anyway.

Re: Subscribers only...

2003-08-14 Thread Robert Collins
On Mon, 2003-08-11 at 19:13, Morrison, John wrote: Hi all, I tried to send an email to -apps this morning from one of my home accounts, it bounced because that account is not actually subscribed. I actually have one subscribed account which .forwards to others. Would it be possible (all

Re: Bug in lynx setup.hint? (was: Re: cygcrypto-0.9.7.dll)

2003-08-14 Thread Robert Collins
On Tue, 2003-08-12 at 08:39, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: On Mon, 11 Aug 2003, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: Ahem, actually, reading the setup sources (inilex.l), it looks like the colons *are* required. Rob, it's your code, care to comment? Igor P.S. This belongs on the cygwin-apps

Re: setup.hint question

2003-08-14 Thread Robert Collins
On Thu, 2003-08-07 at 01:39, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: As far as I understand, no harm (except for some extraneous downloads) will be done if you list both as dependences. This is much less worrisome than a missing dependence, so I'd say go ahead and list both. When 1.6.7-2 becomes curr,

Re: setup.exe: always creating a /usr/src directory?

2003-08-03 Thread Robert Collins
On Sun, 2003-08-03 at 03:19, Jari Aalto+list.cygwin-apps wrote: I have noticed interesting thing with 2.340.2.5 setup.exe setup needs to be extended in it's mkdir logic to understand new-form symlinks, and to honour them. currently it doesn't. However, it's recommended to use a mount point,

Re: [setup PATCH] Use vector instead of array to storePropertyPage pointer list.

2003-08-03 Thread Robert Collins
On Sat, 2003-08-02 at 21:57, Max Bowsher wrote: +2003-08-02 Gary R. Van Sickle [EMAIL PROTECTED] + + * propsheet.cc (Copyright): Update copyright dates. + (PropSheet::PropSheet): Remove NumPropPages initialization. + (PropSheet::CreatePages): Use PropertyPages.size() instead of +

Re: [setup PATCH] Fix ChangeLog

2003-08-03 Thread Robert Collins
On Sat, 2003-08-02 at 21:01, Max Bowsher wrote: 2003-08-02 Max Bowsher [EMAIL PROTECTED] * ChangeLog: Fix broken line-wrapping throughout. Remove Ran automake from 2003-07-26 entry - since there are no generated files stored in cvs, this was neither a change, nor

RE: [setup PATCH] Add icon to title bar

2003-08-03 Thread Robert Collins
On Sat, 2003-08-02 at 20:30, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote: See what you've been missing? Have you even looked at my not-entirely-uncool page dedicated to Cygwin setup? There's an old friend there waiting to greet you ;-)! http://home.att.net/~g.r.vansickle/cygwin/setup/ Time is the key -

Re: [setup PATCH] Fix ChangeLog

2003-08-03 Thread Robert Collins
On Mon, 2003-08-04 at 02:22, Max Bowsher wrote: Robert Collins wrote: On Sat, 2003-08-02 at 21:01, Max Bowsher wrote: 2003-08-02 Max Bowsher [EMAIL PROTECTED] * ChangeLog: Fix broken line-wrapping throughout. Remove Ran automake from 2003-07-26 entry - since

Re: [setup PATCH] Fix ChangeLog

2003-08-03 Thread Robert Collins
On Mon, 2003-08-04 at 07:04, Max Bowsher wrote: Because 1) that ran automake line is there for a reason. (check the bz2lib and zlib directories), Aha. What about this then: * bz2lib/: Ran automake. * zlib/: Ditto. Thus preventing the misunderstanding I just demonstrated. Hmm, ok.

Re: Preremove section in http://cygwin.com/setup.html

2003-08-01 Thread Robert Collins
On Fri, 2003-07-11 at 01:05, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: Rob, Replies inline. On 10 Jul 2003, Robert Collins wrote: Well, we haven't set a policy on the number of postinstall scripts. I'd really prefer one package == one script. It feels cleaner to me that way. It's a general rule

Re: Setup Query for Gary: FreeResource

2003-08-01 Thread Robert Collins
On Sat, 2003-08-02 at 05:16, Max Bowsher wrote: According to the MS docs, FreeResource is an obsolete 16-bit compatibility function. Do we really want/need to use it? MS recommend using DeleteIcon etc rather than it for new code - and yes, its nice to free resources we've used :}. Rob -- GPG

Re: [setup PATCH] Comments 2

2003-08-01 Thread Robert Collins
approved. ROb On Sat, 2003-08-02 at 01:00, Max Bowsher wrote: +2003-08-01 Gary R. Van Sickle [EMAIL PROTECTED] + + * proppage.cc (PropertyPage::FirstDialogProcReflector): Modify comment. Index: proppage.cc === RCS file:

Re: [setup PATCH] Comments 1

2003-08-01 Thread Robert Collins
Approved Rob On Sat, 2003-08-02 at 00:47, Max Bowsher wrote: +2003-08-01 Gary R. Van Sickle [EMAIL PROTECTED] + + * proppage.h (Copyright): Update copyright dates. + (PropertyPage): Document OnNext and OnBack. Index: proppage.h

Re: [setup PATCH] SetDlgItemFont

2003-08-01 Thread Robert Collins
On Thu, 2003-07-31 at 22:20, Max Bowsher wrote: ChangeLog says it all really - this is just an incremental tweak to make it easier to create a Finished page, and to have all our font stylings in one place. Note Gary had the SetDlgItemFont calls moved out in a seperate method. Given that

Re: [setup PATCH] Add icon to title bar

2003-08-01 Thread Robert Collins
So this puts a small icon in the top left - like most programs have? Cool. Approved, Cheers, Rob On Sat, 2003-08-02 at 00:59, Max Bowsher wrote: +2003-08-01 Gary R. Van Sickle [EMAIL PROTECTED] + + * propsheet.cc: Include resource.h. + (PropSheet::Create): Add the Cygwin icon in the left

Re: [setup PATCH] SetDlgItemFont

2003-08-01 Thread Robert Collins
On Sat, 2003-08-02 at 09:12, Max Bowsher wrote: Now, I don't think moving 2 lines of code and 4 lines of comments into a seperate function makes this clearer - rather, it obfuscates what is happening here. In case you are not convinced, here is the alternate patch, to avoid another

Re: [setup PATCH] Rework do_ini [next_dialog removal (2a)]

2003-07-30 Thread Robert Collins
On Tue, 2003-07-29 at 23:40, Max Bowsher wrote: Let's see if this approach is more satisfactory... We're getting close. However, you introduce a regression: currently alocal dir ini failure should just bounce em back to the previous screen IIRC, not exit. Cheers, Rob -- GPG key available at:

Re: [setup PATCH] Rework do_ini [next_dialog removal (2a)]

2003-07-30 Thread Robert Collins
On Wed, 2003-07-30 at 18:34, Max Bowsher wrote: This is just as well, since currently if IDD_S_LOAD_INI does got posted back to threebar.cc, setup hangs on the progress page, since do_fromcwd does not do what the code in threebar.cc seems to believe it does. So, I'm adding an exit in a very

new snapshot...

2003-07-30 Thread Robert Collins
I've uploaded a new snapshot (-402) It's (obviously) got all the recent changes. It's -also- got persisted user settings for most of the dialogs. Take a look at SourceSettings.* or ConnectionSettings.* - they're /very/ simple. (They could be made simpler, but it just wasn't worth it there n

Re: [setup PATCH] Rework do_ini [next_dialog removal (2a)]

2003-07-30 Thread Robert Collins
On Wed, 2003-07-30 at 20:08, Max Bowsher wrote: Actually, that TODO is trivial, so I've done it. Also found a bug in my previous patch (one SetActivePageByID (lParam) remained) - fixed. New patch (ini.cc changes are identical to previous patch): Ok, lets do it. Cheers, Rob -- GPG key

Re: Setup.exe: Mouse wheel

2003-07-30 Thread Robert Collins
On Sun, 2003-06-01 at 03:27, Benjamin Riefenstahl wrote: Finally it's not obviously the Right Thing to do. It seems to me we'd want to trap those events and translate them in the rest of the choose event loop, not as a special case. You mean in listview_proc()? I tried that, but the

Re: Pending setup patches (issue 15)

2003-07-30 Thread Robert Collins
On Thu, 2003-07-31 at 07:54, Max Bowsher wrote: Or in to cvs right now, as is? This one Rob -- GPG key available at: http://members.aardvark.net.au/lifeless/keys.txt. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [setup PATCH] next_dialog micropatch (2)

2003-07-29 Thread Robert Collins
On Tue, 2003-07-29 at 06:50, Max Bowsher wrote: You realise that *all* I am doing with this patch is to change how data is passed between a function and it's caller? Yes, and its that aspect I objected to. I don't understand what was so unclear. Rob -- GPG key available at:

Re: Er I mean... (was: RE: [PATCH] next_dialog micropatch (3)(was: RE: [setup PATCH] next_dialog micropatch (2)))

2003-07-29 Thread Robert Collins
On Tue, 2003-07-29 at 13:47, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote: ...this straightforward patch: 2003-07-28 Gary R. Van Sickle [EMAIL PROTECTED] * dialog.h (do_fromcwd): Change function declaration. * fromcwd.cc (do_fromcwd): Change return type to bool. Eliminate use of

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >