Re: [ITP] email-2.3.0 (review)

2004-10-21 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Oct 20 18:32, Ross Smith II wrote: I've fixed the issues Christopher listed below, and a couple more. 2.3.0-2 is now available. It now defaults to using ssmtp. If you want to use SMTP, you will need to run email-config. I don't understand this one. Exim as well as ssmtp both have a

Re: [ITP] email-2.3.0 (review)

2004-10-21 Thread Ross Smith II
Christopher Faylor wrote: It's close but the SMTP_AUTH stuff still doesn't seem right. It only offers LOGIN or PLAIN. I chose PLAIN but I couldn't send email using my non-SMTP_AUTH email server. I don't think any authorization should be used at all as the default or at least there should

Re: [ITP] email-2.3.0 (review)

2004-10-21 Thread Ross Smith II
Corinna Vinschen wrote: On Oct 20 18:32, Ross Smith II wrote: I don't understand this one. Exim as well as ssmtp both have a config script which sets /usr/sbin/sendmail so that it points to the real executable, if /usr/sbin/sendmail doesn't exists. Wouldn't it be better to use

Re: [ITP] email-2.3.0 (review)

2004-10-21 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Thu, Oct 21, 2004 at 01:11:16PM -0800, Ross Smith II wrote: Christopher Faylor wrote: It's close but the SMTP_AUTH stuff still doesn't seem right. It only offers LOGIN or PLAIN. I chose PLAIN but I couldn't send email using my non-SMTP_AUTH email server. I don't think any authorization

Re: [ITP] email-2.3.0 (review)

2004-10-21 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Thu, Oct 21, 2004 at 01:12:55PM -0800, Ross Smith II wrote: Corinna Vinschen wrote: On Oct 20 18:32, Ross Smith II wrote: I don't understand this one. Exim as well as ssmtp both have a config script which sets /usr/sbin/sendmail so that it points to the real executable, if

Re: [ITP] email-2.3.0 (review)

2004-10-21 Thread Ross Smith II
Sorry for all those glitches. I just took another setup.hint and modified it. I must not have grabbed a nice one. Thanks again for all the help, Ross Christopher Faylor wrote: I've uploaded this but I made a few changes to the setup.hint file. 1) I removed the extraneous '@ chere' from

Re: [ITP] email-2.3.0 (review)

2004-10-20 Thread Ross Smith II
I've fixed the issues Christopher listed below, and a couple more. 2.3.0-2 is now available. It now defaults to using ssmtp. If you want to use SMTP, you will need to run email-config. Package setup.hint: === @ email category: Mail requires: cygwin sdesc: Command line sending of email with

Re: [ITP] email-2.3.0 (review)

2004-10-20 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Wed, Oct 20, 2004 at 06:32:36PM -0700, Ross Smith II wrote: I've fixed the issues Christopher listed below, and a couple more. 2.3.0-2 is now available. It now defaults to using ssmtp. If you want to use SMTP, you will need to run email-config. It's close but the SMTP_AUTH stuff still

Re: [ITP] email-2.3.0 (review)

2004-10-19 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Tue, Oct 19, 2004 at 01:12:10PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: I think this means that the package has the required three votes and is now ready for testing. I tried this out and noticed three things. 1) Should SMTP_AUTH be set in /etc/email/email.conf? I don't think it is standard to

Re: [ITP] email-2.3.0 (review)

2004-10-19 Thread Ross Smith II
Christopher Faylor wrote: I tried this out and noticed three things. 1) Should SMTP_AUTH be set in /etc/email/email.conf? I don't think it is standard to use authentication for sending email. Shouldn't it be commented out? Yes, it should. 2) The binary tar ball contains an empty