On Sun, 2003-08-17 at 12:16, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
I didn't think we needed this either, but there were a few people who did
read the logs (without much more knowledge of setup). Frankly, some of
the setup-related questions on the list result in a request to post the
log, and apparently
On Tue, 19 Aug 2003, Robert Collins wrote:
On Sun, 2003-08-17 at 12:16, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
I didn't think we needed this either, but there were a few people who did
read the logs (without much more knowledge of setup). Frankly, some of
the setup-related questions on the list result
On Fri, 2003-08-15 at 02:41, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
'Nuff said.
I don't think we need this.
The log file is -not- readable without knowledge of setup. Any
assumption folk draw from it need 'expert' review anyway.
In short, this change is for folk that shouldn't be reading the log
anyway.
On Sun, 17 Aug 2003, Robert Collins wrote:
On Fri, 2003-08-15 at 02:41, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
'Nuff said.
I don't think we need this.
The log file is -not- readable without knowledge of setup. Any
assumption folk draw from it need 'expert' review anyway.
In short, this change is for
'Nuff said.
Igor
==
2003-08-14 Igor Pechtchanski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* AntiVirus.cc (detect): Clarify antivirus message.
--
http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/
|\
