I found a problem with the bash_completion as stands...
I have a path ~/Applications/Apache Group/ with no other directory in
Applications starting with 'A'. When I cd ~/Applications/A[tab] it doesn't
autocomplete.
When I look through the shell script I can see...
snippit
# Turn on extended
===
- Original Message -
From: Morrison, John [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 10:02 PM
Subject: RE: bash completion (was: RE: Units)
I found a problem with the bash_completion as stands...
...
Sorry to have caused so
On Thu, Dec 20, 2001 at 11:02:07AM -, Morrison, John wrote:
I found a problem with the bash_completion as stands...
I have a path ~/Applications/Apache Group/ with no other directory in
Applications starting with 'A'. When I cd ~/Applications/A[tab] it doesn't
autocomplete.
That's
-Original Message-
From: Corinna Vinschen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, 20 December 2001 11:22 am
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: Re: bash completion (was: RE: Units)
On Thu, Dec 20, 2001 at 11:02:07AM -, Morrison, John wrote:
I found a problem
===
- Original Message -
From: Morrison, John [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Robert Collins' [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Morrison,
John [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 10:50 PM
Subject: RE: bash completion (was: RE: Units)
Question: does
Charles Wilson wrote:
John, why don't you create a bashutils package, to serve as a
collection of (moderately) useful bash scripts and settings. For now,
it could contain only bashcompletion, but later you could add -- oh,
bashprompt, or something...
I'm sure every daily bash user has
OK,
The setup.hint and bz2 packages can be found at:
http://www.straylight.eu.org/~carl/bash_completion/
Here's the hint file...
sdesc: A script of Bash completion rules.
ldesc: A relatively new feature in bash is programmable completion,
which has been available since the beta version of
Cc: Morrison, John; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: Re: bash completion (was: RE: Units)
Earnie Boyd wrote:
I think that `category: Utils' is too generic. I'd prefer Misc but
that's reserved. How about `category: Shell Utils'?
In the current grammar, `category: Shell Utils
Morrison, John wrote:
Thats not what the help file says...
Note that category names may be multi-word, e.g., ASCII Games but,
currently all categories are only a single word.
I know that.
category: Shell Utils
is two categories.
category: Shell Utils
is one category. (Earnie's
On Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 12:16:58PM -, Morrison, John wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Robert Collins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
- Original Message -
From: Morrison, John [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It is fun.
A couple of questions for you wrt setup.hint...
category: the
On Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 11:04:22AM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote:
Morrison, John wrote:
Thats not what the help file says...
Note that category names may be multi-word, e.g., ASCII Games but,
currently all categories are only a single word.
I know that.
category: Shell Utils
is two
, 2001 4:13 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: bash completion (was: RE: Units)
snip
I'm not sure how you got that impression. This includes the cygwin package
itself would be applied to If your package is dependent on a file. So,
if
your package is not dependent on anything in the cygwin package
The same could be said for many people where the sender is
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Carl
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 4:31 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: bash completion (was: RE: Units)
On Wed, Dec 19, 2001
completion (was: RE: Units)
On Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 04:21:17PM -, Ebrey, Carl wrote:
I have to admit that I thought it was quite confusing too. Perhaps if it
said, This rule also applies to Cygwin itself because Cygwin is also a
package?
Now, *that's* confusing.
So the cygwin package should say
On Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 04:25:36PM -, Ebrey, Carl wrote:
Is there no way that the list program can rewrite the reply-to line? That
would Make Things Easier(TM), IMHO of course :)
How about if I just block any email that mentions Reply-To? That
would make things a lot easier for me.
cgf
: Christopher Faylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 4:31 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: bash completion (was: RE: Units)
On Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 04:25:36PM -, Ebrey, Carl wrote:
Is there no way that the list program can rewrite the reply-to line? That
would
On Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 04:31:40PM -, Ebrey, Carl wrote:
That's what the webpage implies. If that's not what it means, then surely
you have to agree that the page is confusing.
I guess now I understand at least one specific confusion.
Robert already clarified the intent of the section. Go
Christopher Faylor wrote:
Is there anything similar to this in Red Hat, Debian, SuSE, etc.?
Well, /etc/profile, hosts, passwd, group and other core config files are
owned by the 'setup' package in Red Hat Linux. Then there's the
initscripts package for the rc.d directory. And most of the
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, 19 December 2001 4:17 pm
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: bash completion (was: RE: Units)
On Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 11:04:22AM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote:
Morrison, John wrote:
Thats
On Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 10:13:35AM -0700, Warren Young wrote:
Christopher Faylor wrote:
Is there anything similar to this in Red Hat, Debian, SuSE, etc.?
Well, /etc/profile, hosts, passwd, group and other core config files are
owned by the 'setup' package in Red Hat Linux. Then there's the
On Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 04:28:28PM -, Morrison, John wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, 19 December 2001 4:17 pm
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: bash completion (was: RE: Units)
I hate to be a wet blanket about
On Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 12:26:00PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 04:28:28PM -, Morrison, John wrote:
Fair enough - I found it today and found it useful. I thought one of the
purposes of this list was to question whether an app would be a nice
addition.
It
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
I'd like to pour fuel into the fire of `usefulness' of a package.
I'd like to contribute the NetBSD fortune package to Cygwin and
therefore I'd even like to propose to add a Games section *gasp*.
setup.hint:
---
sdesc: Print a random, hopefully
On Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 12:46:58PM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote:
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
I'd like to pour fuel into the fire of `usefulness' of a package.
I'd like to contribute the NetBSD fortune package to Cygwin and
therefore I'd even like to propose to add a Games section *gasp*.
setup.hint:
===
- Original Message -
From: Charles Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hmm. Maybe I just convinced myself that they belong as a separate
package.
How about this:
John, why don't you create a bashutils package, to serve as a
collection of (moderately) useful bash scripts and settings.
- Original Message -
From: Corinna Vinschen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Opinions?
Cool. You've my vote.
Rob
- Original Message -
From: Ebrey, Carl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
One thing I would like to say though is that I've been quite annoyed
by the
attitudes that come over on this mailing list. The last time I
checked
Cygwin was an open project, available for anyone to contribute and
offer
help.
work done :)
J.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Robert Collins
Sent: Wednesday, 19 December 2001 9:37 pm
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: fortune-1.8-1 [was Re: bash completion (was: RE: Units)]
- Original Message
Sure. Will do either tomorrow or Friday.
J.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Charles Wilson
Sent: Wednesday, 19 December 2001 5:54 pm
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: bash completion (was: RE: Units)
Christopher Faylor wrote
On Thu, Dec 20, 2001 at 08:36:52AM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
===
- Original Message -
From: Charles Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hmm. Maybe I just convinced myself that they belong as a separate
package.
How about this:
John, why don't you create a bashutils package, to serve as a
30 matches
Mail list logo
