PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, 22 December 2001 12:39 am
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: which which
- Original Message -
From: Christopher Faylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
So, the bottom line is that once the new version of which
is uploaded,
the
right thing will happen
-Original Message-
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Earnie Boyd
Morrison, John wrote:
Personally, I'd rather identify the apps which _arn't_ GNU. I
didn't know
that the (current) version of which for cygwin wasn't the GNU
version. This
ment that I kept wondering why it
John Morrison writes:
Maybe all the packages ought to state where they originated?
FWIW this often helps :-)
% package --version
Should support for this be a requirement for all Cygwin packages ?
AFAIK it is for gnu applications
Cheers
Norman
On Wed, Jan 02, 2002 at 02:27:35PM -0500, Norman Vine wrote:
John Morrison writes:
Maybe all the packages ought to state where they originated?
FWIW this often helps :-)
% package --version
Should support for this be a requirement for all Cygwin packages ?
AFAIK it is for gnu applications
On Fri, Dec 21, 2001 at 12:37:31PM -, Morrison, John wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Earnie Boyd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Morrison, John wrote:
And here's the setup.hint:
sdesc: Displays where a particular program in your path is located
ldesc: Which takes one
-Original Message-
From: Corinna Vinschen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
On Fri, Dec 21, 2001 at 12:37:31PM -, Morrison, John wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Earnie Boyd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Morrison, John wrote:
And here's the setup.hint:
On Fri, Dec 21, 2001 at 03:15:33PM -, Morrison, John wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Corinna Vinschen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
On Fri, Dec 21, 2001 at 12:37:31PM -, Morrison, John wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Earnie Boyd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
- Original Message -
From: Christopher Faylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
So, the bottom line is that once the new version of which is uploaded,
the
right thing will happen automatically. The only setup.hint changes
that would
be required are to the sdesc and ldesc. I think you should make it
===
- Original Message -
From: Morrison, John [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 11:01 PM
Subject: which which
If you'll pardon the pun, which version of which are we running? The
GNU
version is currently 2.13 and I just wondered if folks would
I wasn't sure that:
1) we were using the GNU which (which --version doesn't work) and
2) by offering to update the package I wouldn't be offending the current(?)
maintainer.
J.
BTW - It wasn't 1.5 in particular I wanted to know but whether it was the
GNU which we were using. Which's are
Ah, well I've no idea about how GNU our version is. :}.
Rob
===
- Original Message -
From: Morrison, John [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Robert Collins' [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 11:23 PM
Subject: RE: which which
I wasn't sure that:
1) we were
On Thu, Dec 20, 2001 at 11:23:38PM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
Ah, well I've no idea about how GNU our version is. :}.
I contributed my own small version of which (which is version 1.5).
If you want to maintain which in future, feel free to contribute
the GNU version instead. I have actually
- Original Message -
From: Corinna Vinschen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I contributed my own small version of which (which is version 1.5).
If you want to maintain which in future, feel free to contribute
the GNU version instead. I have actually no problems stepping back.
I'm happy with
Judging by the following:::
/--
$ cygcheck --help
Usage: cygcheck [OPTIONS] [program ...]
-s, --sysinfo = system information (not with -k)
-v, --verbose = verbose output (indented) (for -s or programs)
-r, --registry = registry search (requires -s)
Corinna - is there any pro's/cons (besides not maintaining your own version)
for/against using the GNU version?
J.
-Original Message-
From: Corinna Vinschen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, 20 December 2001 12:47 pm
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: which which
On Thu, Dec 20, 2001 at 02:29:54PM -, Morrison, John wrote:
Corinna - is there any pro's/cons (besides not maintaining your own version)
for/against using the GNU version?
Dunno. I never compared them. If you compare them and you're
under the impression the GNU version has some real
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: Re: which which
On Thu, Dec 20, 2001 at 02:29:54PM -, Morrison, John wrote:
Corinna - is there any pro's/cons (besides not maintaining
your own version)
for/against using the GNU version?
Dunno. I never compared them. If you compare them and you're
17 matches
Mail list logo