Re: which which

2002-01-02 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Wed, Jan 02, 2002 at 02:27:35PM -0500, Norman Vine wrote: >John Morrison writes: > >>Maybe all the packages ought to state where they originated? > >FWIW this often helps :-) > >% package --version > >Should support for this be a requirement for all Cygwin packages ? >AFAIK it is for gnu appli

RE: which which

2002-01-02 Thread Norman Vine
John Morrison writes: >Maybe all the packages ought to state where they originated? FWIW this often helps :-) % package --version Should support for this be a requirement for all Cygwin packages ? AFAIK it is for gnu applications Cheers Norman

RE: which which

2002-01-02 Thread John Morrison
> -Original Message- > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Earnie Boyd > "Morrison, John" wrote: > > Personally, I'd rather identify the apps which _arn't_ GNU. I > didn't know > > that the (current) version of which for cygwin wasn't the GNU > version. This > > ment that I kept wond

Re: which which

2002-01-02 Thread Earnie Boyd
"Morrison, John" wrote: > > Personally, I'd rather identify the apps which _arn't_ GNU. I didn't know > that the (current) version of which for cygwin wasn't the GNU version. This > ment that I kept wondering why it wasn't in 'sync' with the 'latest' GNU > one. > Uhm, "Use the source, Luke" (

RE: which which

2002-01-02 Thread Morrison, John
ssage- > From: Robert Collins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Saturday, 22 December 2001 12:39 am > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: which which > > > - Original Message - > From: "Christopher Faylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >

Re: which which

2001-12-21 Thread Robert Collins
- Original Message - From: "Christopher Faylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > So, the bottom line is that once the new version of which is uploaded, the > right thing will happen automatically. The only setup.hint changes that would > be required are to the sdesc and ldesc. I think you should m

Re: which which

2001-12-21 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Fri, Dec 21, 2001 at 03:15:33PM -, Morrison, John wrote: > OK I don't mind maintaining it as long as I can just forward questions to > the proper people :) and it compiles OOTB (or very nearly :]) Uhm, as the maintainer _you_ are the person who would have to answer questions. That's the t

Re: which which

2001-12-21 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Fri, Dec 21, 2001 at 03:15:33PM -, Morrison, John wrote: > >> -Original Message- >> From: Corinna Vinschen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >> On Fri, Dec 21, 2001 at 12:37:31PM -, Morrison, John wrote: >> > > -Original Message- >> > > From: Earnie Boyd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTE

RE: which which

2001-12-21 Thread Morrison, John
> -Original Message- > From: Corinna Vinschen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > On Fri, Dec 21, 2001 at 12:37:31PM -, Morrison, John wrote: > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Earnie Boyd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > "Morrison, John" wrote: > > > > > > > > And here's the setu

Re: which which

2001-12-21 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Fri, Dec 21, 2001 at 12:37:31PM -, Morrison, John wrote: > > -Original Message- > > From: Earnie Boyd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > "Morrison, John" wrote: > > > > > > And here's the setup.hint: > > > > > > sdesc: "Displays where a particular program in your path is located" > >

RE: which which

2001-12-21 Thread Morrison, John
> -Original Message- > From: Earnie Boyd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > "Morrison, John" wrote: > > > > And here's the setup.hint: > > > > sdesc: "Displays where a particular program in your path is located" > > ldesc: "Which takes one or more arguments. For each of its arguments > > it pr

Re: which which

2001-12-21 Thread Earnie Boyd
"Morrison, John" wrote: > > And here's the setup.hint: > > sdesc: "Displays where a particular program in your path is located" > ldesc: "Which takes one or more arguments. For each of its arguments > it prints to stdout the full path of the executables > that would have been executed when this

RE: which which

2001-12-21 Thread Morrison, John
Hi, I've done the package. The hint file should be embedded below. Corinna - I don't know if this is a good idea or not, but should it be an aim of Cygwin to use as many GNU original programs as possible rather than writing our own (our in the collective noun as it's _FAR_ beyond my capabilitie

RE: which which

2001-12-20 Thread Morrison, John
day, 20 December 2001 3:28 pm > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Subject: Re: which which > > > On Thu, Dec 20, 2001 at 02:29:54PM -, Morrison, John wrote: > > Corinna - is there any pro's/cons (besides not maintaining > your own version) > > for/against

Re: which which

2001-12-20 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Thu, Dec 20, 2001 at 02:29:54PM -, Morrison, John wrote: > Corinna - is there any pro's/cons (besides not maintaining your own version) > for/against using the GNU version? Dunno. I never compared them. If you compare them and you're under the impression the GNU version has some real adv

RE: which which

2001-12-20 Thread Morrison, John
Corinna - is there any pro's/cons (besides not maintaining your own version) for/against using the GNU version? J. > -Original Message- > From: Corinna Vinschen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, 20 December 2001 12:47 pm > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subj

RE: which which

2001-12-20 Thread Roth, Kevin P.
Judging by the following::: /-- $ cygcheck --help Usage: cygcheck [OPTIONS] [program ...] -s, --sysinfo = system information (not with -k) -v, --verbose = verbose output (indented) (for -s or programs) -r, --registry = registry search (requires -s)

Re: which which

2001-12-20 Thread Robert Collins
- Original Message - From: "Corinna Vinschen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > I contributed my own small version of which (which is version 1.5). > > If you want to maintain which in future, feel free to contribute > the GNU version instead. I have actually no proble

Re: which which

2001-12-20 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Thu, Dec 20, 2001 at 11:23:38PM +1100, Robert Collins wrote: > Ah, well I've no idea about how GNU our version is. :}. I contributed my own small version of which (which is version 1.5). If you want to maintain which in future, feel free to contribute the GNU version instead.

Re: which which

2001-12-20 Thread Robert Collins
Ah, well I've no idea about how GNU our version is. :}. Rob === - Original Message - From: "Morrison, John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'Robert Collins'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 11:

RE: which which

2001-12-20 Thread Morrison, John
I wasn't sure that: 1) we were using the GNU which (which --version doesn't work) and 2) by offering to update the package I wouldn't be offending the current(?) maintainer. J. BTW - It wasn't 1.5 in particular I wanted to know but whether it was the GNU which we were

Re: which which

2001-12-20 Thread Robert Collins
=== - Original Message - From: "Morrison, John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 11:01 PM Subject: which which > If you'll pardon the pun, which version of which are we running? The GNU > version is curr

which which

2001-12-20 Thread Morrison, John
If you'll pardon the pun, which version of which are we running? The GNU version is currently 2.13 and I just wondered if folks would like and update...? (it compiles OOTB) J. === Information in this email and any attachments