>Other than that I would think that the package would be ready for
>submission. Any changes to support additional projects like Dokany, etc.
>could easily happen in the future when those projects are ready.
Currently it is the package that is not ready for other additional projects.
I saw that
On 9/20/16, 10:33 PM, Mark Geisert wrote:
>On Tue, 20 Sep 2016, Bill Zissimopoulos wrote:
>> Mark, has there been any additional progress on this?
>
>No activity. I was not expecting Dokany to be fully integrated before
>ITPing cygfuse, but I had hoped to hear at least that the layout of FUSE
On Tue, 20 Sep 2016, Bill Zissimopoulos wrote:
On 9/8/16, 1:03 AM, Mark Geisert wrote:
I've changed Subject: to reflect what's being discussed now. When we
have a
consensus cygfuse I'll issue an ITP for it.
I've now updated the cygfuse repository on GitHub so it is more neutral
about
FUSE
On 9/8/16, 1:03 AM, Mark Geisert wrote:
>I've changed Subject: to reflect what's being discussed now. When we
>have a
>consensus cygfuse I'll issue an ITP for it.
>
>I've now updated the cygfuse repository on GitHub so it is more neutral
>about
>FUSE implementations. It can be seen at
