On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 05:17:10PM -0500, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
>cygwin/doc/configure and cygwin/testsuite/configure are now the only
>configure scripts in the winsup tree which were generated with
>autoconf-2.5x. Any objections to regenerating them with 2.68?
No, go ahead.
cgf
cygwin/doc/configure and cygwin/testsuite/configure are now the only
configure scripts in the winsup tree which were generated with
autoconf-2.5x. Any objections to regenerating them with 2.68?
Yaakov
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 02:35:16PM -0500, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
>On 2012-04-23 10:37, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 04:52:54PM +0200, Michel Bardiaux wrote:
>>> I *get* that. My problem was, the web is so cluttered with pages mentioning
>>> the no-cygwin thing (including t
On 2012-04-23 21:35, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
> On 2012-04-23 10:37, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> Could someone provide some appropriate words?
>
> Patch attached.
> +The copmilers provided by the mingw-gcc,
compilers
Cheers,
Peter
On 2012-04-23 10:37, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 04:52:54PM +0200, Michel Bardiaux wrote:
I *get* that. My problem was, the web is so cluttered with pages mentioning
the no-cygwin thing (including the cygwin FAQ!) that finding a good howto is
nearly impossible.
Is there a
