On Thu, 2006-01-05 at 13:52 -0800, Max Kaehn wrote:
On Thu, 2006-01-05 at 16:17 -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
But, that is the whole point of setting my_sendsig to
INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE.
Which I would've picked up if I had read the change log (RTFCL). :-P
* sigproc.cc
On Thu, Jan 05, 2006 at 12:50:47PM -0800, Max Kaehn wrote:
I notice that no_signals_available() tests my_sendsig using !.
INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE is -1. If no_signals_available() evaluates to
true, that should prevent sig_send() from getting to the
wait_for_sigthread() when there's no sigthread to
On Thu, 2006-01-05 at 16:17 -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
But, that is the whole point of setting my_sendsig to
INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE.
Which I would've picked up if I had read the change log (RTFCL). :-P
* sigproc.cc (no_signals_available): test for my_sendsig ==
