On Jan 16 09:50, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 12:19:39PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >On Jan 11 10:58, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> >> On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 08:12:32AM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> >> >On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 02:11:02PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrot
On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 12:19:39PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>On Jan 11 10:58, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 08:12:32AM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> >On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 02:11:02PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> >>On Dec 23 10:28, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>>
Hi Chris,
On Jan 11 10:58, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 08:12:32AM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> >On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 02:11:02PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >>On Dec 23 10:28, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >>> On Dec 22 11:08, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> >>> > I ha
On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 08:12:32AM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 02:11:02PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>>Hi Chris,
>>
>>On Dec 23 10:28, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>>> On Dec 22 11:08, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>> > On Sat, Dec 22, 2007 at 10:48:51AM +0100, Corinna Vin
On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 02:11:02PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>Hi Chris,
>
>On Dec 23 10:28, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> On Dec 22 11:08, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> > On Sat, Dec 22, 2007 at 10:48:51AM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> > >On Dec 20 19:35, Brian Dessent wrote:
>> > >> Christoph
Hi Chris,
On Dec 23 10:28, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Dec 22 11:08, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 22, 2007 at 10:48:51AM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > >On Dec 20 19:35, Brian Dessent wrote:
> > >> Christopher Faylor wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > Unless Corinna says differently, I thin
On Dec 22 11:08, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 22, 2007 at 10:48:51AM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >On Dec 20 19:35, Brian Dessent wrote:
> >> Christopher Faylor wrote:
> >>
> >> > Unless Corinna says differently, I think she wants to be in control of
> >> > what goes into the branch
On Sat, Dec 22, 2007 at 10:48:51AM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>On Dec 20 19:35, Brian Dessent wrote:
>> Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>
>> > Unless Corinna says differently, I think she wants to be in control of
>> > what goes into the branch so I don't want to suggest that you should
>> > check
On Dec 20 19:35, Brian Dessent wrote:
> Christopher Faylor wrote:
>
> > Unless Corinna says differently, I think she wants to be in control of
> > what goes into the branch so I don't want to suggest that you should
> > check it in there too.
>
> Okay, I'll let her take care of the branch since s
Christopher Faylor wrote:
> Unless Corinna says differently, I think she wants to be in control of
> what goes into the branch so I don't want to suggest that you should
> check it in there too.
Okay, I'll let her take care of the branch since she's been handling all
the releases from it.
> The
On Fri, Dec 21, 2007 at 01:59:54AM -, Dave Korn wrote:
>On 20 December 2007 21:12, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Dec 20, 2007 at 07:15:53AM -0800, Brian Dessent wrote:
>>> The attached patch un-NT-ifies bloda.cc but sadly a similar cleanup is
>>> still required for cygpath as well if w
On 20 December 2007 21:12, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 20, 2007 at 07:15:53AM -0800, Brian Dessent wrote:
>> The attached patch un-NT-ifies bloda.cc but sadly a similar cleanup is
>> still required for cygpath as well if we are to support 9x/ME out of the
>> 1.5 branch. In that case I
On Thu, Dec 20, 2007 at 07:15:53AM -0800, Brian Dessent wrote:
>Brian Dessent wrote:
>
>> Fortunately, I have VMware with a Win98 image here.
>>
>> The problem is that bloda.c calls NtQuerySystemInformation without using
>> any kind of autoload.cc-type indirection, and so cygcheck gets a hard
>> d
Brian Dessent wrote:
> ... but sadly a similar cleanup is
> still required for cygpath as well if we are to support 9x/ME out of the
> 1.5 branch. In that case I suppose you could just revert cygpath.cc to
> an older revision before the native APIs were added.
Er, nevermind. I was accidently loo
Brian Dessent wrote:
> Fortunately, I have VMware with a Win98 image here.
>
> The problem is that bloda.c calls NtQuerySystemInformation without using
> any kind of autoload.cc-type indirection, and so cygcheck gets a hard
> dependency on ntdll.dll which doesn't exist on 9x/ME. We need to do on
15 matches
Mail list logo
