On Thu, Sep 25, 2003 at 09:47:48PM -0400, Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
This patch sets the _pinfo acl in order to allow access after
seteuid and exec.
While looking at spawn.cc I also noticed oddities in pinfo related
error handling, and reworked them. I also restored impersonation in
case of
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Thu, Sep 25, 2003 at 09:47:48PM -0400, Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
This patch sets the _pinfo acl in order to allow access after
seteuid and exec.
While looking at spawn.cc I also noticed oddities in pinfo related
error handling, and reworked them. I also
On Fri, Sep 26, 2003 at 09:41:17AM -0400, Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Somehow I'm missing a description why that's necessary and the
implications.
I am getting paranoid. Most often we duplicate DUPLICATE_SAME_ACCESS
without thinking about what access is really
On Thu, Sep 25, 2003 at 09:47:48PM -0400, Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
This patch sets the _pinfo acl in order to allow access after
seteuid and exec.
While looking at spawn.cc I also noticed oddities in pinfo related
error handling, and reworked them. I also restored impersonation in
case of
On Thu, Sep 25, 2003 at 10:17:22PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
I was looking at the above today. Don't you have to reimpersonate regardless
of whether the CreateProcess succeeded?
Nevermind. That's exactly what you're doing.
I'm always briefly 10% more brilliant after I hit 'y' to send
On Thu, Sep 25, 2003 at 10:17:22PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
I'll check in the rest of the spawn.cc stuff with some modifications. I see
I missed some cases with the addition of _P_SYSTEM.
I'm sorry. Long day. I'm checking in the non-acl related stuff. I'll leave
the rest for Corinna's
At 10:23 PM 9/25/2003 -0400, you wrote:
On Thu, Sep 25, 2003 at 10:17:22PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
I'll check in the rest of the spawn.cc stuff with some modifications. I see
I missed some cases with the addition of _P_SYSTEM.
I'm sorry. Long day. I'm checking in the non-acl related
On Thu, Sep 25, 2003 at 10:56:41PM -0400, Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
At 10:23 PM 9/25/2003 -0400, you wrote:
On Thu, Sep 25, 2003 at 10:17:22PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
I'll check in the rest of the spawn.cc stuff with some modifications. I see
I missed some cases with the addition of