Cygwin/X - Problems with XDMCP due to firewall software.

2003-12-23 Thread Harold L Hunt II
Some users have been reporting that they cannot get an XDMCP login screen on a remote *nix box from their Windows XP machines. I was unable to figure out what was going on here until I enabled the Windows Internet Connection Firewall (ICF) for my notebook when I was out of town. Upon

Fix to stop xwinclip from clobbering remote clipboard

2003-12-23 Thread Øyvind Harboe
I'm going out on a limb here, as my experience with xfree86 is extremely limited. Perhaps there is an option to achieve what I'm suggesting here. Oh well! :-) xwinclip is clobbering the clipboard when I work w/e.g. OpenOffice: - If I copy and paste a spreadsheet cell while xwinclip is running,

Re: Fix to stop xwinclip from clobbering remote clipboard

2003-12-23 Thread Harold L Hunt II
yvind, yvind Harboe wrote: I'm going out on a limb here, as my experience with xfree86 is extremely limited. Perhaps there is an option to achieve what I'm suggesting here. Oh well! :-) xwinclip is clobbering the clipboard when I work w/e.g. OpenOffice: - If I copy and paste a spreadsheet cell

Re: not getting login using xdmcp

2003-12-23 Thread Takuma Murakami
Sorry for the wrong info. In my previous mail quoted below, all comment out must be uncomment. Additionally I made sure the following appears in /opt/kde3/share/config/Xaccess and /etc/X11/xdm/Xaccess: # The nicest way to run the chooser is to just ask it to broadcast # requests to

Proper attribution of patches

2003-12-23 Thread Harold L Hunt II
The following CVS commit, made by Thomas Dickey, has no indication that Thomas was either a) not involved at all in the patch or b) that Thomas found Ralf Habacker's patch and committed a modified version of that patch. The CVS log message says: fixes for _XtInherit on cygwin. The

Re: Proper attribution of patches

2003-12-23 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Harold L Hunt II wrote: The following CVS commit, made by Thomas Dickey, has no indication that Thomas was either a) not involved at all in the patch or b) that Thomas found Ralf Habacker's patch and committed a modified version of that patch. The CVS log message says:

Re: Proper attribution of patches

2003-12-23 Thread Harold L Hunt II
Thomas Dickey wrote: On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Harold L Hunt II wrote: The following CVS commit, made by Thomas Dickey, has no indication that Thomas was either a) not involved at all in the patch or b) that Thomas found Ralf Habacker's patch and committed a modified version of that patch. The CVS

Re: Proper attribution of patches

2003-12-23 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Harold L Hunt II wrote: Your commit didn't mention this either. Our change log is in our release notes, where the changes were attributed to Ralf Habacker: tsk, tsk: the actual commit on the code change bears only your name. A casual reader of that commit (and of this

Re: Proper attribution of patches

2003-12-23 Thread Harold L Hunt II
Thomas Dickey wrote: On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Harold L Hunt II wrote: Your commit didn't mention this either. Our change log is in our release notes, where the changes were attributed to Ralf Habacker: tsk, tsk: the actual commit on the code change bears only your name. A casual reader of that

Re: Proper attribution of patches

2003-12-23 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Harold L Hunt II wrote: XFree86 should be taking care not to steal credit for our patches by committing them without proper attribution. your standards are inconsistent: your committing the change rather than offering commit access to someone who solved a problem that

Re: Proper attribution of patches

2003-12-23 Thread Harold L Hunt II
Thomas Dickey wrote: On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Harold L Hunt II wrote: XFree86 should be taking care not to steal credit for our patches by committing them without proper attribution. your standards are inconsistent: your committing the change rather than offering commit access to someone who

Books for development?

2003-12-23 Thread Harold L Hunt II
Do any developers need books? I've got enough money for one or two books in the fund. If you have contributed at least one patch before and you need a book on X, Win32 API, compilers, build tools, or something else related to Cygwin/X development, then I can help you out in getting the books

Re: Proper attribution of patches

2003-12-23 Thread Brian E. Gallew
Do you actually do anything useful? Or do you just steal other people's code and then act annoying (and childish) when someone calls you on it?

Re: Proper attribution of patches

2003-12-23 Thread Brian E. Gallew
Argh. That was supposed to go to our good friend Thomas Dickey. Somebody in Pittsburgh, PA stop by and slap me.

Re: Proper attribution of patches

2003-12-23 Thread Frédéric L. W. Meunier
On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Brian E. Gallew wrote: Do you actually do anything useful? Or do you just steal other people's code and then act annoying (and childish) when someone calls you on it? You can see for yourself what he does: http://invisible-island.net/ ftp://invisible-island.net/ Thomas,

Re: Proper attribution of patches

2003-12-23 Thread Harold L Hunt II
Thomas Dickey wrote: On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Harold L Hunt II wrote: Thomas Dickey wrote: On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Harold L Hunt II wrote: Your commit didn't mention this either. Our change log is in our release notes, where the changes were attributed to Ralf Habacker: tsk, tsk: the actual

Re: Proper attribution of patches

2003-12-23 Thread Eric Anholt
On Tue, 2003-12-23 at 11:32, Thomas Dickey wrote: On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Harold L Hunt II wrote: XFree86 should be taking care not to steal credit for our patches by committing them without proper attribution. your standards are inconsistent: your committing the change rather than

RE: Proper attribution of patches

2003-12-23 Thread Armbrust, Daniel C.
Thomas, as a casual observer of your behavior in respect to Harold, your last name would describe you better if it were shortened to Dick. Here is a Quote from Mr. Dickeys webpage where he is whining about not getting credit for patches he wrote: This is a collection of some of the patches

Re: Proper attribution of patches

2003-12-23 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Eric Anholt wrote: The only responsible thing for you to do would be to correct the ChangeLog to attribute it to the patch's author. well that's polite enough. unlike Harold. no problem. -- Thomas E. Dickey http://invisible-island.net ftp://invisible-island.net

Re: Proper attribution of patches

2003-12-23 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Harold L Hunt II wrote: No, that is not good enough. You should amend your change log entry to attribute the patch to Ralf and you should apologize to the X community at large for being so sloppy with attributing credit. yes, you're right. now I'll have to scrutinize

Re: Proper attribution of patches

2003-12-23 Thread Harold L Hunt II
Thomas Dickey wrote: On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Harold L Hunt II wrote: Put Ralf's name in the change log!!! you first. Ralf's name is already in our change log, but our change log is not in CVS. I guess I need to show you that you actively took credit for the patch again: The

Re: Proper attribution of patches

2003-12-23 Thread Harold L Hunt II
Thomas Dickey wrote: On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Eric Anholt wrote: The only responsible thing for you to do would be to correct the ChangeLog to attribute it to the patch's author. well that's polite enough. unlike Harold. I have not been rude in this discussion. I have repeatedly asked you to

Re: Proper attribution of patches

2003-12-23 Thread Alan Hourihane
On Tue, Dec 23, 2003 at 02:02:20PM -0500, Thomas Dickey wrote: On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Harold L Hunt II wrote: The following CVS commit, made by Thomas Dickey, has no indication that Thomas was either a) not involved at all in the patch or b) that Thomas found Ralf Habacker's patch and

Re: Proper attribution of patches

2003-12-23 Thread Harold L Hunt II
Thomas Dickey wrote: On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Harold L Hunt II wrote: No, that is not good enough. You should amend your change log entry to attribute the patch to Ralf and you should apologize to the X community at large for being so sloppy with attributing credit. yes, you're right. Thanks.

Re: Proper attribution of patches

2003-12-23 Thread Harold L Hunt II
Alan Hourihane wrote: On Tue, Dec 23, 2003 at 02:02:20PM -0500, Thomas Dickey wrote: On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Harold L Hunt II wrote: The following CVS commit, made by Thomas Dickey, has no indication that Thomas was either a) not involved at all in the patch or b) that Thomas found Ralf

Re: Proper attribution of patches

2003-12-23 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Alan Hourihane wrote: Thomas, If you did get this code directly from Cygwin/X's tree then I'd of expected at least the credit to be apportioned to Harold at the very least, rather than putting your name against it. Ralf's name could have been corrected later, with a

Re: Proper attribution of patches

2003-12-23 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Harold L Hunt II wrote: Thomas Dickey wrote: On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Eric Anholt wrote: The only responsible thing for you to do would be to correct the ChangeLog to attribute it to the patch's author. well that's polite enough. unlike Harold. I have not been

Re: Proper attribution of patches

2003-12-23 Thread Harold L Hunt II
Thomas Dickey wrote: On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Alan Hourihane wrote: Thomas, If you did get this code directly from Cygwin/X's tree then I'd of expected at least the credit to be apportioned to Harold at the very least, rather than putting your name against it. Ralf's name could have been corrected

Re: Proper attribution of patches

2003-12-23 Thread Harold L Hunt II
Thomas Dickey wrote: On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Harold L Hunt II wrote: Thomas Dickey wrote: On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Eric Anholt wrote: The only responsible thing for you to do would be to correct the ChangeLog to attribute it to the patch's author. well that's polite enough. unlike Harold. I

Re: Proper attribution of patches

2003-12-23 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Eric Anholt wrote: I see only minor inconsitency on his part, that the original commit of that code didn't attribute it to its author in the CVS logs, while at least some other commits do note authors of patches. However, he didn't explicitly take credit for it, like you

Re: Proper attribution of patches

2003-12-23 Thread Harold L Hunt II
Thomas Dickey wrote: On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Eric Anholt wrote: [snip] announcement of new packages with those changes reflects the author correctly. I don't see Harold Hunt asking for his name to be on the patch in any way, only the patch's author's name (the members of the Cygwin/X community in

Re: Proper attribution of patches

2003-12-23 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Harold L Hunt II wrote: been corrected later, with a follow email from Harold. It's a simple change to put that right in the CHANGELOG. So I'll do that. I had that on my next set of commits. Then why not say so earlier? There was no point in doing so. -- Thomas

Re: Proper attribution of patches

2003-12-23 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Harold L Hunt II wrote: a lot of words. -- Thomas E. Dickey http://invisible-island.net ftp://invisible-island.net

Re: Proper attribution of patches

2003-12-23 Thread Harold L Hunt II
Thomas Dickey wrote: On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Harold L Hunt II wrote: been corrected later, with a follow email from Harold. It's a simple change to put that right in the CHANGELOG. So I'll do that. I had that on my next set of commits. Then why not say so earlier? There was no point in doing

Re: Proper attribution of patches

2003-12-23 Thread Harold L Hunt II
Thomas Dickey wrote: On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Harold L Hunt II wrote: a lot of words. The modus operandi of Thomas Dickey: 1) Stick head in sand 2) ??? Harold

Re: Proper attribution of patches

2003-12-23 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Harold L Hunt II wrote: Sure there was: you would not have exposed yourself as a hypocrite by doing exactly that which you denounce on your home page (pointed out by Daniel Armburst). You lambast those egotistical plagiarists that yes, I can imagine that you admire them.

Re: Proper attribution of patches

2003-12-23 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Tue, Dec 23, 2003 at 05:34:46PM -0500, Thomas Dickey wrote: On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Harold L Hunt II wrote: Sure there was: you would not have exposed yourself as a hypocrite by doing exactly that which you denounce on your home page (pointed out by Daniel Armburst). You lambast those egotistical

RE: Proper attribution of patches

2003-12-23 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Armbrust, Daniel C. wrote: I've seen your postings before, and have no use for your opinions. (that seems to be a common trait of Harold's friends - I don't have to address each one of them). -- Thomas E. Dickey http://invisible-island.net ftp://invisible-island.net

Re: Proper attribution of patches

2003-12-23 Thread Harold L Hunt II
David Dawes wrote: On Tue, Dec 23, 2003 at 01:25:52PM -0500, Harold L Hunt II wrote: The following CVS commit, made by Thomas Dickey, has no indication that Thomas was either a) not involved at all in the patch or b) that Thomas found Ralf Habacker's patch and committed a modified version of

RE: Proper attribution of patches

2003-12-23 Thread Armbrust, Daniel C.
Wow, your still so pissed off about being wrong, now you are attacking all of Harold's friends. Boy, you're a big powerful man. Let me bow before you. #1. I do not know Harold. All I know about him is what I have learned by following this list for about a year. #2. I don't know you. All I

RE: Proper attribution of patches

2003-12-23 Thread Alec Mihailovs
I didn't follow all of the discussion and I am not a friend of Harold, but I would be happy to become his friend in the future. Harold seems to be a really nice guy spending his free time on the Cygwin X development. Dickey seems to be a really dick as somebody already noted, or a really dangerous

RE: Proper attribution of patches

2003-12-23 Thread Frédéric L. W. Meunier
On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Alec Mihailovs wrote: I didn't follow all of the discussion and I am not a friend of Harold, but I would be happy to become his friend in the future. Harold seems to be a really nice guy spending his free time on the Cygwin X development. Agreed. Dickey seems to be a

Screenshots page updated

2003-12-23 Thread Harold L Hunt II
Our screenshots page has been completely updated: http://xfree86.cygwin.com/screenshots/ Nine old screenshots have been removed. Nine new screenshots have been added, showing off new features such as the exit confirmation and the tray icon menu. Merry Christmas! Harold