How to install a locale in cygwin?

2005-03-10 Thread Duong Duong
I ran an application but it told that: " Cannot load either en_US.UTF-8 or vi_VN.UTF-8 locale To use this program you must have one of these locales installed". So how to install en_US.UTF-8 or vi_VN.UTF-8 in cygwin. Thanks. __ Do you Yahoo!? R

Re: startx (still) hangs at startup

2005-03-10 Thread martouf .
I was having the same problem (XWin 'hanging' at the "Rules = " line) and found it went away if I reverted to cygwin 1.5.12-1 from 1.5.13-1. Same hanging problem occurs when using the snapshot cygwin1-20050309.dll. I haven't tried the "-kb" option to XWin yet with cygwin 1.5.13-1, but I can repor

RE: bad installation ?

2005-03-10 Thread Matthew Johnson
--- "John Morrison (Cygwin)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Matthew, > > Although the message is from base-files the reason > is due to installation. OK... > In my experience this only > occurs when installing for a domain user although > others have reported other reasons for it. 'Domain'?

RE: 30+ reasons why X-Win32 is Better than Cygwin/X

2005-03-10 Thread Ruth Ivimey-Cook
HI, > > 5 Stability Medium High > > Quite unclear wording. I use Cygwin/X in my daily work and > this proves it's stability. The multiwindow mode still has > some issues but is very stable too. Indeed, and misleads, too. I actually have a Starnet license, but no longer use it.

RE: 30+ reasons why X-Win32 is Better than Cygwin/X

2005-03-10 Thread Ruth Ivimey-Cook
> In case anyone is interested, I will be looking into > solutions for remote sound support. I realize that this is > not directly an Cygwin/X issue, but it would be something > that I have not seen with any other packaged X server. If > anyone has some suggestions or comments about this, ple

Re: eclipse 3.0.1 input problem

2005-03-10 Thread Mike Starbuck
i don't know. what is xev? --- Alexander Gottwald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 9 Mar 2005, Mike Starbuck wrote: > > > no > > What does xev report on keypress? > > bye > ago > -- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.gotti.org ICQ: 126018723 > -- The information contai

Re: 30+ reasons why X-Win32 is Better than Cygwin/X

2005-03-10 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 12:57:53PM -0800, Matthew Johnson wrote: >First question: is this _really_ on topic for the list? I would have >thought not. If someone is talking about implementing features, then sure. cgf

Re: 30+ reasons why X-Win32 is Better than Cygwin/X

2005-03-10 Thread Matthew Johnson
First question: is this _really_ on topic for the list? I would have thought not. --- Alexander Gottwald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 9 Mar 2005, Joseph Miller wrote: > > Commenting the list: > > 30+ Reasons Why X-Win32 is Better than Cygwin/X > >

RE: bad installation ?

2005-03-10 Thread John Morrison (Cygwin)
Hi Matthew, Although the message is from base-files the reason is due to installation. In my experience this only occurs when installing for a domain user although others have reported other reasons for it. For me, the message occurs because the base-passwd (which I also maintain) doesn't and (f

RE: bad installation ?

2005-03-10 Thread Matthew Johnson
Hi, John- Since I myself have no idea why it is outputting that message, no I cannot suggest a better message. And I notice that when I did a fresh installation of cygwin and cygwin/x on a brand new system yesterday, now I am getting that message too. Do _you_ have any idea why fresh installations

Re: 30+ reasons why X-Win32 is Better than Cygwin/X

2005-03-10 Thread Alexander Gottwald
On Thu, 10 Mar 2005, Joseph Miller wrote: > In case anyone is interested, I will be looking into solutions for remote > sound support. I realize that this is not directly an Cygwin/X issue, but it > would be something that I have not seen with any other packaged X server. If > anyone has some

Re: 30+ reasons why X-Win32 is Better than Cygwin/X

2005-03-10 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 08:40:25AM -0500, Joseph Miller wrote: >On Wednesday 09 March 2005 6:30 pm, Christopher Faylor wrote: >>On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 04:19:18PM -0500, Joseph Miller wrote: >>>I recently received a list entitled "30+ Reasons Why X-Win32 is Better >>>than Cygwin/X". I don't know e

Re: 30+ reasons why X-Win32 is Better than Cygwin/X

2005-03-10 Thread Joseph Miller
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 In case anyone is interested, I will be looking into solutions for remote sound support. I realize that this is not directly an Cygwin/X issue, but it would be something that I have not seen with any other packaged X server. If anyone has some sug

Re: 30+ reasons why X-Win32 is Better than Cygwin/X

2005-03-10 Thread Joseph Miller
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wednesday 09 March 2005 6:30 pm, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 04:19:18PM -0500, Joseph Miller wrote: > >I recently received a list entitled "30+ Reasons Why X-Win32 is Better > > than Cygwin/X". I don't know enough at the mom

Re: 30+ reasons why X-Win32 is Better than Cygwin/X

2005-03-10 Thread Alexander Gottwald
On Wed, 9 Mar 2005, Joseph Miller wrote: Commenting the list: 30+ Reasons Why X-Win32 is Better than Cygwin/X > # FeaturesCygwin/XX-Win32 > 1 3-D Hardware Acceleration for OpenGLNo Yes It is work in progress but it wo

Re: 30+ reasons why X-Win32 is Better than Cygwin/X

2005-03-10 Thread Alexander Gottwald
On Wed, 9 Mar 2005, Joseph Miller wrote: > 3-D Hardware Acceleration for OpenGL - I am told that Cygwin/X supports this, > but I use XWin_GL.exe. What do they mean by this? XWin_GL links to opengl32.dll from windows and uses hardware acceleration if the video driver support it. Many video drive

Re: 30+ reasons why X-Win32 is Better than Cygwin/X

2005-03-10 Thread Chris Green
On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 06:30:35PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 04:19:18PM -0500, Joseph Miller wrote: > >I recently received a list entitled "30+ Reasons Why X-Win32 is Better than > >Cygwin/X". I don't know enough at the moment (though I am learning) about > >the

RE: bad installation ?

2005-03-10 Thread Morrison, John
As maintainer of the package which outputs that message I'm always glad to hear of ways to improve it. Can you suggest a better message? J. > -Original Message- > From: Matthew Johnson > > Well, Phil, I read what she posted, and I do NOT think > it tells "all Banibrata needs to know".