On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 01:42:46 -0500, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
> Alan,
>
> No recent patches were lost. I am talking about patches that I
> submitted after the 4.2.0 branch. After about two weeks you stopped
> committing them to both trees, even though I noted that they should be
> committed
Alan,
No recent patches were lost. I am talking about patches that I
submitted after the 4.2.0 branch. After about two weeks you stopped
committing them to both trees, even though I noted that they should be
committed to both trees. I thought I remember you telling me at one
point that you
On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 11:02:37 -0500, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
> Right, but I am being very pragmatic here. In the past it has been
> difficult to submit, and get Alan to commit, dual patches for both head
> and a branch. After about a month, I think Alan deletes the branch, so
> patches to i
Alexander Gottwald wrote:
On Tue, 14 Jan 2003, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
Once I make an official release of the multi-monitor patch I can submit
both the multi-window and multi-monitor patches.
Is the multi-window feature ready for an official release? Esp. the WM
functions?
Nope. It is
On Tue, 14 Jan 2003, Alan Hourihane wrote:
> No. I think it's too early for that patch anyway. I was hoping the pseudo
> reloc stuff would just work without any intervention, but alas it doesn't
> so I wouldn't want to make such intrusive changes at this stage.
It's ok to me as it required new bi
On Tue, 14 Jan 2003, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
> Once I make an official release of the multi-monitor patch I can submit
> both the multi-window and multi-monitor patches.
Is the multi-window feature ready for an official release? Esp. the WM
functions?
> There were also some cross-compiling bu
On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 10:24:48 -0500, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
> Once I make an official release of the multi-monitor patch I can submit
> both the multi-window and multi-monitor patches.
As long as they are completely isolated. I'll need to review them first.
> There were also some cross-comp
On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 04:13:49 +0100, Alexander Gottwald wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Jan 2003, Alan Hourihane wrote:
>
> > This is what David Dawes wrote about the forthcoming 4.3.0 release.
> >
> > Harold, Alex, and others. Can you take the time to really test the
> > current CVS and get patches in no
Once I make an official release of the multi-monitor patch I can submit
both the multi-window and multi-monitor patches.
There were also some cross-compiling build warnings that I had written
in about, but no one had commented on. I will see if I can dig them up
again.
Basically, we need to g
On Tue, 14 Jan 2003, Alan Hourihane wrote:
> This is what David Dawes wrote about the forthcoming 4.3.0 release.
>
> Harold, Alex, and others. Can you take the time to really test the
> current CVS and get patches in now.
Will we include the pseudo relocation patches? I've not received a commen
This is what David Dawes wrote about the forthcoming 4.3.0 release.
Harold, Alex, and others. Can you take the time to really test the
current CVS and get patches in now.
Thanks.
Alan.
- Forwarded message from David Dawes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Here's a quick status update regarding th
11 matches
Mail list logo
