Harold,
I find it sad that you had to make this decision.
I've just been absent for a little more than two weeks and
was unable to commit patches - look what came out of it.
I understand that the level of frustration among contributors
has risen to a point that people are starting to use bad
Egbert,
Egbert Eich wrote:
Harold,
I find it sad that you had to make this decision.
I've just been absent for a little more than two weeks and
was unable to commit patches - look what came out of it.
Egbert, I am sorry, I want to make it absolutely clear that my raising
the issue with
Harold,
I have been lurking on this list for a while now. I don't know much about XFree86, or
the politics, or any history. But I read the threads that led up to your decision. I
applaud you. You asked for something completely reasonable, and (pardon the language)
David Dawes came off as
I'll also chime in as a lurker to say that you have kicked some major
ass for us Cygwin/XFree86 users, Harold, and I think you've been nothing
but helpful and responsive on the list. I think your plea on the
XFree86 list was reasonable. Good luck as you explore other options.
Harold L Hunt II
It seems that David Dawes has made his decision not to let the
Cygwin/XFree86 project commit patches directly to the XFree86.org CVS
tree; he doesn't seem to want to go on record saying this, but he has
written several messages during this discussion about ftp servers, cvs
servers, etc., while
On Mon, Oct 27, 2003 at 11:35:20AM -0500, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
6) Alternatives are being evaluated for hosting Cygwin/XFree86 code in
CVS. Hosts that can provide CVS commit access for at least five
Cygwin/XFree86 developers will be given priority.
Harold,
I thought you already had the
Alan Hourihane wrote:
On Mon, Oct 27, 2003 at 11:35:20AM -0500, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
6) Alternatives are being evaluated for hosting Cygwin/XFree86 code in
CVS. Hosts that can provide CVS commit access for at least five
Cygwin/XFree86 developers will be given priority.
Harold,
I thought
FWIW,
I read the cygwin-xfree mailing list archives from time to time, and I
just read the [EMAIL PROTECTED] thread linked from /., and it looks to
me like Harold was being pretty reasonable and was getting a terrible
response.
I followed the [EMAIL PROTECTED] discussion and the xwin.org and
Mitch,
Mitchell Skinner wrote:
FWIW,
I read the cygwin-xfree mailing list archives from time to time, and I
just read the [EMAIL PROTECTED] thread linked from /., and it looks to
me like Harold was being pretty reasonable and was getting a terrible
response.
Thanks. It was so weird to write
