Re: Updated: ghostscript-7.05-1 (test release)

2002-07-23 Thread Harold L Hunt II
What is going on here Mr. Jack Larsen? We have had four posts of this meesage to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Were you intending to post this to cygwin-apps or somewhere else? Have you put this in release/ or release/XFree86? If it isn't in release/XFree86 then you need to talk to cygwin-apps to get

Re: Updated: ghostscript-7.05-1 (test release)

2002-07-23 Thread Nicholas Wourms
--- Harold L Hunt II [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What is going on here Mr. Jack Larsen? We have had four posts of this meesage to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Were you intending to post this to cygwin-apps or somewhere else? Have you put this in release/ or release/XFree86? If it isn't in

Re: Updated: ghostscript-7.05-1 (test release)

2002-07-23 Thread Harold L Hunt II
Nicholas, Thanks for the refresher course in the package approval process, the discussion of which I was a participant in. You seem to have confused the *directory* release/XFree86 with the *category* XFree86. Go back and read my original response and you will see that I was trying to

Re: Updated: ghostscript-7.05-1 (test release)

2002-07-23 Thread Jack Larsen
Hi Harold, I am sorry that you found 4 post in [EMAIL PROTECTED] My mail program hanged and therefore I again and again pushed the send button. Nevertheless [EMAIL PROTECTED] was the right address as Mr Wourms already mentioned. Please let me know whether a .dll X11 variant comes or not -

Re: Updated: ghostscript-7.05-1 (test release)

2002-07-23 Thread Nicholas Wourms
Harold, Thanks for the sarcasm, but it was hardly warranted. I was simply restating the facts for those who were not involved. Also, it seems that you missed one of the points of that discussion, which was that all things of XFree nature should be discussed on the XFree list, regardless of

Re: Updated: ghostscript-7.05-1 (test release)

2002-07-23 Thread Harold L Hunt II
Nicholas Wourms wrote: Harold, Thanks for the sarcasm, but it was hardly warranted. I was simply restating the facts for those who were not involved. Also, it seems that you missed one of the points of that discussion, which was that all things of XFree nature should be discussed on the