-Original Message-
From: Alexander Gottwald
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sun, August 03, 2003 11:00 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: No keyboard with XFree86 4.0.3
Pavel Rozenboim wrote:
Hi,
I just upgraded XFree86 to a latest 4.0.3 packages. Now,
when I run
On Mon, 4 Aug 2003, Pavel Rozenboim wrote:
please check if a file /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/XKeysymDB exists
and if a line
like these exists:
XF86_Switch_VT_1:1008FE01
It exists.
Since you're the only one with this Problem I suspect it's a problem
with the 1.5 release of cygwin.
Alexander Gottwald wrote:
Harold L Hunt II wrote:
I am all about baby steps. We haven't even proven that we know how to
start a new application for the user from the system tray icon yet.
Until we actually do that this discussion is really pointless.
I can send you code which spawns new
On Mon, 4 Aug 2003, David Fraser wrote:
I can send you code which spawns new processes from a running windows app.
Could you send it to the list?
/* we must build this string with information about mount points */
const char* command = c:\\cygwin\\usr\\x11r6\\xterm.exe
-Original Message-
From: Alexander Gottwald
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Mon, August 04, 2003 11:03 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: No keyboard with XFree86 4.0.3
On Mon, 4 Aug 2003, Pavel Rozenboim wrote:
please check if a file /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/XKeysymDB
On Mon, 4 Aug 2003, Pavel Rozenboim wrote:
I suspect it caused by upgrade from 4.2.0 to 4.3.0, since I didn't have such
problem with X 4.2.0 and cygwin 1.5.1. I could not reproduce it on abother
computer , though.
There were several people who have upgraded to 4.3.0 too and have not reported
-Original Message-
From: Alexander Gottwald
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Mon, August 04, 2003 12:20 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: No keyboard with XFree86 4.0.3
On Mon, 4 Aug 2003, Pavel Rozenboim wrote:
I suspect it caused by upgrade from 4.2.0 to 4.3.0, since
Harold,
I downloaded the XFIXES_BRANCH but when I tried to compile it I got:
make[4]: Leaving directory
`/home/u752359/x-devel/build/std/programs/Xserver/XTrap'
cleaning in programs/Xserver/xfixes...
cd: can't cd to xfixes
cleaning in programs/Xserver/hw/xwin...
make[4]: Entering directory
JS,
Okay, it looks like you are using my suggested directory structure from
the Contributor's Guide. Does this mean that you have XFIXES_BRANCH
somewhere like:
/home/u752359/x-devel/xc/
?
If so, had you had a previous branch, say HEAD, at:
/home/u752359/x-devel/xc/
?
Yes? Good. That
Alexander Gottwald wrote:
On Mon, 4 Aug 2003, David Fraser wrote:
I can send you code which spawns new processes from a running windows app.
Could you send it to the list?
/* we must build this string with information about mount points */
const char* command =
On Mon, 4 Aug 2003, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
/* we must build this string with information about mount points */
const char* command = c:\\cygwin\\usr\\x11r6\\xterm.exe -display :0.0;
That line and comment are really the crux of my whole argument. It is
simple to spawn a process.
Alexander Gottwald wrote:
On Mon, 4 Aug 2003, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
/* we must build this string with information about mount points */
const char* command = c:\\cygwin\\usr\\x11r6\\xterm.exe -display :0.0;
That line and comment are really the crux of my whole argument. It is
simple
On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 12:03:37PM -0400, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
Alexander Gottwald wrote:
On Mon, 4 Aug 2003, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
/* we must build this string with information about mount points */
const char* command = c:\\cygwin\\usr\\x11r6\\xterm.exe -display
:0.0;
That line
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 12:03:37PM -0400, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
Alexander Gottwald wrote:
On Mon, 4 Aug 2003, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
/* we must build this string with information about mount points */
const char* command = c:\\cygwin\\usr\\x11r6\\xterm.exe
On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 12:22:33PM -0400, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
Depends on if we use Cygwin's fork or Window's CreateProcess. We
haven't made that decision yet.
Huh. Seems like a no-brainer to me. It's a cygwin program so why not
use fork/exec? Then Xwin will be able to use 'wait()' to
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 12:22:33PM -0400, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
Depends on if we use Cygwin's fork or Window's CreateProcess. We
haven't made that decision yet.
Huh. Seems like a no-brainer to me. It's a cygwin program so why not
use fork/exec? Then Xwin will
On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 12:58:06PM -0400, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 12:22:33PM -0400, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
Depends on if we use Cygwin's fork or Window's CreateProcess. We
haven't made that decision yet.
Huh. Seems like a no-brainer to me.
Chris,
We discussed this back in May/June. Suhaib mailed me the CDs of his
initial work in June as a result of the discussion. I have the CDs, so
I don't need to check the archives for proof here. Of course, since
then I have been rather tied up with things (wedding, moving, etc.).
End of
Start-Run
c:\cygwin\usr\X11R6\bin\run /usr/X11R6/bin/xterm -display :0
YES! , this works perfectly. Now could this be added
as a right click menu option to the tray?
I'd thought about suggesting this before, but I decided against it: it
is bad UI. Windows already has a method of starting
On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 01:21:12PM -0400, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
We discussed this back in May/June. Suhaib mailed me the CDs of his
initial work in June as a result of the discussion. I have the CDs, so
I don't need to check the archives for proof here. Of course, since
then I have been
Right to all of that, but I am really busy at work right now and this is
precisely the sort of discussion that I don't have time to partake in at
the moment.
Harold
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 01:21:12PM -0400, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
We discussed this back in May/June.
On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 02:17:24PM -0400, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
Right to all of that, but I am really busy at work right now and this
is precisely the sort of discussion that I don't have time to partake
in at the moment.
That's ok. I'm done. You can just ignore anything I said. It's your
/ Jack Tanner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
|Start-Run
|c:\cygwin\usr\X11R6\bin\run /usr/X11R6/bin/xterm -display :0
| YES! , this works perfectly. Now could this be added
| as a right click menu option to the tray?
or hmm during setup of the packages, add an icon for X-server, and
local xterm, to
OR,
paste the following into a batch file, then put an icon to the batch
file on your desktop (or your start menu, etc... the possibilities are
endless!).
@echo off
set path=%PATH%;C:\cygwin\bin
cd c:\cygwin\home
c:\cygwin\usr\X11R6\bin\run xterm -display :0.0 -e bash --login
Andrew Markebo
Harold L Hunt II wrote:
Depends on if we use Cygwin's fork or Window's CreateProcess. We
haven't made that decision yet.
I'd not set any conditions. If one implements it with fork or with
CreateProcess is quite unimportant.
bye
ago
BTW:
I'd prefer CreateProcess as it bypasses the
Hi,
there is a little problem with gcc 2.95.x. In some files I've got a compiling
error like mentioned below:
wingc.c: In function `winValidateGCNativeGDI':
wingc.c:155: parse error before `fDebugProcMsg'
wingc.c:156: `fDebugProcMsg' undeclared (first use in this function)
wingc.c:156: (Each
On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 09:01:57PM +0200, Alexander Gottwald wrote:
Harold L Hunt II wrote:
Depends on if we use Cygwin's fork or Window's CreateProcess. We
haven't made that decision yet.
I'd not set any conditions. If one implements it with fork or with
CreateProcess is quite unimportant.
The web link for (the binary) of
the newest test server series v (95) is pointing to
test version (94)
Hi,
I'm porting an application from linux to cygwin.
I upgraded from xfree 4.2 to 4.3 and now xft code list no fonts.
It did in 4.2. I tried fontconfig, since that is now available,
but it also doesn't list any fonts. I notice that in 4.2 there
was an XftConfig in /etc/X11, but there isn't in
Jack,
Thanks. Let me tell you, we already have a laundry list of dream
features. We just need people to start working on them.
Harold
Jack Tanner wrote:
This is a pipe dream, but it's a pipe dream worth striving for.
1. X should run as a service. There's no reason for it to run as a
30 matches
Mail list logo
