On Sat, Jul 06, 2002 at 01:51:39AM -0400, Christopher Faylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 06, 2002 at 03:10:33PM +1000, Greg Lane wrote:
> >I have cc'ed this to Nicholas since I'd like to know what version
> >of X he was running...
>
> Actually, wouldn't you sort of assume that Nicho
On Sat, Jul 06, 2002 at 01:51:39AM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>On Sat, Jul 06, 2002 at 03:10:33PM +1000, Greg Lane wrote:
>>Can I just ask what Windows system you tried it on and what version of
>>cygwin X you have? Earlier Nicholas said he had it running on Windows Me,
>>but did not say wha
On Sat, Jul 06, 2002 at 03:10:33PM +1000, Greg Lane wrote:
>I have cc'ed this to Nicholas since I'd like to know what version
>of X he was running...
Actually, wouldn't you sort of assume that Nicholas is reading this mailing
list, since he responded to your first message. There is rarely a nee
I have cc'ed this to Nicholas since I'd like to know what version
of X he was running...
On Sat, Jul 06, 2002 at 12:45:58AM -0400, Christopher Faylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Thanks. I'd never used the 'xset fp=' command before.
>
> Unfortunately, now that I've tried running things, the
On Sat, Jul 06, 2002 at 02:24:13PM +1000, Greg Lane wrote:
>On Fri, Jul 05, 2002 at 11:57:55PM -0400, Christopher Faylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Sat, Jul 06, 2002 at 01:17:13PM +1000, Greg Lane wrote:
>> >Then I have tried pointing my font path to it (with xset fp= ...)
>> >from a number
On Fri, Jul 05, 2002 at 11:57:55PM -0400, Christopher Faylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 06, 2002 at 01:17:13PM +1000, Greg Lane wrote:
> >Then I have tried pointing my font path to it (with xset fp= ...)
> >from a number of sources
> >
> >1) remote machine running freebsd
> >2) from
On Sat, Jul 06, 2002 at 01:17:13PM +1000, Greg Lane wrote:
>Then I have tried pointing my font path to it (with xset fp= ...)
>from a number of sources
>
>1) remote machine running freebsd
>2) from cygwin x-server on the same machine
>3) from XWinPro on the machine
Can you send what, exactly, yo
> Either the 'mount' command or the 'cygcheck -r -s -v' would provide concrete
> data for this.
In case it helps, here is the output of 'cygcheck -r -s -v' also. I
apologise if it is superfluous or unnecessary.
Cygwin Win95/NT Configuration Diagnostics
Current System Time: Sat Jul 06 13:26:56 2
On Fri, Jul 05, 2002 at 10:53:16PM -0400, Christopher Faylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >Do you mean during the initial installation did I choose "unix" style
> >files? If so, yes. (And the fonts I've been testing with are just the ones
> >installed by the cygwin package into /usr/X11R6/bin
On Fri, Jul 05, 2002 at 03:49:23AM -0700, Nicholas Wourms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Well then, has anyone on this list had xfs running properly under
> > cygwin?
> I just tried it yesterday on WindowsME, it works for me. You probably
> will want to check to see if XP is running any serv
On Sat, Jul 06, 2002 at 12:47:15PM +1000, Greg Lane wrote:
>On Fri, Jul 05, 2002 at 04:35:07PM +0200, Alexander Gottwald
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Just a thought: How are the fonts mounted? Some programs don't like
>> textmode files.
>>
>
>G'day Alexander,
>
>I've only really got in to
On Fri, Jul 05, 2002 at 04:35:07PM +0200, Alexander Gottwald
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Just a thought: How are the fonts mounted? Some programs don't like
> textmode files.
>
G'day Alexander,
I've only really got in to cygwin since I've started having to run XP on
my laptop, so I'm not s
Remove -DNO_TCP_H from cygwin.cf and a related #if !defined(__CYGWIN__)
from xc/programs/lbxproxy/os/connection.c.
Harold
xc-programs-lbxproxy-os-connection.c-20020705-.diff
Description: Binary data
xc-config-cf-cygwin.cf-20020705-.diff
Description: Binary data
Frederic,
> However, it depends how you manage to contribute with the
> paid development to the XFree project. I mean, would such
> development be made available to the community after a
> while (say 3 months or more for example) ?
Oh no, that was exactly the misunderstanding that I was trying t
>From my point of view, I am not against payed development,
even in open source project. But from my experience,
it is not obvious about the availability in the long term
for such development.
I saw so many examples of open-source project that turn
in commercial project and therefore splittin
Nicholas,
> Well there is no point in keeping stale defines around, is there?
> Obviously you were curious, otherwise you wouldn't have invested so much
> time. :-)
Right, there is no point to keeping around stale defines. Of course I was
curious, and that's part of my problem: I get too curi
--- Harold L Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nicholas,
>
> > Anyhow, I think we are missing the whole point of this thread, what
> were
> > *YOUR* findings.
>
> I forgot to draw attention to what I found, but I did post your build
> snippet
> with warnings and my build snippet that didn't ha
I have been kicking around an idea that I'd like some feedback on.
The Cygwin/XFree86 project is at the point where it is nearly a replacement
for the commercial X Servers for Microsoft Windows. There remain only a few
features that need to be implemented in order for most businesses to find
Cyg
Nicholas,
> Anyhow, I think we are missing the whole point of this thread, what were
> *YOUR* findings.
I forgot to draw attention to what I found, but I did post your build snippet
with warnings and my build snippet that didn't have warnings for the same file.
My overall results were that I g
Nicholas,
> Let's assume I have followed the directions exactly (because this is what
> has happened in the past when I followed them exactly). When
> cross-compiling, why is make World trying to use the foreign utilities to
> build the fonts? Shouldn't it be using the utilities under
> /usr/X1
Harold,
On ~ line 66158 of my build log, you'll notice this:
LD_LIBRARY_PATH=../../../exports/lib ../../../exports/bin/bdftopcf -t
tech14.bdf | gzip > tech14.pcf.gz
/bin/sh: ../../../exports/bin/bdftopcf: No such file or directory
LD_LIBRARY_PATH=../../../exports/lib ../../../exports/bin/bdfto
--- Harold Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nicholas,
>
> > We had this discussion in the past, and yes I *have* read the
> cygwin-xfree
> > contributor's guide and followed your directions WORD-FOR-WORD, except
> for
> > removing the NO_TCP_H and defining font building.
>
> You could not possi
Am I to follow the old adage that no news is good news in regards to Test 63?
Test 60 through Test 63 changed over a thousand lines of code, with a lot of
those changes occuring in Test 63; I can hardly believe that we haven't
trigged lots of new bugs.
In case you missed the announcement, you ca
--- Greg Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 04, 2002 at 11:12:58PM -0400, Christopher Faylor
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 05, 2002 at 12:54:38PM +1000, Greg Lane wrote:
> > >The "rules" say to post here, although would there be any point
> asking
> > >on the main cygwi
O.k. If the problem still exists, contact Keith Packard directly. It's
more than likely he missed the post too. But this code is his domain
and he's been banging on it a lot lately.
I'm sure Keith will respond.
Alan.
On Fri, Jul 05, 2002 at 10:39:24AM -0400, Harold Hunt wrote:
> Alan,
>
> Hmm.
Nicholas,
> I just tried... Not as complete as one would hope... Nevermind about
> this... :-)
What did you find that was broken? Were there build errors or did it just
not run? See my message that I just sent. I've done a build so far and saw
no problems related to removing -DNO_TCP_H. I
Alan,
Hmm... as usual I misspoke... I was bitching about the ``findfonts'' script
which runs on the installed fonts rather than on fonts being built.
I'll have to look into the font build utility problem.
I hate it when I get confused. Anyway, here is what I wrote to the XFree86
devel list.
H
On Fri, Jul 05, 2002 at 03:30:37PM +0100, Alan Hourihane wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 05, 2002 at 10:22:00AM -0400, Harold Hunt wrote:
> > Oh, I know that the XFree86 folks are doing some stupid things with respect
> > to expecting certain XFree86 utilities to already be installed at build
> > time. I bi
On Fri, 5 Jul 2002, Greg Lane wrote:
> At the first font request to xfs running under cygwin, it core dumps.
Just a thought: How are the fonts mounted? Some programs don't like
textmode files.
bye
ago
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.gotti.org ICQ: 126018723
On Fri, Jul 05, 2002 at 10:22:00AM -0400, Harold Hunt wrote:
> Oh, I know that the XFree86 folks are doing some stupid things with respect
> to expecting certain XFree86 utilities to already be installed at build
> time. I bitched about this to the devel list at XFree86 and you know what?
> I did
Nicholas,
> We had this discussion in the past, and yes I *have* read the cygwin-xfree
> contributor's guide and followed your directions WORD-FOR-WORD, except for
> removing the NO_TCP_H and defining font building.
You could not possibly have followed the Contributor's Guide (CG)
instructions w
Harold,
We had this discussion in the past, and yes I *have* read the cygwin-xfree
contributor's guide and followed your directions WORD-FOR-WORD, except for
removing the NO_TCP_H and defining font building.
I checked out the Xfree tree with the 4.2.0 sticky tag. I then updated
the xwin drivers
On Thu, Jul 04, 2002 at 11:12:58PM -0400, Christopher Faylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 05, 2002 at 12:54:38PM +1000, Greg Lane wrote:
> >The "rules" say to post here, although would there be any point asking
> >on the main cygwin list to get a broader coverage and try and find
>
33 matches
Mail list logo
