Eliah Kagan wrote:
On 11/9/05, Mehnaz Farooqui wrote:
Hi,
can you pls tell me how I can port existing x windows
application to win32? Is there any tool that does this
or do I have to replace the X11 API with win32 API
manually?
Thanks,
Mehnaz
Since there are X servers for Windows (like
I don't think there is any windows sdk api supporting Motif stuff. But
we do have OpenGl for Windows. Hence the option is to use
Cygwin/Hummingbird/Winaxe as far as I know.
Regards,
Karthik
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mehnaz
On Thu, 10 Nov 2005, Michel Bardiaux wrote:
Eliah Kagan wrote:
There is of course a cygwin port of the X11 *client* libraries, but what if
you cant put your app under GPL? Is there a pure mingw port of the X11 client
lib?
The X11 client libraries aren't GPL.
--
Thomas E. Dickey
Thomas Dickey wrote:
On Thu, 10 Nov 2005, Michel Bardiaux wrote:
Eliah Kagan wrote:
There is of course a cygwin port of the X11 *client* libraries, but
what if you cant put your app under GPL? Is there a pure mingw port of
the X11 client lib?
The X11 client libraries aren't GPL.
No, but
On Thu, 10 Nov 2005, Michel Bardiaux wrote:
Thomas Dickey wrote:
On Thu, 10 Nov 2005, Michel Bardiaux wrote:
Eliah Kagan wrote:
There is of course a cygwin port of the X11 *client* libraries, but what
if you cant put your app under GPL? Is there a pure mingw port of the X11
client lib?
At 04:09 10/11/2005, you wrote:
Hi,
can you pls tell me how I can port existing x windows
application to win32? Is there any tool that does this
or do I have to replace the X11 API with win32 API
manually?
Thanks,
Mehnaz
We have ported large X apps from Unix / Linux onto Cygwin using a
Thomas Dickey wrote:
On Thu, 10 Nov 2005, Michel Bardiaux wrote:
Thomas Dickey wrote:
On Thu, 10 Nov 2005, Michel Bardiaux wrote:
Eliah Kagan wrote:
There is of course a cygwin port of the X11 *client* libraries, but
what if you cant put your app under GPL? Is there a pure mingw port
of
On Thu, 10 Nov 2005, Michel Bardiaux wrote:
Thomas Dickey wrote:
I assume you refer to the cygwin FAQ:
I'm aware of it. Looks like you read this, but still don't understand it.
(Perhaps you should discuss this on the regular cygwin mailing list).
But I am not sure it can be applied to a
Thomas Dickey wrote:
On Thu, 10 Nov 2005, Michel Bardiaux wrote:
Thomas Dickey wrote:
I assume you refer to the cygwin FAQ:
I'm aware of it. Looks like you read this, but still don't understand it.
Possibly. It is also possible I *do* understand it, just not the same
way you do. What is
Michel Bardiaux wrote:
Thomas Dickey wrote:
(Perhaps you should discuss this on the regular cygwin mailing
list).
Not really possible, the trafic there is way too much for the time I
have.
Perhaps you should discuss this on the cygwin-licensing list, which is:
1) Designed specifically
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Nov 10 12:15, Michel Bardiaux wrote:
Thomas Dickey wrote:
On Thu, 10 Nov 2005, Michel Bardiaux wrote:
Thomas Dickey wrote:
On Thu, 10 Nov 2005, Michel Bardiaux wrote:
Eliah Kagan wrote:
There is of course a cygwin port of the X11 *client* libraries, but
So, I was right (rather than 'disregardable'). And that's from the horse's
mouth, so to speak. Which brings back my query: is there a free but not
GPL version of the X client libraries for Win32?
Microsoft's Software Services For UNIX 3.5 available for free download. As
I wrote earlier it
Darryl wrote:
So, I was right (rather than 'disregardable'). And that's from the
horse's mouth, so to speak. Which brings back my query: is there a
free but not GPL version of the X client libraries for Win32?
Microsoft's Software Services For UNIX 3.5 available for free download.
As I
On Thu, 10 Nov 2005, Michel Bardiaux wrote:
So, I was right (rather than 'disregardable'). And that's from the horse's
mouth, so to speak. Which brings back my query: is there a free but not GPL
version of the X client libraries for Win32?
rofl
I have a better suggestion: since you don't
On Nov 10 11:19, Thomas Dickey wrote:
On Thu, 10 Nov 2005, Michel Bardiaux wrote:
So, I was right (rather than 'disregardable'). And that's from the horse's
mouth, so to speak. Which brings back my query: is there a free but not
GPL version of the X client libraries for Win32?
rofl
I
On Thu, 10 Nov 2005, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
I'm really wondering what you're up to. Michel's choice of words might
You shouldn't have to wonder if you read my response rather than
cut/paste from a boilerplate response regarding the cygwin dll.
The X library source is not GPL. Likewise
Thomas Dickey wrote:
The X library source is not GPL. Likewise ncurses.
Stating that it is effectively GPL is at best misleading,
since it is possible for someone to take the same source
to a different place and use it without cygwin.
The word effectively might be misleading to you but it's
On Thu, 10 Nov 2005, Brian Dessent wrote:
Thomas Dickey wrote:
The X library source is not GPL. Likewise ncurses.
Stating that it is effectively GPL is at best misleading,
since it is possible for someone to take the same source
to a different place and use it without cygwin.
The word
On Thu, Nov 10, 2005 at 09:53:54AM -0500, Richard Campbell wrote:
Michel Bardiaux wrote:
Thomas Dickey wrote:
(Perhaps you should discuss this on the regular cygwin mailing
list).
Not really possible, the trafic there is way too much for the time I
have.
Perhaps you should discuss this on the
On 11/10/05, Thomas Dickey wrote:
On Thu, 10 Nov 2005, Michel Bardiaux wrote:
Eliah Kagan wrote:
There is of course a cygwin port of the X11 *client* libraries, but what if
you cant put your app under GPL? Is there a pure mingw port of the X11
client
lib?
The X11 client libraries
On Thu, 10 Nov 2005, Eliah Kagan wrote:
For the record (especially since issues of attributed accuracy are
being raised later in the thread) I did not write the following:
hmm - go back and count the marks (I didn't misquote anything, as
your text illustrates well enough ;-)
--
Thomas E.
Oh, please don't. This is a simple concept. There is nothing
complicated here.
If you build your program using Cygwin's gcc then your program is
GPLed regardless of whether it is using X11 libraries.
-m-no-cygwin?
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#CanIUseGPLToolsForNF
-Richard
On Thu, Nov 10, 2005 at 04:59:00PM -0500, Richard Campbell wrote:
Oh, please don't. This is a simple concept. There is nothing
complicated here.
If you build your program using Cygwin's gcc then your program is
GPLed regardless of whether it is using X11 libraries.
-m-no-cygwin?
In this
23 matches
Mail list logo
