Re: xterm access violations (again)

2011-04-04 Thread richardvo...@gmail.com
> FWIW, I know what is causing the problem but not how to fix it.  It's > similar to > > http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2011-04/msg1.html > > Rebasing should fix that particular problem but it's not a panacea. The strace output in that other thread shows that GetLastError of 997 formerly caused s

Re: xterm access violations (again)

2011-04-04 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 02:27:27PM +0100, Jon TURNEY wrote: >On 01/04/2011 17:05, Jim Reisert AD1C wrote: >> On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 1:50 PM, Jim Reisert AD1C wrote: >>> On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 12:35 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote: Could someone try this with the latest snapshot? I haven't made

Re: xterm access violations (again)

2011-04-04 Thread Jon TURNEY
On 01/04/2011 17:05, Jim Reisert AD1C wrote: > On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 1:50 PM, Jim Reisert AD1C wrote: >> On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 12:35 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote: >>> Could someone try this with the latest snapshot? I haven't made any >>> changes but I just want to confirm that it still fails

Re: xterm access violations (again)

2011-04-01 Thread Jim Reisert AD1C
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 1:50 PM, Jim Reisert AD1C wrote: > On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 12:35 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote: > >> Could someone try this with the latest snapshot?  I haven't made any >> changes but I just want to confirm that it still fails with something >> close to what will become Cy

Re: xterm access violations (again)

2011-03-27 Thread Jim Reisert AD1C
On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 12:35 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote: > Could someone try this with the latest snapshot?  I haven't made any > changes but I just want to confirm that it still fails with something > close to what will become Cygwin 1.7.9. > > http://cygwin.com/snapshots/ > > You just have to

Re: xterm access violations (again)

2011-03-26 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 01:22:42AM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: >On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 10:09:38PM -0600, Jim Reisert AD1C wrote: >>On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 5:24 PM, webmaster wrote: >> >>> http://www.donsbox.com/~dfelicia/xterm-269[redacted] >> >>Still dumps, but xterm came up anyway: >> >>Exc

Re: xterm access violations (again)

2011-03-25 Thread webmaster
> Possibly rebase will help. Nope. Same result. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://x.cygwin.com/docs/ FAQ: http://x.cygwin.com/docs/faq/

Re: xterm access violations (again)

2011-03-24 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 10:09:38PM -0600, Jim Reisert AD1C wrote: >On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 5:24 PM, webmaster wrote: > >> http://www.donsbox.com/~dfelicia/xterm-269[redacted] > >Still dumps, but xterm came up anyway: > >Exception: STATUS_ACCESS_VIOLATION at eip=61020497 >eax=00DD00F8 ebx=61246A44 e

Re: xterm access violations (again)

2011-03-24 Thread Jim Reisert AD1C
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 5:24 PM, webmaster wrote: > http://www.donsbox.com/~dfelicia/xterm-269[redacted] Still dumps, but xterm came up anyway: Exception: STATUS_ACCESS_VIOLATION at eip=61020497 eax=00DD00F8 ebx=61246A44 ecx=75570D06 edx=00334118 esi= edi=0028F9F4 ebp=61020BE0 esp=0028C7

Re: xterm access violations (again)

2011-03-24 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 04:40:01PM -0400, Thomas Dickey wrote: >On Thu, 24 Mar 2011, webmaster wrote: > >>> I just built 269 and will uploaded it with the rest of the X11 updates. >> It doesn't help. I built using cygport from what you've got in git and >> I still get: >> >> Exception: STATUS_ACCES

Re: xterm access violations (again)

2011-03-24 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Thu, 24 Mar 2011, webmaster wrote: I just built 269 and will uploaded it with the rest of the X11 updates. It doesn't help. I built using cygport from what you've got in git and I still get: Exception: STATUS_ACCESS_VIOLATION at eip=61020497 eax=00DA80E0 ebx=6124298C ecx=76A10D06 edx=00371D

Re: xterm access violations (again)

2011-03-24 Thread webmaster
> I just built 269 and will uploaded it with the rest of the X11 updates. It doesn't help. I built using cygport from what you've got in git and I still get: Exception: STATUS_ACCESS_VIOLATION at eip=61020497 eax=00DA80E0 ebx=6124298C ecx=76A10D06 edx=00371D48 esi= edi=0028F9F4 ebp=61020BE

Re: xterm access violations (again)

2011-03-24 Thread webmaster
> where would one get xterm-269.cygport et al. for local building?Answered my > own question: > http://cygwin-ports.git.sourceforge.net/git/gitweb.cgi?p=cygwin-ports/xterm;a=summary -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/probl

Re: xterm access violations (again)

2011-03-24 Thread webmaster
> I just built 269 and will uploaded it with the rest of the X11 updates. Probably in some FAQ and I just can't find it, but where would one get xterm-269.cygport et al. for local building? Some git repository, somewhere? -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem r

Re: xterm access violations (again)

2011-03-24 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Wed, 23 Mar 2011, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: On Wed, 2011-03-23 at 19:16 -0600, Jim Reisert AD1C wrote: Thomas, that may well be true, but the latest one in the Cygwin repository reports (261). It shows up as 261-1 in setup.exe I just built 269 and will uploaded it with the rest of the X11

Re: xterm access violations (again)

2011-03-23 Thread Yaakov (Cygwin/X)
On Wed, 2011-03-23 at 19:16 -0600, Jim Reisert AD1C wrote: > Thomas, that may well be true, but the latest one in the Cygwin > repository reports (261). It shows up as 261-1 in setup.exe I just built 269 and will uploaded it with the rest of the X11 updates. Yaakov Cygwin/X -- Unsubscribe in

Re: xterm access violations (again)

2011-03-23 Thread Jim Reisert AD1C
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 3:17 PM, Thomas Dickey wrote: > #269 is current.  At the moment, the only fixes I've made against that > are minor things (an incomplete change for the fullscreen feature, and > an obscure case of a control sequence from #251 changes). Thomas, that may well be true, but th

Re: xterm access violations (again)

2011-03-23 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Wed, 23 Mar 2011, webmaster wrote: what is "xterm -v"? $ xterm -v XTerm(261) That's from last June. #263 makes a fix for a problem which might be relevant (and #265 fixes a regression from #263). Note I built myself using cygport so that I could add --disable-narrowproto (See thread w

Re: xterm access violations (again)

2011-03-23 Thread Jim Reisert AD1C
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 11:28 AM, Jim Reisert AD1C wrote: > On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 11:15 AM, webmaster wrote: > >> After updating to the latest cygwin 1.7.8, today, xterm constantly crashes. >> >> cat xterm.exe.stackdump >> [...] >> >> Usually rebaseall fixes this problem, but not this time. I a

Re: xterm access violations (again)

2011-03-23 Thread webmaster
> what is "xterm -v"? $ xterm -v XTerm(261) Note I built myself using cygport so that I could add --disable-narrowproto (See thread with subject "Bug: XTerm scrollbar issue" last updated 7/13/2010) -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cy

Re: xterm access violations (again)

2011-03-22 Thread Jim Reisert AD1C
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 11:28 AM, Jim Reisert AD1C wrote: > On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 11:15 AM, webmaster wrote: > >> After updating to the latest cygwin 1.7.8, today, xterm constantly crashes. >> >> cat xterm.exe.stackdump >> [...] >> >> Usually rebaseall fixes this problem, but not this time. I a

Re: xterm access violations (again)

2011-03-22 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Tue, 22 Mar 2011, webmaster wrote: On my Win7 system, [xterm] crashes about 1/2 the time. Right. Same, here. It used to crash a lot less frequently. what is "xterm -v"? (the last crash-related bug I recall was fixed last spring). -- Thomas E. Dickey http://invisible-island.net ftp://invi

Re: xterm access violations (again)

2011-03-22 Thread webmaster
> On my Win7 system, [xterm] crashes about 1/2 the time. Right. Same, here. It used to crash a lot less frequently. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://x.cygwin.com/docs/ FAQ:

Re: xterm access violations (again)

2011-03-22 Thread Jim Reisert AD1C
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 11:15 AM, webmaster wrote: > After updating to the latest cygwin 1.7.8, today, xterm constantly crashes. > > cat xterm.exe.stackdump > [...] > > Usually rebaseall fixes this problem, but not this time. I also tried > building xterm with cygport, but same result. This is on

xterm access violations (again)

2011-03-22 Thread webmaster
After updating to the latest cygwin 1.7.8, today, xterm constantly crashes. cat xterm.exe.stackdump Exception: STATUS_ACCESS_VIOLATION at eip=76F730CC eax=0047B8A0 ebx=00498820 ecx=00498830 edx= esi=00498820 edi= ebp=0028B850 esp=0028B7CC program=C:\Cygwin\bin\xterm.exe, pid 5532,