Re: gtk with cygwin

2002-07-07 Thread Sylvain Petreolle
--- Steven O'Brien [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit : Hi Sylvain The problem you are seeing occurs when you have . in your PATH. It will always happen with GNU packages, not just gnome, because they always have a text file INSTALL in the top level directory, and make install will try to

Re: gtk with cygwin

2002-07-07 Thread Sylvain Petreolle
Hi Steven and all, Renaming the INSTALL file makes glib compile (it is found by configure even if it . is not in $PATH, as it is hardcoded in configure). gtk+ compiles without needing your patch... but perhaps it is needed in order to compile Gnome, as it isn't that I want i don't care for the

RE: New xlauncher (was: Re: Success with Java prog in XFree)

2002-07-07 Thread Harold Hunt
Tim, How does this work, do I just make a package, and then email cygwin-apps? Is this valid for this sort of program, where it isn't even compiled using cygwin? I haven't had any comments on this program yet because, while it is a neat exercise and will be useful for other work, it will not

Re: New xlauncher (was: Re: Success with Java prog in XFree)

2002-07-07 Thread Charles Wilson
Harold Hunt wrote: I haven't had any comments on this program yet because, while it is a neat exercise and will be useful for other work, it will not be distributed with Cygwin/XFree86 until it is written in a language that can be compiled with a free software compiler, preferrably gcc or

Slashdotting

2002-07-07 Thread Harold Hunt
We have been Slashdotted, with a post that mentions that we are now easily installable via Cygwin's setup.exe: http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=02/07/07/1227202mode=nestedtid=104 I'd like to express my thanks to all Cygwin/XFree86 contributors. This time we might get a lot of new users

Re: New xlauncher (was: Re: Success with Java prog in XFree)

2002-07-07 Thread Charles Wilson
Harold Hunt wrote: That's fine about Java... but that last I knew this xlauncher was a Delphi app. What have you got to say about that :) WTF? I don't follow the xfree list all that closely, but didn't this thread start out as Success with Java prog in XFree? I just assumed that

Re: Slashdotting

2002-07-07 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Sun, Jul 07, 2002 at 02:06:12PM -0400, Harold Hunt wrote: We have been Slashdotted, with a post that mentions that we are now easily installable via Cygwin's setup.exe: http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=02/07/07/1227202mode=nestedtid=104 I'd like to express my thanks to all Cygwin/XFree86

RE: New xlauncher (was: Re: Success with Java prog in XFree)

2002-07-07 Thread Harold Hunt
Chuck, WTF? I don't follow the xfree list all that closely, but didn't this thread start out as Success with Java prog in XFree? I just assumed that 'xlauncher' WAS that Java prog. Sorry for the confusion. You know... sometimes I'm just not paying any attention at all. What has happened

Using only the X server of Cygwin

2002-07-07 Thread Rhialto
Hi, I am not subscribed to this mailing list but I would like to give some feedback anyway. Please Cc: any responses to me. I am testing the Cygwin/XFree server to use it as a remote display for my Unix box which runs xdm: XWin -broadcast. So in the installer I choose to de-install All, and to

Re: New xlauncher (was: Re: Success with Java prog in XFree)

2002-07-07 Thread Charles Wilson
Harold Hunt wrote: WTF? I don't follow the xfree list all that closely, but didn't this thread start out as Success with Java prog in XFree? I just assumed that 'xlauncher' WAS that Java prog. Sorry for the confusion. You know... sometimes I'm just not paying any attention at all. What

Re: Using only the X server of Cygwin

2002-07-07 Thread Charles Wilson
Hey, Nicholas -- don't squish Rhialto that quickly. He's probably one of our new users who knows nothing about the cygwin project except what he read on slashdot this morning. The fact is, Rhialto, we focus on cygwin -- as an environment all by itself, *and* independent of any specific

Re: Using only the X server of Cygwin

2002-07-07 Thread Ian Burrell
Rhialto wrote: I am testing the Cygwin/XFree server to use it as a remote display for my Unix box which runs xdm: XWin -broadcast. So in the installer I choose to de-install All, and to install *only* XFree86-xserv. I noted that the installer installed a lot of things that are not

RE: xf86config patch

2002-07-07 Thread Harold Hunt
Alexander, 1) In winconfig.c, why is this there: #ifndef PROJECTROOT #define PROJECTROOT /usr/X11R6 #endif 2) Are any of these files significantly copied from hw/xfree86, or anywhere else that we should attribute? 3) Will there be any effect, whatsoever, on users that do not use an

Re: Using only the X server of Cygwin

2002-07-07 Thread Nicholas Wourms
--- Charles Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hey, Nicholas -- don't squish Rhialto that quickly. He's probably one of our new users who knows nothing about the cygwin project except what he read on slashdot this morning. Sorry, I am still cranky about the refusal to include objc in

gcc-3.1.x [was: Re: Using only the X server of Cygwin]

2002-07-07 Thread Charles Wilson
[follow up to the cygwin list; this is getting off-topic for cygwin-xfree.] Nicholas Wourms wrote: Hey, Nicholas -- don't squish Rhialto that quickly. He's probably one of our new users who knows nothing about the cygwin project except what he read on slashdot this morning. I am still

Re: Using only the X server of Cygwin

2002-07-07 Thread Rhialto
On Sun 07 Jul 2002 at 15:35:22 -0400, Charles Wilson wrote: However, it SHOULD be possible -- and checking the ml archives on this will help -- to create a custom 'setup.ini' script or pseudo-package that setup.exe can read, to install ONLY what you want -- but this will take a little work

Re: New xlauncher (was: Re: Success with Java prog in XFree)

2002-07-07 Thread Tim Thomson
On Sun, Jul 07, 2002 at 11:56:44AM -0400, Harold Hunt wrote: I haven't had any comments on this program yet because, while it is a neat exercise and will be useful for other work, it will not be distributed with Cygwin/XFree86 until it is written in a language that can be compiled with a

RE: xf86config patch

2002-07-07 Thread Alexander Gottwald
On Sun, 7 Jul 2002, Harold Hunt wrote: Alexander, 1) In winconfig.c, why is this there: #ifndef PROJECTROOT #define PROJECTROOT /usr/X11R6 #endif Hm, I just copied it from xf86Config.c. Just to be sure it's defined. 2) Are any of these files significantly copied from hw/xfree86, or

Re: Using only the X server of Cygwin

2002-07-07 Thread Alexander Gottwald
On Sun, 7 Jul 2002, Rhialto wrote: You have a point. But I also think that there will be lots of people who would like cygwin/xfree to be a replacement for XWin-32 or other similar products, so some configuration preset for that would come in handy. I mainly use Cygwin/XFree86 as X-Terminal

compiling mplayer - libpng undefined references

2002-07-07 Thread Sylvain Petreolle
Hi, I'm trying to compile mplayer, a GPL video player. (http://mplayerhq.hu) Enabling the gui makes uses of png library. I have the following packages installed : (from cygcheck) 171k 2002/05/07 C:\cygwin\bin\cygpng10.dll - os=4.0 img=1.0 sys=4.0 cygpng10.dll v0.0

xmodmap.*s

2002-07-07 Thread Lapo Luchini
*4.5. *Where can I find an xmodmap for my non-U.S. keyboard layout? * *You can try using an xmodmap file for your keyboard layout from a GNU/Linux distribution (e.g. RedHat). Aren't xmodpad.* files redistributable? Couldn't we include that puny 20k as default xfree files? Or maybe as a

[PATCH] -scrollbars option

2002-07-07 Thread Jehan
Hello, Since I've seen a couple complaints about not being able to resize the windows in this mailing list and on slashdot, I've decided to implement it. So here it is. With this option, when in windowed mode, you can resize the window (if you use decoration) and have a virtual screen bigger

Cross Compiling

2002-07-07 Thread Harold Hunt
Yup, cross compiling is toroughly broken right now. It will take awhile to get it working properly. I'd appreciate it if anyone that is cross compiling the current XFree86 cvs would send in their host.def, any modification they made to cygwin.cf, etc. and their build command. Thanks, Harold

RE: [PATCH] -scrollbars option

2002-07-07 Thread Harold Hunt
Jehan, That is an excellent patch! I was just thinking that we should add this sort of functionality. Yes, I was reading the ./ posts too :) However, there are a bunch of ^M's showing up in the patch file for winwndproc.c starting at about line 496 (in the patch file). Could you clean that

RE: xf86config patch

2002-07-07 Thread Harold Hunt
Alexander, I've merged your patch with my local tree and I'm going to try to test it tomorrow. Could you send me a sample and/or skeleton (containing commented versions of each config option) config file? Thanks, Harold -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL

Re: [PATCH] -scrollbars option

2002-07-07 Thread Robert Collins
Why not just run the patch through d2u? Rob - Original Message - From: Harold Hunt [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: cygx [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 2:59 PM Subject: RE: [PATCH] -scrollbars option Jehan, That is an excellent patch! I was just thinking that we should add

Incorrect version in packages names

2002-07-07 Thread Sylvain Petreolle
Running setup to update my cygwin with setup.exe version 2.249.2.5, kde package versions are changed to strange numbers : kdelibs-2 appears for example as version 2-2-2-2-2-2-2-2-2-b1 in the 'current' field. Correct version is displayed in the 'new' field as 2.2.2-b1 In my downloaded files