The battle is far from won. It may be, in fact, headed towards being
irretrievably lost. If cryptography policy on the surface appears more
liberal you can bet your left nut that in parallel and more quietly the
legal foundation for giving you the rubber hose treatment should you
choose to keep
dmolnar wrote:
On Tue, 7 Mar 2000, Michael Motyka wrote:
you? Or have you always been a mindless, obedient twit? Is that what
Harvard is accepting for admission these days? If so, we're doomed. I
sure as hell won't send my kids there.
Would you believe I was being sarcastic
If people would just mind their own business and put half the effort
into securing systems and data in transit that they put into detection,
enforcement and punishment then the world would be a happier place.
Can't have that in a Puritan society.
That's why we need an Information Czar NOW,
Personally, I think they ought to be tracked down and dealt with more
directly. Cops who solicit illegalities need to be dealt with directly.
But that's just my opinion.
I think it should just be considered entrapment and made unusable in
court. That would end the problem right
Cam you say "patent" at least for https, Oh I'm longing for September 20th
!! (The pessimistic side me predicts that on or around that date the NSA/RSA
will announce
some sort of legal maneuver to extend or complicate the end of the patent.
Correct me if I'm wrong but isn't it the case
I've got it - the LEO trollers are subscribing the list to all this
crap. Time to 'suscribe' them right back.
* "image matching" software
A huge field. Probably will go after the basics : filenames, file sizes,
hashes, data matched against known set.
* "steganography detection" software
Another huge field. Maybe like virus detection SW. For each Stego system
that is implemented and available
At 11:04 AM 8/11/00 -0700, jeradonah wrote:
Major University to Be Asked to Review F.B.I.'s 'Carnivore'
Is there a *John* Major University? :-)
...
Today's announcement was not a surprise, since the F.B.I. said
several weeks ago that it wanted an outside study of Carnivore.
Interesting. But my main concern was the anti-stego software. I can't
see how it relates much to child porn (you can't hide a typical GIF or
JPEG inside another one - it takes huge amounts of data in which to
hide little amounts of other data that way).
You could easily hide JPEGs inside
From: "Reese" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Idiot, you underscore Tim's point with your own racism.
That's cool. Tim's racism is ok, anybody else's is wrong. [Plus, what's the
connection between "Tim May has a small dick" and racism?]
Sometimes, Tim manages to write something libertarian; most of
First few paragraphs are titillating but it fizzles quickly
http://washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A34238-2000Aug27.html
Um, if there's any hint of a trail back to the sender where's the
anonymity?
Trust the recipient to use a remailer chain for the return path. or not.
Include the return mail address in the body if you choose to. Isn't that
what anonymity is about? Placing the choice for the disclosure of
12 matches
Mail list logo
