Jim Burnes smoldered:
#Reese wrote:
# Reno burned little kids in their church, because of the FIREARMS held
# or believed to be held somewhere on or around the compound.
#
# You might want to reappraise.
#
#I've appraised the Waco scenario more than most. You might
--
On Fri, Jan 19, 2001 at 04:13:32PM -1000, Reese wrote:
Then why were the troops laying siege to the compound, instead of
snatching koresh when he made one of his frequent trips into town?
At 11:54 PM 1/19/2001 -0500, Declan McCullagh wrote:
Because sometimes a show of force is
On Sat, Jan 20, 2001 at 08:32:14AM -0800, James A. Donald wrote:
--
On Fri, Jan 19, 2001 at 04:13:32PM -1000, Reese wrote:
Then why were the troops laying siege to the compound, instead of
snatching koresh when he made one of his frequent trips into town?
At 11:54 PM 1/19/2001
On Sat, Jan 20, 2001 at 01:06:43AM -0800, Raymond D. Mereniuk wrote:
Declan McCullagh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
But I wonder who really believes Ashcroft is being absolutely genuine
in his responses to Feinstein?
In the last election in Texas when G.W. Bush was running for
governor he
At 12:07 AM 1/21/01 -1000, Reese wrote:
It wasn't a right for the what, 40,000 in flint michigan, either, was it?
It's called at-will employment: You keep your employer happy, you get your
job. (I'm starting to think you're not only very educated, but not very
educable. I'd love for you to
On Sun, 21 Jan 2001, Declan McCullagh wrote:
You're thinking too literally. Show of force: When an employer reminds
a slacker that having a job is not a right.
That's just shit rolling downhill. How long is a manager going to have
his job if he *doesn't* fire slackers? Or how long can an
Declan McCullagh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
But I wonder who really believes Ashcroft is being absolutely genuine
in his responses to Feinstein?
In the last election in Texas when G.W. Bush was running for
governor he was accused by his opponent of only using the
governvorship of Texas as a
Reno probably didn't expect the situation to, um, blow up in her face.
It is also undisputed that if they wanted to avoid a show of force, they
could have nabbed Koresh during his jogs around the property line or
whatnot in the morning. Reese, you blather too much.
-Declan
At 09:19 PM
At 9:00 AM -0500 1/20/01, Declan McCullagh wrote:
Reno probably didn't expect the situation to, um, blow up in her face.
It is also undisputed that if they wanted to avoid a show of force,
they could have nabbed Koresh during his jogs around the property
line or whatnot in the morning. Reese,
On Sat, 20 Jan 2001, Tim May wrote:
As for Ashcroft, we'll see. Bush won, so Bush gets to appoint his
staff. The whole "review by the Senate" thing is a relic of the
McCarthy era, actually, and should be done away with.
Advice and consent of the Senate as to federal officers has been in
At 10:52 AM 1/20/01 -1000, Reese wrote:
It is also undisputed that if they wanted to avoid a show of force, they
could have nabbed Koresh during his jogs around the property line or
whatnot in the morning.
I said something to that effect, yesterday. Missed it, did'ja?
Pardon me if I don't
William Jennings McCullagh wrote:
But I get paid by the word for mine, generally speaking.
Those are speaking words did you not say a few days ago,
now worth more than wired fool's nuggets. Who's your agent
for priceless yarp, and what's her cut? These questions are
aimed at learning how to
On Thursday 18 January 2001 23:00, Reese wrote:
At 11:56 AM 1/18/01 -0600, Jim Burnes wrote:
On Thursday 18 January 2001 10:15, Declan McCullagh wrote:
Quite right. Ashcroft is objectionable, as is any candidate George W.
would propose, but he is arguably less objectionable than Reno.
://www.prorev.org), has confirmed something that drug war
observers had strongly suspected: John Ashcroft, as Missouri
Governor, agreed to "look the other why" while state police
On Fri, Jan 19, 2001 at 04:13:32PM -1000, Reese wrote:
Then why were the troops laying siege to the compound, instead of
snatching koresh when he made one of his frequent trips into town?
Because sometimes a show of force is perceved as necessary.
Heck, employers do it to employees all the
ead skunks. Sounds like everyone's taking this process real seriously.
Confirmation is more like a ritual hazing and has absolutely nothing
to do with a candidate's fitness for the job. We've survived Ed Meese
and Janet Reno, we'll survive John Ashcroft, too.
--
Greg Broiles [EMAIL PROTECTED]
something to the effect
that "We need to move forward on these issues". He also mentioned
that he favored closing the "gun show loophole" (A view shared by
Republican sellouts).
On both 1st and 4th amendment issues, John Ashcroft has one of the
worst records on Ca
I've written about Ashcroft's mixed records on tech issues:
http://www.politechbot.com/cgi-bin/politech.cgi?name=ashcroft
On Tue, Jan 16, 2001 at 07:54:00PM -0800, Anonymous wrote:
"Me" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "sparky" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
everyone's taking this process real seriously.
Confirmation is more like a ritual hazing and has absolutely nothing
to do with a candidate's fitness for the job. We've survived Ed Meese
and Janet Reno, we'll survive John Ashcroft, too.
--
Greg Broiles [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PO Box 897
Oakland CA 94604
If this is inappropriate for this list, I hope all participants will accept
my apologies in advance, and let me know, and I will not post this
sort of thing here again.
If any here are in opposition to the nomination of John Ashcroft to
Attorney General, the following website allows citizens
"Me" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "sparky" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.opposeashcroft.com
I'm not trying to get people into any arguments here.. I
thought this
might be appropriate since people here are concerned with civil
rights.
Quite right, I am
will accept
my apologies in advance, and let me know, and I will not post this
sort of thing here again.
If any here are in opposition to the nomination of John Ashcroft to
Attorney General, the following website allows citizens to sign a
petition stating this:
http://www.opposeashcroft.com
I'm
22 matches
Mail list logo
