On Tue, 3 Jul 2018 20:48:05 +0530
mark M wrote:
>
>
>
> Couldn’t we just prune the old spent transactions in the blockchain and keep
> the chain and dB smaller
well, to verify new transactions you only need the UTXO set - problem
is, in order to get the UTXO set you
Might be of interest to you.
https://keepingstock.net/not-all-post-2011-satoshi-appearance-has-been-debunked-fab9a5c23812
This latest "Satoshi" is a hoax though, not very credible at all.
On 3 July 2018 at 17:15, mark M wrote:
> Georgi
> There’s no crypto key or proof of ownership of the
I read about this too, it's not really a voluntary society in a libertarian
sense.
https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-07-02/mexican-town-overthrew-their-local-government-and-things-are-going-great
>From here is linked to a Vice article (and video) about this place:
Though some residents complain they are almost required to pay for this
protection.
On Tue, Jul 3, 2018, 9:42 AM Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> A Mexican Town Overthrew Their Local Government And Things Are Going
> Great
>
>
A Mexican Town Overthrew Their Local Government And Things Are Going
Great
https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-07-02/mexican-town-overthrew-their-local-government-and-things-are-going-great
The town of Cherán, Mexico was once plagued…
Cherán is now run by autonomous groups of armed individuals…
Yes, he did sign the genesis blocks as they ran on his laptop ?
>
> On Jul 3, 2018 at 7:26 PM, mailto:tom@busby.ninja)> wrote:
>
>
>
> Satoshi actually never, ever signed anything cryptographically.
>
>
> We don't even know for sure if whitepaper Satoshi,
Georgi
There’s no crypto key or proof of ownership of the genesis blocks in this
site or excerpt
But the excerpt does read very well a Little too wordy for Satoshi who I
remember as terse and matter of fact
>
> On Jul 3, 2018 at 6:37 PM,
Couldn’t we just prune the old spent transactions in the blockchain and keep
the chain and dB smaller
>
> On Jul 3, 2018 at 6:58 AM, mailto:juan@gmail.com)> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mon, 2 Jul 2018 17:50:02 -0700
> Steven Schearwrote:
>
> > I
On Tue, Jul 03, 2018 at 03:56:19PM +0200, Tom Busby wrote:
> Satoshi actually never, ever signed anything cryptographically.
>
No problem. As a proof of identity I request 1337.7331 bitcoins from one
of their accounts ;)
Georgi
That’s a great test
Tom
The personal identity of Satoshi over time as you say is very nuanced much like
dpr of Silk road as multiple characters over time took the mantle of dpr
But even with all of the dprs Ross Ulbricht was definitely doxed
I'll be honest, I suspect that Satoshi was either Nick Szabo, Hal Finney,
or both working together. We'll never know for sure though.
On Tue, 3 Jul 2018, 5:31 pm mark M, wrote:
> Georgi
> That’s a great test
>
> Tom
> The personal identity of Satoshi over time as you say is very nuanced much
Are you talking about Craig Wright's "private demonstrations" to Gavin
Andresen etc?
On Tue, 3 Jul 2018, 5:16 pm mark M, wrote:
> Yes, he did sign the genesis blocks as they ran on his laptop ?
>
>
>
> On Jul 3, 2018 at 7:26 PM, > wrote:
>
> Satoshi actually never, ever signed anything
Tbf there are no (spendable) accounts which are known to be Satoshi for
sure.
There's the genesis block reward (not spendable due to a quirk in the
protocol), the address Satoshi used to send the first transaction to Hal
Finney (was this really Satoshi? We don't know for sure) and there are a
Satoshi actually never, ever signed anything cryptographically.
We don't even know for sure if whitepaper Satoshi, genesis block Satoshi,
email address(es, there were two) Satoshi, and BitcoinTalk Satoshi were the
same person.
On 3 July 2018 at 15:07, Georgi Guninski wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 02,
On Mon, Jul 02, 2018 at 07:03:24AM -0700, mark M wrote:
> http://nakamotofamilyfoundation.org/
>
> http://nakamotofamilyfoundation.org/duality.pdf
>
> http://nakamotofamilyfoundation.org/cryptogram.html
Is this the real Nakamoto, speculations?
Didn't see crypto key to prevent potential future
15 matches
Mail list logo
