> We have fundamental sovereignty over our own body.
Good luck with that.
> On Aug 2, 2017, at 10:50 AM, Razer wrote:
>
>
>
> On 08/02/2017 06:30 AM, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
>> reaching out to "the people"
>
> Reaching out to people who have computers. The WHITE middle class, and
> upper working class urban dwellrs who aspire to that ever-shrinking
> On Jul 13, 2017, at 1:42 PM, Razer <g...@riseup.net> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 07/13/2017 10:33 AM, Joshua Case wrote:
>>> Ps. I just received an email at this address from a "Mark M"
>>> <write2ma...@gmail.com> <mailto:write2ma...
Some women have dicks. Sorry. Not my fault. It just happens to be the case.
> On May 23, 2017, at 5:26 PM, juan <juan@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 23 May 2017 17:04:05 -0400
> Joshua Case <jwc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
>
> women don't have dicks - by defintion.
Did someone fall in love an get a surprise? Otherwise, why bother yourself with
someone else’s labels? I’m sorry you find it politically incorrect to use
language that attaches dicks to women, but that is the world you live in.
Description
anal sensitivity :)"
----
Joshua Case
jwc...@gmail.com <mailto:jwc...@gmail.com>
“International tensions. Mounting international tensions. First there were
states of precautionary alert, then there were enhanced readiness centers. This
was followed by maximum arc situational prep
> On Mar 3, 2017, at 2:01 PM, James A. Donald <jam...@echeque.com> wrote:
>
> On 3/4/2017 2:33 AM, Joshua Case wrote:
>> Though you would agree that this exists though, and is of late gaining
>> momentum of some sort, yes?
>>
>> https://www.stormfront.
or, this
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B06XDBHHV5/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8=1488520894=8-1=hailstorm+saga+of+the+new+ss
<https://www.amazon.com/dp/B06XDBHHV5/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8=1488520894=8-1=hailstorm+saga+of+the+new+ss>
Joshua Case
jwc...@gmail.com <mailto:jwc...@gmail.com>
“I
if all
people are rational actors, if they were the free market system would have
worked! (Ok last line was open trolling, Jim)
Best
Joshua Case
jwc...@gmail.com <mailto:jwc...@gmail.com>
“International tensions. Mounting international tensions. First there were
states of precaut
Apologies, I had intentionally thought to send to a single user, but hit the
whole list inadvertently - i am too stupid to have an email account. Please
forgive.
> On Feb 21, 2017, at 3:07 PM, Joshua Case <jwc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Well he’s correct in a way - in 1962 Phil
> I was writing code before there was any money in it, or 'gits' etc. I do
> other things now. Fuck off.
Take your half baked political noise back to reddit or whatever. This list is
not your fucking personal Pinterest for political marketing. It had a topic
and a purpose, and it was better
Cypherpunks write code.
> On Feb 14, 2017, at 1:32 PM, Razer wrote:
>
>
>
>> On 02/14/2017 10:25 AM, Ted Smith wrote:
>> "Cypherpunks write code."
>
> But that's not all they doand besides (boilerplate)
>
>>
>> The trolls infesting this list, typically suggesting it's
what do you think a ‘cypher’ is, shill?
Joshua Case
jwc...@gmail.com <mailto:jwc...@gmail.com>
“International tensions. Mounting international tensions. First there were
states of precautionary alert, then there were enhanced readiness centers. This
was followed by maximum arc situa
> On Feb 14, 2017, at 10:40 AM, Razer wrote:
>
> From the publisher of Right-Wing Watch.
>
If you are skeptical at efforts to define your own sworn enemy, you cannot say
you know your enemy. A partisan appealing to the ‘expertise’ and ‘authority’ of
another partisan who
>
> What Juan and Zen do is a kind of a 'harassment' according to most
> moderators.. Adding unwanted, often entirely off-topic, inflammatory, ad hom
> garbage to threads to attempt dissuading people from reading threads they
> want to suppress and targeting certain individuals with garbage
Would be interesting is to know how long it took Obama to fire Bush’s info-sec
chief. Looking around, any one know offhand? Seems like usual turnover type
business to me, really. I mean, do you really need a witch-hunt when the
Whitehouse changes hands from one party to another? Seems like
> On Feb 10, 2017, at 1:40 PM, Razer <g...@riseup.net> wrote:
>
> On 02/10/2017 10:28 AM, Joshua Case wrote:
>> meaning, you won’t interact with me unless it’s in front of other people?
>
> Yup. That's Eggs-ackly what I mean.
>
>> because you need that lev
ect.
>
> Don't contact me offlist again schmuck. I'm too busy for you nonsesne
>
> On 02/10/2017 10:07 AM, Joshua Case wrote:
>>
>>
>>>
>>> So are the people who run world governments that commit Genocide and the
>>> officers of corpo
OK SO, LET ME SEE IF I CAN PASS RAEZOR’S IQ TEST!
>>Jim Bell
Who wrote and did time for “Assassination Market” essay, among other things
some good, some not so good in my humble…might be described as a Libertarian.
RAZERr makes it clear, in settling a bit of a
Jim- come on It's only confusing or vague if you're pretending to be in a
court. I know you did your time in the system, as did I, but out here you don't
have to defend your opinion from statute. -Joshua
> On Feb 2, 2017, at 6:47 PM, juan wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2 Feb 2017
have to strive for a world of
cooperation. If I take your tracts and replace nazi with Jew what we have is
very familiar. I was young once though, and I thought violence sucked then too.
> On Feb 2, 2017, at 6:37 PM, Razer <g...@riseup.net> wrote:
>
>
>
>> On 02/02/20
taking away
Milo's liberty unfairly because I think it reasonable to deny him use of the
communistically shared space he finds so precious.
> On Feb 2, 2017, at 6:14 PM, jim bell <jdb10...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> From: Joshua Case <jwc...@gmail.com>
>
>
Moreover this is what I just said, and you took issue with - when this person
says it it's getting something right? Maybe you're just being a dick because
you like the attention.
> A prog-Lib, Murtaza Hussain from The Intercept, FINALLY gets something right
>
> "Free speech means you have
for lack of self
awareness.
> On Feb 2, 2017, at 5:47 PM, Razer <g...@riseup.net> wrote:
>
>> On 02/02/2017 02:33 PM, Joshua Case wrote:
>> More to the point he was seeking right to assembly, it wasn't his speech
>> that was suppressed. His views are well know, his senti
More to the point he was seeking right to assembly, it wasn't his speech that
was suppressed. His views are well know, his sentiment registers broadly. He
was denied assembly. Seems reasonable.
> On Feb 2, 2017, at 4:30 PM, Razer wrote:
>
>
> Image gleaned from twitter
>
>
Such a boring line of technicality. As though anyone is in a position to call
themselves "the Russian government" - and deliver 'anonymously' to Wikileaks.
Assange guilty of the same duplicitous doublethink as the machine he is
destroying. However many hands the documentary evidence passed
26 matches
Mail list logo